patrick.net

Those zany Swiss. No wonder they are using Red Cross 'ambulances' for ferrying Ukrainian Nazis around. Money laundering won't be the same without the traditional Ukraine that we know and love.
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/51632?source=patrick.net

Ceffer says

Those zany Swiss. No wonder they are using Red Cross 'ambulances' for ferrying Ukrainian Nazis around. Money laundering won't be the same without the traditional Ukraine that we know and love.

What's so great about the Swiss, anyway?
Well... their flag is a giant plus.

Ceffer says

More likely a soldier carried his bleeding friend into the ambulance.

Hircus says

More likely a soldier carried his bleeding friend into the ambulance.

No, they accidentally caught soldiers jumping in and out of the Red Cross vans. Red Cross is crooked as hell.

SunnyvaleCA says

What's so great about the Swiss, anyway?
Well... their flag is a giant plus.

Groan.

"We would like to walk back the statement that we have ever walked back any statements," said a frustrated Psaki. "But if you find any statements that we have walked back let me know and we'll circle back later to walk back our walk-back."

new jackets available for the vaccinated....

megan fox and her three sons...

Is Boris Johnson a mask wearing avatar? Look at his nose. Mask split open without him knowing it?

gabbar says

Yeah, because that 600,000 number is factually incorrect.

PS. And the "holding in the north" part didn't age well, LOL.

Crooked schmuck would look good in an Afro wig and a dress.

Ceffer says

Saved. This is the faux skeptic in a nutshell. They want you to conclusively disprove the status quo opinion, that was formed on the basis of weak evidence or flat out bullshit.

Ceffer says

megan fox and her three sons...

Pure coincidence!

Ceffer says

But do you have a proof their opinion was formed w/o any proof? Or you just formed your opinion on their opinion with absolutely no proof whatsoever? =))

I need proof that you require proof.

Eric Holder says

But do you have a proof their opinion was formed w/o any proof? Or you just formed your opinion on their opinion with absolutely no proof whatsoever? =))

Not to interject so much, but when you hear what is coming out of somebody's mouth the same thing that is coming off from your television, in this day and age, 99.9% of the time whatever you're hearing you know they've not thought anything about.

For example, the primary reason you should be suspect about the claims of the plight of Ukraine, the unproved attack by Russia, Ukraine's defense of democracy, the war crimes of Russia is you're hearing exactly that on television. It doesn't mean they are lying, but considering they have spent 5 years quite obviously and unashamedly lying, should give you pause.

In a few years we'll find out the truth about the situation, when the propaganda is no longer needed for whatever agenda that is being pushed then.

The truth about the supposed pandemic is just coming out now for example. The truth about Syria came out, the truth of Iraq came out.

richwicks says

Not to interject so much, but when you hear what is coming out of somebody's mouth the same thing that is coming off from your television, in this day and age, 99.9% of the time whatever you're hearing you know they've not thought anything about.

Yeah, there are plenty of posters recently who post the same thing coming of RT, even if it contradicts their own supposedly principled and well thought-out positions from just a couple of months ago.

Nobody remembers Obama from alleged Columbia years. Those were probably his 'CIA years' of being directly trained and groomed to become the phony baloney Globalist Manchurian that he is. They bribed him into Harvard Law and Harvard obligingly doxed him up to fake him to look like a genius of merit and attainment. The Nobel Peace Prize was just the last in a string of staged frosting on the intelligence agency legend cake.

Eric Holder says

Yeah, there are plenty of posters recently who post the same thing coming of RT

It's not my fault that RT is now a more reliable source than CNN, MSNBC, or Fox news.

That's not the way it was 40 years ago, I'm fully aware, but it's absolutely true now. Russia Today and Sputnik are doing to the United States today the same thing the United States did to the USSR 40 years ago - just telling the ugly truth to a population that is brainwashed, at least when it comes to US foreign policy and US propaganda. This is highly destabilizing, which frankly, is good with this corrupt, dishonest government.

I'm as surprised as you are, but they have been brutally honest about Syria, and Iraq, and Libya.

When the US overthrew Ukraine, all our media could talk about is "*gasp* Victoria Nuland said FUCK!!!* and they entirely omitted he fact that Nuland was saying that the next leader of Ukraine was going to be Yatseniuk more than 2 weeks before the "revolution". RT didn't. I follow people that covered that story, they are all banned from Youtube, and Twitter, and Facebook. Today, in the United States, if you're not censored you're either not talking about politics or you're just talking bullshit. It is now, ironically, a mark of credibility to be deplatformed. Same as it was in the USSR. Samizdat lives.

I guess Washington DC figures if all the blatant lying and gaslighting doesn't work, than maybe sandbagging will.

Empty government buildings being sandbagged, to add to the fencing and barrier soap operas of the paranoid occupiers. Have they been warned of a HAARP weather attack, or do they expect their swamp ooze to come bubbling up from all of those tunnel systems underground?

https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/52261?source=patrick.net