« First « Previous Comments 223 - 262 of 1,290 Next » Last » Search these comments
I've taught in a school where we averaged 1 case per week for the first 3.5 months. The school is nearly 100 percent vaxxed. This past week, presumably, new variant came in, infected 130 kids, likely much more. The vaccine is nearly useless against transmission. I was in contact with 25 this week. I have been preciously infected and double jabbed 11 months ago. So far, I'm still negative. I was also taking the Rin pill for minor cold so that might have helped.
Martin Neil
@MartinNeil9
4:59 PM · Dec 3, 2021
1.Our research team have now analysed the ONS England November mortality data. We conclude that despite seeming evidence to support vaccine effectiveness this conclusion is doubtful because of a range of serious inconsistencies and anomalies.
See: https://rgdoi.net/10.13140/RG.2.2.14176.20483?source=patrick.net
2.The data appear to show lower non-Covid mortality for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Odd. Also unvaccinated mortality rates peak at the same time as the vaccine rollout peaks for the age group, then falls and closes in on the vaccinated. This is not natural
3. Consider what we are witnessing here. We have a vaccine whose recipients are suffering fewer non-covid deaths and hence are benefitting from improved mortality. And the mortality rates look to differ significantly from historical norms, as evidenced in mortality lifetables.
4.Correlating unvaccinated mortality with vaccine roll out we see curious patterns (dotted line the proportion of people getting first and second doses). Why are the unvaccinated dying after NOT getting the 1st dose? Why are the single dosed dying after NOT getting the 2nd dose?
5.Plenty of evidence that the vaccinated who die within 14 days of vaccination may be categorized as unvaccinated. Then someone who dies within 14 days of first dose is miscategorised as unvaccinated and a similar thing could occur post second dose.
6. Miscategorization might explain odd phenomena in ONS mortality. To correct the error we can take the difference between the expected mortality for the unvaccinated and the data, and re-allocate this unexpected excess mortality to the vaccinated to get new ADJUSTED estimates.
7. The early spikes in mortality that appear to occur soon after vaccination may be caused by the infirm, moribund, and severely ill receiving vaccination in priority order and thus simply appearing to hasten deaths that might otherwise have occurred later in the year.
8.Turning to Covid mortality, at face value, there appears to be clear evidence of vaccine effectiveness. But……..
9.After vaccination people endure weakened immune response for a period of up to 28 days and may be in danger of infection from Covid or other infectious agent at any time in that period. It therefore makes sense to examine infection date rather than date of death registration.
10.We adjust for this using a temporal offset and see a large spike in mortality for all age groups during the early weeks, when covid prevalence was high, and when the first dose vaccination rollout peaked.
11.After our offset adjustment we observe no significant benefit of the vaccines in the short term. They appear to expose people to an increased mortality, in line with what we know about immune exposure or pre-infection risks,
12.Whatever the explanations for the observed data, it is clear that the ONS data is both unreliable and misleading.
Absent any better explanation Occam’s razor would support our conclusions. The ONS data provide no reliable evidence that the vaccines reduce all-cause mortality.
This is the latest of numerous attempt to decode ONS hieroglyphs, but now we may have stumbled upon a rosetta stone to help solve the puzzle.
https://probabilityandlaw.blogspot.com/?source=patrick.net
This is unrewarded work done at some considerable career risk.
Some of our clinical collaborators COULD NOT put their names on the paper.
Omicron - which continues to appear significantly less dangerous though more transmissible than earlier variants of Covid - has been used as a cover for vaccine failure.
Most new Covid cases in Denmark occur in people who are vaccinated or boosted - and that is true for both Omicron and earlier variants. More than 76 percent of non-Omicron Covid infections in Denmark are in vaccinated people, along with about 90 percent of Omicron infections.
Memory Hole: virtually every major health official in the United States has claimed that COVID shots stop the virus
And every single 'public health' pandemic policy is anchored to the idea that COVID shots stop the virus.
There is an incredible gaslighting campaign happening in the United States right now, as COVID cases reach all time highs in the U.S. northeast and elsewhere.
On television and in corporate press outlets, there is a giant, ongoing memory-holing operation related to the once-promised idea that mRNA shots would stop the spread of the virus that causes COVID-19.
While they now claim otherwise, every single major government health official and pharmaceutical executive has claimed that COVID shots stop the virus. Let’s take a look at what the top government health officials have said on the record about these shots over the past year.
Let’s start with the worst of offenders, Dr. Anthony Fauci.
“When you get vaccinated, you not only protect your own health and that of the family but also you contribute to the community health by preventing the spread of the virus throughout the community. In other words, you become a dead end to the virus. And when there are a lot of dead ends around, the virus is not going to go anywhere. And that's when you get a point that you have a markedly diminished rate of infection in the community."
Bluechecks gonna bluecheck
Alex Berenson 12 hr ago
773
Wherein a CNN finds out that virus gonna virus and the vaccines don’t really work so good.
Just wait until he hears that vaccinated people die of Covid too. He’s gonna be soooo mad!
Also, Chris, the Tooth Fairy is not real. We’ll talk about Santy Claus later. That’s enough hard stuff for one day.
The mRNA-LNP platform's lipid nanoparticle component used in preclinical vaccine studies is highly inflammatory
Vaccines based on mRNA-containing lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a promising new platform used by two leading vaccines against COVID-19. Clinical trials and ongoing vaccinations present with varying degrees of protection levels and side effects. However, the drivers of the reported side effects remain poorly defined. Here we present evidence that Acuitas' LNPs used in preclinical nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccine studies are highly inflammatory in mice. Intradermal and intramuscular injection of these LNPs led to rapid and robust inflammatory responses, characterized by massive neutrophil infiltration, activation of diverse inflammatory pathways, and production of various inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. The same dose of LNP delivered intranasally led to similar inflammatory responses in the lung and resulted in a high mortality rate, with mechanism unresolved. Thus, the mRNA-LNP platforms' potency in supporting the induction of adaptive immune responses and the observed side effects may stem from the LNPs' highly inflammatory nature.
