patrick.net

https://galileoisback.substack.com/p/game-over-for-pfizers-lab

GAME OVER FOR PFIZER'S LAB
Repeated and overwhelming public demonstrations of no confidence against the Israeli Ministry of Health (IMOH)

In March 2022, a few cases of polio were diagnosed in Israel. The infection was concluded to be a vaccine-derived polio virus.

As a result, the IMOH announced a vaccination campaign using a weakened live vaccine. https://www.ynet.co.il/health/article/bkjhzpxz5

The campaign was an utter failure.
Out of approximately 500,000 children and youth, the target population, only ~25,000 (5%) showed up following a personal invitation.

Two of the reasons that were mentioned in the Israeli media:

“vaccination fatigue and lack of public trust”.

This was a clear no-confidence vote.

The lack of confidence was already reflected during the campaign to vaccinate the 5-11 age group (~200,000 children) in early 2022. Despite coercion and harassment (e.g. loss of green pass, repetitive home isolations), less than 18% of this age group got the first two doses.

In the first week of the first booster campaign for this age group and with no coercion measures and threats, only about 300 (1 in 660 or 0.15%) were brought by their parents to receive the shot.

Not ONLY the kids.

Many Israeli adults chose not to receive the required 3rd dose despite tough coercive measures at the time, losing their “right” to a green pass.
A mere 13.6% of the population older than 18 opted for the 4th dose after it was recommended to them by the IMOH. ...

The IMOH started 18 months ago with a Covid19 fearful population and an impressive 98% routine vaccination rate history, unprecedented propaganda budget and legal powers to revoke basic human right from the vaccine hesitant.

They ended with way over 90% of the population vaccine-hesitant.

Good work IMOH!

Was it your undisputable incompetence or is it the “safe and effective” holy vaccine?

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/data-suppression-and-adulteration

https://ashmedai.substack.com/p/cdc-wasteful-spending-galore

Dr. Coburn noted, “Recently, it was reported that the CDC director told Congress the agency ‘needs’ an additional $1 billion in 2008 to do its job properly. The FFM oversight report shows the director where she might begin looking for those funds internally, before she asks taxpayers to open their wallets even wider. ...

A sample of what is included in this new oversight report:

CDC spent $1.7 million — including funds from a terrorism account — on a Hollywood liaison program, which happens to be run by a former CDC employee (see page 87);

CDC paid to create a statue of a woman made out of vegetables, “who” was featured in its $106 million new communications and visitor center (recently named after the senator in charge of funding CDC) (see page 11);

The Thomas R. Harkin visitor center also includes a giant 70-foot-wide by 25-foot-tall video wall of plasma screen TVs to showcase vignettes about the agency. The plasma TVs are part of the building’s $5.1 million “audio visual integration” expenditures (see page 8);

CDC spent $30,000 on saunas for its new $200,000 fitness center, a center which also includes mood-enhancing lightshows and two $1,750 zero-gravity chairs (see page 15);

CDC syphilis prevention funds were spent to host a “safe-sex” event with a porn star, during a time when rates of the disease among men climbed by 68 percent (see page 44);

CDC HIV/AIDS prevention funds were spent on a transgender beauty pageant (see page 45);

CDC spent $45 million for conferences, including those featuring prostitutes, protests, and beach parties (see pages 50, 52,53, & 55);

CDC sent 110 employees to two international AIDS conferences (20 to Thailand and 90 to Barcelona), when purchasing retroviral drugs with the trip funds likely could have prevented mother-to-child AIDS transmission for more than 115,000 infants around the world (see pages 52 & 54);

CDC is opening a Hawaii office, a development announced by a senator from Hawaii who oversees its funding (see page 18);

CDC has spent $5 billion over seven years on HIV/AIDS prevention funding, and yet the United States still sees 40,000 new cases each year, with no decrease in infection rates for over a decade (see pages 23-31);

The Inspector General finds that of CDC’s $2.6 billion in HIV/AIDS grants, some have no objectives and are “abysmal,” yet are funded anyway (see pages 38-40);

CDC spent $335 million on a kid-targeted media campaign to fight obesity and found that, later, kids who saw the ads did one more activity, which may or may not have been the result of the ads (see pages 69-71);

