patrick.net

CaptainHorsePaste says

Red SUV ramming through parade... 4 "Dancing Grandmas" confirmed downed...

SUV's don't run over people autonomously. The drive was a black racist,

Media memory holing it now. Black supremacy cannot be exposed. Those are their foot soldiers.

NuttBoxer says

The drive was a black racist

Clearly so.

Video #6 was taken down by the original poster when she found out the driver was Black.

richwicks says

CaptainHorsePaste says

Keep in mind about 1/4 the country probably thinks Kyle shot 3 Black Guys and got away with it.

I was talking to my neighbor today in Silly Con Valley - he thinks it's more like 80% of the population here thinks Kyle shot 3 Black Guys.

So much for us being smart!

I’ve come to the conclusion that although there are lots of highly educated people in the Bag Area most of the regions population lacks common sense and critical thinking skills. Most Bay Area residents are bots for the MSM and Dem politicians.

If you care to see his "artwork":


original link

Kamala went to see Jacob Blake, a repeat violent offender, in the hospital.

Will Shits and Giggles visit the children of the Parade? And will it get multiple mentions in the press throughout the day? Or will it not happen, or be done quickly with minimal coverage, to bury and distract from the Woke Terrorist act?

... the player tried to take the field
The marching band refused to yield
Do you recall what was revealed
The day the music died?
… We started singin' bye-bye, Miss American Pie
Drove my Chevy to the levee, but the levee was dry
Them good old boys were drinkin' whiskey and rye
And singin' "This'll be the day that I die
This'll be the day that I die"

And people sometimes question my recent views on "The Tribe".:

Obvious raciallly-motivated terrorist act.rigidmember says

richwicks says

CaptainHorsePaste says

Keep in mind about 1/4 the country probably thinks Kyle shot 3 Black Guys and got away with it.

I was talking to my neighbor today in Silly Con Valley - he thinks it's more like 80% of the population here thinks Kyle shot 3 Black Guys.

So much for us being smart!

I’ve come to the conclusion that although there are lots of highly educated people in the Bag Area most of the regions population lacks common sense and critical thinking skills. Most Bay Area residents are bots for the MSM and Dem politicians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obrazovanshchina

Obrazovanshchina (Russian: образованщина, 'educationdom', 'educaties',[1] 'smatterers') is a Russian ironical, derogatory term for a category of people with superficial education who lack the higher ethics of an educated person.[2]

The term was introduced by Alexander Solzhenitsyn in his 1974 essay "Obrazovanshchina" (translated as "The Smatterers") as a criticism of the transformation of the Russian intelligentsia, which, in his opinion had lost high ethical values.

....

Wykształciuchy is a similar term used in Poland, a country that shares the concept of 'intelligentsia' with Russia.[7][8]

Solzhenitsyn defines obrazovanshchina as the category of people who refer to themselves as "intelligentsia" solely on the basis of having a higher than middle education. Solzhenitsyn explains the selection of the term by reference to Vladimir Dahl's dictionary, which distinguished the terms образовать ('to educate') and просвещать ('to enlighten'), the former concept having a superficial character, "external gloss."

Terror attack by black supremacist. Federal charges need to be filed.

Booger says

And people sometimes question my recent views on "The Tribe".:

Agreed, unfortunately there are too many jews who are a disgrace to their own race. This is like saying the concentration camp guards acted in self defense. You can't help these people

FuckCCP89 says

Terror attack by black supremacist. Federal charges need to be filed.

No point, he's not re-entering society. No children were killed at least.

Eric Holder says

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obrazovanshchina

Awesome. Intellectual, yet not intelligent; Middlebrow... but this really captures the whole thing.

HunterTits says

FuckCCP89 says

Terror attack by black supremacist. Federal charges need to be filed.

How is this guy a black supremacist? How is this related to the Rittenhouse verdict?

We don't know, and now we can't find out. All of his online statements have been scrubbed.

I captured a few, and I'm certain many other people captured a bunch. We'll find out in time.

