« First « Previous Comments 8 - 47 of 79 Next » Last » Search these comments
know that they were hired in preference to possibly more competent people and this must generate feelings of "imposter syndrome" in them and doubts about their self-worth
Texas A&M Rejects DEI, Switches to Merit-Based Admission and Hiring System
CV NEWS FEED // The Texas A&M University system announced Thursday that it will remove all diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) statements from its admissions and hiring criteria effective immediately.
“No university or agency in the A&M System will admit any student, nor hire any employee based on any factor other than merit,” the system’s Chancellor John Sharp, said in a statement posted on the university system’s website. The A&M System includes 11 institutions spread across the state of Texas.
The sudden change came less than a month after the office of Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott issued a letter to all of Texas’ state agencies and public universities telling them to stop using DEI criteria in hiring employees and admitting prospective students.
The term DEI has been used by left-wing activists to describe practices that give one group of people special treatment and advantages over most people in order to compensate them for past injustices.
In the February memo, Gov. Abbott’s Chief of Staff stated: “The innocuous sounding notion of DEI has been manipulated to push policies that expressly favor some demographic groups to the detriment of others.” There have been numerous questions about the legality of DEI-inspired policies and the Abbott administration maintains that state and federal law deem them to be clearly illegal.
Following Abbott’s letter, Chancellor Sharp spent several weeks “reviewing” A&M’s DEI practices before finally complying with the governor’s order to end them. The large university network, which Sharp has led since 2011, currently enrolls over 150,000 students. The A&M system will now require people seeking to work there to provide just a resume, cover letter, references, and other work-related materials.
Chancellor Sharp, a Democrat, was formerly the Texas Comptroller and Railroad Commissioner, and a longtime member of the State Legislature.
The anti-DEI non-profit National Association of Scholars celebrated the decision, tweeting “One by one, the DEI regime will fail.”
A&M’s decision is only the latest in a string of colleges and universities to scrap DEI and return to a merit-based admission and hiring system.
Just last week, the University of North Carolina announced that it was abandoning its former DEI policies. On Thursday, February 23, the school stated that going forward it “shall neither solicit nor require an employee or applicant for academic admission or employment to affirmatively ascribe to or opine about beliefs, affiliations, ideals, or principles … as a condition to admission, employment, or professional advancement.”
Have you noticed that lack of diversity at the Federal Reserve?
They know.
They can't let something as important as cartel control over the money supply fall into the hands of the incompetent.
Patrick says
Complex Systems Won’t Survive the Competence Crisis
At a casual glance, the recent cascades of American disasters might seem unrelated. In a span of fewer than six months in 2017, three U.S. Naval warships experienced three separate collisions resulting in 17 deaths. A year later, powerlines owned by PG&E started a wildfire that killed 85 people. The pipeline carrying almost half of the East Coast’s gasoline shut down due to a ransomware attack. Almost half a million intermodal containers sat on cargo ships unable to dock at Los Angeles ports. A train carrying thousands of tons of hazardous and flammable chemicals derailed near East Palestine, Ohio. Air Traffic Control cleared a FedEx plane to land on a runway occupied by a Southwest plane preparing to take off. Eye drops contaminated with antibiotic-resistant bacteria killed four and blinded fourteen.
While disasters like these are often front-page news, the broader connection between the disasters barely elicits any mention. ...
The core issue is that changing political mores have established the systematic promotion of the unqualified and sidelining of the competent. This has continually weakened our society’s ability to manage modern systems. At its inception, it represented a break from the trend of the 1920s to the 1960s, when the direct meritocratic evaluation of competence became the norm across vast swaths of American society. ...
By the 1960s, the systematic selection for competence came into direct conflict with the political imperatives of the civil rights movement. During the period from 1961 to 1972, a series of Supreme Court rulings, executive orders, and laws—most critically, the Civil Rights Act of 1964—put meritocracy and the new political imperative of protected-group diversity on a collision course. Administrative law judges have accepted statistically observable disparities in outcomes between groups as prima facie evidence of illegal discrimination. The result has been clear: any time meritocracy and diversity come into direct conflict, diversity must take priority.
The resulting norms have steadily eroded institutional competency, causing America’s complex systems to fail with increasing regularity. ...
The prognosis is harsh but clear: either selection for competence will return or America will experience devolution to more primitive forms of civilization and loss of geopolitical power. ...
When the priorities of their organizations shift away from performance, high performers respond negatively.
