patrick.net

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mainstream-media-fda-approval-pfizer-vaccine/

Ceffer says

There's still that little issue with arbitrary and selective enforcement

Exactly.

This totally undermines respect for the law.

Fauci just outright lied to Congress about his gain-of-function research in Wuhan.

Rand Paul asked that charges be brought, because lying to Congress is a crime.

What do we get from the DOJ? Crickets...

@Patrick Just read Booger's link, and that's one of the most complete explanations I've heard outside the Malone interview. Should add to OP.

https://leohohmann.com/2021/08/25/fda-playing-bait-and-switch-with-americans-tricking-them-into-believing-shots-currently-being-offered-have-been-granted-full-approval-when-they-have-not/

Erik A.G. Hanon
@HanonErik
4h
Replying to @RWMaloneMD
If they are playing switcheroo games with the product approvals, they are obviously not 100% confident they will always be extrajudicial.

https://twitter.com/HanonErik/status/1430945738968772614#m

https://usawatchdog.com/comirnaty-cv19-vax-approval-is-actually-fraudulent-chris-martenson/

Dr. Chris Martenson holds a PhD in toxicology from Duke University and is a futurist and economic researcher. Martenson says the FDA just approved a Pfizer CV19 vaccine named Comirnaty, but the public is not getting it. This is classic bait and switch because the public is still getting the same Pfizer jab they have been getting all along. It’s still experimental (Emergency Use Authorization or EUA), and it still gives Pfizer total immunity from liability. Dr. Martenson explains, “For all practical purposes, there are two identical drugs. One stays under EUA, and one has been given approval. The problem is the one given approval, and if you are in the United States, you can’t get it. There is none here. So, they approved something that doesn’t exist.

Patrick says

https://usawatchdog.com/comirnaty-cv19-vax-approval-is-actually-fraudulent-chris-martenson/


Dr. Chris Martenson holds a PhD in toxicology from Duke University and is a futurist and economic researcher. Martenson says the FDA just approved a Pfizer CV19 vaccine named Comirnaty, but the public is not getting it. This is classic bait and switch because the public is still getting the same Pfizer jab they have been getting all along. It’s still experimental (Emergency Use Authorization or EUA), and it still gives Pfizer total immunity from liability. Dr. Martenson explains, “For all practical purposes, there are two identical drugs. One stays under EUA, and one has been given approval. The problem is the one given approval, and if you are in the United States, you can’t get it. There is none here. So, they approved somethi...

Isn't it pretty much a matter of slapping a different label on the vial?

Yes, it is, but with massive legal differences.

The current "vaccine" is still NOT approved and Pfizer has zero liability for it if it kills you, as it has killed so many already (minimum 11,000 in the US, probably actually well over 50,000).

But the approved "vaccine" is not available, exactly because they are making Pfizer liable for the death and destruction it causes.

The reported "approval" is simply a corporate media lie of intergalactic proportions.

Every injection is still with the unapproved label.

But it's interesting - why didn't the obvious corrupt FDA just approve it under all labels and remove all liability from their masters as Pfizer? There must be some legal hitch they are worried about. What is that hitch exactly?

I love this line:

"Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for this product. Here’s what you need to know when somebody orders you to get the vaccine: Ask to see the vial. If it says “Comirnaty,” it’s a licensed product. If it says “Pfizer-BioNTech,” it’s an experimental product, and under 21 U.S. Code 360bbb, you have the right to refuse. If it comes from Moderna or Johnson & Johnson (marketed as Janssen), you have the right to refuse. The FDA is playing bait and switch with the American public — but we don’t have to play along. If it doesn’t say Comirnaty, you have not been offered an approved vaccine."

You must always have the right to refuse injections or you are not a free human being.

There's a strange rumor from citizen journalists on Bitchute that perhaps 50 percent of the vaccines have been replaced by 'White Hats' with saline. They also state the 'true' vaccination rate is about 36 percent, so only 18 percent have gotten the 'real' vaccine. Is this why some people are 'fine' after vax?
They also state (more than a few ?circular gossip?) that the FDA approval was a trap, because to get things the way they wanted, they approved a clause that means that Pfizer MUST reveal the contents of their vaccines, which they have not had to do so far.
They think when the contents are published (14 days from 'approval') that Pfizer will be toast, because they will have to show the nano tech that they put in vaccines. Also, the nano tech is designed to react to 5G radiation. 5G was always designed for social control modalities and to implement pathology and even death through transhumanism.

Of course, this could just be more daft hopium. I guess we'll see, I'll try to post links later.

Here's one of at least two independent sources:

@Ceffer You do realize that sounds bat guano crazy? I'm not saying your wrong, BTW. But on the face of it sounds ludacrious. 5G radiation and nanotechnology? That's some next level conspiracy right there...