CDC pays two former employees $250,000 to (temporarily) help build staff morale, and the agency is currently seeking a full-time replacement who will cost taxpayers over $1 million in the next decade (see pages 100-101);

A CDC HIV/AIDS prevention grantee hosted a bar night and printed magazine instructions on how to throw a good party with lots of alcohol, despite the fact that booze is a known risk-factor for spreading the deadly disease (see page 104); and

$128,000 in CDC bioterrorism funds were spent by Los Angeles County (a high-target area) on trinkets such as letter openers, whistles, magnets, mouse pads, flashlights, pens, and travel toothbrushes (see pages 106-108). ...

If NIH and CDC are still having trouble coming up with ways to fund their fight against Ebola, here is a list of 15 wasteful programs totaling $15,135,574,669.00 where they could have saved:

Telling Taxpayers How to Eat ($15 billion) – Yes, that’s billion with a “b” in front. In a massive overstep of government power, Obamacare carved out $15 billion for CDC to convince Americans to make “healthy” choices through “Community Transformation Grants” (CTG). The CTG program “supports efforts to modify behavior through anti-obesity campaigns, as well as anti-smoking and pro-sin tax regulations and legislation” at the state and local levels, according to the bipartisan Citizens Against Government Waste.

Grant Money to China ($90 million) – NIH awarded more than $90 million to Chinese researchers. This included $2 million to develop a vaccine for a parasite disease common in China. The Traditional Values Coalition asked, “As our country heads to fiscal ruin, why are we giving millions in taxpayer dollars to Chinese science — which benefits China and its institutions — when they hold more than $1 trillion in American debt?”

Duplicate Agricultural Programs ($22 million) – CDC spent $22 million on their Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing Program. The problem? This project was nearly identical to efforts already underway at the Department of Agriculture. CDC allotted $181,966 for developing a smart phone app for specialized farmers in Tennessee.

“Why Are Lesbians Fat?” ($2.87 million) – That’s one question NIH has decided to research for the last four years, spending more than $2.87 million so far on the project. The ongoing study is meant to explain why “women of minority sexual orientation are disproportionately affected by the obesity epidemic,” operating under the claim that “three-quarters” of lesbians are obese. First funded in 2011, the study is slated to continue into 2016.

Promoting HPV Vaccine for Young Girls ($544,188) – CDC provided $544,188 for a study on how to boost the number of young girls getting Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccinations in Los Angeles County. Although CDC says the benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risk, it counts 772 serious adverse side effects, including 32 deaths, among the millions of doses administered to young girls between June, 2006, and December, 2008. Parents have raised moral objections as to whether young girls should receive the vaccine, which covers four sexually transmitted diseases.

Drunken Monkeys ($3.2 million) – NIH spent $3.2 million getting monkeys drunk just to see what would happen. The agency apparently has quite a fascination with excessive drinking, since it also “doled out money in recent years for research on binge-drinking mice, inebriated gamblers and pilots seeking the sensation of flying drunk,” according to The Washington Times.

Bizarre Sex Studies ($1.5 million) – Congress voted to give NIH $1.5 million to spend on four obscure sex studies: “Mood Arousal and Sexual Risk Taking,” “Study on Sexual Habits of Older Men,” “Study on San Francisco’s Asian Prostitutes/Masseuses,” and “Study on American Indian Transgender Research.” NIH still received the requested funds from Congress, despite efforts by Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Penn., in 2004 to defund the projects.

Funds for Homosexual Activists in Public Schools ($1.4 million) – CDC gave The Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network (GLSEN), the homosexual activist group, $1.4 million to create “safe spaces” in public schools starting in 2011. The funding will be distributed during a five year period, as GLSEN works in 20 targeted school districts across the country. GLSEN Executive Director Eliza Byard claimed in 2011 that safe spaces “are vital to these students’ health, success in school and life prospects."

Centers for ‘Gun Disease’ Prevention ($2.6 million) – CDC spent $2.6 million on studies that also seemed to favor greater gun control before when Congress defunded the research in 1999. Apparently Congress thought CDC had more important issues to study, like how to control actual diseases. For FY 2015, President Obama is asking Congress to grant CDC $22.2 million in new funding to study and prevent gun violence. Obama has made similar requests in previous years, though unsuccessfully.

