patrick.net

OK, call me paranoid.

I think Trump knew that the military wanted to test out its toxxine on the general public, as a preparation for biological warfare. Trump knew about the toxxine before the virus existed.

Then the virus escaped or was released, and the military was delighted to have their excuse to demand that everyone submit to the injection.

Patrick says

OK, call me paranoid.

I think Trump knew that the military wanted to test out its toxxine on the general public, as a preparation for biological warfare. Trump knew about the toxxine before the virus existed.

Then the virus escaped or was released, and the military was delighted to have their excuse to demand that everyone submit to the injection.

It doesn't make sense to me. What is the purpose of testing on such a HUGE group anyhow?

I think this was more of a psychological test. I learned a lot from it anyhow.

Trump is a germophobe and very likely that is why he acted the way he did. Plus he was notoriously bad in choosing advisors.

richwicks says

What is the purpose of testing on such a HUGE group anyhow?

I think the DoD wanted to see if they could handle the logistics of a virus which spreads rapidly to everyone.

Bd6r says

Trump is a germophobe and very likely that is why he acted the way he did. Plus he was notoriously bad in choosing advisors.

I think Trump knew about the vaxx, which already existed, and the intention to develop a virus to go along with it, but being given bad advice by Fauci, Birx, et al, went along with it.

Trump's germophobia may have convinced him that it was best for the country to try out the vaxx on everyone.

And you know, this might be why they have such a hard time convicting Trump of anything. Trump could tell the truth about it all.

OTOH, this gives the DOD a huge motive to bump off Trump, which hasn't happened yet.

I could be wrong about everything, but I don't think so. I think I'm probably wrong about some details.

These people have some interesting takes:

https://brownstone.org/author/debbie-lerman/

https://brownstone.org/author/will-jones/

I think they'd agree that it was a DOD operation.

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/fkg3wx/dr_deborah_lbirx_the_dod_traveling_avon/

Dr Deborah L.Birx, the DoD traveling Avon Salesperson
Serving under the Department of Defense (DoD) as a military-trained clinician in immunology...

Birx was placed by the DoD to "manage" the toxxine experiment on the public.

https://www.fox29.com/news/dr-anthony-fauci-and-dr-deborah-birx-a-look-at-2-of-the-leaders-of-the-us-covid-19-response

Like Fauci, who Birx regards as her mentor, Birx is well-regarded in the medical community for her work in understanding, treating and preventing infectious diseases, as well as her contributions to addressing the HIV/AIDS epidemic. The Penn State medicine grad started her career at the Department of Defense (DOD). Birx rose through the military medical ranks, known for keen leadership and management skills.

When they started suppressing drugs that work, like HCQ and ivermectin, and demonizing people who came up with effective treatments, it was clear that they were paving the way for a "vaccine" and not going to allow anything to get in the way of that. Also note that the lockdowns were always "until there's a vaccine". Why not "until there's a vaccine or a treatment?" Everything was done with the aim of getting people jabbed in massive numbers. Lockdowns were a strong punishment to push people in the direction the DoD wanted them to go.

The FDA issued the EUA for the "vaccine" before the clinical trial, which is way too early - the FDA knew that the public safety wasn't going to get in the way of a DoD program. They were just following orders.

The whole thing - virus, lockdowns, the rapid development and rollout of the "vaccine" were all part of one thing. The thing was all run by a part of the bio-defense part of the DoD. It was all just a drill to test their bioweapon response program, a program with two parts: lockdowns and rapid vaccine development + rollout. The virus was created by Fauci in Wuhan to be just scary enough to get most people to submit, but not really dangerous to most people.

Sadly the "vaccine" turned out to be deadly - much worse than the virus. Oh well. What can you do? The DoD is a law unto itself, and doesn't have to answer any questions, because, you know, "national security". It's a lot like the FBI never answering any questions because "ongoing investigation".

Patrick says

https://www.fox29.com/news/dr-anthony-fauci-and-dr-deborah-birx-a-look-at-2-of-the-leaders-of-the-us-covid-19-response

Like Fauci, who Birx regards as her mentor, Birx is well-regarded in the medical community for her work in understanding, treating and preventing infectious diseases, as well as her contributions to addressing the HIV/AIDS epidemic. The Penn State medicine grad started her career at the Department of Defense (DOD). Birx rose through the military medical ranks, known for keen leadership and management skills.

I doubt this. These people seem the furthest thing from being competent in the medical field. What they are good at is being dishonest and following orders. Results or their stated job is irrelevant.

When you see actually competent and knowledgeable people discuss Birx and Fauci, often they are in a near state of disbelief these people have risen through the ranks. They're dumb enough to follow orders, but not smart enough to care what the consequences of following them are.

