patrick.net

^^^

If I could like @richwicks' post twice, I'd do it. It's like Moses being allowed to see the promised land, but never enter it. Perhaps my son will one day . . .

WineHorror1 says

richwicks says

If they funded it properly (and they won't) they'd mix lies with heaps of truth, that's the best way to hide a lie, but they aren't going to be well funded.

Really? They will get billions in funding.

No, they won't. They didn't even put the effort into creating a plausible name for the Ministry of Truth or get a competent believable person to head it.


original link


It's fucking hilarious to see their death throws. People give up in despair. It's not really the darkest before the light - twilight gradually sinks in, I'm certain you've seen a morning. I have however realized that they double, triple, quadruple down on lies. As they do this they lose more and more followers. We have a government in a desperate situation, and they will act more insane because they are insane. These people are so divorced from us, they don't know how to control us, much less communicate with us.

It's going to get weirder before it gets better though but at the end of it, is a sea change. I'm 50, and I fully expect a revolution within my lifetime. I think nearly all of us are old here, we are at the age of considering what kind of mess we want to leave the next generation. I don't want to leave them with even the shitshow I've seen for the last 2 decades where we have presidents lie us into war, governments that bail out criminal syndicates in investment markets, lie to children about a looming climate catastrophe. We can't allow this.

Patrick says

I've been watching the "Rome" series with my wife lately. They also lost their republic, but I know that they never got it back. Kind of depressing.

I highly recommend you watch People's Century, it covers 1900 to 1997 or so, through the eyes of the general public.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYmbyOrM4gs&list=PLuL26fXZ8eTNLLnugg2BTyOZQ7HT-QZk4&source=patrick.net

This was before our news agencies were entirely compromised. The people who are interviewed were believers in what they were doing. See what people were programmed into believing. They are just common people, of the early USSR, of the early United States, of early communist China. The series is a good series, I think there are 20 of them.

richwicks says

I hope to live long enough to see humanity regain control of the planet.

Humanity has control of the planet. This is what you get when a nation turns its back on God.

PeopleUnited says

richwicks says

I hope to live long enough to see humanity regain control of the planet.

Humanity has control of the planet. This is what you get when a nation turns its back on God.

Again although I do not share your religion, I respect it.

The people who run this nation are not like me. If I was able to make a trillion dollars by killing a single person, I wouldn't do it. They kill people for pennies. They are not like me at all, and it's not because of "God", it's because I respect life. They don't. Sociopaths run our nation, and I'm not a sociopath.

I'm anti-abortion, despite being an atheist - or that's how I'd be regarded. I don't view it as an acceptable form of birth control, and if a pregnancy is to be terminated, do it as soon as possible before the fetus develops a brain. The longer the pregnancy goes, the closer it is to murder. Now is that left wing or right wing? Morality exists regardless of your belief in divinity. Morality is a real, palatable force which I struggle to understand, but I know for certain is there. How its created, what makes it exist, that's a real study. You just give up and say "it's God", it's deeper than that, it's a goddamned force of nature and science, which is a study of nature.

The concept of morality is being picked apart and being understood, this is not a bad thing though. Once we understand it, the worst of us can seek to control us, the best of us will seek to enhance it. I have belief in the best of us. There's a real war between evil and good, and I think the right side will win in time. I don't know with man if we are fundamentally good, but I can tell you with certainty that an animal is. Deprive them of their struggle to survive, and all you end up with is a happiness in a ball of fur. Animal models are an extremely useful model for humanity, and that's not because evolution is some pernicious lie.

Our enteral struggle is to end humanity's struggle to survive. That's what all our conveniences are all about, but then we have the bastards making more headaches more rules more artificial struggles. That's the real war. We are undermined with evil people, but I'll say this, the division between us and them become more clear every day, every week, month, and year. I can see the lines being drawn and there's 1000 of us to every one of them. Most people are good people.

richwicks says

PeopleUnited says

richwicks says

I hope to live long enough to see humanity regain control of the planet.

Humanity has control of the planet. This is what you get when a nation turns its back on God.

Again although I do not share your religion, I respect it.

The people who run this nation are not like me. If I was able to make a trillion dollars by killing a single person, I wouldn't do it. They kill people for pennies. They are not like me at all, and it's not because of "God", it's because I respect life.