National Institutes of ‘Gun Control’ ($5 million) – Separately from the CDC, NIH also handed out nearly $5 million for research promoting gun control as of October, 2009, according to an article in The Washington Times. NIH pursued research on “gun related violence,” despite the issue being well outside the organization’s typical domain. Grants included “$642,561 in taxpayer funds to learn how inner-city teenagers whose friends, acquaintances and peers carry firearms and drink alcohol on street corners could show up in emergency rooms with gunshot wounds.”

Cocaine Enhances Japanese Quail’s Sex Drive ($181,406) – No joke, this was a real study sponsored by NIH and slated to run through next year. Why quail? Because “quail provide a convenient and interesting alternative to standard laboratory rats and pigeons.”

Empowering Women to Choose Contraception … in Jail ($279,789) – Liberals have long battled to expand women’s access to contraceptives. So in June 2012, NIH allocated $279,789 “to improve contraceptive use for incarcerated women” as they neared the end of their jail time. The program, which ran from June 1, 2008, through on May 31, 2014, was ultimately intended to reduce unexpected pregnancies and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) among recently incarcerated women.

Bogus AIDS Experiments ($4.9 million) – Results of an HIV/AIDS vaccine study funded by NIH were faked by researcher at Iowa State University (ISU), calling into question $19 million in grants awarded to the same researcher over the years. “Inauthentic” samples throughout a period of four years made the vaccine reportedly appear far more effective than it actually was. Although NIH refused to pay ISU the final installment of the grant money, the university was allowed to keep more than $4.9 million after paying back the researcher’s salary – nearly three-quarters of the original grant.

Sex Workers Spreading STDs ($675,786) – Ever wonder why sex workers spread HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs)? The answer might seem obvious, but NIH is spending $675,786 to find out exactly how and why in an ongoing study. Researches are continuing the regular testing of 600 female sex workers on the U.S.-Mexico border for HIV, syphilis, gonorrhea, and Chlamydia.

Examining ‘Barriers to Correct Condom Use’ ($423,500) – It turns out “young, heterosexual adult men” weren’t using condoms as frequently as NIH would like. A study investigating the apparent problem in 2009 came with $423,500 price tag.

https://babylonbee.com/news/government-declares-gay-orgies-an-essential-activity

https://gettr.com/post/p1kmwy5c933

Arnie1974
@Arnie1974
·
4h
The CDC Has Thrown Bioethics Right in the Rubbish Bin by Obstructing Our Rights to Informed Consent

Dr. Robert Malone: "The CDC has spent over 1 billion US dollars promoting these vaccines and suppressing any discussion about their potential risks."

"There is no way that vaccine recipients have received informed consent because the CDC has actively blocked anyone's ability to be able to access the actual information about adverse events and risks."

Full Video: https://tinyurl.com/Malone-CHD

https://www.infowars.com/posts/cdc-covid-guideline-update-finally-allows-individuals-to-make-their-own-decisions/

The CDC issued a new “Guidance for Minimizing the Impact of Covid-19” on Thursday, shockingly admitting what many Americans have been shunned or even banned online for saying.

https://spectatorworld.com/newsletter/uselessness-cdc-dc-diary-08-12-22/

The CDC confirms its own uselessness ...

For understandable reasons, most people stopped listening to the CDC months ago. And so very few people will update their Covid-related decision-making based on the change in advice. What will go, one hopes, are the few remaining disruptive mass-testing and quarantine protocols in schools and other public settings — some of the last barriers standing between Americans and business as usual.

The CDC should be completely eliminated, just like the FBI. Both are a hazard to the public.

https://nitter.pussthecat.org/ianmSC/status/1558242439436967936#m

Ian Miller
@ianmSC
17h
It's absolutely insane that even after the CDC admitted that there is absolutely no difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated people with regards to catching or spreading COVID, there's been no change in federal policy to end the ludicrous ban on unvaccinated travelers
Aug 13, 2022

That’s because the CDC did not admit any such thing.

https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2022/p0811-covid-guidance.html

Protection provided by the current vaccine against symptomatic infection and transmission is less than that against severe disease and diminishes over time.

