patrick.net

Patrick says

The Oresund bridge and tunnel between Denmark and Sweden was started in 1995 and finished in 2000. Clearly it's not going to work if sea levels rise, so why did they build it anyway? Answer: because they know that sea levels are not rising.

Nooo! They didn't know the seas were rising because Greta hasn't been born yet!!!

https://notthebee.com/article/a-group-of-italian-scientists-says-a-critical-assessment-of-extreme-weather-events-suggests-a-climate-crisis-is-not-evident-yet

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/storms-are-not-intensifying-media?publication_id=323914&post_id=75800736&isFreemail=true

storms are not intensifying, media is

"A Category 5 false flag media lie has just hit the coast of Florida."

https://helenaglass.net/2022/10/18/ancient-civilizations-that-disappeared/

ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS that Disappeared Because of Climate Change

It's just how the world has always worked.

https://notthebee.com/article/climate-change-hysteria-has-gotten-so-bad-that-even-climate-scientists-are-warning-other-climate-scientists-to-stop-with-the-doom-mongering

https://slaynews.com/news/global-warming-data-exaggerated-50-percent-years-new-evidence/

‘Global Warming’ Data Exaggerated 50% Over Last 50 Years, New Evidence Shows ...

The new groundbreaking research, compiled by two atmospheric scientists at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, Dr. Roy Spencer and Professor John Christy, shows 50% less warming over 50 years across the eastern United States than official data claims.

The new evidence deals a major blow to the widespread use of regularly adjusted global and local surface temperature datasets showing increasingly implausible rates of warming.

The research attempts to remove distortions caused by increasing urban heat and uses human-made structure density data over 50 years supplied by the Landsat satellites.

It compares the official National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) homogenized surface temperature dataset and exposes a 50% reduction in the warming trend.

10 years ago today.

Might be true.

https://notthebee.com/article/elites-flew-to-a-climate-summit-in-egypt-in-four-hundred-private-jets-you-know-because-the-world-is-literally-on-fire

Elites flew to a climate summit in Egypt in FOUR HUNDRED private jets, you know, because the world is literally on fire

Patrick says

10 years ago today.

Might be true.

Might?

I'm not sure where the concept of global warming first came from.

HeadSet says

richwicks says

There is no market for a supersonic airline.

Apparently, there is, since two major airlines have already placed orders. We will see if the airlines are able to fill the seats.

I'd agree. I do think there is demand for a small segment of wealthy business and leisure travelers. Not a fan of Europe, but would like to see Greece or Spain. No interest in sitting in a tube for that long though for something that isn't necessarily on my bucket list. I'd rather grunt out the 18-20 hours, take a copious amount of edibles before the flight and to go to Southeast Asia/Pacific. Also New Zealand is on the list.

But if I could get to Greece in 4 hours, now we're talking. Only other way I'd go to Europe is a trans Atlantic relocation cruise for the ship to hit the Mediterranean.

https://slaynews.com/news/climate-scientists-dont-believe-climate-change-narrative/

A whopping 41 percent of climate scientists say they don’t believe the official “climate change” narrative that’s promoted by politicians and the corporate media, a new report has revealed.

The media and political elite are constantly demanding that the public complies with their green agenda by arguing that the “science is settled” on global warming.

The official narrative insists that there is a nearly 99% “consensus” among scientists that the human race is causing a catastrophic “climate emergency” through carbon emissions.

However, a bombshell new survey reveals that 41% of climate scientists dispute these claims.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/11/here_is_a_story_that_most_people_wont_see_because_it_doesnt_push_the_radical_left_agenda_wildfires_are_down_85_this_year.html

Here is a story that most people won't see because it doesn't push the radical left agenda. Wildfires are down 85% this year

https://thegoodcitizen.substack.com/p/spoilt-climate-cult

They’re sending out a message, but it’s not primarily intended for you or me. They are recruiting. (Again, perhaps with the delusional belief that there are more people out there like them than actually exist.) But the only people who will respond positively are those with a similar psychology: alienated, resentful, destructive, paranoid, narcissistic, and potentially psychopathic.