I agree. "Military intelligence" is a contradiction. It's the mixture of incompetence and power which is causing mass death by vaxx right now.

I'm just pointing out that Birx used to work for the DoD, and still does imho.

They've marched the country and indeed the world through the equivalent of the radioactive cloud in Nevada.

The DOD was never above experimenting on the US population. When nuclear weapons were new, bright, and shiny, they conducted covert radiological tests on urban populations and overt tests on servicemen. This doesn't include the clusterfucks of the Castle Bravo test shot and fallout from Area 51 above-ground tests.

Now the new, bright and shiny thing is recombinant biological warfare, and sure enough, mass experiments on populations and coerced experimentation on the troops is once again up and running.

Yep like Patrick said, my first clue that the upcoming “vaccine” was sketchy was their suppression of Covid treatments outside of a few (Remdesivir and ventilators) that would definitely kill the patient. And they suppressed the actual treatments “for safety” which was absolutely laughable on its face to anyone who knew the least bit about biology or medicine. Sadly, this doesn’t include many doctors who blindly followed the “HCQ and Ivermectin are killing people” narrative even though it made no medical sense at all.

Then when I saw the mechanism for the jabs, I thought “they could hide any kind of code in that mRNA at all, and it could become part of your DNA through reverse transcription.” So I was a hard pass on the Covid vax before it was available.

To be fair, wasn’t it the DoD that passed on funding the eco health alliance gain of function research that Faucci ended up funding via NIH?

Now the fact that DoD was involved in the manufacture of the vax and the coercion of people to take it doesn’t surprise me. I’m just saying they didn’t create the virus.

The US Army sprayed flu droplets in the subway in the 1960s, didn't they (going from memory here).

pudil says

To be fair, wasn’t it the DoD that passed on funding the eco health alliance gain of function research that Faucci ended up funding via NIH?

Now the fact that DoD was involved in the manufacture of the vax and the coercion of people to take it doesn’t surprise me. I’m just saying they didn’t create the virus.

@pudil Yes, you may be right about that. I kind of remember that the DoD did't want to fund EcoHealth at first.

But now the DoD is definitely funding EcoHealth to make more viruses:

https://www.theblaze.com/news/department-of-defense-ecohealth-alliance-funding

Starting on Dec. 12, 2022, and ending on Dec. 11, 2025, the Department of Defense will give $3 million in funding to EcoHealth Alliance, according to USA Spending – the official source for spending data for the U.S. government.

Seems similar in Britain:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11687675/Army-spied-lockdown-critics-Sceptics-including-Peter-Hitchens-suspected-watched.html

Army spied on lockdown critics: Sceptics, including our own Peter Hitchens, long suspected they were under surveillance. Now we've obtained official records that prove they were right all along

Military operatives were part of an operation that targeted politicians and high-profile journalists who raised doubts about the official pandemic response

A shadowy Army unit secretly spied on British citizens who criticised the Government's Covid lockdown policies, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

Military operatives in the UK's 'information warfare' brigade were part of a sinister operation that targeted politicians and high-profile journalists who raised doubts about the official pandemic response.

They compiled dossiers on public figures such as ex-Minister David Davis, who questioned the modelling behind alarming death toll predictions, as well as journalists such as Peter Hitchens and Toby Young. Their dissenting views were then reported back to No 10.

Documents obtained by the civil liberties group Big Brother Watch, and shared exclusively with this newspaper, exposed the work of Government cells such as the Counter Disinformation Unit, based in the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, and the Rapid Response Unit in the Cabinet Office. ...

The information was then used to orchestrate Government responses to criticisms of policies such as the stay-at-home order, when police were given power to issue fines and break up gatherings.

It also allowed Ministers to push social media platforms to remove posts and promote Government-approved lines. ...

To me, the most astonishing thing about the great Covid panic was how many attacks the state managed to make on basic freedoms without anyone much even caring. This was partly because of the fear the Government had deliberately spread (as SAGE minutes reveal).

So now is the time to demand a full and powerful investigation into the dark material which Big Brother Watch has bravely uncovered – and to stand against the tendency towards censorship and suppression which flourishes like bindweed if it is not ruthlessly cut back.

Government should not manage, control or influence public opinion. Government should respect, acknowledge and respond to The will of the people.

I like that!

Added to my platform.

https://patrick.net/post/1347927/2022-10-22-patrick-s-platform

I think that the "U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command" (USAMRDC) may be the guys ultimately responsible for the pandemic and the dangerous and ineffective vaxx.

https://mrdc.health.mil/index.cfm/about/mission_vision



Got this tip from:

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/us-army-medical-research-and-development

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/american-domestic-bioterrorism-program

Congress and US Presidents legalized and funded the overthrow of the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. government and the American people, through a massive domestic bioterrorism program relabeled as a public health program, conducted by the HHS Secretary and Secretary of Defense on behalf of the World Health Organization and its financial backers.

https://www.gao.gov/assets/720/718566.pdf



Why the fuck was the DoD involved at all? I say it's because the whole scamdemic and death jab mandate was their work all along.

