patrick.net

My guess is a lot of institutions will do this, because they don't want to lose customers, members and money.
But it wont be reported in the media. to the contrary, I think the media will double down and tell the public everyone is doing it.

I saw that less than 3% of those not vaxxed at this point, have said, they would never get the jab. Though some lamented they would if they were forced for a job, school or some other opportunity that required it.

Maybe someone pulled one of these on 'em:

HunterTits says

...because legally they cannot require it. As a public college, it is a government agency and to do so would violate federal law and the Nuremberg Code. And they know it.

@HunterTits But they did it anyway, and all the UC and CSU are mandating the jab now.

So are they violating federal law and the Nuremberg Code?

Patrick says

So are they violating federal law and the Nuremberg Code?

Yes.

And yet they are demanding the jab and refusing to enroll students who will not submit.

So maybe the law doesn't even matter anymore.

HunterTits says

Supremacy Clause

Thanks, much of this is still murky to me:

Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution
The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws.

HunterTits says

Depends upon what the courts say.

Which courts, by the way? State?

HunterTits says

Depends upon what the courts say. Feds can not have control over state agencies directly except when the Supremacy Clause is clearly violated.

This falls under state or personal jurisdiction per the 10th Amendment, NOT federal.

Patrick says

And yet they are demanding the jab and refusing to enroll students who will not submit.

So maybe the law doesn't even matter anymore.

See “election” 2020, Mostly peaceful protests, Hunter Bidens’s laptop, private email servers with classified information on them, trampling of rights that specifically say shall not be infringed...

Yeah, seems like the law doesn’t matter anymore.

Last I checked the bill of rights was being used for toilet paper by Bidet’s handlers. He did say his butt had been wiped right?

PeopleUnited says

Last I checked the bill of rights was being used for toilet paper by Bidet’s handlers. He did say his butt had been wiped right?

Lol!

HunterTits says

Congress passed the EUA law that said people can not be forced to take the vaccine.

Congress had no authority to pass that law(again 10th). And in this case the state has no authority either. This one falls to the individual level, since no one has a right to force someone to put something into their body.

Now the question is whether you can be fired or disenrolled for asserting a basic human right.

Depends on how perverse the society is.

NuttBoxer says

Depends on how perverse the society is.

Exhibit A: “Wet ass pussy”
Exhibit B: hunter’s laptop
Exhibit C: mostly peaceful protests

Shall we continue? We have not even begun to talk about Catholic Priests and Epstein island.

Patrick says

Now the question is whether you can be fired or disenrolled for asserting a basic human right.

Already happening.

That's why we need an iron-clad Constitutional amendment:

https://patrick.net/post/1340459/2021-08-04-proposed-constitutional-amendment

Annddd, it's been reversed. She got an email from a teacher saying community college will require shot.