that’s fake news, bill stops employers from forcing employees to do that.
It will create business opportunities for Security Guard companies. The bill only prohibits store employees, not hired security working for 3rd party companies.
that’s fake news, bill stops employers from forcing employees to do that.
It's virtue signaling via nanny-State to give employees ammunition to use against employers in alliance with the shop lifters. Basically, deputizing the shop lifters against the business isn't enough, they are deputizing the employees as well to create a litigation trap and also to protect the primary deputized shoplifters.
If a shoplifter 'injures' an employee, with or without intervention, the employer is responsible. The burden is lifted from the shoplifter to the employer. Employer winds up both robbed and sued by a 'slip and fall' employee.
So, a security agency isn't an employee? Where is the language that provides an exception to security agencies?
Juan O Savin pundit says the FBI document that they tried so hard to conceal will reveal an entire chain of capers involving a hundred times the 5 million with IP addresses illegally used for bank transfers, and will lead to Pelosi, Romney et alia.
Chlorine Dioxide is one of the handful of chemical formulae winding up in crop circles, along with melatonin, niacin and vitamin D. Are the aliens trying to tell us something?
Some thinkers think that DNA by itself does not have the information density for life. DNA contains the coding for proteins. However, it looks very much like an antenna for receiving and transmitting, so are DNA arrays receiving the information for constructing life from somewhere else? Are we biological antennae arrays?
« First « Previous Comments 25,382 - 25,421 of 42,635 Next » Last » Search these comments
that’s fake news, bill stops employers from forcing employees to do that.
It will create business opportunities for Security Guard companies. The bill only prohibits store employees, not hired security working for 3rd party companies.
It's virtue signaling via nanny-State to give employees ammunition to use against employers in alliance with the shop lifters. Basically, deputizing the shop lifters against the business isn't enough, they are deputizing the employees as well to create a litigation trap and also to protect the primary deputized shoplifters.
If a shoplifter 'injures' an employee, with or without intervention, the employer is responsible. The burden is lifted from the shoplifter to the employer. Employer winds up both robbed and sued by a 'slip and fall' employee.
So, a security agency isn't an employee? Where is the language that provides an exception to security agencies?
https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/98787
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/107847
https://www.brighteon.com/cbea0547-0152-48d0-8ad8-6898a2a2a27f
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/107866
https://t.me/STFNREPORT/23866
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/107900
« First « Previous Comments 25,382 - 25,421 of 42,635 Next » Last » Search these comments