This effect was likely seen in a recent paper by McDonald, Keeves, and Westphal. The paper points out that white male senior leaders reduce their engagement following the appointment of a minority CEO. While it is possible that author Ijeoma Oluo is correct, and that white men have so much unconscious bias raging inside of them that the appointment of a diverse CEO sends them into a tailspin of resentment, there is another more plausible explanation. When boards choose diverse CEOs to make a political statement, high performers who see an organization shifting away from valuing honest performance respond by disengaging.
Some demoralized employees—like James Damore in his now-famous essay, “Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber”—will directly push back against pro-diversity arguments. Like James, they will be fired. Older, demoralized workers, especially those who are mere years from retirement, are unlikely to point out the decline in competency and risk it costing them their jobs. Those who have a large enough nest egg may simply retire to avoid having to deal with the indignity of having to attend another Inclusive Leadership seminar. ...
The U.S. has embraced a novel question: what happens when the men who built the complex systems our society relies on cease contributing and are replaced by people who were chosen for reasons other than competency?
The answer is clear: catastrophic normal accidents will happen with increasing regularity. While each failure is officially seen as a separate issue to be fixed with small patches, the reality is that the whole system is seeing failures at an accelerating rate, which will lead in turn to the failure of other systems. ...
Given the damage already done to competence and morale combined with the natural exodus of baby boomers a decades worth of tacit knowledge, the biggest challenge of the coming decades might simply be maintaining the systems we have today.
The path of least resistance will be the devolution of complex systems and the reduction in the quality of life that entails. For the typical resident in a second-tier city in Mexico, Brazil, or South Africa, power outages are not uncommon, tap water is probably not safe to drink, and hospital-associated infections are common and often fatal. Absent a step change in the quality of American governance and a renewed culture of excellence, they prefigure the country’s future.
The U.S. has embraced a novel question: what happens when the men who built the complex systems our society relies on cease contributing and are replaced by people who were chosen for reasons other than competency?
Look at the results in Rhodesia, and Union of South Africa when the Whites were expelled and took all corporate knowledge with them.
It's not corporate knowledge that is missing, it's skilled labor.
Even Anheuser-Busch seems to think it owes us lectures on “inclusivity” or some other woke nonsense. It is, of course, America’s unwanted, unsupported new religion brought to you by a lot of the same folks who relentlessly sue to get religion out of any public space. So, if you want to destroy an institution, here is a simple list of action steps to help you expedite the process:
First, flood it with women. See higher ed. Fill your ranks to the point where you have a heavy supermajority of women and other docile, emasculated workers governed by lots of rules to protect people from being offended. Bring in as many young, female woke activists as you can who identify as “she/her” in their email signatures.
Second, put women in charge. Give them control of the entire HR/DEI/leadership apparatus. Give them the power to rule over everyone through noxious legal theories and infuse the institutions with feminine values- docility, a healthy work-life balance, getting along with others over doing good work, and “inclusivity” over truth.
Third, let DEI become the unofficial purpose of your institution. This will inevitably happen when you put enough women and feminized men in charge. Accordingly, in my former office, about 1/4 to 1/3 of the emails I received each week pertained to DEI events or initiatives. Another 1/4 pertained to Zoom brown bag sessions on how to care for your aging relatives or how to manage anxiety in the workplace.
Fourth, encourage then require telework. Do everything on Zoom, never meet your coworkers in person again, stay in your pajamas all day!!! Let’s be honest, telework is for mommies. I have nothing against mommies, I just am not one and I don’t think the workplace should cater SOLELY to their needs and interests. In fact, I view telework as a kind of cheating on the job. Being at home takes away your focus, but the mommies and nannies who run our culture won’t admit that.
Once you’ve taken these steps, your institution is well on its way to hollowing itself out and severing any connection to its original purpose. Think about how we handled the pandemic. What might have happened if we hadn’t already become a whining, nagging, hectoring Longhouse of a nation? During the Spanish Flu of 1918, only one city, San Francisco of course, required residents to wear gauze masks in public.
“Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket.” ― Eric Hoffer
The CDC probably started out as a noble cause seeking to protect Americans from infectious diseases, but after almost 80 years it has become an appendage of the pharmaceutical and health insurance industries. A perpetual advocate for more medicines, vaccines, and treatments to inflict on the American people.
So it is with countless other institutions and organizations. Once noble causes, now corrupt rackets. I commend Christopher Rufo’s efforts to openly infiltrate and seize control of these deranged environments, but so many places are so far gone that we need to be talking about eliminating and dramatically shrinking useless, meddling bureaucracies. It’s either that or start building a parallel society that actually recognizes that we need MORE boys in STEM, for example. We can’t go on like this.
