patrick.net

Don’t you ever wonder how ‘gay’ — a condition affecting less than two per cent of the population, came to be so total, not to mention totalitarian? How did they go from being allegedly a marginalised and despised group on the periphery of reality to probably the most successful movement of social change in the history of democracy? Not only have these people altered the very meanings of archetypal human relationships under headings like parenthood and family, they have thrown a grenade into the centre of the definitions of the age-old concept of marriage. They have stolen the rainbow from the sky, ransacked books of myths and legends to usurp the meaning of iconic concepts like the unicorn and the mermaid, and hijacked in its entirety the heavenly month of June. What activist group, promoting the demands of a minority, has in the past been able to, within a decade and from a standing start, progress to commanding the entirety of the public realm for a month every summer to promote its grievances and stick its flag up everyone’s nostrils? If, 40 years ago, you couldn’t get a notice for a leftish meeting read out on the radio, what changed? ...

In reality ‘gay activists’ are simply stooges for the wealthiest organised interests in the world seeking to effect the most fundamental change in our political system since the introduction of democracy, 2,500-odd years ago.

That, and only that, explains the scale of what we see moving on our streets, rending our airwaves with rage and clamouring, spitting out its demands on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. This is not about sexual orientation. This is about power and control. This is the leveraging of gay victimhood as part of a softening-up process which started out, a decade ago, as one of the preliminary stages of a slow-motion coup, designed to alter the fundamentals of our culture so that we might become less adapted to resist what was coming. And what is coming is fascism by its dictionary definition: a coalition of political and corporate power, globally organised and directed, preparing to replace the prevailing structure of government with a universal social control grid, digitally powered and data driven, operating via saturation surveillance and a programmed digital money system to imprison the populations of the world in a dystopia that will leave the sci-fi writers of the past century shame-faced at their own lack of imagination. That’s what ‘gay’ is. That’s what LGBTQ+Blah amounts to. ...

As I’ve written many time, one of the primary purposes of the gay insurgency was to introduce mutism into public culture, so that eventually the entire population would become lockjawed. This condition is now beginning to heal itself, as more and more people begin to realise they have nothing to lose by standing up to the bullies and their proxies. Even the most phlegmatic of those in the middle ground are now beginning to wake up and go, ‘WTF?’, as the gay agenda emerges as one of the most sinister and evil insurgencies the world has seen in peacetime, and we realise that our deficit of homophobia (perhaps requiring to be redefined as a fear of the weaponisation of gay victimhood) has virtually destroyed our education system, our capacity to discuss openly any controversial idea, and our sense of belonging to the places we once regarded as our homeland.

adrenochrome

Several small-scale studies (involving 15 or fewer test subjects) conducted in the 1950s and 1960s reported that adrenochrome triggered psychotic reactions such as thought disorder and derealization.[4]

In 1954, researchers Abram Hoffer and Humphry Osmond claimed that adrenochrome is a neurotoxic, psychotomimetic substance and may play a role in schizophrenia and other mental illnesses.[5]

It might actually be psychoactive:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrenochrome

Several small-scale studies (involving 15 or fewer test subjects) conducted in the 1950s and 1960s reported that adrenochrome triggered psychotic reactions such as thought disorder and derealization.[4]

In 1954, researchers Abram Hoffer and Humphry Osmond claimed that adrenochrome is a neurotoxic, psychotomimetic substance and may play a role in schizophrenia and other mental illnesses.[5]

Human Events ran a gratifying story yesterday headlined, “Trans Lawmaker Shamed Into Dropping Pedo-Normalization Bill in Minnesota Amid Backlash.”



In February, Representative Leigh Stinky, I mean Finke, Minnesota’s first unattractive cross-dressing state legislator, introduced a bill called the “Take Pride Act.” The bill would have “proudly” removed language from Minnesota’s state Human Rights Act, which currently excludes pedophilia from the protected “sexual orientation” class.

In other words, the bill would have made “pedophilia” a protected sexual orientation under Minnesota’s Human Rights Act. But Minnesota House Republicans successfully intervened and “managed to get the language normalizing pedophilia stripped out of the bill in a vote.”

Back in the day, they promised us that legalizing gay marriage would never EVER lead to crazy stuff like this. Normalizing pedophilia was just a silly “slippery-slope” conspiracy theory. Well? How about now?