Whatever the flavor of Woke—whether it concerns climate change, racism, trans, crime, mental illness, drugs, or homelessness—each has the structure of what I call an anti-religion. For each of these varieties, Shellenberger and Boghossian list their forms of original sin, guilty devils, myths (creation stories), sacred victims, the elect, supernatural beliefs, taboo facts, taboo speech, purifying rituals, and purifying speech.

In the case of climate change activism, there’s naturally a sense of the apocalyptic. Fossil fuels and global industry have created a system that threatens mass extinction, and we must deface works of art and glue ourselves to museum walls—in addition to reducing our “carbon footprints,” paying carbon taxes, and going green—in order to stave off the wrath of the sun god. We only have x years left. Just don’t say nuclear.

The structure of this belief system bears more than a passing resemblance to the paranoid prophets of old, like Thomas Müntzer, or a more modern one like Jim Jones. Just as with their explicit beliefs, it doesn’t matter that the apocalypse never comes—with the types of folks creating these movements, they always bring their own apocalypse. ...

The world will never please them. It will never fill the inadequacies they feel inside, the lack of connection to the lives of others. Their ideologies are designed to be unfulfillable. This debt can never be repaid, which locks them into a never-ending cycle of criticism and protest. Any concessions and “positive change” in the world will never be enough. It cannot be, because the compensatory myths are designed in such a way as to reflect the inner psychology of those creating and espousing them.

Remember wikileaks showed how some guys had manipulated data and done other shit to make it appear to show warming? I think it was the same guys who came up with the "hockey stick" graph.
I'm definitely a sceptic and actually a denier since the proponents have been caught profiting from my believing something that I don't.

Alex Epstein
@AlexEpstein
Nov 30
"Climate reparations" are immoral

1. They punish the free world for fossil fuel use that has made the whole world better, including safer from climate.

2. They punish poor people by taking away their freedom to use the fossil fuels they need to flourish.

https://twitter.com/CatchUpNetwork/status/1598106691496972288

@CatchUpNetwork
Angry French man throws climate protesters around like rag dolls. Is he Obelix?

That guy deserves the Légion d'honneur from France.

It's fucking cold even in the greater yay area right now. We have regular frost in wine country.and it rained a fuckton, may check out tahoe soon if I can find a few days of free time, skiing should be.epic with that yuge snowfall in the sierras. The sheisters of global warming got dumped on again by weather inc.

Patrick says

Politifact mostly agrees.
Fact check: mostly true. 😂

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/mar/02/facebook-posts/fact-checking-claims-al-gore-said-all-arctic-ice-w/

How many millions have been killed by the WET BULB this year?

https://financialpost.com/opinion/bjorn-lomborg-suppressing-good-news-is-scaring-our-kids-witless

Not long ago, environmentalists constantly used pictures of polar bears to highlight the dangers of climate change. Polar bears even featured in Al Gore’s terrifying movie An Inconvenient Truth. But the reality is that polar bear numbers have been increasing — from somewhere between five and 10,000 polar bears in the 1960s up to around 26,000 today. We don’t hear this news, however. Instead, campaigners just quietly stopped using polar bears in their activism.

2021 was world’s 6th-warmest year on record!
https://www.noaa.gov/news/2021-was-worlds-6th-warmest-year-on-record

Anecdotally, it's fucking cold today.

https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/more-states-take-emergency-measures-historic-winter-storm-puts-240-million-americans-under

Manbearpig! Manbearpig!

Global warming is vicious this winter.

https://twitter.com/backtolife_2023/status/1605698874986729472?ref_src=patrick.net

Wittgenstein
@backtolife_2023
German health minister prepares public for climate lockdowns using covid as a model.....

https://www.climatedepot.com/2019/03/05/study-polar-bear-numbers-reach-new-highs-population-increases-to-the-highest-levels-in-decades/

Polar Bear numbers reach new highs – Population increases to the highest levels in decades
Far from the 2007 predictions of a 67% decline in global polar bear numbers, the new report reveals that numbers have risen to the highest levels in decades.

The US Geological Survey estimated the global population of polar bears at 24,500 in 2005. In 2015, the IUCN Polar Bear Specialist Group estimated the population at 26,000 (range 22,000–31,000)7 but additional surveys published 2015–2017 brought the total to near 28,500. However, data published in 2018 brought that number to almost 29,5009 with a relatively wide margin of error. This is the highest global estimate since the bears were protected by international treaty in 1973.