They did not say “no protection” or “ insignificant protection.”

https://rumble.com/v1fxz67-where-is-the-national-apology-to-all-the-covid-skeptics-who-were-right.html

Where is the NATIONAL APOLOGY to all the covid skeptics who were RIGHT?

Undoctored says

They did not say “no protection” or “ insignificant protection.”

Then they lied.

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/facts-not-aligning-with-your-narrative

Lol, the CDC swapped one lie for another.

Inevitably, they're going to have to admit the second one is false as well.

More concentration camp guards trying to walk back their participation in stuffing the gas chambers. Fiat bribe monies dried up and the hookers are flouncing and pouting for new customers?
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/70479

In what documents does the CDC have any power to do any of this? Ot doesn't have this power.

Patrick says

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/facts-not-aligning-with-your-narrative

Lol, the CDC swapped one lie for another.

No actually the claim within the red box on the current page (no DNA modification) was there on the earlier one too. They simply deleted the claim about spike proteins being cleared quickly. The graphic is misleading.

The CDC never advocated keeping unvaccinated people away from the vaccinated in the first place. They never condemned it, true, but the idea of vaccination requirements for the workplace and public venues (“mandates”) never had any basis in any CDC guidance. So technically their new streamlined quarantine rules should not affect those requirements. In other words, if it’s wrong now in light of CDC guidance it has been wrong from the beginning.

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/disband-the-cdc-goes-mainstream

"disband the CDC" goes mainstream
the reflexivity of the overton window

el gato malo




the CDC failed on virtually every measurable metric of covid response.

they promoted the pseudoscience of lockdowns and masking trotting out study after study with cherry picked or outright fraudulent parameters.

they made up ideas like “6 foot distancing” that lacked any basis whatsoever

they failed to recognize or admit to airborne and aerosol transmission

they pushed over-sensitive and irrelevant testing and fruitless and impossible contact tracing

they claimed vaccines would stop spread

they claimed vaccines would be 100% effective vs hospitalization and death

they pushed 2 doses and done as the “path to get your life back” then 3, then 4, then booster forever all on the basis of shoddy science.

and they systematically refused to do their appointed job of monitoring the adverse events of the vaccines.

they destroyed schools and businesses and drove the US economy and society into a ditch.

they made the lives of american children into a misery and cost them years of education and development despite their never having been at material risk.

they vilified and attacked the sane and accurate folks like jay and martin and sunetra and the great barrington declaration which was, quite literally, just a simple and uncontroversial elucidation of 100 years of evidence based epidemiology.

and now they have finally come full circle and tried to slide into adopting the practices that the actual adults in the room had been advising all along.

it took the CDC years to finally be pummeled into arriving at the place the great barrington declaration started back in fall 2020.

this absolute panoply of total, tragic, and willful failure has become way too big to miss.

this agency is either so outlandishly incompetent or so desperately politicized and corrupt as to pose grave threat to the american people especially and specifically because it was allowed to dictate to them (either directly or by informing the choices of those who did) and perhaps most of all because people trusted them.

Patrick says

https://rumble.com/v1fxz67-where-is-the-national-apology-to-all-the-covid-skeptics-who-were-right.html

Where is the NATIONAL APOLOGY to all the covid skeptics who were RIGHT?

Oh, you haven't been doing this for long.

You will never get an apology for being right before the crowd realized you were right.

What you will hear will be along the lines of "of course everybody knew this back then". I have gone through this more than once. You will be resented for being correct, not applauded. There's no reward for pointing out that the government lied, ever. You have shown the other person to be gullible and a fool, you never ever get an apology.

Patrick says


Haha - no - people actually like their dogs generally, that's why they have a useless eating and shitting machine. They are cute and lovable, they are manipulative, they are good at controlling you, it's charming.

We're more like cattle than pets. Pets are often valued.

