patrick.net

The war on the ‘unvaccinated’ is a desperate attempt to demonize and destroy the control group
The ruling class is very worried about non-compliant citizens.

Jordan Schachtel

I wanted to turn your attention to a side by side comparison map comparing the COVID pandemic of last year to this year. It is a true “photo is worth a million words” tweet from Rational Ground’s Woke Zombie:




... Schallenberg is lying and he knows it. The shots will not prevent another wave of sickness. These “waves” are simply the reality of a seasonal respiratory effect that happens every single year. The global ruling class have been lying to the masses for a long time. They’d rather not admit to all of these sunk costs, so the political elite will continue to uphold the myth that the COVID shots are still some kind of magic bullet that they are not.

Those who did not comply from the beginning of COVID Mania serve to pose the biggest threat to the power of these maniacal politicians. That’s why they’re attacking us so ferociously. The political elite pretend as if they care about COVID, but it’s not the virus that is keeping them up at night. It’s those pesky individuals who refuse to bend the knee – those are the ones in the crosshairs. The control group is the biggest threat to the people in power. They simply can’t survive the political ramifications of a control group outperforming the citizens living under the weight of destructive COVID Mania mandates and societal edicts.

Vaccinated English adults under 60 are dying at twice the rate of unvaccinated people the same age
And have been for six months. This chart may seem unbelievable or impossible, but it's correct, based on weekly data from the British government.

New study from Germany confirms higher vax coverage --> higher excess mortality
The Harvard study showed vaccination makes things worse as far as cases goes. This new study from German shows that the more you vaccinate the more people get killed. Not a surprise to me. ...

More likely than not, it is the people with the most comorbidities that are getting the vaxx. Generally speaking the healthy aren't really into it.

Thus, since they have a higher chance of dying because of their heath, this is just born out in the statistics.

Nothing to see.

More likely than not, it is the people with the most comorbidities that are getting the vaxx. Generally speaking the healthy aren't really into it.

Thus, since they have a higher chance of dying because of their heath, this is just born out in the statistics.

Nothing to see.

UK data shows the vaccines are NOT saving any lives at all. Zero. Zip. Nada.
Mathew Crawford just did an analysis showing that the data from the UK shows that the vaccines aren't saving any lives at all. Zero. Zip. Nada. So we're killing over 150K people to save no lives. Wow.

More likely than not, it is the people with the most comorbidities that are getting the vaxx. Generally speaking the healthy aren't really into it.

Thus, since they have a higher chance of dying because of their heath, this is just born out in the statistics.

Nothing to see.

High COVID-19 vaccination rates were expected to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in populations by reducing the number of possible sources for transmission and thereby to reduce the burden of COVID-19 disease. Recent data, however, indicate that the epidemiological relevance of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals is increasing. In the UK it was described that secondary attack rates among household contacts exposed to fully vaccinated index cases was similar to household contacts exposed to unvaccinated index cases (25% for vaccinated vs 23% for unvaccinated). 12 of 31 infections in fully vaccinated household contacts (39%) arose from fully vaccinated epidemiologically linked index cases. Peak viral load did not differ by vaccination status or variant type [1].

CITIZENS’ CORNER: [ANALYSIS] “Real-World Cost-Benefit Scenario for COVID-19 Vaccines”
October 13, 2021 • by Dr Ronald Neil Kostoff
Introduction

Our recent paper on vaccinating children against COVID-19 showed a best-case cost/benefit (c/b) ratio of ~5 for the most vulnerable demographic, 65+. The costs were defined as the deaths resulting from the “vaccine”, and the benefits were the true COVID-19 deaths that could have been prevented by the “vaccine”. This meant that five “vaccine”-driven deaths occurred for every truly attributable COVID-19 death prevented. In the paper, we concluded: “if the best-case scenario looks poor for benefits from the inoculations, any realistic scenario will look very poor”. The present analysis replaces the best-case scenario with a real-world scenario, followed by a tradeoff analysis that addresses some of the concerns raised by a few critics of the article.