It's tampering with evidence when corporations delete social media to protect suspects. Facebook, Youtube, and Twitter do it constantly. Here want to see one of his videos I grabbed before it was deleted?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AawNaWkuh8M

Here's the video:


original link


You have to realize that Google, Facebook and Twitter are arms of the government now. That's why they prevent independent investigation and protect criminals. Our government is at war with its population. It's been this way for a long long time, but people are starting to figure it out, and the companies that got in bed with them to wage this war, we're just starting to realize who they really are. Companies like Gab, Bitchute, Odysee, whatever - they may switch sides themselves over time.

If they start employing censorship, you MUST abandon them. If you are still using "Big Tech" exclusively, you have absolutely no idea what is actually going on and what the pulse of the nation actually is. You're on this site, this is not atypical of people's level of being pissed off. This site is representative of people who are inordinately pissed off, but not by much. All the actually smart people have abandoned Big Tech. I can't even post on youtube at this point, so, I ignore it. It's just a propaganda vector now, and view counts, and comments are scrubbed and modified. It's only useful for pull videos from before they are deleted.

@Patrick is right not to allow embedding of videos of Youtube here - they just disappear. I CAN give him a script to archive any links from youtube, if he wants, but it will rapidly consume space. I can (for a time) give him a script that will archive the videos on my machine if he wants and as they are deleted, repost them. Google has betrayed its mission of educating the public and allow them to know what is going on. As a search engine now, it's crap. I rarely use it. www.duckduckgo.com IS better but it may be compromised but its at least as useful as google is, and www.yandex.com is about at useful as Google EVER was, and is certainly better than it is now.

Remember, just because a company promises to not monitor you, don't trust them. They lie. I almost exclusively use searches in "incognito mode" or "private browsing" - this deletes and recreates cookies (supposedly) so each time I connect, it's extra effort to track my history by the company. This doesn't guarantee my privacy though.

HunterTits says

FuckCCP89 says

Terror attack by black supremacist. Federal charges need to be filed.

How is this guy a black supremacist? How is this related to the Rittenhouse verdict?

Did this guy say things in front of a camera that proves either relation or both are the case or something?

Literally. It's not. He made it clear in his social media posts.

ChauvinsKnee says

HunterTits says

FuckCCP89 says

Terror attack by black supremacist. Federal charges need to be filed.

How is this guy a black supremacist? How is this related to the Rittenhouse verdict?

Did this guy say things in front of a camera that proves either relation or both are the case or something?

Literally. It's not. He made it clear in his social media posts.

Really? Lets see his social media posts....

Which I know were deleted to protect him.

Why are suspected criminal's social media posts deleted? Come up with a good explanation for that bullshit. I want to see somebody try.

richwicks says

Why are suspected criminal's social media posts deleted? Come up with a good explanation for that bullshit. I want to see somebody try.

There isn't any. Unless, it's to protect the Narrative.

He couldn't have done it while he was under arrest and in jail last night.

Only the Silly Con Valley-Intelligence network (but I repeat myself) could and would have done so.

CaptainHorsePaste says

richwicks says

Why are suspected criminal's social media posts deleted? Come up with a good explanation for that bullshit. I want to see somebody try.

There isn't any. Unless, it's to protect the Narrative.

Right. To protect the propaganda. I'm well aware that our media is nothing but propaganda, but few other people are. It's obvious but good luck getting people to see it.

CaptainHorsePaste says

He couldn't have done it while he was under arrest and in jail last night.

Yep. That's right. Companies are protecting him, and they are arms of our government, which is at war with the population.

CaptainHorsePaste says

Only the Silly Con Valley-Intelligence network (but I repeat myself) could and would have done so.

I swear to god I didn't intend this. My absolute disappointment is that there are so many people here that don't care. I'd say it's 80/20 %. Some of us do care, we're in the minority. Most people are wage slaves. They can't afford to care. They "have children to raise and a mortgage". Banks run the majority of our society. Few people have any freedom at all and there's tons of people that don't give a fuck about Constitutional rights, they're just H1-B visas that don't care. That's who runs Google now. Sundar Pichai doesn't give a goddamn about freedom. He's a total fucking whore.

I still have confidence we'll fix it. The sellouts are pathetic and stupid. We can out-think them even in the minority, but it open's Pandora's box. Something we don't want to do but will have to do. There's many solutions but it allows gross violations of legality without consequence. The Silk Road was just a website, what we will unleash won't have a central point of contact. It will be first used for illegal reasons, and later, it will be used for proper reasons. We didn't want to go here, but we must.

