patrick.net

porkchopexpress says

It makes me think that big pharma has paid shills everywhere to shut down anyone's interest in these herbal remedies because of the threat it poses to their profits.

If you recall, one such posterer showed up here & did the same for Quercetin (pretending to be some ahem, smart guy who knew about polymerization & bio-availability) until I posted the Quercetin Phytosome pubmed article & then he disappeared.

porkchopexpress says

- 100mg Quercetin
- 150mg Green Tea extract

All good but this is how I would change it ...

250 mg Quercetin Phytosome (it's important that ppl stopped taking the Dihydrate form as it's not bioavailable)
200 mg Allisure Allicin

and then add the smaller stuff

so

Green Tea's EGCG at 150 mg
Turmeric w/ Bioperine 500 mg
R-Lipoic Acid 100 mg
etc

Here's Que for the common cold

https://patrick.net/post/1343582/2022-02-06-quercetin-a-study-on-the-common-cold-te

And my latest vax story

https://patrick.net/post/1343648/2022-02-12-rin-and-the-vaccine-part-deux

Yea, those idiots are everywhere. Amazing how much damage they can do and sway opinions.

I hope more and more people catch on to all these herbal remedies because it's not just about Covid, but practically any RNA virus out there.

Rin says

Here's Que for the common cold

https://patrick.net/post/1343582/2022-02-06-quercetin-a-study-on-the-common-cold-te

I missed this post before. Thanks for sharing.

If you're daily supplementing w/ Allisure Allicin, like 80 to 100 mg per day, here's one other effect you may notice.

During your dental cleansing, your gumline should look heathier and the blood letting, a lot less than earlier.

I came across this post in a forum about Novirin where there were clearly paid pharma shills calling the studies worthless and that the herbal remedy is snake oil. Dr. Polansky is the inventor of Novirin. This was one of the posts that I thought was fascinating:

"Let me explain why I think the Polansky and Itzkovitz paper is special. Currently, there is a war raging on between the pharmaceutical and the alternative medicine industries. The reason is billions of dollars that pharmaceutical companies make every year from selling drugs. As it turns out, the number one tool these companies use in protecting their enormous profits is the double blind, multimeter, clinical study. To pay for such a study, a company needs hundreds of millions of dollars. Guess who has that much money? The largest pharmaceutical companies. Who doesn't? Alternative medicine companies. What's the result? Alternative medicines are regarded as inferior to drugs. As long as the medical community will regard the double blind, multimeter, clinical study, as the gold standard for testing medical treatments, pharma will continue to make billions and control the fate of billions of people.

It is interesting that the FDA understands the situation, and an attempt to break the grip of the pharmaceutical companies by introducing other acceptable tests. Let me quote from the Polansky and Itzkovitz paper.

"The FDA guidance lists five types of controls for both pre marketing and post marketing studies: 1) Placebo Concurrent Control, 2) Pre-treatment Concurrent Control, 3) Dose-response Concurrent Control, 4) Active (Positive) Concurrent Control, 5) External Control (Including Historical Control). The External Control “can be a group of patients treated at an earlier time (historical control)” [25]

The FDA proposed four other controls in addition to the Placebo Concurrent Control. In its guideline to the industry, the FDA does not distinguish between the very expensive, placebo control, and the much cheaper other controls. To me it sounds like the FDA encourages the alternative industry to submit applications that are not using the placebo control. Am I the only one shocked by this policy?
Now, of course, if the medical community will follow the FDA lead and recognize the value of these controls, the pharmaceutical industry will start losing its monopolistic power, and suddenly, the market will see the introduction of many cheap, natural, and effective alternatives to drugs. Who will benefit from this change? The public. And who will lose? Pharma. When I think about it, it reminds me the time when IBM controlled the computing world with its very expensive mainframes. What happen when many small companies started to introduce the first PCs? A revolution. Everyone got access to a computer, and IBM got a big red number on its financial balance sheets.

I hope the publication of the Polansky and Itzkovitz paper will have the same effect on medicine as the introduction of the first PCs had on computing."