Latest devastating news on the vaccine
If you weren't already convinced, you double your risk of cardiac incidents and the rate of stillborn babies is up by 29 times (but only if you are vaccinated). Does anyone in authority care?

Its Happening now in the UK. The Double jabbed are in serious trouble

“Real-World Cost-Benefit Scenario for COVID-19 Vaccines”
October 13, 2021 • by Dr Ronald Neil Kostoff
Introduction

Our recent paper on vaccinating children against COVID-19 showed a best-case cost/benefit (c/b) ratio of ~5 for the most vulnerable demographic, 65+. The costs were defined as the deaths resulting from the “vaccine”, and the benefits were the true COVID-19 deaths that could have been prevented by the “vaccine”. This meant that five “vaccine”-driven deaths occurred for every truly attributable COVID-19 death prevented. In the paper, we concluded: “if the best-case scenario looks poor for benefits from the inoculations, any realistic scenario will look very poor”. The present analysis replaces the best-case scenario with a real-world scenario, followed by a tradeoff analysis that addresses some of the concerns raised by a few critics of the article.

They Said Vaccines Were Safe For Pregnant Women, Now This Happens
November 23, 2021 | Sundance | 230 Comments
Something troubling is happening in Scotland. At least 21 babies under four weeks old died in September, a rate of 4.9 per 1,000 births. The former average was 2.1 deaths per 1,000 births. The nationalized health service tracks records, because everyone is on the same system; that’s why when an internal alarm is triggered by the data as it rolls in, they stop and look immediately.

"Of all Covid patients in the ICU, about 80% are over 50 and most have risk factors such as high blood pressure, heart failure or diabetes."
The vaccinators are vaccinating the wrong people, Part 1491230471325. ...

Mandate centrism aside, the basic point here is crucial: People who end up in hospital dying of Corona are overwhelmingly very old and very sick. If our press or our bureaucrats truly wished to solve the problem of overwhelmed hospitals, they would be investigating the demographic characteristics of severely ill unvaccinated patients, discovering trends in this group, and pondering ways to get vaccines to them. Reducing the likelihood of severe outcome in the very old and the very sick is the only conceivable application that our leaky, rapidly fading vaccines have. ...

Lockdowns have implanted in the minds of policymakers everywhere, the unshakeable belief that by reducing spread overall, you can also save the elderly. Over a year’s worth of experience has shown that this is the wrong strategy, and yet vaccination policy continues to operate on the same premise, hoping to use vaccines in place of lockdowns to suppress SARS-2. This idée fixe is particularly unfortunate, because it is above all in stopping transmission that the vaccines have failed.

What nobody will recognise in all of this, is the simple fact that most infections don’t matter. Most people feel sick for a few days and recover without incident. Accepting for the sake of argument all the official doctrines about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, it necessarily follows that most vaccinations don’t matter either. Universal suppression policies are destroying our economies, our societies, and our lives, while also failing to do anything much about SARS-2.

If our press or our bureaucrats truly wished to solve the problem of overwhelmed hospitals, they would be investigating

What nobody will recognise in all of this, is the simple fact that most infections don’t matter.

it necessarily follows that most vaccinations don’t matter either.

Latest devastating news on the vaccine
If you weren't already convinced, you double your risk of cardiac incidents and the rate of stillborn babies is up by 29 times (but only if you are vaccinated). Does anyone in authority care?

Immunization expert: ‘Unvaccinated people are not dangerous; vaccinated people are dangerous for others’

World Health Organization European Advisory Group of Experts in Immunization former Vice President Professor Christian Perronne yesterday said that all vaccinated people must quarantine over the winter months or risk serious illness.

Perronne specializes in tropical pathologies and emerging infectious diseases. He was Chairman of the Specialized Committee on Communicable Diseases of the High Council of Public Health.

Confirming the rapidly deteriorating situation in Israel and the UK, the infectious disease expert stated: “Vaccinated people should be put in quarantine, and should be isolated from the society.”

He went on to say: “Unvaccinated people are not dangerous; vaccinated people are dangerous for others. It’s proven in Israel now – I’m in contact with many physicians in Israel – they’re having big problems, severe cases in the hospitals are among vaccinated people, and in UK also, you have the larger vaccination program and also there are problems.”