You vehemently support the guy who already killed tens of thousands of people, including his own compatriots, over some loony pseudo-historic shit, baseless paranoia and illusions of grandeur, so lose the white cape - it doesn't fit.

Why isn't Tucker mentioning 2000 Mules at all?

personal

Patrick says

Why isn't Tucker mentioning 2000 Mules at all?

They didn't write the story.

Remember it wasn't that long ago that Fox wouldn't allow the mention of the name Soros in any news program. I think they gauge the penetration of the alternative information from other sources, and when it reaches some threshold of awareness, they will allow it after the fact as a Tucker or Hannity rant. That way they can serve many masters in their own propaganda machine, and suck Globalist cock without destroying their conservative viewer base entirely.

rocketjoe79 says

Why isn't Tucker mentioning 2000 Mules at all?

Because he is controlled opposition. As I think @richwicks previously posted. truly honest journalists get whacked.

Ceffer says

Remember it wasn't that long ago that Fox wouldn't allow the mention of the name Soros in any news program. I think they gauge the penetration of the alternative information from other sources, and when it reaches some threshold of awareness, they will allow it after the fact as a Tucker or Hannity rant. That way they can serve many masters in their own propaganda machine, and suck Globalist cock without destroying their conservative viewer base entirely.

Once they can't ignore it, they have to mention it or risk losing legitimacy. Legitimacy they shouldn't even have in the first place.

Booger says

Would be perfectly legal in CA, btw.

$20 on her being a AFSCME or NEA/AFT member.

rocketjoe79 says

They didn't write the story.

Fox news "Legal Agreement" they signed promising no "Election Fraud" stories. Not with Tucker, but with Dominion.

Which I think was purposeful: It gives them a plausible financial reason not to discuss it.

https://rumble.com/v10l71y-how-they-did-it-true-the-votes-catherine-engelbrecht-and-gregg-phillips-on-.html


original link

https://www.ntd.com/can-2000-mules-change-an-election_778513.html

Can 2000 Mules Change an Election?

In Dinesh D’Souza’s groundbreaking new documentary “2000 Mules,” he lays out the compelling case for 2020 voter fraud by working with a team that used cellphone geotracking to pinpoint the travel pattern of “mules”—people paid to collect and drop off ballots in ballot boxes, an illegal practice in every single state.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/arizona-county-featured-in-2000-mules-investigating-voter-fraud-allegations_4465269.html?utm_source=share-btn-copylink

Arizona County Featured in ‘2000 Mules’ Investigating Voter Fraud Allegations
By Zachary Stieber May 13, 2022

Officials in an Arizona county that was featured in the documentary “2000 Mules” are investigating voter fraud, but a spokesperson said the new announcement wasn’t related to the movie.

Sure, not related to your utter failure to examine felonies directly attacking the basis of the country, felonies which you somehow did not investigate before the movie came out...

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/obama-affiliated-ngos-poured-billions-into-local-insurgencies-to-steal-2020-election-analyst_4458553.html?utm_source=share-btn-copylink

Ballot Mules Funded by Obama-Linked NGOs Who Poured Billions Into ‘Local Insurgencies’: Analyst
Facts MatterFACTS MATTER
ROMAN BALMAKOV

An organization called True the Vote has, for the past year and a half now, been investigating the illegal ballot harvesting that took place around the entire country during the 2020 election. And after painstakingly tracking 10 trillion cell phone pings after looking at millions of minutes of surveillance footage, and after actually being able to speak with some of the whistleblowers who acted as ballot mules in 2020, they were able to conclude that around 5 million ballots were trafficked during the 2020 election, and very likely swung the results.

In order to get a better picture of what really took place, my team and I flew down to Florida in order to sit down with Greg Phillips and Catherine Engelbrecht from True the Vote and figure out what they found, what they’re doing to stop it from happening again in the future, as well as what common Americans like you and me can do to help.

Requires registration to watch the video.

I watched about half of the documentary. Lots of weak sauce imo.

Woah, I don't think you got the point. Phone geolocation data shows that thousands of people were stuffing ballot boxes.

https://reclaimthenet.org/2000-mules-confirmed-as-a-huge-hit-for-rumble-and-locals/

Patrick says

Woah, I don't think you got the point. Phone geolocation data shows that thousands of people were stuffing ballot boxes.

