patrick.net

Patrick says

I think all children remember the original betrayal of vaccination. The parent, who is supposed to protect them, turns them over to a stranger who uses sharp metal objects to inject poisons into their body. This grotesque ritual disconnects children from their own bodies, their parents, the wisdom of nature, and divine source.

I don't blame parents.

They trust the wrong people.

You have any idea what it's like to be the ONE person with the idea EVERYBODY rejects? I do, I've had several of these and despite being proven right over time. It's a real burden. It's very hard to go against the flow of everybody.

I just recently realized I have a Cassandra Complex except my curse isn't knowing the future and having nobody believe me - it's knowing the present and having nobody believe me.

People will forgive you for being wrong, but they will never forgive you for being correct. I've experienced this countless times, and FINALLY I just own it. I'm never going to go along to get along again. I'm fed up with it. No more of "I forgive you for thinking and saying I was insane and nuts, even though I never got an apology from you, even though I was right and you know I was right", it's "fuck you for being an asshole to me, and a moron that still can't admit even now I was correct X years ago, even though you shit all over me" from here on now. I can't deal with these people anymore. The sheep are running off a fucking cliff and I don't want to be around them anymore.

Patrick says

https://notthebee.com/article/autism-rates-in-the-us-are-skyrocketing-according-to-cdc-data

Could be all the vaxxes they give kids now (76 of them, iirc) or maybe autism is just becoming a fashionable diagnosis. That happens in waves, where various medical services realize they can get money if they just make the right diagnosis.

Age of the woman Patrick. I'm convinced of this. I'm gonna go Iwog on this and I believe he was right. Women/girls should have kids 16-25 when their bodies are the healthiest and at reproductive peak.

Because we need two income households women put it off until 30+. Vaccines could be the cause I suppose, but I think there's more to it. Dudes can plant their seed any time, I'd advise as early as possible with 2 kids. But women should not be having kids over the age of 30 in my opinion. The lifetime of their reproductive organs is literally halfway over by that time if not 60% done. Women go through menopause in their 40's sometimes. What's the outcome of that baby 5 year prior? Issues.

To put it in guy terms, do you trust the 3k mile car more or the 200k mile car more? Things go wrong with age. Birth rates have been declining but population overall is growing because we live longer. I think women specifically are like, oh I'll be able to have a kid at some point. Having a bull dog of a wife (not looks) she wanted kids so we had them. I think most women are weak today, at least 45 and under. Afraid to have kids.

Covid vaccine is bull shit. I'll agree on that. Other things like clean water and sewer systems have been a massive help and maybe the other vaccines are not needed any more or we know how to treat disease. I just think autism and mental issues have more to do with age and/or drug/alcohol usage. That includes prescription meds.

Kid from my class had an autistic son. Died two years ago. Most people don't realize what people are on. His wife was doing meth and you wouldn't have known unless you've seen it or can spot the signals. Just like when I'm 10 beers deep on vacation you'd have zero clue I've been drinking. Throw in some pills and no wonder the kid comes out autistic. We have a pill problem in this country. I don't think tested, decades old vaccines are the issue. As with Vax injuries/deaths, we have no idea if it was a mixture of other stuff they were taking. This takes at least a decade to figure out.

This is not clear cut. Womyn, esp. with a healthy lifestyle and advancement in medicine have pushed the limits well into 40s, 50s (rarely even 60s). While for many the 40s mean it's over, most of my friends and family was born to womyn around or just before 40 and they are all healthy kids. A lot of it is genetics, but the increase in risk of health issues for the kids of older parents is far less than what people think, for both men and womyn, as long as they are able to conceive and give birth. The main reason to have kids earlier (besides being a younger parent) is that you have more energy imo, but usually also less money. It's a gamble for a man who really wants at least one kid to go with a woman over 35, but their chances, given they have access to fertility treatments over the years of 35 and into her 40s are fairly high if they try for a few years. Now best is to look at family history and go with a fertile and healthy one if she is already "older", or get with a womyn around or below 30. But if she has fertility issues by way of genetics, she can be 25 or 30 and never have kids, or only with a lot of effort and medical intervention. Genetics is the most important factor.

https://rumble.com/v10m6zb-peer-reviewed-ten-year-study-are-vaccinated-kids-healthier-than-the-unvacci.html


original link

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/whats-the-point-of-developing-new

What's the point of developing new drugs?