Patrick says

https://www.gao.gov/assets/720/718566.pdf



Why the fuck was the DoD involved at all? I say it's because the whole scamdemic and death jab mandate was their work all along.

I say you are right. Do you think they or other deep state like Fauci told Trump the whole story?

Hard to know how much they told Trump.

https://brownstone.org/articles/biontech-pfizer-vax-timeline/

a BioNTech study report released in response to an FOIA request shows that the company had already in fact begun preclinical (animal) testing on January 14.

This is already astonishing enough, since January 14, 2020 was only 2 weeks after the first report of Covid-19 cases in Wuhan. On that very day, moreover, the WHO was saying that there was no “clear evidence” of human-to-human transmission. (See WHO tweet here.) Why in the world would BioNTech begin work on a Covid-19 vaccine without clear evidence of human-to-human transmission?

At this point, Pfizer was not part of BioNTech’s C-19 vaccine project. As narrated in The Vaccine, the small German company, which had never had any product on the market, only succeeded in recruiting the American multinational as partner three months later (p. 156).

So, we know that BioNTech began preclinical testing on January 14. But, of course, this means that the project as such must have been launched even earlier. The formulation being tested had to be produced first. In this case, that meant first manufacturing the mRNA and then formulating it in lipid nanoparticles. ...

There is no avoiding the conclusion that BioNTech’s Covid-19 vaccine project must in fact have started before any Covid-19 cases had even been reported! The obvious question is: How is this possible?

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/do-governments-track-the-injury-and

My guess is that the response from the agencies will be that they do not track data on bioweapon deployment because those are prohibited by international laws, and the US Government would never do such a thing as to lie to the public about biochemical weapons, “pandemic” and “vaccines”, you silly conspiracists!

However, some governments appear to maintain excellent data tracking “the kill”. Here is an example sent to me by a colleague form Australia, of an online database with beautiful graphing tools (this is for New South Wales). NSW includes Sydney, it’s population is ~8 million (of Australia’s total of about 25M) and was founded by the British as a penal colony. Perhaps that last factoid is why they are so unabashedly clear in reporting the results of their mass injury/murder campaign? Or maybe they simply have good database skills available.

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/draft-freedom-of-information-act

Prepared for a FOIA coordination call today:

Signed, dated copies of reports to Congress, prepared and submitted by DOD and HHS, under 50 USC 1512, 50 USC 1513, 50 USC 1518, 50 USC 1523, and 50 USC 1528, and/or any other applicable Congressional notice and/or reporting law, quantifying the mortality and morbidity data collected from any and all government databases (VAERS, V-Safe, VA, DMED, etc), contract manufacturer and subcontractor databases (ATI, Pfizer, Moderna, Ventavia, ICON, etc.), and private health insurance databases (Kaiser, Blue Cross, etc.), assessing the effectiveness of the mRNA/LNP class of bioweapons for incapacitating, sterilizing and killing adults and children, from the start of the events known as “Covid-19 vaccine clinical trials” in Spring 2020 to the present.

DOD and HHS will likely reject these requests on national security grounds, because it’s a military campaign, so data about military weapons and their demonstrated effectiveness is probably classified as non-available outside of a very small Congressional oversight committee, assuming there’s even a small group of Congress members kept in the loop. Which there may not be.

I didn't watch all this, but it's Sasha Latypova documenting DoD involvement in the scamdemic.


original link

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/toxic-by-design-researcher-explains-why-us-defense-depts-covid-vax-operation-shows-intent-to-harm/

‘Toxic by design’: Researcher explains why US defense dept’s COVID vax operation shows intent to harm

... Latypova worked more than 25 years in the pharmaceutical industry specializing in research and development, including data analysis, clinical trials, and technologies, while also co-founding multiple research organizations before retiring at a relatively young age. ...

As Latypova has explained, the DoD managed to classify these “vaccines,” not as medicines or pharmaceuticals but as “COVID countermeasures” under the authority of the military, which means they are not required to comply with U.S. law governing the manufacturing quality, testing, effectiveness, safety, and labeling of medical products.

Yet while such laws did not apply to these “COVID-19 vaccines,” the government advanced an orchestrated public relations façade that standard testing, monitoring and approval processes were being strictly observed by the CDC and FDA, even as many thousands of injuries and deaths had been steadily documented and independent medical experts and media sounded alarms only to be canceled my legacy and social media corporations.

In an early December video lecture, the former pharma executive laid out evidence for how the DoD, HHS, and other U.S. government agencies, along with other governments and pharmaceutical companies, were involved in “a conspiracy to commit mass murder through bioterrorism and informational warfare operations worldwide.”