In battleground states, using ballots trafficked from “non-profits.” Any guess as to whose name was on those ballots for President? And what impact did this have on down ticket and local races as well?

Bottom line, this was the most insecure and fraudulent/fake election in American history.

Patrick says

Phone geolocation data shows that thousands of people were stuffing ballot boxes.

Not to mention the videos of people stuffing ballot boxes matching the timestamps of the mule's geolocations.

Remember when they dragged the boxes of ballots out from under the desks after they closed the polls in Georgia? Uninvestigated and unprosecuted as far as I know.

The election was stolen by a desperate kleptocratic gerontocracy. Hopefully we'll get our liberty back and justice will be served but I don't see it happening.

I am seeing some cognitive dissonance kicking in with some people, but there is still a lot of rabid antiMAGAers out there.

Onvacation says

but there is still a lot of rabid antiMAGAers out there.

Regardless of how people feel about Trump, how can anyone feel good that hundreds of thousands of ballots were trafficked in battleground states? More than enough to negate the votes of legitimate voters who followed the election rules.

I thought the video of the ballot box stuffers looked weak. It sure didn't look like they were putting 100s of ballots in at a time. Don't get me wrong, I believe the election was stolen but I also believe Trump was complicit. Really? I have no clue anymore about what's what any longer. Anybody could be lying about anything.

The US is about whatever you can get away with.

PeopleUnited says

Onvacation says

but there is still a lot of rabid antiMAGAers out there.

Regardless of how people feel about Trump, how can anyone feel good that hundreds of thousands of ballots were trafficked in battleground states? More than enough to negate the votes of legitimate voters who followed the election rules.

Most libs could care less if they win by hook or crook. They don't care one bit what is destroyed as long as they think they're right.

PeopleUnited says

In battleground states, using ballots trafficked from “non-profits.”

If a shitlib ever complains about religious tax exemptions, talk about pulling it for Planned Parenthood, ACLU, OpenSociety, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, etc.

"THAT's different. That's progress towards a better world, without superstition, run by Experts(tm)"

The smoking gun of election fraud I thought was how they stopped the count in the middle of the night when Trump was winning and then magically discovered enough Biden votes to push him over when counting resumed. We’ve all seen the suspicious looking graph. This 2000 Mules thing sheds absolutely no light on that, since the mules’ ballots all would have been submitted together with the legitimate ones in normal ballot boxes.

I believe that they used many forms of cheating.

Undoctored says

This 2000 Mules thing sheds absolutely no light on that, since the mules’ ballots all would have been submitted together with the legitimate ones in normal ballot boxes.

And it still wasn't enough to put Biden over the top. They probably had boxes of ballots for Biden just in case in all of the battleground districts.

Onvacation says

Undoctored says

This 2000 Mules thing sheds absolutely no light on that, since the mules’ ballots all would have been submitted together with the legitimate ones in normal ballot boxes.

And it still wasn't enough to put Biden over the top. They probably had boxes of ballots for Biden just in case in all of the battleground districts.

Righ it does shed quite some light on it. The muled ballots were just necessary base ballots. Later that night they just unearthed additional necesssary suitcases full of ballots for the win. Plus they knew some ballot drop boxes would not be counted until days later, which then was used for the narrative that the lead "widened" and recounts were just unnecessary taxpayer costing sore loser antics.

IHLlary was a failed stolen election, so they clearly have studied the process from the ground up and scaled up the fraud on many fronts. If the fake voter rolls didn't do it, add mail in voting. If the ballot stuffing doesn't do it, then add reams of manufactured ballots. If all of that doesn't work, deploy the death star Dominion and voting machines.

Corrupt secretaries of state were given Soros checks since 2004, when the process was field tested in Nevada, then California. Nothing is enforced in a situation where public executions of government officials are now warranted.

However, the fact that they think the sham theater of elections is still necessary points to the frailty of their dictatorial fantasies. The people need to rend them limb from limb.

They did the same shit they do in Democrat Primaries in Big Cities.

Eric Holder says

Would be perfectly legal in CA, btw.

One of the many reasons I'm moving but perhaps the main one. There is no hope for this place.