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/sweeping-reorganization-at-cdc-to

"sweeping reorganization" at CDC to "restore public trust"
that phrase may not mean what they hope you think it does

but then you read the text of the story and realize that it’s just the same people who have been such interminable fonts of incomprehension, disinformation, and outright fraud grabbing even more power and remaking an agency that is already a weapons grade dysfunction junction into one even more able to wreak mischief and menace upon the populace. ...

i mean, come on. pull my other paw, it plays jingle bells. ...

make no mistake: there is nothing trustworthy about this.

so, after 3 years of publishing inaccurate claim after inaccurate claim and studies that crossed well over the line into outright fraud, the solution is to find ways to publish even less well vetted “pre-publication” science and to “simplify” the website to justify providing even less data and to pull down all the evidence of things you got wrong without any pesky questions being asked?

because all that sounds like to me is a way to make sensational claims and prescriptions without having to provide any supporting data.

are we seriously calling that the road to regaining trust? ...

The agency has also been criticized throughout the pandemic for issuing public health guidance that some saw as confusing and ineffective.

Many also felt it wasn't moving fast enough to respond.

sorry, but:

this is what they think people are upset about and what lost public health agencies the public trust?

it wasn’t the fraudulent mask studies they published and the reams of made up guidance and guidelines that fell apart faster than knock off ikea furniture from uzbekistan?

it wasn’t pushing lookdowns that were known not to work and explicitly contra-indicated by 100 years of evidence based pandemic study?

it wasn’t claiming that the vaccines would provide herd immunity and become “a dead end for the virus” only to near instantly recant when the jabs failed to work as advertised?

or their total failure to even to the basic rudiments of their job and monitor the VAERS system for danger signals despite the biggest spike of reported vaccine adverse events in human history?

and then quietly erasing vaccine safety claims from their website? (just “streamline and simplify” i guess?)

and manipulating efficacy data and playing “hide the ball” with all cause death and cancer reporting? (see safety claims link above)

this is a classic false framing. you straw man a question no one asked and then answer it as though it resolves an objection in order to sidestep the real points of criticism and blame the victims for being unsatisfied.

but it’s pure farce.

The only thing that could regain trust in the CDC is a speedy trial, quick imprisonment, and possibly the public hanging of Pfizer-bot Walensky and everyone else who had anything to do with pushing the death jab on the public.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/white-house-covid-czar-admits-6-foot-social-distancing-rule-not-the-right-way_4670814.html?utm_source=share-btn-copylink

White House COVID Czar Admits 6-foot Social Distancing Rule ‘Not the Right Way’

White House COVID-19 czar Ashish Jha on Tuesday admitted that the six-foot social distancing rule that was implemented in early 2020 isn’t actually effective.

Over the past several years, “a lot of time” was spent “talking about six feet of distance, 15 minutes of being together. We realize that’s actually not the right way to think about this,” he said during a White House briefing on COVID-19.

“That’s not the most accurate way to think about this,” Jha said, adding that it is about “the quality of air you’re breathing around you.”

In a crowded indoor area with poor ventilation, people can “get infected” with COVID-19 “in minutes,” Jha said, adding that being outdoors you can be “outside for long periods of time” and not get infected. ...

The agency last week rescinded a number of rules and made key updates to its recommendations, now stating that unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals should essentially be treated the same, while explicitly saying that those with a prior infection have protection against severe illness. ...

A former administration for the Food and Drug Administration, Scott Gottlieb, revealed in late 2021 that the six-foot rule was made up.

“Nobody knows where it came from,” Gottlieb, *a Pfizer board member*, told CBS News.

https://resistthemainstream.org/ben-shapiro-warns-cdc-has-a-bigger-motive-behind-its-shake-up/

“If you actually wanted to shake-up the CDC, what you would do is use a little bit of epistemic humility. You’d actually look at their system and say, okay, what if we shrank what it is that we say that we can do?”

“But that’s not what the CDC is doing,” Shapiro explained. “Their argument is they need more power. Their big mistake is that they weren’t forceful enough during the last pandemic. So when they say shake-up, what they mean is give us more power.”

https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/the-meaning-of-incredible/

The CDC seems to think nobody will notice its crimes, and the crimes of its sister agencies, FDA, NIAID, NIH (and the White House Task Force) if it strolls jauntily into the fall season whistling a happy a tune: Nevermind Covid anymore, la la la…. Did I say crimes? Yes, I did. As in gross violations of the law and the basic social contract.

