I did not, but I agree with it. Trouble me not, and tell me what book it is from. Trouble me and I will find out what book it is from.
When I read that, I heard the rage that was being spit out, and I entirely understand this rage. I am so disgusted.
You and I might fight a bit, but trust me, I'm not an enemy. Know that. My purpose has been, and has always been, the education of the entire planet. I'm not dead yet.
No 6 words EVER spoken in the English language are the same, unless it's a quote. Just have to use the right search engine. That's not Google anymore, it's yandex.
I've read that testicular cancer is more common on whatever side a guy carries his phone on. That's not proof of anything, but it is suspicious.
You'd need to source the study to find out.
I'm dubious. I've worked around high field RF quite a bit. I'll admit it's plausible, but even if it's true, people aren't going to give up their little radios called "cellphones".
We are reducing RF transmission anyhow. Lower power == longer battery life, and also reduced time on the network. I would bet a kid today is exposed to less RF than we were 40 years ago.
I can copy a 2 hour film to my phone through FTP in 2 minutes. I bet I got less RF exposure from that than I did sitting in front a television in 1985 while I copied a VCR tape over 2 hours. Remember when you turned on a computer and it would screw up your television? How about when the microwave was running your TV would get static? That stopped happening in the late 1990s.
We were AWASH in RF radiation as kids and young adults.
« First « Previous Comments 21,420 - 21,459 of 42,077 Next » Last » Search these comments
No reason to think the picture is authentic given current technology..
https://t.me/STFNREPORT/21800
I did not, but I agree with it. Trouble me not, and tell me what book it is from. Trouble me and I will find out what book it is from.
When I read that, I heard the rage that was being spit out, and I entirely understand this rage. I am so disgusted.
You and I might fight a bit, but trust me, I'm not an enemy. Know that. My purpose has been, and has always been, the education of the entire planet. I'm not dead yet.
https://books.google.ru/books?id=BuBeCAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=false
@Ceffer - told you I'd find it.
Everything is online.
No 6 words EVER spoken in the English language are the same, unless it's a quote. Just have to use the right search engine. That's not Google anymore, it's yandex.
Thanks, that image is important, so I tried to extract and sharpen it:
I have to say that the book of Ezekiel sounds very much like someone saw a UFO.
I've read that testicular cancer is more common on whatever side a guy carries his phone on. That's not proof of anything, but it is suspicious.
You'd need to source the study to find out.
I'm dubious. I've worked around high field RF quite a bit. I'll admit it's plausible, but even if it's true, people aren't going to give up their little radios called "cellphones".
We are reducing RF transmission anyhow. Lower power == longer battery life, and also reduced time on the network. I would bet a kid today is exposed to less RF than we were 40 years ago.
I can copy a 2 hour film to my phone through FTP in 2 minutes. I bet I got less RF exposure from that than I did sitting in front a television in 1985 while I copied a VCR tape over 2 hours. Remember when you turned on a computer and it would screw up your television? How about when the microwave was running your TV would get static? That stopped happening in the late 1990s.
We were AWASH in RF radiation as kids and young adults.
« First « Previous Comments 21,420 - 21,459 of 42,077 Next » Last » Search these comments