patrick.net

Reality says

so the banksters can keep 75+yrs of 30% savings

If an accountholder dies, does not the account go to heirs? So how do bankers benefit?

HeadSet says

If an accountholder dies, does not the account go to heirs? So how do bankers benefit?

That's why there are "banking secrecy" laws preventing surviving family members from getting answers from banks on what accounts the dead had. The banks are required by law not to disclose; the laws of course were bought and paid for by the banksters. The survivors would only receive the money in accounts that the dead had previously disclosed to the heirs. 90+% of husbands and wives don't get along with each other very well after a few years, and have accounts hidden from the other.

More importantly, when banksters organize Holocaust and other wars and revolutions, entire victim families die, so no member of the family would be able to withdraw money. That's why Hitler the Austrian was somehow placed at the head of the German army to carry out Anschluss as the first step of German expansion, and a full cycle before that a Corsican Italian (Napoleon) was placed at the head of a French army to invade northern Italy and destroy the accounting books of Genoese banks and Venetian banks so that the banks no longer had to pay back depositors. The opposing armies melted away (after taking bribes) in front of Napoleon, who was the son of the Corsican representative to the City of London when Corsica was variously "independent" or territory of Britain (after being snatched from an Italian city state) before being given to France. A century before Napoleon was the War of Spanish Succession and the Great Northern War; a century before that, the 30-Years War, etc.. All bankster wars designed to kill account holders en masse.

Remember in even main stream history, the Knight Templars restarted banking in Europe (some 500 years) after the collapse of banking in late Roman Empire. How did they do that? They invented the Pilgrimage and Crusades! Europeans of means were encouraged to take the perilous journey to Jerusalem; because the risks on the way, the travelers had to park money with the Knight Templars before embarking on the journey and then pick up money when they arrived, that's the theory, and they would have park the money with the KT again on the way back, that is assuming they came back. Since it was a perilous journey, many did not make it or make the way back. After the crusaders led by the church and KT took Jerusalem, their apparently military superiority likely also attracted local depositors in the middle-east, in addition to gullible European pilgrims and donors. However, as we have learned from the the Bernie Madoff insider scam, managing money for profit is a lot harder than making up false statements. After occupying Jerusalem for about 88 years, the Knight Templar insisted on marching out to do battle with a numerically far superior Muslim army under Saladin, instead of relying on the very expensive city walls that had given them success every time previously; Battle of Hattin (what 4th of July was previously known in the world, before US Independence) was when the crusader army was deliberately destroyed, so that Jerusalem would fall, and all the bank books could be destroyed so that the first bank of revival could welch on its depositors after 88 years of ponzi scam operation. Apparently, in the long run (after full economic cycle is accounted for), the primary source of profit for banks is abandoned accounts! Now we can understand why Holocaust, why Huguenot Wars, why communist revolutions, etc.. They are all banksters' effort to kill off account holders. Contemporary to WW1+WW2, there was the "Spanish Flu," in reality systematic medical malpractice via Asprin overdose; around the time of Napoleonic Wars, there was the sudden medical obsession with bleeding patients to death pretending to be the cure, despite 5000 years of medical history proving letting out 20-30% of a patient's blood would kill the patient. Now we have been looking at mass murders via mRNA/spike-protein and the bankster-hired actors pushing for WW3. Why? Because when the Holocaust took place killing millions of Jews and gays (some of the most prolific savers), the biggest beneficiaries were the banks (and bank-like whole-life insurance companies) holding their accounts where the victims had their life-time savings!

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/10/26/american-oligarchy-meet-the-billionaire-mega-donors-behind-the-biden-presidency/

Yup. If you are Israeli, and you can see the headlights and read the logo on the thresher "John Deere, sponsored by your friendly Rothschild Messiahs", then it is probably too late to fear the reaper.

Booger says

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/10/26/american-oligarchy-meet-the-billionaire-mega-donors-behind-the-biden-presidency/

It is important to understand a key principle in modern Democratic politics: if you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu. Today, it’s Joe Biden’s table, and he’s happy to provide the entertainment.

Remember, unlike Joe Biden, all of these oligarchs are good with money. They aren’t giving away tens of millions of dollars out of the goodness of their heart. They want something in return. In each and every case, Joe Biden serves a purpose for them — maybe many purposes.

Let’s meet Joe’s billionaire cabinet:

Dustin Moskovitz (net worth: $11.6 billion)

Eric Schmidt (net worth: $26.2 billion)

Jeffrey Katzenberg (net worth: $900 million)

Laurene Powell Jobs (net worth: $13.7 billion)

Reid Hoffman (net worth: $2.1 billion)

Tom Steyer (net worth: $2.1 billion)

Yes, they are all pure evil, but I suspect that there are much bigger players we do not hear about. Remember, the Fed can print as much cash as it wants at any time, and is never seriously audited.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Transparency_Act

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has stated that "the financial statements of the Federal Reserve Banks and the Board of Governors are audited annually by an independent outside auditor."[7] The bill's sponsor, Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX), countered by stating that the present audit process exempts the Fed's "most crucial activities".[8]

https://t.me/drue86/47075

Patrick says

Yep, explain the same about this guy while at that:

Who cannot be criticized?