They lied about their roles in the nefarious origins of SARS CoV-2. They conjured up — already had waiting, actually — dangerous genetic treatments masquerading as “vaccines” and then they faked the safety trials to rush them into use. They denied people proper, effective treatments with inexpensive drugs and killed them with ventilators and remdesivir — solely to maintain a fraudulent emergency use authorization (EUA) that shielded “vaccine” companies from lawsuits. Once the “vaccines’ were widely distributed — and forced upon many people with mandates — they confabulated and hid information about adverse reactions and deaths. They destroyed countless small businesses, livelihoods, households, and hindered children’s development with lockdowns. And they used both social and news media to censor their critics in direct violation of the first amendment. That’s all.

Oh, one more thing: they destroyed modern medicine. They will probably assist in the destruction of law, too, because the legal system will never be able to handle the volume of lawsuits against all parties involved in the Covid “vaccine” mass slaughter — including the corporations that forced their employees to get vaxxed and the pharma companies themselves, who will lose their EUA protections once their fraud is proven. And they will hasten the death of an already ailing financial system that can’t bear the wealth transfers implied in the foregoing (on top of the worst debt crisis in human history).

You think I exaggerate? We’re sailing into the flu season with millions of people whose immune systems are wrecked by multiple shots of mRNA novelty drugs. They are also susceptible to many viruses and bacteria which normally lurk in everybody’s bodily ecosystem, but would be controlled by otherwise healthy immune systems. Likewise, their hacked immune systems are no longer able to suppress cancers — many forms of which are already way up above normal statistical levels. Not to mention damage done to cardiovascular systems by spike proteins, which linger in human bodies for more than a year after “vaccine” shots, as well as neurological and brain damage.

Former Wall Street analyst Edward Dowd said yesterday (Aug 18) that a Society of Actuaries report just made public shows that a 20 percent uptick in excess deaths among working age people, which began with vaxx mandates in the fall of 2021, continued into the second quarter of 2022. Actuaries are the people who compile and analyze statistics for insurance companies.

So, all week the CDC has been walking-back one “guidance” after another. No more compulsory testing, no more contact-tracing, no more social distancing, no more treating the unvaxxed differently than the vaxxed (though the “Joe Biden” regime still won’t allow unvaxxed travelers into the USA), no more vaxx mandates (except, apparently, the US military). Oh, and they’ve conceded that their “vaccines” do not remain in the deltoid muscle, but actually leak all over the body. Note: whatever else the public health agencies are saying or doing right now, they are still promoting the mRNA vaccines, and lying about their safety and effectiveness — because if they told the truth, they would be completely discredited and surely subject to criminal prosecution. And they are still suppressing cheap and effective treatment protocols while promoting remdesivir and the useless (plus expensive) Paxlovid.

The CDC capped the week’s walk-back campaign by announcing a major overhaul of how the agency works. (The FDA and other public health entities made no such promises.) CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, fronting for other little-known federal bigwigs actually called in to clean-up after her, made the hilarious statement: “I look forward to working with the incredible people at CDC and our partners to realize the agency’s fullest potential to benefit the health and well-being of all Americans.” What a dim bulb. Does she know the definition of the word incredible? (Here it is: impossible to believe.)

Of course, the more sobering picture is that virtually all American institutions are now incredible, impossible to believe, starting from the top: “Joe Biden” as president. The executive branch of the government is being run by Barack Obama and a claque around him and is being run into the ground either on-purpose or out of astounding incompetence. Attorney General Merrick Garland flamboyantly disgraces the very idea of justice with Stalinesque political prosecutions. FBI Director Christopher Wray flouts every attempt to extract the truth about his agency’s operations, and at least half the country believes he’s turned it into a secret police operation like the Gestapo. The college presidents and deans have dishonored the idea of truth-seeking with their cowardly submission to Jacobin-Marxist maniacs and their program of anti-knowledge. And who in America really trusts his doctor? (Not me. Mine is the “chief medical officer” of my network and he’s still pushing “vaccines.”)