5G is on my 'conspiracy theory' research index. I think there could be something to it, but it is too early to reach conclusions, but not too early to spitball and speculate.

https://principia-scientific.com/major-law-firm-confirms-fda-deceived-america-with-its-approval-of-pfizer-vax

Major Law Firm Confirms FDA Deceived America With Its ‘Approval’ Of Pfizer Vax
Published on September 6, 2021

When the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced Aug. 23 it had granted full approval to the first Covid “vaccine” under the brand name Comirnaty, the mainstream media immediately ran with the narrative.


Joe Biden jumped in front of a microphone and told businesses they needed to “step up” the mandating of vaccines for their employees.

Dr. Anthony Fauci told national media outlets he expected a whole host of new “mandates” to be fueled by the “approval” of the Pfizer jab.

There’s only one problem. The “approval” given by the FDA was not for the Pfizer jab currently available in the U.S. market.

The devil is always in the details. Some of us weren’t fooled.

See our article, which has over the past three days received nearly 150,000 reads: FDA ‘playing bait and switch’ with Americans, tricking them into believing shots currently being offered have been granted full approval when they have not.

But because we and a few others looked beneath the facade and checked the facts of what the FDA actually did and not what the media and Joe Biden’s administration said it did, we took some heat. Even some of our own subscribers questioned whether maybe we got it wrong.

No, it was the corporate media who got the story wrong. And as a result, thousands of Americans no doubt capitulated and went ahead and rolled up theirs sleeves, thinking they had no other choice legally than to succumb to their employers’ mandates.

Saw someone post a Comirnity vax card on socials the other day. Thinking UK(?), as the date was in the day/month/year format.

NuttBoxer says

Saw someone post a Comirnity vax card on socials the other day. Thinking UK(?), as the date was in the day/month/year format.

Germany:










PS. If you have one of these yellow UN vaxx books forging it should not carry the same alleged consequences* as doing that to a card bearing CDC logo.

*) The probability of that is slim as fuck anyway.

Then there is this thing from God knows where:

Ceffer says

5G is on my 'conspiracy theory' research index. I think there could be something to it, but it is too early to reach conclusions, but not too early to spitball and speculate.

Who can keep up, right? I am so behind, I still haven't figured out who exactly killed Kennedy.

Eric Holder says

Then there is this thing from God knows where:

So that’s great that the card says that, but what the hell does the vial say that the needle they dispensed the JAB from was filled from? That’s really all that matters, as a card can be made to say anything they want.

ForcedTQ says

Eric Holder says

Then there is this thing from God knows where:

So that’s great that the card says that, but what the hell does the vial say that the needle they dispensed the JAB from was filled from? That’s really all that matters, as a card can be made to say anything they want.

To think about it they can do the same with the vial too. :D

Eric Holder says

Then there is this thing from God knows where:

Now, I ain't a Europe boy, but sure don't seem right that they got their Comirnaty shot in Feb.

It's day/month/year basically everywhere but the USA. How could they possibly have a card with the brand name before they even publicly announced it? Looks like they're just retroactively calling the Pfizer shots by the brand name.

Unless I'm mistaken. I'll gladly accept corrections.

DhammaStep says

Eric Holder says

Then there is this thing from God knows where:

Now, I ain't a Europe boy, but sure don't seem right that they got their Comirnaty shot in Feb.

It's day/month/year basically everywhere but the USA. How could they possibly have a card with the brand name before they even publicly announced it? Looks like they're just retroactively calling the Pfizer shots by the brand name.

Unless I'm mistaken. I'll gladly accept corrections.

It appears they had the name coined and publicized as early as December 2020:

Bern, 19.12.2020 - Vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech authorised in the rolling review procedure after close scrutiny of the risks and benefits Swissmedic has authorised the vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech. According to the data assessed by the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products, the level of protection afforded seven days after the second injection of the vaccine is over 90 percent. This represents the world's first authorisation in the ordinary procedure.

Two months after receiving the application, Swissmedic, the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products, has granted authorisation for the coronavirus vaccine Comirnaty® (BNT162b2) on the basis of a careful review of the documents submitted on an ongoing basis. The data available to date showed a comparable high level of efficacy in all investigated age groups, thus meeting the safety requirements.

https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/en/home/das-bag/aktuell/medienmitteilungen.msg-id-81761.html

Whoops, meant Holder.

Ah, I see. In that case, European Comirnaty is still exempt from liability, right?

Whereas, supposedly USA FDA approved Comirnaty is supposed to have at least some liability attached?

Oh, who am I kidding? No one will be held liable for anything.

DhammaStep says

Ah, I see. In that case, European Comirnaty is still exempt from liability, right?

I don't see anything about liability in that Swiss document. And it says it's "the world's first authorisation in the ordinary procedure", i.e. non-emergency(?).