« First « Previous Comments 91 - 130 of 171 Next » Last » Search these comments
No quote, no link.Are you saying that you don't remember? Yes or no?
...not because I learn anything from you at this point.
richwicks saysNo quote, no link.Are you saying that you don't remember? Yes or no?
Patrick - reveal this comment: https://patrick.net/post/1344825?start=27#comment-1837824
@richwicks ^^
Quote me, provide a link, refresh my memory.Here you go, dear senile: https://patrick.net/post/1344073?start=9#comment-1826473
no proof of any existential threat to Russia from Ukraine have been provided
I do not like Putin, as he is a murdering thug.He is indeed.
The idea that the invasion was "unprovoked" is a matter of opinion.
HeadSet saysI do not like Putin, as he is a murdering thug.He is indeed.
HeadSet saysThe idea that the invasion was "unprovoked" is a matter of opinion.
It is a matter of opinion indeed. All this "Support Ukraine" business - it's the world deciding whether the opinion of a murdering thug should count for anything going forward.
I do not like Putin, as he is a murdering thug. But from the Russian point of view, with Ukraine
richwicks saysQuote me, provide a link, refresh my memory.Here you go, dear senile: https://patrick.net/post/1344073?start=9#comment-1826473
mostly reader saysrichwicks saysJust demonstrate I'm incorrect. You're again wasting your time insulting me.I've done it, and repeatedly.
Quote me. We're going back to this.
Show your dedicated post, quote it, provide links. I expect you to point to any random post, and dishonestly claim it proves something it doesn't. This is why I'm saying "quote it", if you do - I expect you to lie about the quotes.
Show your dedicated post, quote it, provide links.I did just that - provided a link to my dedicated post. That's EXACTLY what you asked me to do. This is YOUR quote from YOUR post asking me to do that. Now you act butthurt because supposedly it's not what you demanded.
richwicks saysShow your dedicated post, quote it, provide links.I did just that - provided a link to my dedicated post. That's EXACTLY what you asked me to do. This is YOUR quote from YOUR post asking me to do that. Now you act butthurt because supposedly it's not what you demanded.
Sheesh, you can't even put together a coherent thought.
Are you denying that you tried to pin Bucha on Ukrainians and requesting quote for that?
Be specific, dear senile.
British Petroleum poisoned the entire Gulf of Mexico.
What I HEAR, and I may be misinformed, is that the Ukrainians did it.
richwicks saysShow your dedicated post, quote it, provide links.I did just that - provided a link to my dedicated post
mostly reader saysrichwicks saysNo, exact quote, and link to it.I feel that I'm talking to a retard
That's interesting. Quick scan had no links again.
Provide quotes of mine with links.
Well, show the quote.I gave you the link, go and read. I'm not chewing your dog food. It's quite clear that your demands for quotes are a stalling technique.
you talk about nothingThis is not true. I point out holes in your disinformation campaign and I accurately classify your status in this world.
I have had to beg you for over a month for what forms your opinions.Did anything change once you had it? Nope. That's why. I understand fully well who you are.
richwicks saysWell, show the quote.I gave you the link,
Provide a quote and links. Show your dedicated post, quote it, provide links.
Here you go, dear senile: https://patrick.net/post/1344073?start=9#comment-1826473
My response:
mostly reader saysHere you go, dear senile: https://patrick.net/post/1344073?start=9#comment-1826473
This would be a 101 on how to detect one of the propaganda techniques.
Intro: most real-life situations have a large number of variables and moving parts. It's not always clear how they fit multi-dimentional world into a coherent picture based on incomplete and ambiguous data. Slight mis-interpretation of data points - a little bit to the right here, a little bit upwards there, skip this data point because it doesn't fit, stretch another one because it supports - and you get one pictures. Change the direction in which you move the points - and you get a different picture, which may also be consistent, yet be in conflict with the first one. That's what this technique does, it paints the picture by slight manipulation of data points. Lying by omission is quite popular with this approach.
In other words, just your bullshit - nothing I've said.No-no-no-no-no-no-no-no-no. This selective quoting that you are demonstrating right now is exactly an example of grey propaganda. I further dissect that lie you push about US overthrowing Ukraine. You conveniently omit that bit.
richwicks saysIn other words, just your bullshit - nothing I've said.No-no-no-no-no-no-no-no-no. This selective quoting that you are demonstrating right now is exactly an example of grey propaganda.
FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut saysnot sure what this means, will this do anything for our gas prices? They haven't come down yet.
No connection whatsoever.
RWSGFY says
FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut saysnot sure what this means, will this do anything for our gas prices? They haven't come down yet.
No connection whatsoever.
well fuck me then, $7 a gallon. Can't wait till I'm out of CA with their faggot tranny worshipping bullshit and high gas prices and fucking commie fucks everywhere and militant leftist blacks. fuck all of that.
Hey, meant to ask you and forgot. How did you know which posts of mine marked as "personal"
Because I replied to them before they were marked.
richwicks saysBecause I replied to them before they were marked.
No, you didn't. https://patrick.net/post/1344825?start=27#comment-1837824 -
I don't think this is going anywhere guys. Right or wrong, maybe just move on from the back and forth? This is going down the classic forum rabbit hole. Agree to disagree so to speak.