We allowed this to happen. We tolerated this exorbitant abuse by runaway authorities-gone-criminal. We let them get away with their bullshit about “defending our democracy” when they are actively and visibly destroying it. Serious people must be seriously asking themselves: what will it take to stop them now?

Patrick says

Former Wall Street analyst Edward Dowd said yesterday (Aug 18) that a Society of Actuaries report just made public shows that a 20 percent uptick in excess deaths among working age people, which began with vaxx mandates in the fall of 2021, continued into the second quarter of 2022. Actuaries are the people who compile and analyze statistics for insurance companies.

I thought it was 40%.

Patrick says

https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/the-meaning-of-incredible/

no more treating the unvaxxed differently than the vaxxed

I think that only applies to quarantine rules. Interestingly none of the CDC guidance ever recommended that any institution require vaccination for anything. So I don’t see how the new CDC guidance is going to lead to any school, museum, theater, or employer stopping their vax-based discrimination. If anyone knows of any such institution changing their policy to treat the unvaccinated absolutely equally as a result of this new guidance, let me know.

"Let's see if we can rejuvenate whatever trust they still have in us to kill a few more. After all, Klaus has assured us that non-extradition estates await us next to Mengele's old South American ranch."

"Democrat Megadonor Parts Ways With Party Over COVID Vaccine Data"
https://www.theepochtimes.com/democrat-megadonor-parts-ways-with-party-over-covid-vaccine-data_4674361.html?utm_source=share-btn-copylink
"The megadonor, Steve Kirsch, says that he has called everyone that he’s had any relationship with in the Democratic Party, including six members of Congress, trying to get some answers about the COVID vaccine injuries but asserts that no one picked up his calls.

“I’m disappointed in the lack of goals that they had and now becoming extremely disappointed that I can’t get a return phone call,” Kirsch told The Epoch Times."

It won't be long before all the calls are forwarded to Uruguay and Argentina.

Straight from the horse’s mouth:

https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2022/p0811-covid-guidance.html

“Recommending screening [sic] testing of asymptomatic people without known exposures will no longer be recommended in most community settings.”

So what does this mean for places that have had a “vax or test negative” rule? Are these places dropping the test and if so will they admit all or exclude all unvaccinated as a result?

I’m sending the following query to offending institutions:

“The CDC no longer recommends screening the asymptomatic for COVID-19, and all their rules treat the vaccinated and unvaccinated the same. In light of this will you now be admitting in all visitors without them needing to show proof of COVID-19 vaccination or negative test for? If not, why not?”

I’m guessing they will all keep their policy precisely because the CDC is acknowledged by all to be irrelevant. The sword cuts both ways.

Undoctored says

Interestingly none of the CDC guidance ever recommended that any institution require vaccination for anything.

Does this mean my friend who was fired for refusing the jab can sue her ex employer?

@Onvacation she will have a good chance if she requested a religious accommodation and it was refused. See this case, where the settlement terms were drawn up even before the CDC’s August revision:

https://cookcountyrecord.com/stories/629535956-northshore-to-pay-10m-to-settle-covid-vax-mandate-lawsuit-fired-workers-could-get-25k-and-their-jobs-back

But every institution with any kind of vaccination requirement is doing so without the blessing of the CDC. Seems like a clear cut violation of the ADA to me. The CDC has never determined that the medical category of “unvaccinated” poses a direct threat so no discrimination at all is allowed regardless of religion. So yeah, go ahead and sue. This should have been done long ago.

Undoctored says

@Onvacation she will have a good chance if she requested a religious accommodation and it was refused

For fucks sake, it's a valid excuse that "I believe the great invisible entity in the sky forbids this", but "this doesn't make any fucking sense to me, and you can't explain how it makes any sense - so fuck you" is not valid.

I swear to god, the whole purpose is to push society into insanity or to at least claim insanity.

There's religious exemptions, but not RATIONAL exemptions.

This is an untested serum for a disease which kills practically nobody, and if the serum actually works, the only people at risk, are the people that refused the serum. If, however, the untested serum doesn't work, it can harm or even kill the person that takes it.

This is logical, can't be refuted, it's entirely logical and consistent, but people have to appeal to a supposed believe in god.