« First « Previous Comments 9 - 48 of 51 Next » Last » Search these comments
Meh, I'm not sure what is even meant by 'conservative' anymore
You're not alone. That word has suffered the fate of another word - "Nazi": it means anything it needs to mean at the moment.
You can no longer pretend to be the good guy when your party is the one of endless wars while locking up your opponents for “crimes” that they have committed.
I don’t argue that Trump didn’t break any laws.
Coulter sticks the knife in Trump by claiming that liberals had it all wrong before by 'crying wolf,' then adds that "liberals finally have him dead to rights committing serious felonies. And no one believes them." (Coulter already believes Trump is guilty)
Go here to read the entire clever hit piece on Trump. Also, be sure to read some of the comments attached to the article.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/06/14/ann-coulter-the-trump-indictment/
Meh, I'm not sure what is even meant by 'conservative' anymore but I've always found Anne to be consistent in her views
Coulter is a Neocon piece of shit. She's got not ethics at all.
richwicks says
Coulter is a Neocon piece of shit. She's got not ethics at all.
That makes sense. When she was promoting Trump as Prez he was just an actor hired to lose to Hillary.
It's all political theatre, but that does not mean that the criminal syndicate is not trying to kill or enslave us.
Somehow, the staunch conservative Coulter misses that part of history, and holds Trump solely accountable.
Recall too that it was Congress (led by the RINO Speaker Paul Ryan) that steadfastly refused to allocate the necessary funds that Trump requested to build the wall, which Trump insisted upon building.
Trump can't even get deals done when his own party had the majority (Paul Ryan was too mean!).
But we are to believe an older, slower and more toxic Trump in 2024 is going to be able what he failed to do the first time in taking on Democrats, Media, Deep State and the Republicans?
The above is selective memory; Ryan and others are RINOs and were fucking up Trump at every turn.
We need a disrupter, not another politician who promises to fix the system by using the system.
New polls are coming out this week showing DeSantis doing better against Biden than Trump does in the General.
Onvacation says
I would probably vote for RFK before Ron. We need a disrupter, not another politician who promises to fix the system by using the system.
You'd vote for an extreme Leftist like RFK over DeSantis and are cool with all of RFK's positions below?
- pro abortion
- pro Federal funding of Planned Parenthood
- pro gay-marriage
- pro Impeachment of Trump
- pro gun grabber
- pro student loan forgiveness
- pro CRT taught in H.S.
- pro mail-in ballots for Federal elections
- pro Amnesty for illegals
- pro healthcare for illegals
- pro Federal funding to Sanctuary Cities
- pro expanding the Supreme Court
- pro Single Payer healthcare
- against building a wall on the southern border
https://www.isidewith.com/candidates/robert-kennedy-jr-2/policies
But we have so much on our plate that needs reform NOW - and can't spend the next 4+ years of blowing more shit up and more drama that would be Trump's second term. We have a guy in DeSantis that knows how to play the game and has been very successful in fighting back against entrenched bureaucracy.
You'd vote for an extreme Leftist like RFK
the intelligence agencies will FUCKING LIE about a person's actual positions to try to get rid of them all the time.
Yeah. I'm a one issue voter this time; DESTROY THE CRIMINAL SYNDICATE!
If Junior investigates his uncles murder...
I will always thank Trump (and his supporters) for the important disruption he provided us and by saving us from Hillary.
Just blow up the whole fucking thing. The later it happens the worse it will be.
Both his uncle and father were murdered by the same people. It was CIA in cooperation with Israeli intelligence. Israel was building their nuclear weapons program in Dimona and JFK was standing in the way of that. Israel did this by smuggling out enriched uranium from the United States.
hear ya... but then you're left with everything blown up. People need education not annihilation.
I didn't know there was a controversy over what happened on 9/11/2001 until 2013 when I read about it on patrick.net. If I hadn't, "done my own research" I never would have realized what a twisted world we live in. Had I stayed asleep I might have taken the jab and condemned you all as conspiracy theorists.
hear ya... but then you're left with everything blown up. People need education not annihilation.
Evidence?
Vela Incident - Israel and South Africa were working together on bombs. SA has plenty of uranium.
JFK was killed because he refused to buckle and send in air support when the CIA lied about the potential effectiveness of the Bay of Pigs invasion; and when he had second thoughts of escalating Vietnam, that was it.
He was a huge pro-Israel guy.
https://www.jfklibrary.org/archives/other-resources/john-f-kennedy-speeches/new-york-ny-19600826
ONE was his desire to prevent Israel from becoming a nuclear power.
Could have been, he didn't want them with the bomb through. Public statements mean nothing from politicians.
Uranium isn't the problem - that's easy to get. Enriched uranium, that's HARD to get. The original method was gaseous diffusion where heavier bits of uranium because of higher momentum diffused slower than lighter isotopes. We used an ENORMOUS amount of energy to make the first nuclear weapon, and we had reactors to make plutonium. Israel was stealing refined products at NUMEC.
Why didn't you vote against her? Did you not realize how evil she was at the time?
Maybe you were butt hurt that Jeb didn't win? Who was your dog in the race back in 2016?
The US government rebuked many countries in the 50s and 60s for atomic research, and pretty much all research will have an end result in nuclear weapons.
"They didn't allow the IAEA". Most countries didn't, or only under narrow, Potemkin-village style inspections, including South Africa which did not allow inspections until 3 years after they tested the bomb in 1982, not until 1985.
The Hereditary House of Assad claimed their facility the Israelis bombed wasn't for nuke research, but then forbade then and forever IAEA inspectors from looking into it, despite being NPT signatories. I guarantee if the Israelis attacked a site that had nothing to do with WMDs, Hafez or Bashar the Very Mighty Lion would happily give the IAEA carte blanche and rend their clothes moaning for all the world to know they wuz wronged by the Zionist Entity.
BTW I'd say 75% chance CCP takes over Taiwan without a shot, which wouldn't happen if they had wonderful nuclear deterents. That's the problem with relying on others - the "others" don't stay the same over the years.
India and Pakistan (the latter got it flying US taxpayer provided C130s to pick up NORK and CCP parts, Centrifuge materials, and tech and innate R&D heavily financed by the House of Saud, who in return is guaranteed a bomb if Iran gets one) don't do the NPT either.
I live in California, so my vote wouldn't impact anything, otherwise I would have voted for Trump in 2016 too. I assumed in 2016 Trump was just another New York Liberal and was pleasantly surprised by some of his successes while in office.
« First « Previous Comments 9 - 48 of 51 Next » Last » Search these comments
Go here to read the entire clever hit piece on Trump. Also, be sure to read some of the comments attached to the article.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/06/14/ann-coulter-the-trump-indictment/