by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 236 - 275 of 995 Next » Last » Search these comments
Michael Tracey
@mtracey
Oct 17
Every time I walk into a restaurant with my mask affixed for 30 seconds before being seated, then spend 45 minutes unmasked eating and drinking, and then affix my mask again for 30 seconds while leaving, I give thanks for how many thousands of lives this practice has surely saved
6:51 PM · Oct 17, 2021
Michael Tracey
@mtracey
Oct 17
Every time I walk into a restaurant with my mask affixed for 30 seconds before being seated, then spend 45 minutes unmasked eating and drinking, and then affix my mask again for 30 seconds while leaving, I give thanks for how many thousands of lives this practice has surely saved
6:51 PM · Oct 17, 2021
Even pro youth athletes have passed out / collapsed running track hard while wearing a mask. Nuts
‘It’s crap’: Victorian study claiming mandatory masks stopped second wave shredded by experts
The authors of a “world-first” Australian face mask study that was ripped apart by experts as “very, very low quality” have issued a response to the criticism.
Frank Chung
October 21, 2021
You should have gone to Florida instead.
Panhandle FL does have the best sand I’ve personally experienced.
Clearly you have never been on the beach in Atlantic City.
Needles don't wash up on the beach in the Panhandle.
Masking can act as a tool through which a particular relational dynamic is enacted. The coercive nature of mask mandates means that masks are experienced as being in one part of a coercive relationship. The relationship can be described as:
-moralizer vs those in need of moral correction, or
-enforcer vs enforced. ...
In the “enforcer vs enforced” or “moralizer vs ‘needing of moral correction,’” the ‘enforcer’/’moralizer’ role can be enticing – after all, exerting power from a position of moral judgement has been an attractive position for government and those in positions of leadership in institutions since time immemorial.
However for those on the other side of these relationships – those experiencing enforcement, or being moralized – it is an oppressive and suffocating relationship. In these circumstances, removing a mask is not a sign of ‘not caring;’ rather it becomes a safety valve and one small step towards exiting a controlling and oppressive relationship. ...
Wearing a mask, therefore, signals to others “I consent to this system, I consider myself to be an infection risk to others and wish to be governed as such” and significantly “I invest in the medical system as the authority to make and impose decisions on society independent of democratic and legal safeguards.”
In this context, choosing to not wear a mask can be a simple act of rejection of medical power, of affirming the reality that our lives are complex, and our relationships diverse, and therefore do not consent to diminishing ourselves to a risk that needs to be managed, but rather assert our humanity and dignity, and most importantly our respect for our fellow citizens.
Not wearing a mask, therefore, can make a statement of “I respect that we all have unique relationships to health and to authority, with our own individual perspectives. I am curious to hear what you think, and I do not view you as a risk to be managed, but as an equal citizen with whom I am privileged to share the world.” ...
However the invocation of the legal system and other coercive functions of the state to enforce one set of meanings, one understanding of health behaviours onto others, needs to be resisted. We all must live in this world and our society together, and therefore need to listen and be open to different perspectives – however it is only possible to do that once the threat of mask mandates and other tools of coercion are removed.
Biden met maskless with Pope Francis even though he'd met with Covid-positive Jen Psaki the week before
No, Masks Do Not Work Against The Flu
Somehow the inaccurate narrative refuses to die
Fortunately, in 2019, the World Health Organization collected a thorough review of the literature for their “Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza” planning document.
It bears repeating just how little evidence there was for the organization to suggest that masks would impact the flu:
1. Ten RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, and there was no evidence that face masks are effective in reducing transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.
Ah wait, it wasn’t that there was “little” evidence. There was no evidence. None.
Ten randomized controlled trials. Ten of them. All resulted in zero evidence that face masks are effective in reducing transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.
Here’s a relevant portion of their discussion, explaining just how little impact masks had:
…the evidence was insufficient to exclude chance as an explanation for the reduced risk of transmission
Literally, the potential reduction in transmission was indistinguishable from random chance. This is what the media are promoting as an indefinitely necessary measure.
I thought the Florida school system was forbidden from requiring masks.
Booger says
I thought the Florida school system was forbidden from requiring masks.
Didn't DeSantis forbid mask mandates in FL?
Resist the never-ending mask mandate
The CDC director has endorsed the idea of permanent masking to prevent the spread of the common cold and flu
« First « Previous Comments 236 - 275 of 995 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,257,866 comments by 15,013 users - DOGEWontAmountToShit, gabbar, Onvacation, RandalRay, Rin, WookieMan online now