patrick.net

This is the other side I find a bit concerning. Putin has been getting his share of praise in the past year. I don't think it's a sign Putin has turned over a leaf, more of a sign of how low the bar has fallen when it comes to finding something to praise about government leaders. Thanks to Covid we now know the world is full of dictators.

Soo, @NuttBoxer, do you also believe something called "Khazarian mafia" is real and operational in this world?

personal

Eric Holder says

Soo, @NuttBoxer, do you also believe something called "Khazarian mafia" is real and operational in this world?

I haven't heard this name before, but the deeds they attribute to them definitely fit a profile that has been given many names over the centuries. Cecil Rhodes is a good place to start if you're sincerely interested in learning more.

Why is it when I ask you for feedback on my sources, rather than commenting over their, you run to this thread, and ask a question unrelated to my comment, where I basically slam Putin? I would think someone as invested in Ukraine as you would be very interested in new information.

I mean you are capable of looking at opposing views right? You can admit if there's no good side in a conflict? Because to religiously cling to one viewpoint being constantly spouted by a majority of the world's media is what a bunch of Covidites did for the past two years.

NuttBoxer says

Eric Holder says

Soo, @NuttBoxer, do you also believe something called "Khazarian mafia" is real and operational in this world?

I haven't heard this name before, but the deeds they attribute to them definitely fit a profile that has been given many names over the centuries. Cecil Rhodes is a good place to start if you're sincerely interested in learning more.

So if you haven't heard this name before and Cecil Rhodes doesn't write about it either (assuming you read his writings), how the fuck will I learn anything about proof of existence of "Kharazian mafia" from that Cecil dude?

Eric Holder says

So if you haven't heard this name before and Cecil Rhodes doesn't write about it either (assuming you read his writings), how the fuck will I learn anything about proof of existence of "Kharazian mafia" from that Cecil dude?

I think you're missing my point. Is there secret organizations that attempt to control the world and shape it as they see fit? Rhodes purposely didn't name his groups beyond a generic "round table" designation. You could also read some of the old letters exchanged by European monarchs about such societies. Before you go around trashing specific theories, learn about their origins you can speak from a place of authority.

Strange. A couple of years ago when I started to play the Assassin’s Creed games, the first couple I played took place in Paris and London. They had their mythologies based on the historical assassin’s cults, and their centuries old battles with the demonic illuminatis and freemasons.

I am surprised as time goes on as to the historical foundations of these games being pretty well researched. I didn’t pay that much attention to those issues while I was playing them, just presuming they were computer game mythologies. I was in my happy place of political ignorance.

Some weighty thumb must have been placed on them after that, because they veered away from these and went into other historical mythologies in Egypt, Greece, and now Vikings in medieval England. There is a bit of the old frisson but the Freemason lead got buried somewhere, and it seems it is because somebody didn’t want game players educated about these ancient political conflicts.

With the events of the past few years, you ignore these histories and dynastic consolidations of wealth and influence at peril to your own survival.

Denial is an expensive luxury nowadays.