This question is not rhetorical. A new treatment to lower harm from a minor respiratory virus in infants instead is associated with MORE baby deaths, clinical trials show. Yet no one seems to care. ...

In the most important trial, of healthy near-full-term and full-term infants, three out of 994 infants given nirsevimab died within a year. None of the 496 infants who received a placebo shot died.

Patrick says

This question is not rhetorical. A new treatment to lower harm from a minor respiratory virus in infants instead is associated with MORE baby deaths, clinical trials show. Yet no one seems to care. ...

I have a question for you @Patrick - have you changed your mind about vaccines? I think you were once "a liberal", as was I. You cannot be on the side of a "party", if you want the truth.

I'm quite a bit suspicious about general vaccines now, and if you talked to me 5 years ago about this, pushed against vaccination with me then, I would have flat out said you were nuts - but there seems to be a lot of evidence I was wrong.

I used to laugh at the actual "anti-vaxxers", I'm not laughing now, just like I don't laugh at the "bible beaters" warning that gay marriage was a slippery slope. It's a struggle to climb out of the hole.

I still think the "bible beaters" are wrong about much, however, they weren't wrong about gay marriage.

@richwicks Yes, I changed my mind about vaccines.

I used to think that "everyone knows" vaccines are always good. Now I'm pretty sure that vaccines are a scam, causing more harm than good, for the profits of criminal organizations like Pfizer.

I also used to think that some gay men were "born that way". Then I actually worked at gay.com on a contract, met a lot of them, and decided no, they are lying about that to cover up and excuse the sexual abuse they suffered as boys. The whole culture was revoltingly self-indulgent, lots of drugs as well. Anything that contradicts their self-indulgence is called bigotry.

Another one, just from today: the breakfast cereal companies make a lot of money and used that to push the outright lie that "breakfast is the most important meal of the day". It's not. You'd actually be way better off skipping breakfast entirely:

https://patrick.net/post/1339310/2021-05-20-weight-loss?start=41#comment-1965485

Patrick says

Another one, just from today: the breakfast cereal companies make a lot of money and used that to push the outright lie that "breakfast is the most important meal of the day". It's not. You'd actually be way better off skipping breakfast entirely:

I'm pretty much in agreement with what you said, especially about "breakfast". Garbage that pigs wouldn't eat sold as cereal.

Not all gay men are what you think they are. I'm an aberration myself, but I'm not gay, but my cousin is, he's an aberration himself. We're both perplexed on society's acceptance of what we just went though. He can see his homosexuality as a mental disease, which he doesn't want to cure. He doesn't see it as harming him, and honestly, I don't either.

I've just concluded that 1 out of 10 people are human, and 9 out of 10 are not. If the government said sticking your finger up your asshole, and hoping around on 1 foot would prevent you from dying, at least 60% of the population would do it. 30% would refuse to do it because "the wrong party" is president. Most of the population are cattle, to one party or the other, only 10% are actually independent and simply don't blindly follow orders or blindly refuse to.

Patrick says

Another one, just from today: the breakfast cereal companies make a lot of money and used that to push the outright lie that "breakfast is the most important meal of the day". It's not. You'd actually be way better off skipping breakfast entirely:

The biggest lie is that cereal was the all-American breakfast. It's a late 19th Century Health Weirdo breakfast, with added sugar.