The latest figures from the UK Health Security Agency show that the fully vaccinated population of the UK accounted for 4 in every 5 COVID-10 deaths over the past four weeks. This is not data from some conspiracy theorist on the Internet. These are the official figures from the government of the United Kingdom.
Eighty percent of the people dying of COVID-19 in the UK are double or triple jabbed.
Here comes an avalanche
Wuhan Virus vaxx related injury and death petitions are stacking up
New studies show that the COVID vaccines damage your immune system, likely permanently
The vaccines are making it more likely you'll be infected with Omicron 90 days after you are fully vaccinated. To keep vaccine effectiveness high against omicron, vaccination every 30 days is needed.
Yet another independent study confirms over 150K Americans killed by the COVID vaccines
I had 8 independent ways to show this before. And now there are 9. And nobody has a defensible number < 150,000. The CDC still claims no deaths, yet cannot explain how Schirmacher and others goofed.
https://www.ntd.com/us-navy-warship-pauses-deployment-after-covid-19-outbreak-among-100-percent-immunized-crew_718844.html?utm_source=patrick.net&utm_medium=patrick.net&utm_campaign=patrick.net
Most articles are propaganda these days. But at least there are a few nuggets of truth in that one along with the propaganda.
Most articles are propaganda these days. But at least there are a few nuggets of truth in that one along with the propaganda.
Patrick sayshttps://www.ntd.com/us-navy-warship-pauses-deployment-after-covid-19-outbreak-among-100-percent-immunized-crew_718844.html?utm_source=patrick.net&utm_medium=patrick.net&utm_campaign=patrick.net
From the article...
"The vaccine continues to demonstrate effectiveness against serious illness.”
Patrick saysI was explaining this to my son last night because he was asking why I think the jabs aren't safe. This is what I know: since the vaxx campaign started, I've seen an unprecedented # of injuries and deaths in my circle of acquaintances:Most articles are propaganda these days. But at least there are a few nuggets of truth in that one along with the propaganda.
I really don't know where to go, mentally, from here on out. I still don't know anyone whose been hurt by the vax. I do know 4 people who've been Hospitalized and 2 deaths. 1 of the deaths i don't personally know but a friend of my father does. 1 death was a healthy 60 year old male (vax status unknown) and a 40 year old overweight smoker male (unknownvax status). My father in law is in the hospital now. His condition seems to go up and down. He has been taking a protocol that includes most of Rin's protocol + hydroxycloraquin as a prophylaxis. He took 5 12mg Ivermectins AND the monoclonal antibody infusion.
i think we can say with fairly high confidence that there is nothing in this data that supports the idea that widespread booster usage is stopping spread or contagion of covid.
The results are in and they should give us all pause
A decent-sized study noted over the last two weeks that if you are a male under 40 years old your risk of a serious adverse reaction called myocarditis is much higher from taking the vaccine than what you would experience from just contracting Covid.
Our friend Vinay walks through the details here. The evidence is pretty irrefutable now - there is a significant risk to men under 40 after taking 2 shots of the mRNA vaccine.
in the sort of delicious irony we’ve all come to expect from modern day health policy (and doubly so from the boriqua version) we see once more the total faceplant of “jim covid” laws.
MMM is a puerto rico health insurer. (text below is from a guy who works there)
they mandated covid vaccination for employees.
employees sued and won exemptions.
the company responded by segregating them and moving all the unvaxxed into a separate building.
then covid broke out in the vaccinated building (but not the unvaxxed).
you seriously cannot make this stuff up.
i have changed nothing (except for covering the phone numbers)
A decent-sized study noted over the last two weeks that if you are a male under 40 years old your risk of a serious adverse reaction called myocarditis is much higher from taking the vaccine than what you would experience from just contracting Covid.
15/12/2021
On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination
Why the vaccines cannot protect against infection
A fundamental mistake underlying the development of the COVID-19 vaccines was to neglect the functional distinction between the two major categories of antibodies which the body produces in order to protect itself from pathogenic microbes.
The first category (secretory IgA) is produced by immune cells (lymphocytes) which are located directly underneath the mucous membranes that line the respiratory and intestinal tract. The antibodies produced by these lymphocytes are secreted through and to the surface of the mucous membranes. These antibodies are thus on site to meet air-borne viruses, and they may be able to prevent viral binding and infection of the cells.
The second category of antibodies (IgG and circulating IgA) occur in the bloodstream. These antibodies protect the internal organs of the body from infectious agents that try to spread via the bloodstream.
Vaccines that are injected into the muscle – i.e., the interior of the body – will only induce IgG and circulating IgA, not secretory IgA. Such antibodies cannot and will not effectively protect the mucous membranes from infection by SARS-CoV-2. Thus, the currently observed “breakthrough infections” among vaccinated individuals merely confirm the fundamental design flaws of the vaccines. Measurements of antibodies in the blood can never yield any information on the true status of immunity against infection of the respiratory tract.
The inability of vaccine-induced antibodies to prevent coronavirus infections has been reported in recent scientific publications.
Both Moderna and Pfizer Spike Protein Contain the ADE-Related Epitope - and I Found Something Weird Encoded by Pfizer's mRNA
My prior analysis of Pfizer had (mistakenly) used an very large antisense open reading frame that encodes a protein unknown to science.
« First « Previous Comments 223 - 262 of 1,290 Next » Last » Search these comments
First one:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10035347/Married-couple-Michigan-fully-vaccinated-die-COVID-one-minute-apart.html?source=patrick.net