patrick.net

Deadly products should not be on the market

Many people in the freedom movement take the position that they support “freedom of choice” — if someone wants to get a vaccine (or 100 of them) they should be free to do so.

Unfortunately that’s not going to work.

As bad as things are right now (a literal genocide happening in front of our eyes) only 3% of parents completely opt out of the CDC vaccine schedule (as all evidence suggests that they should).

The remaining 97% witness vaccine injuries in their children that are so catastrophic they will cause the collapse of the U.S. in our lifetime. We’re talking TRILLIONS of dollars in harm because they failed to do their proper due diligence and because our system allows this to happen.

So “freedom of choice” in this case is just a path to collapse. We don’t allow freedom of choice for thalidomide; we rightly recognize that it’s a teratogen and ban its use for pregnant women.

If vaccines are toxic (which they are) we should stop them from harming any more people and remove them from the market entirely. ...

I will never normalize this

Why do ob/gyns poison children in utero?

Why do all U.S. hospitals poison children on the first day of life?

Why do pediatricians poison children 90 times before they reach 18?

What the actual f*ck is wrong with these people?

How the actual f*ck did this country become so insane?

‘Among 3–5-month-old children, having received DTP (± OPV) was associated with a mortality hazard ratio (HR) of 5.00 (95% CI 1.53–16.3) compared with not-yet-DTP-vaccinated children. Differences in background factors did not explain the effect. The negative effect was particularly strong for children who had received DTP-only and no OPV (HR = 10.0 (2.61–38.6)). All-cause infant mortality after 3 months of age increased after the introduction of these vaccines (HR = 2.12 (1.07–4.19)).

For example, just a few years ago, most of America believed vaccines were safe and effective, and when I wrote my first article here on February 12, 2022, while the majority of people still did (81% had got the COVID vaccine), massive protests were beginning to break out against the COVID vaccine mandates. Now, almost no one is (e.g., according to the likely inflated CDC numbers, only 22.3% of US adults received the most recent booster).

When you consider that it took slightly over a century of protest to repeal the (disastrous) smallpox vaccine mandates, this is incredible progress, especially since the most aggressive propaganda campaign in history was used to push the COVID vaccines upon the world. Likewise, I’ve seen more shift in a month than what many of my friends who have worked for decades in vaccine safety saw happen after years and years of work on it. These are truly remarkable changes.

• Thimerosal (TM) significantly affects mitochondrial bioenergetics in the brain.

• Mitochondrial integrity (membrane potential) was maintained after acute TM treatment.

• Ethylmercury released after the breakdown of TM compromised the cholinergic system.

• The brain is more sensitive to oxidative stress induced by TM compared to the liver.

Thimerosal (TM) is a toxic, organometallic mercury compound (which releases ethyl-mercury-containing compounds in aqueous solutions) used as a preservative in vaccines. Mitochondria are organelle which are highly vulnerable to many chemical compounds, including mercury (Hg) and its derivatives.

DTP

RFK Jr. makes a simple but obvious point that I'd never thought about before. Our mega companies love those "trapped" markets. That's why Big Pharma loves to get a new vaccine on the childhood immunization schedule. If you can't afford private school tuition for your kids and your children have to go to public school, you HAVE to get these shots. It's another "trapped" market. - Bill Rice, Jr.

@LegalizeItLala_
In 1979, eleven babies died of SIDS in one county in Tennessee.

They all had received the same vaccine from the same batch at around the same time.

Wyeth's (since merged with Pfizer) response:

Instead of recalling the vaccine pending an investigation, they covered it up AND ordered all future batches to be spread out across the country, so that any more deadly clusters would go unnoticed.

The Century of Evidence That Vaccines Cause Sudden Infant Deaths

The Disturbing Parallels between Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and Sudden Adult Death Syndrome

•To maximize profits, the pharmaceutical industry will often identify vulnerable groups who lack the ability to advocate for themselves and refuse pharmaceutical products.

•When the DPT vaccine was first developed over a century ago, it was tested at Irish orphanages. Recently mass graves of those early test subjects were discovered.

•Since the DPT vaccine hit the market, physicians around the world have observed waves of infant deaths following its use, which were often sudden and inexplicable (along with many other severe side effects).

