« First « Previous Comments 53 - 91 of 91 Search these comments
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mainstream-media-fda-approval-pfizer-vaccine/
Interesting article about approved vaccine
Americans, told that the Pfizer COVID vaccine is now licensed, will understandably assume COVID vaccine mandates are lawful. But only EUA-authorized vaccines, for which no one has any real liability, will be available during the next few weeks when many school mandate deadlines occur.
The FDA appears to be purposefully tricking American citizens into giving up their right to refuse an experimental product.
While the media has trumpeted that the FDA has approved COVID vaccines, the FDA has not approved the Pfizer BioNTech vaccines, nor any COVID vaccines for the 12- to 15-year age group, nor any booster doses for anyone.
And the FDA has not licensed any Moderna vaccine, nor any vaccine from Johnson & Johnson — so the vast majority, if not all, of vaccines available in the U.S. remain unlicensed EUA products.
Here’s what you need to know when somebody orders you to get the vaccine: Ask to see the vial. If it says “Comirnaty,” it’s a licensed product.
Ok, so I have it on authority that the FDA approved the clot shot for everyone 16+. The 12-15 ages are still under the EUA, which is part of what triggered the confusion.
Ok, so I have it on authority that the FDA approved the clot shot for everyone 16+. The 12-15 ages are still under the EUA, which is part of what triggered the confusion.
No one has mentioned MIS-C, which is a more likely outcome than death for COVID-19 in minors. I think that is the main factor you're balancing again myo- and pericarditis in when you're thinking about vaccinating the 12 and up crowd.
But Pfizer has liability for “Comirnaty”, for now,
the Pfizer jab having a 1 in 9 chance of SAE, that's still a 100 fold risk of getting maimed by the jab.
mell saysthe Pfizer jab having a 1 in 9 chance of SAE, that's still a 100 fold risk of getting maimed by the jab.
Still trying to figure out what you're referring to mell. Is it this, or something else? If something else, a link would be helpful.
Severe adverse reactions (grade ≥3, defined as interfering with daily activity) occurred more commonly with the vaccine (10.7%) compared with placebo (1.9%). The most common grade 3 symptoms reported by vaccine recipients were fatigue (3.5%), fever (3.0%), headache (2.7%), chills (2.1%), and injection site pain (1.5%). Generally, grade ≥3 reactions were more commonly reported after the second dose than after the first dose.
Adverse events classified as serious† were reported in more recipients of vaccine than...
No it's here:
The entire government is corrupt. The Law doesn't mean shit. At. All.
So start doing whatever the fuck you want.
There's still that little issue with arbitrary and selective enforcement
Erik A.G. Hanon
@HanonErik
4h
Replying to @RWMaloneMD
If they are playing switcheroo games with the product approvals, they are obviously not 100% confident they will always be extrajudicial.
Dr. Chris Martenson holds a PhD in toxicology from Duke University and is a futurist and economic researcher. Martenson says the FDA just approved a Pfizer CV19 vaccine named Comirnaty, but the public is not getting it. This is classic bait and switch because the public is still getting the same Pfizer jab they have been getting all along. It’s still experimental (Emergency Use Authorization or EUA), and it still gives Pfizer total immunity from liability. Dr. Martenson explains, “For all practical purposes, there are two identical drugs. One stays under EUA, and one has been given approval. The problem is the one given approval, and if you are in the United States, you can’t get it. There is none here. So, they approved something that doesn’t exist.
https://usawatchdog.com/comirnaty-cv19-vax-approval-is-actually-fraudulent-chris-martenson/
Dr. Chris Martenson holds a PhD in toxicology from Duke University and is a futurist and economic researcher. Martenson says the FDA just approved a Pfizer CV19 vaccine named Comirnaty, but the public is not getting it. This is classic bait and switch because the public is still getting the same Pfizer jab they have been getting all along. It’s still experimental (Emergency Use Authorization or EUA), and it still gives Pfizer total immunity from liability. Dr. Martenson explains, “For all practical purposes, there are two identical drugs. One stays under EUA, and one has been given approval. The problem is the one given approval, and if you are in the United States, you can’t get it. There is none here. So, they approved somethi...
Major Law Firm Confirms FDA Deceived America With Its ‘Approval’ Of Pfizer Vax
Published on September 6, 2021
When the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced Aug. 23 it had granted full approval to the first Covid “vaccine” under the brand name Comirnaty, the mainstream media immediately ran with the narrative.
Joe Biden jumped in front of a microphone and told businesses they needed to “step up” the mandating of vaccines for their employees.
Dr. Anthony Fauci told national media outlets he expected a whole host of new “mandates” to be fueled by the “approval” of the Pfizer jab.
There’s only one problem. The “approval” given by the FDA was not for the Pfizer jab currently available in the U.S. market.
The devil is always in the details. Some of us weren’t fooled.
See our article, which has over the past three days received nearly 150,000 reads: FDA ‘playing bait and switch’ with Americans, tricking them into believing shots currently being offered have been granted full approval when they have not.
But because we and a few others looked beneath the facade and checked the facts of what the FDA actually did and not what the media and Joe Biden’s administration said it did, we took some heat. Even some of our own subscribers questioned whether maybe we got it wrong.
No, it was the corporate media who got the story wrong. And as a result, thousands of Americans no doubt capitulated and went ahead and rolled up theirs sleeves, thinking they had no other choice legally than to succumb to their employers’ mandates.
Saw someone post a Comirnity vax card on socials the other day. Thinking UK(?), as the date was in the day/month/year format.
5G is on my 'conspiracy theory' research index. I think there could be something to it, but it is too early to reach conclusions, but not too early to spitball and speculate.
Then there is this thing from God knows where:
Eric Holder saysThen there is this thing from God knows where:
So that’s great that the card says that, but what the hell does the vial say that the needle they dispensed the JAB from was filled from? That’s really all that matters, as a card can be made to say anything they want.
Then there is this thing from God knows where:
Eric Holder saysThen there is this thing from God knows where:
Now, I ain't a Europe boy, but sure don't seem right that they got their Comirnaty shot in Feb.
It's day/month/year basically everywhere but the USA. How could they possibly have a card with the brand name before they even publicly announced it? Looks like they're just retroactively calling the Pfizer shots by the brand name.
Unless I'm mistaken. I'll gladly accept corrections.
Bern, 19.12.2020 - Vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech authorised in the rolling review procedure after close scrutiny of the risks and benefits Swissmedic has authorised the vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech. According to the data assessed by the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products, the level of protection afforded seven days after the second injection of the vaccine is over 90 percent. This represents the world's first authorisation in the ordinary procedure.
Two months after receiving the application, Swissmedic, the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products, has granted authorisation for the coronavirus vaccine Comirnaty® (BNT162b2) on the basis of a careful review of the documents submitted on an ongoing basis. The data available to date showed a comparable high level of efficacy in all investigated age groups, thus meeting the safety requirements.
Ah, I see. In that case, European Comirnaty is still exempt from liability, right?
« First « Previous Comments 53 - 91 of 91 Search these comments
original link