by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 212 - 251 of 510 Next » Last » Search these comments
I think they work, except perhaps at the beginning of a line:
bold
italic
Made note to fix that.
Hi Pat, looks like uploading pics is busted for me.
Might have something to do with the underscores?
1) When I click on my profile and then view my comments (https://patrick.net/comments?a=Hircus), they now start at my oldest comment, when it used to be my newest comment. I prefer the old behavior if this wasn't an intentional change.
2) When viewing my comment list, if I click the date/permalink link of a comment, in the past it would take me right to my comment, but not anymore. Some links give me an "invalid start number" error, like this one
https://patrick.net/post/1345054?start=2118#comment-1840720
I suppose this is because the url param start=2116 is wrong. The url should probably be start=4485 or something like that, to take me to the page where my comment is. I bet fixing the other bug fixes this too.
You need a regression test system.
Where did you get that url with the incompatible start and comment_id params? I should fix that if the url appeared on the site.
It shows everything that has 'width' & 'height'..
How would I do that for free, aside from Google Voice?
i do wonder if twitter employees create those via their systems bypassing all verification
I guess link to original images should be good enough. It’s one quick way to browse and visit threads.
Would it just be a long list of images with links below them? Where would I put it on the site?
Patrick saysWould it just be a long list of images with links below them? Where would I put it on the site?
Yes. Create a thread something like, 'Picture2thread'. In case of s*x related images, I'd expect the thread name instead of the image, otherwise it might offend somebody.
https://patrick.net/uploads/a/3/2/a325f7d2de5cc7c973c97eaa9fbf8c18.jpg
richwicks says
I know, can you download this without getting the *.txt extension?
That one has a .jpg extension in it.
This one does not:
https://patrick.net/post/1346861/2022-07-30-court-rejects-google-s-attempt-to
« First « Previous Comments 212 - 251 of 510 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,252,289 comments by 14,939 users - Ceffer, ForcedTQ, FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden, krc, Robert Sproul online now