“The evidence is overwhelming that there is an intent to harm people by the COVID 19 injections, so-called ‘vaccines,’ and other nonsensical COVID response measures implemented in lockstep by governments all over the world,” she explained.

Refusal to intervene despite high injury rates ‘points to an intentional act’ to inflict harm
First, such intent is indicated by the fact that “these injections are toxic by design,” Latypova said. “We know this. There has been an extensive body of literature, studies, scientific discussions, [and] evidence published on this matter.”

“There are numerous mechanisms of injury built into the COVID 19 injections. The most important one being that these shots are designed to make your cells attack themselves, make your cells express antigens that are toxic spike proteins, and then create antibodies to attack the cells. So, it trains your body to destroy itself,” she explained.

Therefore, “there is definitely no safety in these shots,” the analyst said, referring to the well-known death and injury reports from VAERS and other data sources that show “millions of reports of injury, deaths, [and] permanent disabilities,” including these harms being inflicted on many children and young people.

In an earlier presentation to the Corona Investigative Committee (CIC), Latypova called these reports “absolutely alarming,” emphasizing that the safety signals were “obvious from the start.” And the fact that “no health authority ever noticed it” or intervened “points to an intentional act” to inflict harm.

She also highlighted one incident on January 18, 2021 when California health officials “paused” the use of one large lot of the injections from Moderna due to its “higher-than-usual number of possible allergic reactions.” However, just three days later, health authorities said it was “safe to resume” the use of the lot and these products continued to be injected in thousands of people across the U.S.

This batch of biological agents went on to generate “about 1,000 serious adverse events and close to 60 deaths,” Latypova explained. And thus, “all of those [deaths and injuries] should be deemed intentional because the authorities did flag it. They did find that it was generating abnormal adverse events, yet nobody did anything to stop it and they continued pushing it into people.” ...

In addition, “there is no efficacy in these shots,” Latypova explained in December. “In fact, we know there is negative efficacy, meaning that these shots make you more likely to get sick and die.” ...

“There is obviously malignant policy from the government. We know that they’re lying. We know that they’re covering up. They’re gaslighting the families of those killed and injured by these shots,” Latypova summarized. And thus, this demonstrates a “very clear intent to harm through all these actions. And at this point, everything should be deemed intentional. All of the injury and death toll, should be deemed completely intentional.”

“We found that these products are dirty, contaminated, do not conform at all to what the label says. And they’re hugely toxic by design,” she said.

“They should all be stopped immediately, and this should be investigated properly. And we should bring those responsible to justice, to accountability. Until that happens, we cannot move on from this,” Latypova said. “We have to focus on this more and focus especially on prosecution and bringing those responsible to justice.”

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/my-talk-from-lakaruppropet-conference

https://rumble.com/v288sjf-covid-19-countermeasures-evidence-for-an-intent-to-harm-full.html


original link

https://palexander.substack.com/p/covid-vaccine-mandates-and-how-we

Historically, vaccination laws in the U.S. are passed and monitored at the state level, not mandated or enforced at the federal level. While the groundwork to change all that actually began in the 1940s, on January 28, 2003, during President George W. Bush’s State of the Union address, the creation of Project BioShield was revealed. This new legislation was a comprehensive effort to develop and make available “modern, effective drugs and vaccines to protect against possible attacks by biological and chemical weapons.” The initial stage of the program was estimated to cost $5.6 billion over ten years.

Project BioShield established three major components:

1. The creation of a permanent, ‘indefinite funding authority’ to spur the development of medical countermeasures that enabled the government to purchase vaccines and other therapies as soon as experts believed that they could pass the mantra ‘safe and effective.’ Note: The vaccines were not going to be approved for use after extensive study and testing; they could be put to use with a wink, a wet thumb to the air, and a nod that they were good to go.

2. Grant new authority to the NIH [think NIAID - Fauci] to speed research and development of drugs and vaccines to counter bioterrorism threats and,

3. Develop ‘fast track’ provisions such as the declaration of emergency use authorizations [EUA] for the release of treatments, drugs, and vaccines that were still under FDA consideration. [REF: Office of the Press Secretary. “President Details Project BioShield,” The White House, 3 February 2003.} ...

As sweeping as the provisions were at the time, the legislation failed to include the key provisions sought by the drug companies—complete liability protection for all bioterrorism products.

Throughout 2003, 2004, and 2005, many bills were introduced by both the House and the Senate; in fact, 13 bills were introduced in 2005 alone to achieve this desired goal. But it wasn’t until October 17, 2005, when The Biodefense and Pandemic Vaccine and Drug Development Act of 2005 (known as BioShield II) was put on the front burner to ‘make good’ on the promise of protection to drug makers. ...