Back in the day, they promised us that legalizing gay marriage would never EVER lead to crazy stuff like this. Normalizing pedophilia was just a silly “slippery-slope” conspiracy theory. Well? How about now?

Every time something major regarding the Royal Family takes place, I can’t help but think about child sex trafficking. Who knows, perhaps I am wrong in my assumptions, but then again, perhaps I’m not. ...

For example, in his book “The Mountbattens: Their Lives & Loves,” biographer Andrew Lownie notes that in a 1944 FBI file, Elizabeth de la Poer Beresford, Baroness Decies, said “that in these circles, Lord Louis Mountbatten and his wife are considered persons of extremely low morals.”

Mountbatten was a member of the Royal Family. ...

Further, Lownie interviewed two men who both said they were raped by Mountbatten. One was a resident at the notorious Kincora Boys Home in Belfast, which was later found to be the center of a pedophile ring for powerful men.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/may/30/n-ireland-child-abuse-inquiry-turns-to-kincora-home-and-claims-of-mi5-blackmail

... A member of the Royal family was claimed to be part of suspected paedophile ring under investigation by police in the late 1980s. A former Metropolitan Police officer said he was told by a detective sergeant that the investigation into the ring, which was also claimed to include an MP, was shut down for “national security reasons.”

Someone spotted a Pride flag in behind-the-scenes footage from "The Chosen." Check out the show's official response.



The Chosen is a crowdfunded Christian television show about the life and ministry of Jesus that has become insanely popular in American churches over the past few years.

This is why some eyebrows were raised this week when, in behind-the-scenes footage, a rainbow LGBT flag was spotted on the set...

Their official response:

Just like with our hundreds of cast and crew who have different beliefs (or no belief at all) than we do, we will work with anyone on our show who helps us portray or honor the authentic Jesus. We ask that audiences let the show speak for itself and focus on the message, not the messenger, because we’ll always let you down.

For Pride Month, Ford Releases Rainbow Themed Windowless Van

Babylon Bee:

For Pride Month, Ford Releases Rainbow Themed Windowless Van

Someone spotted a Pride flag in behind-the-scenes footage from "The Chosen." Check out the show's official response.

As with pretty much everything I watch these days, I came to “The Chosen” late. However, once I started watching, I found much to appreciate. I have recommended the show to others. I have defended it against some of the concerns expressed by my fellow Christians.

But right now, I’m not sure if I can go back. If I don’t, it won’t be because I have decided to join a boycott. It will be because watching simply makes me too sad.

Matthew Fischer
@MatthewFis74142
Jun 8
I’ll ask the obvious - why are you so afraid of gay people?

@FiveTimesAugust
Nobody is afraid of gay people. Have you considered the possibility, though, that the vast majority of America is just exhausted of an obnoxious, self absorbed, entitled, narcissistic, confused and angry rainbow cult religion being shoved down our families throats every single day? And that none of you are actually victims but extremely privileged brats? And that maybe you've been programmed by mainstream media to regurgitate words like "hate" or "afraid" as a knee-jerk response to anyone who's just not putting up with your insane crap perspective on life? Because maybe we have certain values we're trying to teach our kids without rainbow barf interfering every time we leave the house? Like the idea they're actually perfect just as God made them the day they were born, and maybe they don't need to cut up their body and irreversibly hurt themselves to be happy, especially before they're old enough to drive? Or that they have more to offer the world than dressing in drag and dancing for cash tips in front of five year olds? Have you considered the world doesn't actually revolve around you and what your pronouns are? I understand this is a hard concept to grasp because the world, quite literally right now, is revolving around the Pride cult in every way possible... from TV and movies, books and children's entertainment, corporate brands and commercials, up to the highest levels of government down to the public elementary school system... but guess what? It's all a show, buddy. It doesn't represent reality. It's an agenda designed to divide and conquer, confuse kids, sexualize them and separate families. It's perverse. And if you're going to stand there and tell me all of this is in the name of progress or that my perspective is "outdated" as your friends in the movement enjoy doing, you tell me what we're progressing to then. Once drag queen story hours and kink parades are truly accepted by society as "kid friendly" and appropriate "family entertainment" where do you "progress" from there? When are those things going to be looked back on as "outdated" and what comes next? 🤔I think you know. We all know. And that's why so many are putting their foot down here. It goes no further.