•Numerous data sources correlate increasing childhood vaccination rates with increasing infant deaths. Those deaths played a key role in creating the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. That forgotten data compromises the majority of this article.

•When the COVID lockdowns happened, vaccine safety activists predicted the lockdowns would lead to an unprecedented drop in infant deaths since children were skipping their vaccines. This ended up being exactly what happened, and it was reconfirmed by infant deaths dropping in Florida after the pandemic prompted many parents to begin not vaccinating their children.

A question for the normies:

If something very bad happened at the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), how would you know?

For example, just imagine that malevolent corporate interests who want to profit from poisoning kids captured the AAP. Who would tell you?

The AAP wouldn’t tell you because they are captured.

Pediatricians wouldn’t tell you because they are complicit.

The TV news wouldn’t tell you because they don’t want to lose their major advertisers.

The government wouldn’t tell you because they are also captured.

Academics wouldn’t tell you because they don’t want to be the next victims.

So seriously, how would you know? This is not a partisan question, this is an epistemological question that all people of good faith should wrestle with.

Courageous parents caring for their injured children would tell you as would a handful of brave pediatricians who would soon lose their licenses for telling the truth.

That’s how you’d know.

And that’s exactly what’s happening.

I don't get this. What am I missing?

Patrick says

Study design: We searched VAERS for US reports after Hib vaccines among reports received from January 1, 1990, to December 1, 2013. We reviewed a random sample of reports and accompanying medical records for reports classified as serious. All reports of death were reviewed. Physicians assigned a primary clinical category to each reviewed report. We used empirical Bayesian data mining to identify AEs that were disproportionally reported after Hib vaccines.

Results: VAERS received 29,747 reports after Hib vaccines; 5179 (17%) were serious, including 896 reports of deaths. Median age was 6 months (range 0-1022 months). Sudden infant death syndrome was the stated cause of death in 384 (51%) of 749 death reports with autopsy/death certificate records.

•A long history exists of a wave of severe injuries following new vaccinations being introduced to the market. In most cases, those injuries were swept under the rug to protect the business.

•In many cases, the severe “mysterious” injuries we see now are remarkably similar to those that were observed over a century ago. Unfortunately, a widespread embargo exists on ever allowing this data to come to light (as that would instantly destroy the vaccine program).

•A variety of independent studies (summarized below) have shown that vaccines cause a wide range of chronic illnesses.

•A 1990 book made a strong case that widespread vaccination was also causing an epidemic of widespread brain damage which was both lowering America’s IQ and causing a massive rise in violent crime.

💉 It’s another pandemic miracle! Highly-credentialed, well-spoken, and persuasive covid doc Peter McCullough has now come all the way over to questioning not just covid jabs — but all childhood vaccines. He is now even uttering the dreaded word, “autism.” See for yourself:

https://twitter.com/VigilantFox/status/1778813380519702979

Among other things, in the clip Dr. McCullough described how every single study of kids who went “natural” — didn’t take any jabs — outperformed vaccinated kids in every health category, including autism. So. In any sane world, that evidence should damn the vaccine industry and result in a shot moratorium until they can figure out where they went wrong.

This progress never would have happened without covid. You crazy “anti-vaxxers” have got a lot of powerful new allies. I’m not saying covid would be worth it if it results in destruction of the vaccine industry, but it’s something to think about.

A pediatrician has come forward to blow the whistle by warning the public about a kickback scheme where doctors are “paid to vaccinate your children.”

Dr. Paul Thomas, a celebrated Dartmouth-trained pediatrician, has revealed that doctors across the country receive a huge cash influx for making sure their patients follow the vaccine schedule as specified by Democrat President Joe Biden’s administration.

According to Thomas, a prominent pediatrician in Oregon, the kickbacks have become so systemic that doctors “cannot stay in business” if they don’t keep their patients fully vaccinated.

Dr. Thomas alleges that doctors are rewarded financially if they strictly follow the vaccine schedule dictated by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Remember that, we are advocating now for a pause on the vaccine schedule. In America, it needs to be reevaluated.