Until Kellogg the Health Freak Nutjob spent money to convince people otherwise, Americans ate oatmeal, pancakes or johnny cakes, scrapple ( a kind of corned beef hash, the Amish still eat it today), or yesterday's leftover pottage (whatever veggies and meats they had, simmering in the cauldron) with bread and perhaps seasonal fruit or salted beef they had, with hard cider or small beer.

WookieMan says

Age of the woman Patrick. I'm convinced of this. I'm gonna go Iwog on this and I believe he was right. Women/girls should have kids 16-25 when their bodies are the healthiest and at reproductive peak.

Because we need two income households women put it off until 30+. Vaccines could be the cause I suppose, but I think there's more to it. Dudes can plant their seed any time, I'd advise as early as possible with 2 kids. But women should not be having kids over the age of 30 in my opinion. The lifetime of their reproductive organs is literally halfway over by that time if not 60% done. Women go through menopause in their 40's sometimes. What's the outcome of that baby 5 year prior? Issues.

It's the age of the eggs that matter most, I agree. Sperm, not so much although they try to make a false equivalence; men produce spermatoa unto death and not much difference between 20 or 50 spermwise, other than a few with bad genetics. For women, there's a massive difference between 20 year old eggs and 40 year old eggs, even between 20 and 30 year old's eggs.

One clue is that idiot savants/elfin syndrome were once connected with the youngest child, that would be the one a woman might have well into her 30s.

Patrick says

You'd actually be way better off skipping breakfast entirely

I never have any appetite until almost noon.

AmericanKulak says

It's the age of the eggs that matter most, I agree. Sperm, not so much although they try to make a false equivalence; men produce spermatoa unto death and not much difference between 20 or 50 spermwise, other than a few with bad genetics. For women, there's a massive difference between 20 year old eggs and 40 year old eggs, even between 20 and 30 year old's eggs.

One clue is that idiot savants/elfin syndrome were once connected with the youngest child, that would be the one a woman might have well into her 30s.

Alright! I'm going to argue against this!

Lab mice have reproduction at a very young age, and as a result their telomeres elongated. Telomeres are a fail safe to prevent cancer - cancer is nothing more than an uncontrolled reproduction of cells. Telomeres are useless parts of DNA at the end of chromosomes that don't code for anything, but when a cell divides and duplicates, it cuts off a small portion of the telomere. When there is no telomeres left, you cells can't reproduce. Young animals have very long telomeres, older ones, not as long.

The advantage of having abnormally long telomeres is that cells can fix just about anything, any poison, any shock, but at the cost of leading to cancer at some point. So lab mice are abnormally resistant to shocks to their systems. They are mutants, but they die young due to cancer.

What happened is lab mice developed these extremely long telomeres because they all had children at a very young age, and the mice seemed to be immortal, BUT they all would develop cancer at some point as a result. There was no evolutionary pressure NOT to develop cancer, because ALL the mice stopped reproducing at a young age, so there was no limit imposed by evolution the telomere length.

Bret Weinstein argued this, and I suspect it doesn't just effect lab mice, but farm animals as well. I tried to contact him, but no response - so screw him.

Basically having habitual reproduction at a young age guarantees cancer, and later terms of pregnancy, guarantees faults in the genome but doing it at a later age will, in time, MIGHT increase longevity of the progeny just through evolutionary pressure.

SO if you want to increase the lifespan of people, don't have kids until AT LEAST 30. A good portion of them will die before they get to 30, but SOME will make it, then move up to 40, and 50, and 60 and so on.

Patrick says

richwicks Yes, I changed my mind about vaccines.

More proof it's basically a scam:

https://patrick.net/post/1347021/2022-08-15-sudden-infant-death-syndrome-sids-may?start=53#comment-1965512

Then they got onto another track: who was going to pay for the vaccine and the monoclonal? OMG, if we can’t hang the costs on Uncle Sam, what then? Do you expect us to give this out in our offices and not get reimbursed? Patients don’t pay cash for vaccines. Members attempted to direct CDC to put the vaccine and monoclonal onto the childhood schedule or the Vaccines for Children program. They attempted to tell CDC that nirsevimab, a therapy, should be billed like a vaccine. The appropriate CDC offical had to explain very politely that they have no jurisdiction to tell Uncle what program to put his vaccines or monoclonals into.