HunterTits says

ChauvinsKnee says

Literally. It's not. He made it clear in his social media posts.

He made it clear in his social media posts that what he did he did because of black supremacy views and/or because of the Rittenhouse Verdict?

See where I am coming from here? It was fucking bullshit that is still continuing that is why people think Kyle crossed the state lines with a gun and that he killed three black guys, etc that is caused by shit flying around that doesn't prove anything, but alludes to it indirectly.

So I am applying the fix -- asking for the fucking details and proof to back them up -- for that shit here as well.

They are idiots. Someone in the audience for The View should have been yelling at Whoopi that she is an ignorant idiot who doesn’t have facts straight.

HunterTits says

He made it clear in his social media posts that what he did he did because of black supremacy views and/or because of the Rittenhouse Verdict?

Goes way back to 2017 or so. Before Kyle was even out of short pants.

FuckTheMainstreamMedia says

They are idiots. Someone in the audience for The View should have been yelling at Whoopi that she is an ignorant idiot who doesn’t have facts straight.

Goldberg is fully aware she's being dishonest. Her job is to get viewership, not to educate. None of her stated views are authentic. It's determined by a PR team.

Part of getting viewership is saying bat shit crazy BS, to get people to respond to "correct" her. It's to get engagement in any way possible. They don't care if they misinform or lie to people, they just want engagement. They aren't educators, it's click bait.

HunterTits says

So I am applying the fix -- asking for the fucking details and proof to back them up -- for that shit here as well.

Here you go, this is what was saved before the Silly Con Valley Scrub. Bleached, like with a cloth?

Decide for yourself:

https://patrick.net/post/1342642/2021-11-23-dump-of-files-from-wisconsin-slaying

HunterTits says

CaptainHorsePaste says

HunterTits says

So I am applying the fix -- asking for the fucking details and proof to back them up -- for that shit here as well.

Here you go, this is what was saved before the Silly Con Valley Scrub. Bleached, like with a cloth?

Decide for yourself:

https://patrick.net/post/1342642/2021-11-23-dump-of-files-from-wisconsin-slaying

Nothing there. Just shit that proves he is a Black Supremacist.

Nothing to pin him on doing what he did because of that. That he ran those people down because of his black supremacist views.

Its like saying Kyle Rittenhouse white supremacist who killed those two chumps and maimed another because he's a...

There is no evidence Kyle ever espoused any views even remotely close to white supremacism. So not even sure why Kyle is even mentioned in this thread.

Homie made a rap video where he bragged about being a terrorist, put up a shitload of stuff about killing whitey.

This one foreshadowed exactly what he did 'in revenge'
https://archive.ph/jJdxD

HunterTits says

Its like saying Kyle Rittenhouse white supremacist who killed those two chumps and maimed another because he's a Trump supporter, not because of what was really going down that night.

It's nothing like that. Not even close. Saying that Kyle killed these fucks because he hated black people would be a huuuuge and obvious stretch: they were all white and they all attacked him, forcing him to defend himself. Now to that Waukesha fuck: espoused racist and militant views towards white people as a group - check; attacked bunch of white people without any other reason - check. It's a terrorist act motivated by race hatred, open and shut. He violated his victim's civil rights and committed an act of domestic terrorism therefore Federal charges need to be filed. It's almost exact mirror of Charlottesville car attack case:

On June 27, 2018, as reported by the DOJ's Office of Public Affairs, a W.D. Va. federal grand jury charged Fields under two hate crime statutes with multiple federal hate crimes:[32][37][44]

1 count of a hate crime act resulting in the death of Heather Heyer (18 U.S.C. § 249)
28 counts of hate crime acts causing bodily injury and involving an attempt to kill (18 U.S.C. § 249)
1 count of racially motivated violent interference with a federally protected activity (18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(2)) — resulting in the death of Heather Heyer, for driving his car into a crowd of protestors on a downtown street in Charlottesville, Virginia.[32]
Attorney General Jeff Sessions said of the indictment, "Last summer's violence in Charlottesville cut short a promising young life and shocked the nation. Today's indictment should send a clear message to every would-be criminal in America that we aggressively prosecute violent crimes of hate that threaten the core principles of our nation." W.D. Va. Attorney Thomas T. Cullen called the indictment "the culmination of a 10-month investigation that involved searching the social media accounts where Mr. Fields showed an interest in harming minorities." Adam S. Lee, the special agent in charge of the FBI's Richmond Division, said, "Heyer did not go to the event looking for a fight. She was looking to lend her voice to her cause. Peaceful protest without intimidation, without the threat of violence is every American's birthright."[37]

HunterTits says

ChauvinsKnee says

So not even sure why Kyle is even mentioned in this thread.

there's your problem right there.

