patrick.net

https://barsoom.substack.com/p/the-war-on-life

What I’m interested in here is, why global warming, precisely? Why is the parasite class so obsessed with pushing this specific narrative?

The bluepill answer is that it’s a real threat, and our leadership class are trying to save civilization from itself. Like I said, I’m gonna pass by that without comment.

The more cynical, and more correct, answer is that the narrative is exceedingly useful to their project of establishing a global technocratic governance system. Because the Climate Emergency is a global emergency, forestalling it demands global coordination. Further, the Climate Emergency is that best of emergencies, the permanent emergency – therefore it requires permanent global coordination. ...

Even that answer, however, only provides a partial explanation for why the parasite class has settled upon global warming via carbon emissions, specifically, as supposed to some other hypothetical global crisis.

Think about it: the exact nature of the climatological threat is really quite arbitrary. They could have settled on global cooling, instead, with the deadly threat of a new Ice Age providing the invisible enemy with which to frighten humanity into surrendering our freedom. In the 1970s they were already running with that narrative; it wasn’t until the 80s that the switch happened. Global cooling has a lot to recommend it, too. We know that we’re in an interglacial, and moreover we know that we’re near the end of the current interglacial – historically they last about 10,000 years, after which the icecaps race forward to swallow the land masses for the next hundred thousand. With only a small amount of imagination, a human role in this could be elaborated. For instance, air pollution increasing the albedo of the planet, and reflecting too much sunlight back into space, could be posited as a contributing factor – right there is your excuse to limit jet travel and restrict industry. ...

zzyzzx says

was actually pretty good and single handedly delayed the Californication of Maryland by 8 years.

A fate worse than having IHLlary sit on your face.

Booger says

savage!

Greta

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/greenpeace-co-founder-patrick-moore-says-climate-change-based-false-narratives

Patrick Moore, one of the founders of Greenpeace, said in an email obtained by The Epoch Times that his reasons for leaving Greenpeace were very clear: “Greenpeace was ‘hijacked’ by the political left when they realized there was money and power in the environmental movement. [Left-leaning] political activists in North America and Europe changed Greenpeace from a science-based organization to a political fundraising organization,” Moore said.

Moore left Greenpeace in 1986, 15 years after he co-founded the organization.

“The ‘environmental’ movement has become more of a political movement than an environmental movement,” he said. “They are primarily focused on creating narratives, stories, that are designed to instill fear and guilt into the public so the public will send them money.”

He said they mainly operate behind closed doors with other political operatives at the U.N., World Economic Forum, and so on, all of which are primarily political in nature. ...

Moore provided a graph of temperature continuously measured over 350 years (from 1659 to 2009) in central England. “If carbon dioxide was the main cause of warming, then there should be a rise in temperature along the carbon dioxide curve, but it doesn’t,” he explained.

Moore described the demonization of CO2 as “completely ridiculous.” He added that CO2 is the basis of all life on Earth and its concentration in the atmosphere today, even with the increase, is lower than it has been for a large majority of life’s existence.

A study in 2013 found that increased levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) have helped boost green foliage across the world’s arid regions over the past 30 years. ...

He said the great irony of the present panic about the climate is that the Earth is colder today than it was for 250 million years before the Pleistocene Ice Age set in. And CO2 is lower now than in more than 95 percent of Earth’s history.

“But you would never know this if you listen to all the people who benefit from the lie that the Earth will soon be too hot for life and that CO2 will become higher than in Earth’s history,” Moore said.

According to Moore, nearly all commercial greenhouse farmers worldwide buy CO2 to inject into their greenhouses to realize up to 60 percent higher crop yields.

Patrick says

CLIMATE IS NOT WEATHER!!!!! IT'S DIFFERENT!!!!

Patrick says

The problem is: nobody born after 1980 remembers anything about the previous fad.

https://slaynews.com/news/bill-gates-travels-conference-helicopter-suv-lecture-public-climate-change/

Bill Gates Travels to Conference in Helicopter & SUV to Lecture Public on ‘Climate Change’

Not sure the jets cost a billion dollars, but the point still holds. Billionaires were expending vast amounts of carbon to tell you to reduce yours.

https://slaynews.com/news/climate-emergency-hoax-international-study-finds/

‘Climate Emergency’ Is a Hoax, International Study Finds

The results of the study were reported by Sky News Australia.

