patrick.net

literally, the Crypt Keeper.

A lot of them just look stuff up on the computer and recite nowadays.

A doctor, esp. one practicing for less than a decade, lives in mortal fear of a license revocation.

They have hundreds of thousands to pay off and years invested plus a year or so of $13/hr 60-hour work weeks to make up for.

Sounds like there has been a push back on "AI doctor" on the basis that it is "biased". At this rate big pharma can control both Human and "AI robot" doctors.

Worried FBI

AmericanKulak says

A doctor, esp. one practicing for less than a decade, lives in mortal fear of a license revocation.

They have hundreds of thousands to pay off and years invested plus a year or so of $13/hr 60-hour work weeks to make up for.

They can also look forward to a lifetime of ongoing lawsuits. There is no liability insurance that will pay for the total mess that they were dropped into with Covid fraud, vaccine morbidity, or the tranny child sadism. Its the price of medicine being captured by the insane and megalomaniacal Rockefeller/pharma profit machinery years ago, which have also led to the capture and disgrace of CDC, FDA, NIH, so-called peer reviewed (peer bribed) research et alia.

The tranny mutilation stuff is also pending. There was the thing many years ago when they allowed obstetricians to be sued by children for birth defects on their own behalf when they attained majority i.e. 18 years old. Retired Obs who let their insurances lapse were pumping gas, working in convenience stores, and committing suicide. Any child who was vaccinated, sliced and diced for tranny shit etc. and demonstrates harm can sue all over again on their own behalf when they turn 18.

The class action wolf packs are also out there digesting their future meal tickets. Doctors have been used to sacrifice the children to Moloch through vaccines and mutilation, they in turn will be sacrificed.

Faucigate.

I think the statute of limitations for blaming Trump has expired. Try the agitprop repetition mantra of global warming as a viable substitute. There are still idiots who will believe it.

Interesting financial discussion of bank failures and the coming dooms. Of course, keep in mind that the various precious metal sales people have a gig of creating chronic panic Cassandra wailing to sell their wares and their sponsees sing accordingly.

https://rumble.com/v2dq9kc-the-end-game-last-round-with-clif-high-rafi-farber-and-jean-claudebeyondmys.html

https://rumble.com/v2dq9kc-the-end-game-last-round-with-clif-high-rafi-farber-and-jean-claudebeyondmys.html

I dont like her but I like this video

gabbar says

I dont like her but I like this video

This whole rant and the answers to the questions from the stooges were obviously staged for her. She has zip for improvisation ability. Obviously
a set up aimed at Trump, but down the memory hole for corrupt, treasonous Biden Actor Family.

Ceffer says

https://www.thecollegefix.com/judge-ambushed-at-stanford-refuses-to-apologize-for-calling-protesters-idiots-bullies-and-hypocrites/

Sorry not sorry.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Judge Kyle Duncan, who was recently berated and shouted at as he attempted to give a speech at Stanford University, has a message for the law students who disrupted his speech.

“I have been criticized in the media for getting angry at the protesters. It’s true I called them ‘appalling idiots,’ ‘bullies’ and ‘hypocrites.’ They are, and I won’t apologize for saying so. Sometimes anger is the proper response to vicious behavior,” Duncan wrote in a March 17 op-ed in The Wall Street Journal.

The piece was titled “My Struggle Session at Stanford Law School: A dean voices pride that students are being taught to stage tantrums rather than make a reasoned case.”

https://www.wsj.com/articles/struggle-session-at-stanford-law-school-federalist-society-kyle-duncan-circuit-court-judge-steinbach-4f8da19e (paywall)

Patrick says

https://www.thecollegefix.com/judge-ambushed-at-stanford-refuses-to-apologize-for-calling-protesters-idiots-bullies-and-hypocrites/

Sorry not sorry.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Judge Kyle Duncan, who was recently berated and shouted at as he attempted to give a speech at Stanford University, has a message for the law students who disrupted his speech.

“I have been criticized in the media for getting angry at the protesters. It’s true I called them ‘appalling idiots,’ ‘bullies’ and ‘hypocrites.’ They are, and I won’t apologize for saying so. Sometimes anger is the proper response to vicious behavior,” Duncan wrote in a March 17 op-ed in The Wall Street Journal.

The piece was titled “My Struggle Session at Stanford Law School: A dean voices pride that students are being taught to stage tantrums rather than make a reasoned case.”

https://www.wsj.com/articles/struggle-session-at-stanford-law-school-federalist-society-kyle-duncan-circuit-court-judge-steinbach-4f8da19e (paywall)

If he's serious, he should write on an open platform where there is open debate and discussion - he's hiding behind a paywall, and there's no commenting.

I don't agree with what happened to him at Stanford, but I don't just just don't think this person isn't a total asshole either - he may be. He won't stand up to public criticism. He's a coward. I was in college in the 1990's, I saw speakers being shut down too then, because they were total assholes.

Don't think just because a person has been silenced isn't an asshole, it can be a real reaction to people's disgust with a disgusting person.

He posted on a paywall, that means he's a pussy. He doesn't want to know what people think. Maybe people are wrong, maybe they are right, he doesn't want to listen. You can copy the article to other sites, but he will never see it. I consider this guy a dick, even if he was wrongly silenced.

richwicks says

If he's serious, he should write on an open platform where there is open debate and discussion - he's hiding behind a paywall, and there's no commenting.

I agree with you. But a quick search of the internet turns up non-paywalled versions (or at least very large snippets). For instance, here: https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2023/03/17/judge-duncan-describes-his-struggle-session-at-stanford-law-n537649

Don't think just because a person has been silenced isn't an asshole, it can be a real reaction to people's disgust with a disgusting person.

This seems to be a situation of the silencers being in the wrong. The judge was hassled because he wasn't extreme-progressive in his rulings. From the article written by the judge:

protesters were especially vexed by U.S. v. Varner. A federal prisoner serving a term for attempted receipt of child pornography (and with a previous state conviction for possession of child porn) petitioned our court to order that he be called by feminine pronouns. As my opinion explained, federal courts can’t control what pronouns people use. The Stanford protesters saw it differently: My opinion had “denied a transwoman’s existence.”