I explained why Kyle is being referenced. Yet it seems you went suddenly blind when you read over that part of what I wrote.

If I won't take this fucking bullshit from the Left, why the fuck should I take it from you?

IGNORE

Somebody off his meds today....

HunterTits says

FuckCCP89 says

Somebody off his meds today....

Why? Because I am calling out the same fucking bullshit Libtards do when Patnetrers do it?

Some Patnetters ate being Libtarded hypocrites today.

Bringing Kyle into it is what libtards do. Kyle should be kept completely out of that shit - his case is 100% irrelevant to this particular act of terrorism and bears no resemblance to it.

https://spectatorworld.com/topic/waukesha-wisconsin-christmas-darrell-brooks-media/

POLITICS
Get ready to forget the Waukesha attack
The race and politics of the driver are inconvenient for the media...

The Waukesha attack is everything our establishment media and politicians pretend never happens. White people are supposed to be the perpetrators. Violent criminals can be let out of jail with zero repercussions. White men are automatically considered terrorists, even when acting in self-defense, but we can never know the motives of left-wing and minority perps. Don’t be surprised when this dreadful calamity recedes from your airwaves so that the media doesn’t have to confront inconvenient facts.

FuckCCP89 says

Bringing Kyle into it is what libtards do. Kyle should be kept completely out of that shit - his case is 100% irrelevant to this particular act of terrorism and bears no resemblance to it.

Actually, we don't know.

The town in which this happened is Waukesha, it's about 45 miles from Kensosha. This might have been revenge for the verdict, AND there's been BLM saying they would do something like this IF Rittenhouse wasn't found guilty, if you don't recall. This one nut may have taken it to heart.

HunterTits says

Yes, MAY is the operative word.

I'm not disputing that. The reality is that if he specifically said under interrogation that he ran down those people as a direct result of the Rittenhouse verdict, it would never be reported in our bullshit news media, and you know that as well as I do.

HunterTits says

This is why I object to the whole Hate Crime bullshit.

I agree that motivation shouldn't (much) matter. The exception is if you kill somebody. Killing somebody by accident is different from a crime of passion which is different from premeditated murder.

Patrick says

The Waukesha attack is everything our establishment media and politicians pretend never happens

My fav is when they "Factcheck: So-and-so Iraq/Syrian Weapons Smuggler is not a 'refugee'" When they came in on refugee status just a couple of years before but got a green card in the meantime.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10234599/Woke-Waukesha-DA-admitted-bail-reform-GUARANTEED-innocent-people-killed.html

'You bet my bail reforms will kill people': Shocking 2007 admission by woke Milwaukee District Attorney John Chisholm who freed Waukesha parade killer three weeks ago on $1,000 bond
Milwaukee County DA John Chisholm said in 2007: 'Is there going to be an individual I divert, or put into a program, who's going to go out and kill? You bet'
In 2013, his office gave a deferred prosecution to a convicted drug dealer
That dealer, after being released, fatally injected a 26 year old woman with heroin then tried to hide her body but was caught
On November 11, his office granted Darrell Brooks a $1,000 bond
Brooks went free and within a few weeks, was behind the wheel of his car again
Five people were murdered when he drove through the Christmas parade
Chisholm admitted Brooks' bail was 'inappropriately low' and a review is being conducted
There are mounting calls for him to resign, with many saying the victims' blood is on his hands
Rep. Scott Fitzgerald, who represents Waukesha in Congress, said the 'turnstile approach to justice' needed to be changed
Wisconsin Rep. Congresswoman Cindi Duchow is calling for a change to the constitution to force judges and prosecutors to consider bail differently

Added image to the OP from https://patriotpost.us/articles/84401

A Preventable Atrocity in Waukesha
A violent career criminal took advantage of a soft-on-crime legal system and went on a murderous rampage.