I don't recall.Of course, of course, dear "suddenly senile". FYI - this is what true online spanking looks like.
You're a foul mouthed...Yet I wouldn't dare to even think of deep and dark places where your tongue is usually lodged.
richwicks saysI don't recall.Of course, of course, dear "suddenly senile".
RWSGFY saysGazprom is circling the toilet.
GOOD CALL! Are they bankrupt yet?
Sempra Energy (the United States) has announced that it will sell about 2.25 million tons of liquefied natural gas per year (LNG) to the largest German electricity producer RWE AG, which is trying to abandon natural gas from the Russian Federation.
"RWE Supply & Trading and Sempra Infrastructure have signed a major liquefied natural gas supply agreement for RWE's European utility portfolio for the Port Arthur LNG project in Texas, U.S. The conditions provide for negotiations and the completion of the final 15-year contract for the supply and procurement of approximately 2.25 million tons of LNG per year," the company said.
The volumes will be delivered by RWE anywhere in the world - as an example to the planned LNG import capacity in Germany.
"As RWE we are thrilled to join forces with Sempra Infrastructure, one of the leading LNG infrastructure companies in the U.S. This partnership will help diversify the RWE and German gas supply portfolio and thus improve supply security in Europe on a long-term basis," said RWE Supply & Trading CEO.
Sempra Energy (the United States) has announced that it will sell about 2.25 million tons of liquefied natural gas per year (LNG) to the largest German electricity producer RWE AG, which is trying to abandon natural gas from the Russian Federation.
"Gazprom" to cut gas exports to Europe via NS-1 by 40%
Today, at an operational meeting at PJSC Gazprom, information on the operating mode of the Portovaya compressor station (CS) was considered.
Due to the untimely return of gas compressor units from repair by Siemens (Germany), the exhaustion of the overhaul life of the GCU and the identified technical malfunctions of the engines (an order from Rostekhnadzor on a temporary ban on activities was received), only three gas compressor units can currently be used at the Portovaya CS.
Gas supplies to the Nord Stream gas pipeline can currently be provided in the amount of up to 100 million cubic meters. m per day (with a planned volume of 167 million cubic meters per day).
Russia will experience a massive boom in their economy, because what really allows us to live is just energy.
LOL: Soviet Union had shitload of oil and gas but its economy was complete shit with shortages of pretty much everything - food, cars, electronics, clothes, housing, even fucking toilet paper ...
Another case of the death of a top manager associated with Gazprom. In the pool near St. Petersburg, they found the body of Yuri Voronov, the head of the company's contractor. He died from a gunshot to the head.
The body of 61-year-old Voronov was found on the territory of his site in the cottage village of Marine Terraces near the Gulf of Finland. The man was lying in the pool with a shot through his head, and law enforcement officers found a traumatic pistol nearby. To whom it belonged is not yet clear.
Yuri Voronov is the general director of the transport company Astra Shipping, which, among other things, worked on the Arctic contracts of Gazprom. According to the businessman's wife, he went to the Leningrad region on July 1, and before leaving he had a conflict with business partners due to the loss of money.
This is the fifth death in six months associated with the Russian gas industry. In winter, the body of Leonid Shulman, head of the Gazprom invest transport service, and then Alexander Tyulakov, who worked at Gazprom as deputy general director of the Unified Settlement Center, was found in the Leningrad Region. Interestingly, the corpses of both leaders were found in the same village near St. Petersburg - Leninsky.
In April, the bodies of Vladislav Avaev, a former vice president of Gazprombank, as well as his wife and daughter, were found in a Moscow apartment. A little later, in a similar way, the former Novatek top manager Sergei Protosenya, his wife and daughter were found dead in Spain.
« First « Previous Comments 91 - 130 of 171 Next » Last » Search these comments
"
How Russian energy giant Gazprom lost $300bn.
It was not too long ago that Gazprom, Russia’s state-controlled energy conglomerate, was one of the Kremlin’s most powerful weapons. But those days now seem like a distant memory. Today, Gazprom is a financial shadow of its former self.
The speed of Gazprom’s decline is breathtaking. At its peak in May 2008, the company’s market capitalisation reached $367bn (£237bn), making it one of world’s most valuable companies, according to a survey compiled by the Financial Times. Only fellow Exxonmobile and PetroChina were worth more. Gazprom’s deputy chair Alexander Medvedev repeatedly predicted that within a decade the Russian energy giant could be worth $1 trillion.
That prediction now seems foolhardy. Since 2008, Gazprom’s value has plummeted. In early August it had a market capitalisation of $51bn – losing more than $300bn. No company among the world’s top 5,000 has suffered a bigger collapse, Bloomberg Business News reported in April 2014, and by the end of the year net income had fallen by an astonishing 86%.
Though share prices have rallied slightly since, indicators suggest Gazprom has further to fall. Lingering uncertainty raises questions about whether it can survive, with production continuing to tumble downward.
So what happened? Why is a company with the world’s largest gas reserves, operating in a country bordering China and the European Union – two of the world’s top energy consumers, performing so badly?"
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/07/gazprom-oil-company-share-price-collapse