Of course they should have had no worries—someone else will take care of those details. But it was striking to me how involved they were in the financing of the products, which together cost $700. And why the high cost didn’t seem to bother them at all.

And then I remembered. Pediatricians sink or swim on the vaccines they administer. $400 bonuses for each fully vaccinated child in the practice. Higher bonuses if a higher percentage of the patients are fully vaccinated. Low reimbursements for other billable activities. If a pediatric practice does not give out loads of vaccines, it will simply go under, unless it has a unique specialty practice and does not bill insurance.

Therefore, how can you expect a pediatrician to look closely at vaccines? It would be like asking him/her to dig his own grave.

And then they voted YES for the 4th pneumococcal vaccine, and I said a prayer that it was finally over.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/fatal-and-debilitating-smallpox-vaccine

Fatal and Debilitating Smallpox Vaccine Induced Myocarditis ...

I found this paper from Engler et al, US Department of Defense, which relied upon VAERS do to research approved by an Institutional Review Board to assess the smallpox vaccine utilized in the US military. After vaccinating more than a million personnel from the theoretical threat of smallpox bioterrorism with the old-fashioned type of smallpox vaccine grown on the skin of calves, the US military switched to a second-generation vaccine that's grown in laboratory cell cultures. ...

The authors found 276 cases of myocarditis, 72 with pericarditis, with a mean age of 24 years and 96% men. A total of 31% of cases had reduction in left ventricular function (by echo or MRI) and 84% of the aggregate cases presented with an elevation in cardiac troponin. ...

The major lessons from this study are: 1) VAERS is an excellent source of data for vaccine safety research, 2) the modern smallpox vaccines used in the military had serious side effects including cardiac disability and death, 3) cardiac MRI when used did not identify a large fraction of abnormalities suggesting either late or inappropriate utilization without MRI contrast and assessment for late gadolinium enhancement. ...

Findings from this study apply to COVID-19 vaccine induced myocarditis which appears to be far more frequent and dangerous. Fortunately COVID-19 vaccination is no longer mandated. In young men, vaccines with a proven record of myopericarditis (smallpox, monkeypox, and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines) carry a real risk of debilitating and fatal heart damage.

More evidence that SIDS is likely caused by vaccines.

https://slaynews.com/news/zero-amish-children-diagnosed-cancer-diabetes-autism/

Zero Amish Children Diagnosed with Cancer, Diabetes or Autism

A comprehensive study has found that no Amish children have been diagnosed with chronic conditions that impact the rest of America. ...

As Slay News recently reported, a study conducted by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF) found that Covid death rates among Amish communities are 90 times lower than for the rest of America.

The main difference, the study revealed, is that Amish communities completely ignored the guidelines from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Amish families did not get vaccinated or wear masks, nor did they engage in lockdowns, social distancing, or any other type of restrictions. ...

In a new comprehensive study, presented by VSRF founder Steve Kirsch to the Pennsylvania State Senate, it was calculated that for Amish children, who are strictly 100 percent unvaccinated, typical chronic conditions barely exist, if any at all.

These chronic conditions, which many vaccinated children and swaths of Americans suffer from, include auto-immune disease, heart disease, diabetes, asthma, ADHD, arthritis, cancer, and autism.

During testimony before the PA Senate, expert health advocates shared details on why there have never been any reports published regarding the health of Amish children in general.

“After decades of studying the Amish, there’s no report because the report would be devastating to the narrative,” Kirsch testified.

“It would show that the CDC has been harming the public for decades and saying nothing and burying all the data.” ...