Sometimes, we in our shop will refrain from covering an important story because it’s too new, too fresh, and too murky. Such was the case yesterday morning when we waited to weigh in on the atrocity that took place in the Milwaukee suburb of Waukesha. There, on Sunday afternoon, folks young and old were enjoying the town’s annual Christmas parade when a violent career criminal named Darrell Brooks, a Black Lives Matter supporter who’d posted bail just two days earlier, bypassed a series of barricades and drove his red SUV straight through the crowd of revelers, killing five and injuring dozens.

Was the attack racially motivated? We don’t yet know. But the same mainstream media that was so eager to inject race into the Kyle Rittenhouse trial — a trial in which a 17-year-old white kid shot three white thugs in self-defense — seems suspiciously uninterested in asking any questions about the motivations of the Waukesha assailant.

As the Wall Street Journal editorial board reports: “Police say 39-year-old Darrell Brooks faces five counts of intentional homicide, and more lives are in jeopardy in area hospitals. The dead include members of the Dancing Grannies, a fixture at the annual parade and other Milwaukee-area events. Eighteen children were admitted to a local children’s hospital and trauma center, including 10 in intensive care.”

Now that we know the what, the how, and the who, the questions that must be asked all begin with why?

For example: Why did this happen? Why was Brooks not in prison, given his extensive criminal record? Why had his bail been set so low as to allow him to leave the lockup even though he was being held on multiple charges? Why does it seem that the pendulum of our criminal justice system has swung wildly in the direction of coddling violent criminals and away from protecting the citizenry?

Before his murderous Sunday rampage, Brooks’s rap sheet was 50 pages long and included felony strangulation, aggravated battery, felony bail jumping, felony reckless endangerment, multiple domestic abuse charges, disorderly conduct, and much more. He’s also a registered sex offender in Nevada, where he faces additional charges. And an aspiring rapper. Recently, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, an acquaintance of Brooks told police that he’d stalked her and tried to run her over with his vehicle. And yet for some reason, he wasn’t behind bars where he belonged.

One wonders how many public servants dropped the ball here. How many of them could’ve denied Brooks the freedom to do what he did on Sunday? A good place to start would be with Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm, an unscrupulous Democrat partisan whose office said it’s conducting an internal review of the bail decision, which allowed Brooks to skip upon posting a paltry $1,000. (Chisholm is the same rogue prosecutor who conducted the infamous and despicable “John Doe” investigations against former Governor Scott Walker and other Wisconsin Republicans.)

“The state’s bail recommendation in this case was inappropriately low in light of the nature of the recent charges and pending charges against Mr. Brooks,” said Chisholm’s office in a statement. “Inappropriately low” is an understatement, especially given that this guy had multiple cases pending in court.

Prisons exist not only to punish criminals but to keep the rest of us safe from those who can’t control themselves. And Darrell Brooks’s criminal record made it clear long before Sunday that he couldn’t control himself. He was a known threat, a known danger, a known menace to society. And yet he was turned loose upon the public.

At least one deeply twisted Democrat, though, seemed to revel in the carnage. That would be Mary Lemanski, who until submitting her resignation yesterday was the social media director for the Democrat Party in DuPage County, Illinois. “It was probably just self-defense,” she tweeted, with hashtags to “Wisconsin” and “Kyle Rittenhouse,” in a post that has since been deleted. “You reap what you sow, Wisconsin,” she said in another.

Sick. Just sick.

But in the end, this isn’t about a single despicable Democrat. It’s about the entire soft-on-crime Democrat Party having abjectly failed the people of Waukesha.

The humiliating, stigmatizing, and misleading terms 'career criminal" and "offender" are now being replaced to more socially appropriate term 'Soros Deputies'.

Why did Brooks Jr. say he was "Homeless" on the Ring Video?

Because Baby Mama/Dumb Ho finally wised up and kicked his amateur rapper ass out of the house.

Which was the fault of Whitey.

This is my hypothesis right now.

CaptainHorsePaste says

Why did Brooks Jr. say he was "Homeless" on the Ring Video?

Nah, I think it was just to gain sympathy.

If there's one (racist) trait I can give to black people, they are very good at lying.