This legislation was designed to give unprecedented advantages to the industry and would remove or severely weaken all safeguards that had long been in place to prevent dangerous or unapproved vaccines, drugs, and medical devices from reaching consumers. The bill also introduced the creation of a new agency within HHS, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Agency (BARDA), which would be given the responsibility for handling the $5.6B initiative.

BARDA was officially created in 2006 as part of the Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness Act (PAHPA). To this day, BARDA manages and funds the research, development, and stockpiling of vaccines and treatments that the government could use during public health emergencies such as chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear (CBRN) attacks. For FY2023, BARDA’s budget is $7.345B, a 13% increase over FY2022.

Public outrage against BioShield II began almost immediately. Patriot websites, conservative news outlets, and nationwide talk radio hosts began to decry the unbelievable benefits that the passage of S. 1873 would convey to drug companies. Dozens of activist groups representing thousands of constituents rallied and mounted campaigns to notify Congress of their dissatisfaction with the bill. Faxes, emails, and phone calls to congressional offices conveyed message after angry message, opposing the carte blanche promises about to be handed to the drug makers. Because the outcry against S.1873 was so strong, the possibility of its passage appeared to be difficult at best, impossible at worst.

Successful Sneak Attack; Americans Lose, Forever

To circumvent the public outrage, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist contrived the idea to attach a shortened version of the bill to the 2006 Department of Defense Appropriations Bill. It was literally railroaded through at the eleventh hour, giving sweeping, unprecedented immunity to drug companies.

Called Division E, ‘The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act,’ - or PREP Act for short - Senator Frist added the 40-page addendum to an existing 423-page Defense bill at 11:20 pm on Saturday night, December 17, 2005, well after the House Appropriation Committee members had reached final agreement on the defense bill, had signed off, and most had headed home for the holidays.

Appalled, Representative Dave Obey (D-WI), Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Committee, made the following statement on the floor of the House on December 22, 2005: [NOTE: As far as I can tell, Obey’s response (below) has been completely scrubbed from the Internet]

“When the President requested $7 billion to begin a much-belated crash program to develop a new generation of vaccines and antiviral drugs to combat a potential flu pandemic, the Republican Majority responded by cutting [that request] in half. When I asked Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) in Conference why we shouldn’t fund the rest of the Administration’s request . . . he responded that because liability protection language for manufacturers had not been adopted, long-range funding should be withheld.

“The Conference Committee [on the Defense Appropriations Bill] ended its work with an understanding, both verbal and in writing, that there would be no—I repeat no—legislative liability protection language inserted in this bill. And because the Majority told us it did not want any compensation program for victims to come out of the discretionary portion of the budget, no funding was provided for that either.

“But after the [Committee] finished at 6 p.m., Senator Frist marched over to the House side of the Capitol, about four hours later, and insisted 40 pages of legislation—which I have in my hand— 40 pages of legislation that had never been seen by Conferees be attached to the bill.

“Speaker [Dennis Hastert R-IL] joined Frist’s insistence, and without a vote of the Conferees, the legislation was unilaterally and arrogantly inserted into the bill, after the Conference was over. [This was] a blatantly abusive power play by two of the most powerful men in Congress.

“We then discovered that this language provided all sorts of insulation for pharmaceutical companies and that this insulation applied not just to drugs developed to deal with the [bird] flu, but in fact applied to a far broader range of products.”

After itemizing the problems associated with the “Division E” language, Representative Obey went on to say:

“Mr. Speaker, the Committee system was created years ago to protect the public interest, so legislation would be carefully reviewed before it was placed before the body for consideration. But that protection was arbitrarily bypassed by the Leadership in both Houses.

“This is the second time that this Congress has supinely done the bidding of the pharmaceutical industry in the dead of night. The first time, a vote was held open for three hours while the Republican Majority twisted arms to create the complex and ridiculously confusing prescription drug bill that our seniors are now so desperately trying to understand—a bill that was ushered through this institution by over 600 lobbyists and that protected [drug] companies by preventing the government from even attempting to negotiate lower drug prices.

“If I thought that denying unanimous consent on this bill would force the Majority to eliminate that language I would object. But, Mr. Speaker, it has also been made quite clear to me that the Majority will not relent on the language that insulates drug companies. [Emphasis added.]

“So Mr. Speaker, I want it to be clear that the action to insert this special interest language in the bill is, in my view, a corruption of the legislative practices of the House. When Congress returns in January, I intend to raise a question about the privileges of the House, highlighted by this action, because it has brought discredit to the House and should disturb every Member who serves here. [Note: An objection was never raised…]

“No Member of Congress, no matter how powerful, should be able to unilaterally insist that provisions that were never discussed and never debated in the Conference. [It] should not be slipped into that Conference report without a vote of that same Conference.