The experts all noted that chronic conditions are soaring among the American people.

However, they concluded that these conditions are non-existent among unvaxxed Amish communities.

According to the VSRF study, not one single Amish child could be found who had suffered from cancer, autism, heart disease, or other conditions that are on the rise among American children.

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/thinking-points-july-25-2023

Pediatricians never warn parents about this

Think about what the CDC’s grotesque vaccine schedule does to the relationship between parents and their children. The kid does not know what’s going on. Yet every few months the parents offer up the child to strangers who inflict pain with sharp metal objects while smiling, laughing, and saying “it’s okay,” “you’re a champ.” The shots can cause fever, digestive problems, seizures, and worse for days, months, or even years. The parents go through this Molochian ritual over fifty times. The child has no words to express what’s happening. The child cannot possibly give consent. The psychological scars from this betrayal are permanent and the child learns to never trust the parents again.

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/please-make-them-stop-the-insanity

Please make them stop the insanity of using nearly all newborns as guinea pigs. CDC's ACIP today voted unanimously to give a monoclonal antibody to newborns on day 1-7 of life to prevent RSV.

MORE babies DIED who were TREATED than were in the control group. Same story as Pfizer's initial COVID shot trial. This will almost certainly kill many babies.

https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1688559773212409856

“Highly developed nations requiring the most neonatal vaccine doses tend to have the worst mortality rates in children under age 5, according to a peer-reviewed study published July 20.

The study found that developed nations requiring more neonatal vaccinations may have unintended consequences that increase childhood mortality, challenging the idea that more vaccines administered always results in fewer deaths.

In addition, vaccines have ‘non-specific effects’ that can increase or decrease mortality from infectious diseases not targeted by the vaccine. ‘Some deaths associated with neonatal vaccines may be delayed, possibly through some priming mechanism or cumulative toxicity that increases the risk of a severe or fatal reaction to subsequently administered vaccines,’ Mr. Miller added.”

https://slaynews.com/news/rfk-jr-shreds-experts-claiming-vaccines-are-unequivocally-safe/

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired back at a group of “experts” for claiming that vaccines are “unequivocally safe.”

Kennedy shutting down globalist talking points in a resurfaced interview with the BBC has gone viral on social media.

During the interview, Kennedy shreds the claims by employing basic logic, asking simple questions, and citing publicly available data. ...

However, RFK Jr. responds perfectly with hard facts and reality.

He asked the interviewer how vaccines can be regarded as “unequivocally safe” as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has paid out over $3.3 billion in damages over injuries and deaths caused by vaccinations.

Kennedy then asserts that children are being treated as if they’re disposable.

He then asks if it is right that we should live in a country where a government can come in and say, “We’re going to make your child sick or kill him, in order to save another child.”

The Democrat presidential candidate then cites data revealing that far more children have died from measles vaccines than the illness itself.

RFK Jr. then shreds the declaration by the cited “experts” by asking how such organizations can have any credibility after making demonstrably false claims over something so important. ...

“We’ve had the WHO, CDC, the DHS, and all the three-letter agencies have thought about pandemics for a hundred years.

“And they’ve worked on very, very carefully on pandemic preparedness protocols.

“And all of those protocols said you never lock down a population,” he asserted.

“You cannot stop a respiratory virus with lockdowns,” Kennedy continued.

“You’re going to actually amplify it because they spread indoors.”

https://twitter.com/Inversionism/status/1692224464593826138

Patrick says

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/please-make-them-stop-the-insanity

Please make them stop the insanity of using nearly all newborns as guinea pigs. CDC's ACIP today voted unanimously to give a monoclonal antibody to newborns on day 1-7 of life to prevent RSV.

MORE babies DIED who were TREATED than were in the control group. Same story as Pfizer's initial COVID shot trial. This will almost certainly kill many babies.