Well, the last few weeks have taught us it's not (((Tiny Hats))).

It's AWFLs. Nothing will get you banned faster or more sure than critizing AWFLs.

AmericanKulak says

Nothing will get you banned faster or more sure than critizing AWFLs.

Seriously? What power do these women have? Hopefully you are not trying to distract from powerful Jewish run legal and financial firms that are blacklisting Palestinian supporters or critics of Israel. How about the critics of Jewish CEO run Pfizer? That got you banned instantaneously since 2021.

AWFL is just the new term for "Karen," and Karens have been publicly and widely dissed for years. No bans for that.

Women inherently have no power; rather, they have influence over men to enforce their will against other men, if they're dumb enough to go along. That ability wanes with age, talent, and enthusiasm on the part of the woman. No old crone will be able to marshal an effective defense, short of supernatural witchcraft.

The Sound of Silence...

stereotomy says

Women inherently have no power; rather, they have influence over men to enforce their will against other men, if they're dumb enough to go along.

There's some ancient quote I can't find now, to the effect that while men controlled Rome, their women controlled those men.

I know this is about world power, but at least in America, it seems more and more Zeitgeist was right and I was wrong:
https://archive.ph/kZAkv

See https://twitter.com/Resist_05/status/1719173412520927679

NuttBoxer says

I know this is about world power, but at least in America, it seems more and more Zeitgeist was right and I was wrong:

I really don't like AIPAC.

America should not be sending money to Israel at all, nor to the Palestinians. Food maybe, but not money, and definitely not weapons.

Then again, I've heard that food shipped to Somalia was simply stolen at the port by warlords who then sold it to buy more weapons.

https://patrick.net/post/1344458/2022-04-05-for-god-s-sake-please-stop-the-aid

Governments don't send aid, they launder money. Doesn't matter where it's going to. Local non-profits are the way to go. And with all the way to send money, that's really our best bet to ensure we actually support peace and humanitarian efforts.

Regardless of the situation, you shouldn't send what you don't have. And our government is fucking broke.

https://twitter.com/KawsachunNews/status/1719479069698347327

A brutal analysis by Scott Ritter... A new picture of The middle East is now emerging

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV_HsiJg8Io

Can't have a proper Illuminati Hegelian Dialectic War of Wars without both sides being built up and well financed. Gotta have the Israel lobby AND the Gaza lobbies both screaming bloody murder at the same volume.

Germans were starving in WWI, close to surrender. So, Herbert Hoover arranged for them to get food through the Netherlands so they could keep fighting.

Albert Speer said WWII would have come to an early conclusion if the Allies bombed ball bearing factories. They couldn't bomb factories, because they had to save the investments of the Royals, Western Nazis, Vatican, P2 Masons, Rothschilds etc. in Hitler and Germany, so Tavistock came up with the brilliant idea of bombing workers and civilian targets instead. Also, western factories kept supplying Germany with ball bearings during the war.

The Third Reich never surrendered. Only the German army surrendered.

https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1719351849856254242

https://twitter.com/ModProCom/status/1605997129083731968

The_Deplorable says

There was a ceasefire on October 6. What happened next?

Misc says

"There was a ceasefire on October 6. What happened next?"

Israel has the right to defend itself. Killing unarmed civilians, women and childern is not self defense - it is murder. There is a difference.

Misc says

There was a ceasefire on October 6. What happened next?

IMHO, Israel found it convenient to look the other way and allow Hamas to attack.

Hamas was exceptionally vicious in their slaughter of Israelis, and that suited certain high-up Israelis just fine, because it distracted everyone from the ongoing vaxx deaths, like poster boy Yonatan Erlichman, and from Israeli constitutional issues, and provided a justification for invading Gaza.

The Ethnic Cleansing Of Gaza...



The above photo is a panorama of 3 different places in the MOA article... See https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/10/biden-forced-to-call-off-his-plans-for-ethenic-cleansing-of-gaza.html#more

So...uhhhhh....what is the other alternative to having them move??????

The above is from a forum, and the supposed Biden plan just links to a post with no supporting documentation. The confirmed documents, which speak of forced resettlement of all of Gaza to Sinai, and later Western World, are from Israeli government, not US.

Stuff like this just detracts from facts, and makes it easier for people to dismiss the whole thing as theory. Although I'd certainly concede that forced resettlement could certainly be a nice way to say ethnic cleansing, which is a slightly better sounding term than genocide.

Ah, leaked documents... Nazi apologists are really grasping for straws now to post-factum justify the pogroms.