« First « Previous Comments 5,207 - 5,246 of 5,744 Next » Last » Search these comments
💉 They may not be very smart, but they are extremely cunning. The Hill ran a story Friday headlined, “Which drugs will be selected for Medicare negotiations? Here’s what we know.”
Our first mystery of the day!
Fueled by a new provision in the democrats’ recently-passed, Orwellian Inflation Reduction Act, the federal government is now engaged in a highly-contentious effort to, for the first time in history, set prices on a short schedule of ten drugs (to start with) that are currently approved under Medicare/Medicaid. The pharmaceutical companies that sell the drugs don’t want their prices set by the government and have filed lawsuits trying to legally scalpel the new law apart.
According to the Hill, CMS — the agency that oversees Medicare — is rushing ahead despite all the legal challenges. It can’t wait. The article says that the decision as to which drugs to fiscally shrink is loosely but not necessarily based on the drugs’ overall expense. Although it did not identify which drugs are in the government’s crosshairs, CMS did outline what it’s looking for, and you may notice something the targeted drugs have in common:
“A lot of the likely drugs include blood thinners, diabetes medication, cancer drugs. So many of these drugs are for chronic conditions and cost Medicare’s several thousands of dollars per beneficiary that’s taking it” Bailey Reavis, federal relations associate at Families USA, told The Hill.
Blood thinners, diabetes medication, and cancer drugs. Hmm. What could the common connection be? Maybe … jab injuries? These types of drugs are already expensive for Medicare. Unless it somehow reduces costs, some people might start measuring the extent of jab injuries after Medicare starts suddenly paying a lot more for drugs that thin people’s blood, treat their diabetes and cancer, and so forth.
I’m not saying CMS’s rush to fix low prices for blood thinners and cancer drugs is a cynical effort to sweep jab injuries under the Medicare rug or anything. I’m just saying.
What are you considering a lockdown is? I could go out-of my house any time I wanted.
Parks were closed. You could walk into Walmart or Costco, but not a tiny mom and pop store.
The powers that be might pull another stunt
The "lockdowns" never existed, that I'm aware of.
There's cattle, people that pretend to be cattle, and a FEW human beings. That's idiots, moral cowards, and human beings. I didn't realize how many idiots there were, and I would have been OK with that, but the moral cowards - they broke me.
People who aren't fucking furious, they are cattle, or they're moral cowards that think they "got away with it", by colluding. There's no resistance and there ought to be.
And I can't see what will wake them up. A mass die off?
charlie303 says
And I can't see what will wake them up. A mass die off?
Propaganda. There will be NO mass die off. It's been debonked.
GNL says
charlie303 says
And I can't see what will wake them up. A mass die off?
Propaganda. There will be NO mass die off. It's been debonked.
What about the 15 million excess deaths?
Are you getting your next booster?
There has already been a mass die-off from the vaxx of about 300,000 people in the US.
The vaxx killed about 1 in 800 of those who are foolish enough to take it. The future is uncertain. There could be many more.
https://patrick.net/post/1378505/2023-02-09-more-evidence-that-the-toxxine-kills
Why then did you not get the jab if you believe the Govn/science/media had yours and society's best interests at heart?
What are you considering a lockdown is? I could go out-of my house any time I wanted.
3. I still do not know of anyone that has been harmed by the jab.
3. I still do not know of anyone that has been harmed by the jab. I'm in Fairfax county Va. This is one of the bluest places in America.
No died suddenly???
GNL says
3. I still do not know of anyone that has been harmed by the jab.
You know no one who has had a heart attack, stroke, blood clot, or cancer in the last few years after the transfection reagent roll-out? Unlikely they’d be biopsied or autopsied to look for spike protein-related causation, so you'd have to look at excess cases versus the historical trend.
No, I don't.
"Your Injections Are Killing Our Young People" - Pfizer, Moderna Reps Slammed During Heated Aussie Senate Hearing
This is the new anthem. Go anywhere where people were widely vaxxed who are over 50, they all seem to talk about all of the shit that is happening to themselves and everybody they know around them. Do they talk about vax causation? It seems the Globalists were correct in their estimation of the democidal terror because people don't want to admit that their own compliance led to what is happening to them, the denial is baked in.
"Go anywhere where people were widely vaxxed who are over 50, they all seem to talk about all of the shit that is happening to themselves and everybody they know around them."
"...people don't want to admit that their own compliance led to what is happening to them, the denial is baked in. "
« First « Previous Comments 5,207 - 5,246 of 5,744 Next » Last » Search these comments
I know a few and they sound like absolute shit, and both feel like absolute crap.
Anyone else?
Why the fuck are people injecting themselves with a non-FDA approved biological agent?
And what the fuck are people afraid of, when this covid has a 99.97% survival rate?
I don't understand this level of retardedness... Or maybe I am just super, over the top, fucking retarded, that I can't understand this shit.