And rsv is far worse than covid for babies, still on day 1-7 they don't need anything, maybe after a few months when they come in contact with many others, or when they start daycare. The problem with this is that people substitute the millions of vaccinations every year with millions of say measles cases in their head, and then conclude that more kids would have died from measles. That's also how the "herd immunity supporters" argue. Of course even if nobody was vaccinated, most outbreaks would stop after the initial spread and there likely would never be millions of infections, however with a diseases so infectious as measles (far more infectious than covid) it's actually possible. Of course a mandate is always wrong, but that's how the "guidelines" evolved, initially targeting herd immunity for highly infectious and potentially dangerous diseases, before being hijacked by big pharma. IMO early measles and rsv vaccines can be made good arguments for, hep b, hpv and covid on the other hand are completely unnecessary until adulthood (hep b maybe teenage years).

Patrick says

Most of these on the right are VERY optional.

RWSGFY says

Most of these on the right are VERY optional.

They’re all required for entry to public school, unless you have an exemption (religious, philosophical, or medical), and you can add COVID, hep A, hpv, and rsv to that list as of last fall. States like CA allow only medical exemptions, which are near impossible to get.

goofus says

RWSGFY says

Most of these on the right are VERY optional.

They’re all required for entry to public school, unless you have an exemption (religious, philosophical, or medical), and you can add COVID, hep A, and hpv to that list as of last fall. States like CA allow only medical exemptions, which are near impossible to get.

Not all. I have 3 kids in school so I know what I'm talking about. For example, Influenza, which is prominenly featured on the right, is not required and not even mentioned by the doctor at check-ups.

HPV - optional for sure. In fact, I don't think anything outside of the stuff listed in the second column on the left is mandatory.

Alright, 97% of them. Maybe influenza is optional (are you in California?)

goofus says

Alright, 97% of them. Maybe influenza is optional (are you in California?)

Yes, in California. And here is a doc to confirm my feeble memory doesn't betray me:

https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/CDPH%20Document%20Library/Immunization/IMM-231.pdf

97%? In what math?


Influenza? No
HPV? No
Meningo? No.
Rotavirus? No.

The meme is pure shit. Remove non-mandatory stuff from the right and it's not much different from what's on the left.

And it's completely inexcusable when our government mandates jabs of experimental biologic agents on children to "save grandma". Even if they didn't steal the election they are illegitimate for violating human rights and the constitution.

https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/this-is-what-happens-when-you-dont?r=6gdz

Looks like that chart was put together in what 2017?? - So doesn't take the Vaxx into account.

Since almost all kids are/were vaccinated then, the ability of the researchers to get a decent sample of unvaccinated children becomes a sticking point.

Since there is no sample size listed, the results if not totally fabricated are subject to the small sample sizes.

Misc says

Since almost all kids are/were vaccinated then, the ability of the researchers to get a decent sample of unvaccinated children becomes a sticking point.

It's a chart of general vaccination.

Polio, for example, is no longer necessary in my opinion. It's dead in the wild. Whenever there's an outbreak, it's FROM a live polio vaccine.

They are still using Thiomersal in vaccines. That's a mercury compound. In Israel, they use sesame seed oil as an adjuvent, in the US, peanut oil is used. Ever heard of a sesame seed allergic reaction in the US? Israelis have never heard of a peanut allergy.

The vaccines definitely cause problems, that's UNQUESTIONABLE at this point, the question is, is the risk worth the reward?

Remember all those pictures of kids in iron lungs from the 1950's? That happened AFTER vaccination, not before. Media was more tightly controlled then, AND BTW, I know a person that got polio, he's my age. He was never vaccinated and he got it. He has to walk in crutches in winter.

The idea that "vaccines are TOTALLY SAFE" is wrong. They aren't. However, there's no comprehensive studies on the risk. We know Amish children (who DO get vaccinated frequently, and sometimes never do) have a far lower incidence of autism. It's SUSPECTED it's linked to how many vaccines they take. Amish take a minimum if any. We don't know what their infant mortality rate is - and there's STUDIES on this, but the government won't release the studies to the public.