The contents of the vaccine schedule need to be re-evaluated, but also, its very existence, its construction, its justification, its scheduling, everything- needs to be questioned. And that means we need a pause. Because it is probably damaging lots and lots of children.

Advocate for strict liability on all Pharmaceutical products, and that's really something that lawyers understand, everybody understands. It's a really simple way to fix this problem. It gets rid of almost like 90 percent of the problem from the very beginning, to just say, strict liability.

💉💉 Speaking of ridiculous ideas, this week the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research sprayed a truth weapon into big pharma’s rosy skies, in the form of a new study by Children’s Health Defense researchers (Robert Kennedy’s outfit) titled, “Adverse Outcomes Are Increased with Exposure to Added Combinations of Infant Vaccines.” Not just a little increase in adverse outcomes. A lot.




It’s critical to first understand that vaccine makers are not required to test for interactions with other vaccines, or test for problems associated with combined simultaneous injections of multiple vaccines. So, this study did the work that neither pharma nor the FDA have ever done, but should have, using easily available information.

Well, the information is easily available, that is, if you can find a cooperative government somewhere. In this case, the researchers did find a cooperative government willing to share its priceless Medicaid data: Florida. I do not know what led to Florida cooperating with Children’s Health Defense researchers, but I suspect our terrific Surgeon General Joe Ladapo was involved.

Using decades of data from Florida’s Medicaid database, the CHD researchers evaluated adverse events arising among 1.5 million combinations of six vaccines injected into infants between July 1, 1991, and May 31, 2011.

Let’s start with the study’s awful but deplorably predictable conclusion: “Chiefly, the greater the number of vaccines in the combination yields an exponentially greater number of disease diagnoses.”

In English: the more vaccines they gave infants at the same time, the worse the infants did.

Among other wretched findings, the researchers observed that infants who got six early vaccines were three thousand percent more likely to be diagnosed with "other diseases of the trachea and bronchus" within 30 days after vaccination, compared to infants who only got the three basic vaccines (DTaP+IPV+HIB).

The researchers tracked three categories of enhanced risk: developmental problems, additional infections, and respiratory complications.

The highest developmental risk was for "failure to thrive," which six-shot infants were +366% more likely to experience. The highest infections risk (of many) was for leukocytosis (high white blood cell count). Infants who got the HepB-Rota vaccine on top of the three basic ones were a whopping ten thousand times more likely to have leukocytosis. And under respiratory problems, infants who got all three extra vaccines were also three thousand times more likely to be diagnosed with "other diseases of the trachea and bronchus" within 30 days after the jabs.

This is all very interesting, but don’t jump to conclusions. Remember what they always tell us: correlation isn’t causation. All those extra sicknesses could have caused the vaccinations. It could go either way. You never know.

You’d have to be a pretty sick person to help pharma hide this kind of information. But it’s been hidden for a long time. The data is all right there, in the state insurance databases. They have the records when doctors submit claims for the initial vaccinations. They also have the records when doctors later submit claims for treating the same patients’ adverse events.

But patient-level data has always been guarded — for “privacy” — more diligently than the gold bullion in Fort Knox.

In a sane world, this study would blow the lid right off the infant vaccine business. Scientists would spring into action, trying to recreate these results in the other forty-nine states. But this is not a sane world; this is 2024 Clown World.

So, this study represents more progress, another scientific nail driven into the vaccine industrial complex’s mouldy coffin. But it shows that the dam is leaking badly. Big pharma’s vaccine dam could break any minute now.

Finally, this study could not have been done, much less published, four years ago. It’s serious progress.

This study evaluates 1,542,076 vaccine combinations administered to infants (less than 1 year of age at time of vaccination) between July 1st, 1991 and May 31st, 2011. ...

We produce a systematic analysis of the 7 cohorts and discover adverse outcomes associated with vaccine combinations, as well as describe adverse trends based on the increasing number of vaccines administered.

Overall they found that as the number of shots given to infants in a single doctor’s visit increased, the number of developmental respiratory or infectious disease diagnoses within 30 days of the shots increased exponentially.

Each additional shot more than doubled the number of those different diseases diagnosed.

When Covid injections were added to the mix, sudden deaths soared. ...

The researchers are now calling on governments to pull the Covid shots from public use.