The current working group on the COVID-19 pandemic in France was reported to be “utterly panicked” on receipt of the news, fearing pandemonium if it follows the guidance of the experts.

Israeli doctor Kobi Haviv told Channel 13 News: “95% of seriously ill patients are vaccinated. Fully vaccinated people account for 85-90% of hospitalizations. We are opening more and more COVID branches. The effectiveness of vaccines is declining or disappearing.”

But there are serious concerns about publication bias or selective omission of data, whereby adverse events are less likely to be published than positive results.

A systematic review in PLOS journal analysed 28 studies and found that adverse events were less likely to appear in published journal articles than unpublished studies (e.g. industry-held data).

Experts now suggest that the pivotal Covid-19 vaccine trials may have beenunder-reported adverse events in several ways.

Virtual monitoring with digital apps
In the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccine trials, participants were given digital apps to record adverse events remotely - a more convenient, time efficient and cost-effective way of gathering patient data.

A major problem however, is that the pre-determined options on the digital apps have a narrow focus on particular adverse events.

For example, the app only allows a participant to record what the company deems as ‘expected’ events such as fever, pain at injection site, temperature, redness, swelling, fatigue, headache, diarrhoea, chills, muscle and joint pain.

But if they experience a serious adverse event like myocarditis or early signs of transverse myelitis, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, a myopathic disorder, myocarditis or thrombosis, there is no option for them to record it on the app.

Case in point: Brianne Dressen, a participant in the AstraZeneca (AZD1222) trial. She suffered a severe adverse event after her first injection and became disabled.

Brianne Dressen
Brianne Dressen

But her smartphone app did not allow her to record the particular type of adverse event, nor did it allow her to record her symptoms in her own words.

Once hospitalised, Ms Dressen was ‘unblinded’ from the trial. She was informed that she had been given the AstraZeneca vaccine, not the placebo, and advised not to have the second injection.

The investigators subsequently “withdrew” Ms Dressen from the trial, they disabled her smartphone app, and all her data from that day onwards, were never documented despite still experiencing disability today.

Ms Dressen was concerned about the lack of reporting of her adverse event (and others) in the trial’s publication in the top-tiered New England Journal of Medicine.

She wrote to the journal’s editor-in-chief Dr Eric Rubin, seeking to “request inaccuracies in the trial publication be corrected, and to demand complete reporting of the trial publication and results.”

Dr Rubin refused to correct the inaccurate data in his journal. The full email exchange has been made public.

Significantly elevated cardiac risk caused by the vaccines justifies an immediate halt
The researchers who confirmed the results from the Circulation paper won't publish their results because they are worried about losing their research funding in the future. So don't tell anyone, OK?

WHO director says VAXXED people should wear masks, socially distance, and meet people outside

We are mandating a vaccine where there is no scientific evidence that it has ever saved a single life
As the BMJ noted today, we will NEVER have that evidence because the vaccine makers are structuring the trials to avoid proving an all-cause mortality benefit since they know it is negative.


1 hr ago

If you are are still in doubt as to whether we are being hoodwinked on the safety and efficacy of the COVID vaccines, this Editorial in the BMJ today should remove all doubt. We are being hoodwinked. And it’s not going to get better. Ever. So we are stuck with a vaccine that is being mandated where most people have no fu*&($#ing clue as to whether it works or not.

Why? It’s simple. They know full well from the VAERS data that the vaccine kills far more people than it saves (regardless of age) and they want to make sure you will never find out.

Get it?

Those of us who know how to interpret the safety data from VAERS and other similar systems know full well what is going on, but when we try to warn people, we are being marginalized as spreaders of misinformation. Who’s lying? Well, suffice it to say that no self-proclaimed VAERS expert will agree to a debate.

Note: For those of you upset about the headline, sure, they can argue that the COVID vaccines saved people from dying from COVID. I concede that. But the all-cause mortality (ACM) rate (which nobody is looking at), has always been far greater than the COVID lives saved.

And that my friends is the inconvenient truth.