“While every fear-mongering greenie is saying we’ve never seen flooding like we have in recent years… the report found the opposite,” Sky News host Chris Smith reported.

Smith explains that the politically correct conversations in recent years have stated, without basis, that “whatever disaster” is happening, “we’ve never seen anything like this before.”

It’s always “unprecedented,” he said.

However, the research concluded that there’s “no evidence of a climate emergency in the record to date. No evidence,” he said.

The Oresund bridge and tunnel between Denmark and Sweden was started in 1995 and finished in 2000. Clearly it's not going to work if sea levels rise, so why did they build it anyway? Answer: because they know that sea levels are not rising.

Patrick says

The Oresund bridge and tunnel between Denmark and Sweden was started in 1995 and finished in 2000. Clearly it's not going to work if sea levels rise, so why did they build it anyway? Answer: because they know that sea levels are not rising.

Nooo! They didn't know the seas were rising because Greta hasn't been born yet!!!

https://notthebee.com/article/a-group-of-italian-scientists-says-a-critical-assessment-of-extreme-weather-events-suggests-a-climate-crisis-is-not-evident-yet

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/storms-are-not-intensifying-media?publication_id=323914&post_id=75800736&isFreemail=true

storms are not intensifying, media is

"A Category 5 false flag media lie has just hit the coast of Florida."

https://helenaglass.net/2022/10/18/ancient-civilizations-that-disappeared/

ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS that Disappeared Because of Climate Change

It's just how the world has always worked.

https://notthebee.com/article/climate-change-hysteria-has-gotten-so-bad-that-even-climate-scientists-are-warning-other-climate-scientists-to-stop-with-the-doom-mongering

https://slaynews.com/news/global-warming-data-exaggerated-50-percent-years-new-evidence/

‘Global Warming’ Data Exaggerated 50% Over Last 50 Years, New Evidence Shows ...

The new groundbreaking research, compiled by two atmospheric scientists at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, Dr. Roy Spencer and Professor John Christy, shows 50% less warming over 50 years across the eastern United States than official data claims.

The new evidence deals a major blow to the widespread use of regularly adjusted global and local surface temperature datasets showing increasingly implausible rates of warming.

The research attempts to remove distortions caused by increasing urban heat and uses human-made structure density data over 50 years supplied by the Landsat satellites.

It compares the official National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) homogenized surface temperature dataset and exposes a 50% reduction in the warming trend.

10 years ago today.

Might be true.

https://notthebee.com/article/elites-flew-to-a-climate-summit-in-egypt-in-four-hundred-private-jets-you-know-because-the-world-is-literally-on-fire

Elites flew to a climate summit in Egypt in FOUR HUNDRED private jets, you know, because the world is literally on fire

Patrick says

10 years ago today.

Might be true.

Might?

I'm not sure where the concept of global warming first came from.

HeadSet says

richwicks says

There is no market for a supersonic airline.

Apparently, there is, since two major airlines have already placed orders. We will see if the airlines are able to fill the seats.

I'd agree. I do think there is demand for a small segment of wealthy business and leisure travelers. Not a fan of Europe, but would like to see Greece or Spain. No interest in sitting in a tube for that long though for something that isn't necessarily on my bucket list. I'd rather grunt out the 18-20 hours, take a copious amount of edibles before the flight and to go to Southeast Asia/Pacific. Also New Zealand is on the list.

But if I could get to Greece in 4 hours, now we're talking. Only other way I'd go to Europe is a trans Atlantic relocation cruise for the ship to hit the Mediterranean.

https://slaynews.com/news/climate-scientists-dont-believe-climate-change-narrative/

A whopping 41 percent of climate scientists say they don’t believe the official “climate change” narrative that’s promoted by politicians and the corporate media, a new report has revealed.

The media and political elite are constantly demanding that the public complies with their green agenda by arguing that the “science is settled” on global warming.

The official narrative insists that there is a nearly 99% “consensus” among scientists that the human race is causing a catastrophic “climate emergency” through carbon emissions.

However, a bombshell new survey reveals that 41% of climate scientists dispute these claims.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/11/here_is_a_story_that_most_people_wont_see_because_it_doesnt_push_the_radical_left_agenda_wildfires_are_down_85_this_year.html

Here is a story that most people won't see because it doesn't push the radical left agenda. Wildfires are down 85% this year