“This is what happens when there are no checks and balances, when one party controls the White House, the Senate, and the House and respects no limits on its own use of power. We have been placed in this position because the House Republican Leadership has sent Members home for the Christmas holidays with the message to the Senate that we would not be here [to review the changes]. That was irresponsible and the country will pay the price. This institution will pay a price as well, in terms of diminished respect from the people we were elected to represent. Members on both sides know it and it is time to have a modicum of respect for the way we do the people’s business.

“This is a shameful and shabby way to end the worst session of Congress I’ve experienced in 36 years in Congress. I most reluctantly withdraw my reservation because lodging an objection at this point would simply delay the shameful inevitable.”

The nefarious language that Congressman Obey was objecting to in the “Division E” addendum deserved every bit of his tirade. Even Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) commented,

“Generally around here we measure who the winners and losers are, and we have seen over the period of the last year, year and a half, how the drug companies come out [winners] time and time again, but never, never, ever, ever like they have with this sweetheart deal.”

Senator Frist handed the drug companies more immunity than any bill ever passed by Congress. He has been awarded well for his performance...

What They Won

In case you missed the link above, you can read Division E here.

The PREP Act provided at least four sweeping provisions:

Immunity from liability for ALL drugs, vaccines, and biological products deemed as a “covered countermeasure” in the event of an outbreak of any kind. The proposal is not limited to only new drugs or vaccines developed under the umbrella of “bioterrorism” or “pandemic” protection. The proposal is so broad that it could include drugs like Tylenol, Advil . . . and would have applied to Vioxx, an anti-inflammatory drug that lead to an estimated 88,000 heart attacks in Americans alone, with 38,000 deaths before it was pulled from the market in 2007.

Immunity for Any and ALL products used for any public health emergency declared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). As explained below, the authority to declare an emergency now rests completely in the hands of the Secretary of HHS—an appointed, often non-medical person who has no accountability to the general public. The president’s person, hand-picked to be part of his inner circle, will have the power to mandate vaccines and other medications be given to the American people. In the event of a declared medical emergency, the Secretary of HHS is the most powerful person in America.

Who is that person today?

The current head of HHS is Xavier Beccera. Going into a pandemic, did he have decades of medical or even public health experience? Not at all. ...

Immunity from accountability, no matter what a drug company did wrong. Even if the company’s dirty facility created a batch of contaminated vaccines that resulted in death or injury to thousands of people, the drug company will not be held accountable.

Immunity from lawsuits. A person who suffers any type of loss will be legally prohibited from suing the drug companies; they now had immunity from almost everything, perhaps even murder. The bill’s provisions provided a mechanism for filing a lawsuit, but the language explicitly protects against frivolous suits by setting a standard for liability, so high that lawsuits would essentially be impossible.

Even the American Trial Lawyers Association stated the bill contained language never before seen in any proposal. In simple terms, if a claim is filed by an injured party, it can only go forward if the injured party can prove that the manufacturer, hospital, or medical professional performed an act of willful misconduct that resulted in injury or death. In other words, the injured party would have to prove the drug company or the doctor/nurse had administered the product with the intent to cause harm.

Unbelievably, even then, the defendant would be immune from accountability UNLESS the plaintiff could convince the U.S. Attorney General (AG) that the person or the drug manufacturer had intentionally harmed them AND, being convinced, the AG takes action against the drug company.

This means the U.S. government would have to go to bat for the plaintiff against the drug company for the lawsuit to move forward…..

Keep in mind that the person who rammed this bill through - Senator Bill Frist - was a medical doctor who at one time in his life took an oath to “do no harm.”

Medical Countermeasures

At about the same time that BARDA was created and massive expansion within the government for bioterrorism events, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR) was greatly expanded within the Public Health Service. The agency has various roles and responsibilities dating back to at least 1955.

In 2002, ASPR was promoted to be an independent office, headed by an Assistant Secretary of HHS. In 2006, it was expanded and renamed the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. In July 2022, the scope of duties was again expanded and renamed the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response. ASPR has a $40 billion budget and today is managed by Dawn Myers O'Connell, an attorney who worked as a health advisor within the Obama Administration.

Ever heard of her? She’s one of the most important and powerful unelected persons in our government.

In 2017, O'Connell joined the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), where she served as director of its U.S. office. As the director, she was responsible for managing CEPI's U.S. and North American interests. CEPI was formally launched in 2017 at Davos, Switzerland by the World Economic Forum with initial funding of US$460 million from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, The Welcome Trust, and several governments. In January 2022, an additional $300M was pledged by The Wellcome Trust and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to help CEPI fast-track vaccines within 100 days - or less.