A frightening new potential explanation for vaccine-driven myocarditis and other problems
Researchers in the New England Journal of Medicine raise the possibility of an uncontrolled autoimmune response to the coronavirus spike protein that may last indefinitely

PROOF: COVID vaccines cause prion diseases
Twitter suspended my account (likely forever since there is no appeal) due to one post on prion diseases. Here's the information they wanted to make sure you NEVER find out.


12 hr ago

Summary

There is no doubt the mRNA vaccines are causing prion diseases. People didn’t have these diseases before the shot and suddenly they develop them after the shot. There is no other explanation for this. None of the “fact checkers” can explain the cause of the excess rates. Prion diseases are incurable and always fatal. You can die as soon as 6 weeks after COVID vaccination (see within 6 weeks and within 6 months examples).

However, Twitter believes this is not true, but they refuse to tell anyone why they think that. Other fact checkers who have checked this out never did a VAERS query and are unable to explain away the “excess” number of reports other than doing a blanket dismissal that everything in VAERS is fraudulent without providing any evidence of that claim (other than one report out of 1.6M reports).

None of the fact checkers will debate on this to set the record straight.

In the analysis by Tracy Hoag and colleagues, her results are clear; that a child is more likely to develop myocarditis and be hospitalized than ever get COVID-19, the respiratory illness, and become hospitalized. So, the vaccination or prevention is far worse than what it's trying to prevent." See mark 4:53

A Massive Covid Wave in Germany and Central Europe Despite High Vaccination
By Vasko Kohlmayer

November 27, 2021

... Conclusion

With vaccine uptake in the 60 to 70 percent range, the virus should be – if not banished – then definitely under control. Instead, as we see in a number of countries across Europe, it is out of control.

Watching these numbers, one cannot but feel deeply concerned, especially since the death rates tend to peak in the December-January period. Given the record high case figures in central Europe, these countries may be in for some very dark times in the weeks ahead.

Many European nations, as well as other highly vaccinated countries in other parts of the globe, are sounding the alarm and imposing a new wave of lockdowns.

If the vaccines were even remotely effective, this could have never happened on a continent whose average vaccine uptake is 65 percent.

Given that the exploding case numbers correlate with the high rates of inoculation, one begins to suspect that it may be the vaccines that are responsible for the record-topping case numbers.

The data clearly demonstrates that the vaccines do not have the effect they were supposed to have.

The figures and graphs presented above provide hard evidence of vaccine failure.

45% of deaths after COVID vaccination happen in the first 2 weeks
It's 59% at 4 weeks and 63% at 5 weeks. Doing some very conservative estimates on the number of Americans killed by the vaccine leads to the inevitable conclusion that the vaccines should be stopped.


14 hr ago
My friend Albert Benavides (aka WelcomeTheEagle88) did a quick analysis for me on the deaths reported after vaccination in VAERS.

45% of all reported deaths happened within two weeks after vaccination.

Peter Schirmacher, one of the world’s top pathologists, said that 30% to 40% of people who died within 2 weeks after vaccination died were killed by the vaccine. His results were replicated by other German pathologists (since no US pathologist would dare accuse the vaccine of causing death or they would be immediately fired).

If we take the most conservative view possible, the vaccine should be immediately stopped

Dr. Paul Offit is lying to us about myocarditis rates
For teen boys, vaccines are more likely, not less likely, to kill you or give you myocarditis. Here's the proof.


Nov 2

The New York Times recently reported that Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and member of the FDA outside advisory committee for vaccines (VRBPAC), said that COVID-19 is much more likely to cause myocarditis than the vaccine. ...

The bottom line: if you want to protect your kids, you need to stop believing the bullshit advice from the CDC now about the vaccines being safe and effective. You should not vaccinate them. Period. Full stop. Nobody should be taking these vaccines. If you get COVID, treat it with an early treatment protocol like the one developed by Fareed and Tyson. You will avoid hospitalization, death, long-haul COVID. These treatments will not kill or injure you.

So they are willing to kill children with the vaxx in a mistaken attempt to prevent themselves from catching it.

Aussie Reality TV Star