by Patrick ➕follow (59) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 59 - 98 of 191 Next » Last » Search these comments
The research has not yet been vetted for publication in a scientific journal, but outside experts (i.e. nameless sources i.e. the author totally made this shit up) said that the studies were well-done and the results compelling.
Merriam-Webster Declares 'Gaslighting' 2022 Word of the Year
Dramatic spike in usage in response to our current Orwellian administration.
A California Democrat has thrown his support behind calls from the Biden administration to ban gas stoves from American homes by claiming that the appliances are causing “cardiac problems.”
zzyzzx says
If not the vaccines, what is it then? The Easter Bunny?
What do these young people have in common? Young people from
different states, different countries and different continents?
The_Deplorable
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/think-texas-cheaper-tax-burden-161359267.html
Think Texas has a cheaper tax burden than California? Think again.
💉 In my daily research of mysterious, sudden celebrity deaths, I have noticed a new psyop. Lots of pro-jab accounts have suddenly started reporting historical celebrity deaths and cancers in a common template, using the ridiculous “on this day in history” prop.
The effect of these posts is to flood the search zone, to make it look like kinds of deaths are common, happen all the time. Here are just a few examples from this morning’s search:
All of a sudden, for some reason, there are tons of these “on this day” reminder posts. Of course, all they do is highlight how rare celebrity deaths really are. All of them put together don’t even come close to equalling the number of sudden and unexpected celebrity deaths JUST THIS YEAR.
« First « Previous Comments 59 - 98 of 191 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,263,580 comments by 15,098 users - krc, Patrick, stfu online now