I wouldn't take a flu vaccine at this point, and never will. The increased incidence of Alzheimers may have been from flu vaccines. That was an unheard of disease in the 1970's, but by the 80's, everybody knew about it.

https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/jennifer-margulis-reports-hard-won

Hard Won Autopsy, Near Impossible To Achieve in US, Confirms Two Month Old Baby Died From Over-Vaccination

Patrick says

There are likely larger factors in play such as mother's age at conception and fertility treatments and procedures. Also kids are diagnosed with autism (and add/adhd) which would have been considered normal within the bell curve not long ago.

mell says

There are likely larger factors in play such as mother's age at conception and fertility treatments and procedures. Also kids are diagnosed with autism (and add/adhd) which would have been considered normal within the bell curve not long ago.

I know a guy who swears that his kid was developmentally normal, until he gave his kid 5 shots to be "caught up on the vaccines". His kid is now a young adult, but not an entirely functional one, he had severe autism. His child will have to be institutionalized when his father dies, and he had worked all his life to provide for him beyond his own lifetime.

5 years ago, I would have brushed this off as hysteria, but it's quite obvious at this point that the medical establishment doesn't care about public health. The current set of vaccines for covid were entirely unnecessary, and didn't provide any level of protection from a disease nobody needed protection from even if the vaccine DID work, and they didn't.

I know that outbreaks of polio ONLY seem to happen (to my knowledge!) after a vaccine campaign. They are using live attenuated viruses, the result is that unvaccinated ADULTS get that strain of polio although it should be impossible. The polio vaccine is bread in conditions that a human body SHOULD kill very quickly, but it's a evolutionary system, and the virus is sometimes able to adapt, and to spread. I think wild polio, is extinct. I think the vaccine has no benefit at this point. The only people that are at risk of polio today, are the unvaccinated being around the recently vaccinated. The vaccinated are a threat to the unvaccinated it appears.

The inactivated/dead polio vaccine given exclusively since 2000 cannot cause polio. I'd agree that it's likely useless though polio doesn't seem completely eradicated, but mostly. It would be good to come up with reliable biomarkers for autism, so cause and effect are easier to prove. We still don't know much about it. I would definitely go slow on vaccines, spread them out and refuse useless ones for kids such as hep b as long as possible, unfortunately most preschools and schools require kids to be up to date. Unlike covid, rsv can be serious and fatal in kids

mell says

The inactivated/dead polio vaccine given exclusively since 2000 cannot cause polio.

They still have live attenuated polio vaccines. I have a friend whose kids just went through immunization. HE'S the paranoid one, he's the one that changed my thinking on the whole vaccine thing.

It's pretty easy to measure incidence of autism and see if it correlates with vaccination. This is TRIVIAL to do, and they refuse to do it. That means, there's likely a link. When you don't look for something, you're not going to find it, are you?

They know.

Thiomersal is STILL being used in vaccinations. This is a mercury compound. It's used as preservative, but it's never been studied on its own. It's TRIVIAL to do this in animal models, but they won't do it.

Our medical complex is designed to make people sick, stupid, and weak.

I think vaccines DO have their place, but I'm really pissed they aren't more studied.

If everybody around me is vaccinated, and immune, and I'm not vaccinated, I am extremely unlikely to be able to contract the disease. I think that is what is being done, at the expense of the entire public. I'm certain vaccines can be made safe, and I'm equally certain they are not currently. Adjuvants appear to create allergies. In Israel, they use sesame seed oil as an adjuvant, in the US, peanut oil. Allergies to peanuts is UNHEARD OF IN ISRAEL, just like allergies to sesame seeds is unheard of here.

It's obvious to me that injecting these into your system, causes allergies. It's blatantly obvious. They definitely know, but now they have a money maker. You need to carry around an epi-pen for life. They don't care.