« First « Previous Comments 33 - 72 of 83 Next » Last » Search these comments
Misc says
I like suggestion 2 better.
Better yet would be allowing opposing viewpoints on the vaxx to aired publicly. This has led to extreme consternation on the part of some participants because it contradicts their worldview and changing one's worldview is a daunting prospect.
However, the stipulation against airing pro-vaxx information was put in place about a year ago when some members were all agog that ADE was going to wipe out large numbers of those vaccinated. Since about 5 billion people were vaccinated, they were supposing that hundreds of millions if not a few billion would die from the vaxx.
Since that has not occurred within the estimated timeframe, perhaps Patrick would reconsider his ban.
OK @Patrick - how much of a pain in the ass would it be to make a thread that only two people could discuss between themselves? It would require a ...
Health is not a fad for us. We do not pretend to know more during a crisis, real or faked, than we did prior to it.
When they announced a "vaccine", it quickly became clear that it was their sole focus. Nothing else mattered or was even allowed. I thought to myself that we'll see how this goes, but I knew that vaccine development took 5-10 years. When they had it out in, what? 6-8 months? I immediately said "no f'ing way", especially since by this point it was clear who the at-risk groups were, and my family was not among them.
Life expectancy generally only increased because of successful birth rates.
they have been working on DNA and mRNA vaccines for 2 decades without success
No jab at all, but daughter was required to get jabbed to stay in college. She now has POTS.
Someone on this forum said that probably 80% of the people on this forum are vaxxed.
No jab at all, but daughter was required to get jabbed to stay in college. She now has POTS.
To be clear, I don't see this as some evil plot to depopulate the world.
What bothers me is that the long term risk is unknowable.
Blue says
My owner forced me to get one
You don't really mean "owner" do you @Blue ?
Employer maybe?
Blue says
My owner forced me to get one
You don't really mean "owner" do you @Blue ?
Employer maybe?
HeadSet says
No jab at all, but daughter was required to get jabbed to stay in college. She now has POTS.
@HeadSet do you mean this?
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/postural-orthostatic-tachycardia-syndrome-pots
And now we find it really does modify DNA to produce the spike protein forever, and perhaps even in descendants of people who got the jab.
It took 5 years and tens of thousands of spontaneous abortions and about ten thousand deformed children before they withdrew Thalidomide.
The clot shot will make the Thalidomide disaster look like a game of patty-cake.
This will take years to play out. No one really knows.
socal2 says
were put on ventilators and died
I'm pretty sure it was the ventilator that killed them.
Why do you think it would be rare?
It was just months ago that the corporate media shills were yelling that it is "impossible" for the mRNA shots to get into your DNA, but now there are multiple studies showing that it not only modifies your DNA, it does it quickly, within 6 hours.
They must have killed many. Creepy that hospitals got $48k/dead.
I'm pretty sure it was the ventilator that killed them.
Remember the argument that if they were genetically altered by the vaccines, they no longer were legally human, thus no homicide? Guess they will have to get them on animal cruelty.
Patrick - how much of a pain in the ass would it be to make a thread that only two people could discuss between themselves?
« First « Previous Comments 33 - 72 of 83 Next » Last » Search these comments
Are you vaxxed?
Why or why not?
Someone on this forum said that probably 80% of the people on this forum are vaxxed. Someone else said probably only 2 of us.
Just curious.