BARDA works directly with the Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise (PHEMCE). Housed within HHS, decisions are made by the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Dr. Robert Kadlec, another unelected official who is one of the most powerful people in all of government. PHEMCE decides what countermeasures are needed and then BARDA procures the funds through public-private partnerships. ...

Since that time…

That was a recap from 2005.

The concept of mandatory vaccination has only recently gone from a worrisome possibility to a reality. ...

And, 20 years later, here we are.

If we look back and connect the dots, we see that Project BioShield, the PREP Act, the creation of BARDA, ASPR, PHEMCE, and most recently CEPI, have all been part of the long-term plan that the WEF, UN, WHO, BIS, and our own government put together for the current global takedown, including the decimation of America: One Nation, under God, with Liberty and Justice for all.’ ...

From an email list I'm on:

The planedmic was it now appears a biodefense drill that was a trial run for responding to a biological attack.

wired magazine, 1996
Wake-up call! Some of the world's farthest-out, cutting-edge, and high-technodazzle biotech thinking is now being done not by scientists and academics, but by the military.
And then, suddenly, I could see the whole picture: the conference, titled Biotechnology Workshop 2020, would focus on battles to be fought in the future. These battles would not be limited to the hand grenades, assault rifles, and land mines of the 20th century - they would feature entirely new categories of weapons, munitions based on the biotech advances that would occur in the interim. The army, I concluded, was looking to produce fleets of attack microbes - maybe even a race of supersoldiers - by tinkering with DNA, the molecular basis of all life. And they wanted my far-seeing, penetrating, and all-knowing advice and counsel.
https://www.wired.com/1996/11/es-biowar/

The 2006 Origins of the Lockdown Idea

https://www.aier.org/article/the-2006-origins-of-the-lockdown-idea/

It required the key proponents — Dr. Mecher, a Department of Veterans Affairs physician, and Dr. Hatchett, an oncologist turned White House adviser — to overcome intense initial opposition. It brought their work together with that of a Defense Department team assigned to a similar task.

Was the Pandemic Orchestrated as a Trial Run for Responding to a Biological Attack?

https://brownstone.org/articles/was-the-pandemic-orchestrated/

US Plans to Lockdown and Wait for a Vaccine Date from 2007

https://brownstone.org/articles/us-plans-lockdown-vaccine-2007/

The Early Career of Covid Czar Robert Kadlec
biodefense connections of covid czar Kadlec
https://brownstone.org/articles/early-career-covid-czar-robert-kadlec/

A Manhattan Project for the Biomedical Security State

Gates is the promoter, facilitator and profiteer-in-chief of the great vaccine Manhattan Project but he certainly isn’t the originator of it. The call for a biosecurity Manhattan Project dates back to the George W Bush administration. On July 11, 2019, a think tank called the Biodefence Commission held a panel discussion entitled A Manhattan Project for Biodefence: Taking Biological Threats off the Table. The objective was to ‘create a national, public-private research and development undertaking to defend the United States against biological threats.’

https://brownstone.org/articles/manhattan-project-biomedical-security-state-part-1/

Birx hired by DoD
https://brownstone.org/articles/how-did-deborah-birx-get-the-job/

Lockdowns Were Counterterrorism, Not Public Health

The national security pandemic response plans, devised under the rubric of biodefense, are aimed at countering bioterrorism attacks.

https://brownstone.org/articles/lockdowns-counterterrorism-not-public-health/

Government’s National Security Arm Took Charge During the Covid Response

https://brownstone.org/articles/governments-national-security-arm-led-the-covid-response/

The Pandemic Crisis Action Plan – Adapted (PanCAP-A) dated March 13, 2020. In this plan, the National Security Council is designated as solely responsible for Covid response policy. The document states in a footnote that the “Strategic Objectives” of the response plan “were directed by the NSC Resilience DRG PCC on February 24, 2020.” ... Could this be because they were responding to a potential bioweapon – a genetically engineered virus that they themselves might have been involved in developing?

https://brownstone.org/articles/was-there-a-covid-response-plan-if-so-where-is-it/

Was the Pandemic Orchestrated as a Trial Run for Responding to a Biological Attack?

https://brownstone.org/articles/was-the-pandemic-orchestrated/

US Plans to Lockdown and Wait for a Vaccine Date from 2007

https://brownstone.org/articles/us-plans-lockdown-vaccine-2007/

Patrick says

At this point, Pfizer was not part of BioNTech’s C-19 vaccine project. As narrated in The Vaccine, the small German company, which had never had any product on the market, only succeeded in recruiting the American multinational as partner three months later (p. 156).

Isn't that the company Bill Gates invested $50M in in 2019? And then sold his share for $500M in 2022?

These people are not near as smart as they think they are. Unfortunately they are smart enough to fool most people.