Love him or hate him, in the wake of the revolting testimony of the Ivy League presidents last week, Elon Musk called for the inglorious end of DEI earlier today:
In related news, two days ago Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt issued an executive order yanking every DEI office at every public university.
Activists have already filed Lawsuits against the Governor’s order, arguing it violated the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. But the order remains in effect while legal challenges are pending, and Oklahoma universities are currently undergoing the review process described in the order.
A few months ago in June, Florida passed a similar law, prohibiting the use of state funds for DEI initiatives at public universities. Legal challenges continue, but no court has yet agreed to stay the law. Meanwhile, Florida’s Board of Governors, which oversees the Florida State University System, is considering further restricting DEI programs, potentially mirroring Oklahoma's move, and is said to be considering reviewing and maybe eliminating categories of DEI positions.
Patrick says
diversity implemented by retards turns out like everything else done by retards… fully retarded
.
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/college-student-submits-nearly-500-214835336.html
Open the above link and read about a Univ of Michigan student who is Asian American applying to +450 intern jobs and only getting one offer
I read stats like how people of color make up about 38% of middle ranks within the federal civil service. I think it is under reported and a lot more than 38%, and I think Asian Americans are still under represented along with White Americans.
I wonder if corporations now are in the same circumstance as far as demographics and demographic reporting.
.
You've got to wonder why smaller companies aren't running rings around their competitors now. If a company only hires the best, they should be able to totally kick ass.
The collapse of higher education
What’s wild about higher education is how completely useless it was in response to Covid. All of the tools of the physical and social sciences were abandoned in favor of fear, bias, panic, irrationality, obedience, and profit. The few academics who followed proper methods were fired. We spent hundreds of years developing the university system as a bulwark against tyranny and primitivism. And in the end it was just a Maginot Line that was overrun by the fascists.
GNL says
Funny thing is its the white people who are doing this, right?
I hate to be white.
Look, not anymore:
GNL says
Funny thing is its the white people who are doing this, right?
I'd say our achilles heel is allowing others to guilt trip us. The other problem white people have is altruism. Christianity plays a large role in this.
White people seem more prone to guilt. Maybe it's even genetic and had to do with evolving for tens of thousands of years in a place with hard winters. If you don't help someone through the winter with food etc, that person may die.
Christianity is about guilt and forgiveness too. So it's part of European culture.
Love him or hate him, in the wake of the revolting testimony of the Ivy League presidents last week, Elon Musk called for the inglorious end of DEI earlier today:
white people, as a group, are the dumbest out there.
Patrick says
White people seem more prone to guilt. Maybe it's even genetic and had to do with evolving for tens of thousands of years in a place with hard winters. If you don't help someone through the winter with food etc, that person may die.
Christianity is about guilt and forgiveness too. So it's part of European culture.
This shouldn't be viewed as liability/weakness but as strength/noble value?
I love him. His twitter account is one example. He has spoken up in interviews, he doesn't sugar coat. Man went and smoked pot on Joe Rogan's show (most billionaires don't dare going on Rogan's show) in a t shirt. You see stuff on Twitter than is not allowed on any other media. Space X, Tesla.....He might start a charity foundation in the future, what should one expect more from him? Contrast him with other billionaire.....Bill Gates, Larry Fink, George Soros.....There is no other billionaire who is loved more than Elon.
Over the past few years, McKinsey has released at least 4 studies claiming a positive relationship between DEI and firm performance.
A new paper published today in Econ Journal Watch finds these results can't be replicated.
"Our inability to [replicate] their results suggests that ... they should not be relied on to support the view that US publicly traded firms can expect to deliver improved financial performance if they increase the racial/ethnic diversity of their executives.''
Intellectual, anticommunist, and conservative commenter James Lindsay persuasively argues that DEI, which like sewer water has now seeped into every nook and crevice of our public and private institutions, is actually a long-term socio-political military strategy by our enemies, principally China, to destabilize the United States. DEI is rendering impotent our military, our government, our universities, and even our strategically-critical corporations staffed by graduates of those undermined universities (think Boeing). If James is right, and I think he is, China’s destruction-by-DEI plan is working perfectly.
Now all levels of US corporations and government are staffed with comically incompetent woke idiots. China won.
« First « Previous Comments 8 - 47 of 79 Next » Last » Search these comments
THIS is the explanation that was in the back of my head but I could never articulate!
We now know the right thing to say when the argument comes up:
"Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity" is merely a justification for elevating the incompetent over the competent.
It has the force of irresistible truth, because it is the truth and they know it in their bones.