The Meaning of the Rainbow Revolution

EUGYPPIUS
JUN 11, 2023

Across all of human politics, the Western liberal tradition stands out for its ambitions to circumscribe state power. The people, in this tradition, are held to be the locus of sovereignty, and most Western governments are bound by elaborate constitutions which purport to constrain their jurisdiction over citizens, and which many regard as bearing a nearly religious authority. ...

This approach to politics has not aged well. Covid was a low point, simply for revealing the steely and actually quite anti-liberal authoritarianism these systems have been nurturing in their innermost chambers for many decades. Western liberal states in the modern era do not behave like limited systems which derive their sovereignty from the people. Every day, they more and more resemble the kinds of unchecked, totalitarian regimes we remember from the Soviet period. ...

State power wishes to be free, in the same way that water wishes to flow downhill. The problem with liberal checks on power, is that they forced the state to develop novel legal and cultural solutions to overcome them. State politics in liberal systems has thus come to resemble antibiotic-resistent bacteria in hospitals – it has evolved a general resistance to constitutional limitations, in the process becoming an altogether worse and more dangerous animal. The mutual checks and balances imposed on the state by its competing branches, for example, have merely incentivised the political establishment to develop and enforce among its members a uniform elite outlook, which encourages cooperation towards shared goals among erstwhile rivals. ...

Rights and individual sovereignty have required a rather different, perhaps even more insidious solution. Rather than undermining or qualifying these prerogatives, state ideologues have leaned into them instead. Rights in the liberal conception are fundamentally pre-political; men are endowed with them by their creator and they are inalienable. The concept thus promises many avenues for subverting the popular, democratically expressed will, and the state has worked vigorously to expand the concept of rights, investing ever more regime clients with a vast palette of novel rights. This growing field of unquestionable, sacred entitlements circumscribes popular political expression and undermines those less convenient rights that liberalism started out with. Via recognising – even implicitly – a right to health, for example, the state supersedes the older, far less convenient rights to freedom of assembly and expression. ...

Nowhere do novel liberal rights metastasise so rabidly as in the discourse surrounding sexual and gender minorities. The ever-growing rainbow coalition, symbolised by a flag that every year gains new colours and a puzzling initialism that is forever acquiring new letters (LGBTQQIP2SA appears to be the latest version), is a cutting edge of state power. Each of the identities subsumed into this juggernaut abounds with utility for the administrative state, and opens all manner of avenues for government bureaucrats to define and regulate the most intimate aspects of human culture, behaviour and sexual expression. It is no accident that the pride flag has become the most pervasive and probably the most sacred political symbol in the Western world. It will increasingly displace national symbols in prominence and moral significance.

KANSAS CITY, MO — An awkward moment arose at the city's annual Pride Parade over the weekend, as one young attendee was seen waving politely to his teacher and school principal as they acted out a kinky bondage scene on a passing parade float.

"Hi, Mr. Jenkins!" shouted Braden Harris, a third-grader at a nearby elementary school. "Oh, and Mr. Hartwell, too! Why are you whipping Mr. Jenkins? Is he wearing handcuffs? Did he do something wrong? And why is he wearing pants that have his bare bottom showing? This is weird."

According to one eyewitness, both Mr. Jenkins and Mr. Hartwell were thrilled to see Braden at the parade. "It was a bit surprising to see how thrilled they were to have seen one of their students in the crowd," said the individual who asked to remain anonymous since he understandably didn't want anyone to know he was at the parade. "It's almost as if they've always wanted the kids at their school to see them doing this and just wanted a way to do it legally."

While it isn't known how young Braden ended up at the parade or if his parents took him there with the intention of exposing him to strongly adult situations, one thing that is certain is that Braden has now seen things he will never be able to unsee. "I would have loved to spend today riding my bike and playing baseball," he said, "but now I know about things I'm far too innocent to learn. Awesome!"

At publishing time, Mr. Jenkins and Mr. Hartwell had reportedly enjoyed the experience so much they were asking the parade float to drive around in front of the houses of other students.

When Caesar is flying your flag and demanding that everyone bow to it, I struggle to see how that fits into any reasonable definition of "marginalized."