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/april-4-2003-rep-henry-waxman-questioning

Rep. Waxman question to FDA Commissioner McClellan: "...the BioShield proposal would allow the Secretary of Health and Human Services to waive virtually all of the consumer protections in the Federal Food and Drug Cosmetic Act in case of an emergency. Moreover, the proposal would then severely curtail judicial review of the Secretary’s decision...What is the rationale for severely limiting oversight of these extraordinary powers?"

Emerging research is showing that the entire thing was run by the DoD and the outbreak, lockdowns, and vaccines were all parts of the overall plan. Purpose was apparently a drill, to test the biowarfare response capability. There may be more to it than that as we learn more.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-defense-dept-s-covid-vax-operation-pushed-unregulated-shots-deceived-public-researcher/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-defense-dept-secretly-controls-covid-vaccine-production-process-that-cannot-be-traced-researcher/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/toxic-by-design-researcher-explains-why-us-defense-depts-covid-vax-operation-shows-intent-to-harm/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/how-the-us-govt-built-a-shadow-structure-that-enabled-covid-vax-bioterrorism/

Trump didn’t know shit. they were constantly removing people from his inner circle, and replacing cabinet members with cia/fbi hacks who sabotaged the administration from inside.

4th branch will sacrifice america to steal elections, i truly believe they think we are their sheep and they are our masters by the way how they treat us.

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/breaking-moderna-ceo-admits-company

Moderna CEO Admits Company Produced Covid Vaccine BEFORE The Pandemic
In 2019 Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel knew that " there is gonna be a pandemic".

Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel Admits Company Produced 100,000 COVID-19 Vaccine Doses In 2019 Before The Pandemic Started. Stéphane Bancel also admitted that in 2019 he knew that “there is gonna be a pandemic".

https://rumble.com/v28obuy-moderna-ceo-admits-company-produced-vax-before-the-pandemic.html


original link


Moderna strategic alliances: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

https://expose-news.com/2023/02/06/us-dod-is-running-the-vaccine-fraud/

US Department of Defence has been running the “covid vaccine” fraud worldwide

“[Pfizer] did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered.” Sasha Latypova used these words to describe the basis on which Pfizer has requested the dismissal of a False Claims Act case brought against them for their covid “vaccines.”

The US Department of Defence ordered “demonstrations” from pharmaceutical companies using the same secretive framework they use to order weapons. While telling us they were pharmaceutical products, for legal reasons they described them as emergency use authorised “countermeasures.” No pharmaceutical regulation applies to countermeasures.

“They were claiming that they’re producing pharmaceutical products to the good manufacturing standards when they perfectly well knew, I assure you, they were all aware of this. They perfectly well knew that no pharmaceutical regulations apply to these things, countermeasures … They’re just lying to you that these are pharmaceuticals. They’re actually not,” Latypova explained. ...

Below is a slide from the presentation where the organisational structure of Operation Warp Speed was discussed. “The chief operating officer is the Department of Defence. We were told, ‘oh, they’re just doing logistics’. No, they’re not just doing logistics. They’re running the whole thing,” Latypova said.

As proof of this, Latypova cited the case where Pfizer or the FDA was refusing to release clinical trial data in less than 75 years.

“Who was arguing in court on behalf of Pfizer? Pfizer lawyers were not even in the room. It was the Department of Justice. So why is the US government defending presumably a private commercial interest of a pharmaceutical company?

“[In the slide above] you can see that the pharmaceutical companies are a third level down. They are not in charge, but they’re getting tremendous amounts of money to shut up and follow the orders and do as they’re told. [ ] The whole operation is run by the Department of Defence and the US government. I’m not absolving Pharma … of any responsibility. They are criminals in this cartel, and they’re collaborating, and they’re co-conspirators, and should be prosecuted together.” ...

They spent $47 billion on research and development contracts – $33 billion was spent on “vaccines.” All the contracts are publicly available HERE. All of them say the Department of Defence contracted these companies. And they’re managed through Advanced Technologies International, a long-standing contracts manager for the Department of Defence.

They exempt everyone who participates in this, regardless of where they’re working, as long as they’re following the orders, they’re exempt from liability under the Prep Act clause. That same Prep Act clause states that this is a dual-use civil and military application product. How they exempted themselves internationally is by Pfizer forcing countries to sign predatory contract clauses where the national governments had to lift good manufacturing practice requirements or any drug importation requirements and look the other way. Clauses that if, for example, Swedish citizens get injured and sue Pfizer, then the Swedish government has to indemnify Pfizer and put state assets such as military bases, embassies, and other state assets as collateral. “That’s because it’s the US government who wants that base, not the private commercial manufacturer,” Latypova explained.

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/note-for-legal-cases-in-europe-on

Legal structures were created in the European Union echoing the US structures as evidence of the global pre-planned "plandemic" event.