patrick.net

https://slaynews.com/news/top-heath-official-admits-hospitals-faked-pandemic-deaths/

A top government health official has admitted that hospitals were faking data for causes of death during the pandemic.

A former director of the UK government’s National Health Service (NHS) has spoken out to allege that a new system was introduced at the beginning of the Covid panoramic to certify deaths.

Prior to the pandemic, four types of pneumonia were grouped together as the highest cause of death in the United Kingdom.

However, after the new Medical Examiner System was implemented, medical examiners started certifying deaths from all types of pneumonia as being caused by Covid.

In a post on Twitter/X, former NHS director of End-of-Life Care Saineethan “Sai” Balasubramaniam exposed the changes to the death reporting system implemented by the UK government health service.

https://twitter.com/TheOriginalSai/status/1614332319111970816

https://expose-news.com/2023/11/19/4x-vaccinated-account-94-percent-covid-deaths-past-year/

Yet another... Sudden Cardiac Arrest

https://www.kjrh.com/college-football-player-dies-from-cardiac-arrest-after-workout

A year old, but still relevant:

https://billricejr.substack.com/p/covid-didnt-suddenly-become-deadly

Something else is killing most alleged Covid victims, not this virus …

Again, my major take-away from my research and contrarian analysis is that something else must have been the true cause of death for the vast majority of alleged Covid victims, especially among the younger age cohorts.

The spike in all-cause deaths that began after the lockdowns has to be explained by dozens of reasons instead of this virus. It was the response to the virus, not the virus, that better explains most of these purported “Covid deaths.”

These reasons would/might include ventilators, remdesivir, not giving pneumonia patients antibiotics, de-hydration, over prescription of powerful sedatives, isolation, panic, depression, etc.

If we’re counting all excess deaths, the mRNA “vaccines” probably caused millions of deaths. Spikes in suicides, homicides, domestic assaults, drug over-doses, accidents and deaths from delayed diagnoses from treatable diseases are other causes that no doubt explain the massive surge in extra deaths in the last three years.

Basically, if my hypothesis is correct that the Covid mortality rate should have remained constant, this would mean that, even today, millions of deaths attributed to Covid probably aren’t occurring from Covid or Covid alone.

Even I admit this would constitute a scandal almost too mind-boggling to consider … but I’m considering it because that’s what my “early spread” hypothesis strongly suggests.

If this virus wasn’t deadly in December 2019 or January 2020, it shouldn’t have suddenly become “deadly” a year later … nor today.

Patrick says

Lol there was some of illness, a trifecta of flu, could and rsv, mostly covid and rsv, and I'd say rsv is more severe than covid at this point. It seemed more pronounced than last year for sure, our kids and my wife were sick for 2 weeks. I just had a cold for 2 days with mild fever but I eat a shit ton of garlic and onions. Plus vitamin d and quercetin, so I went skiing to free the sinuses lol. It's also brutally cold, relatively speaking for CA, thanks to global warming. We have frost in wine country pretty much every night :)

Oh and I love my daily red wine, total cold killer.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/01/25/covid-inquiry-bbc-misrepresented-risk-pandemic/

BBC ‘misrepresented’ Covid risk to boost lockdown support, inquiry told

Epidemiologist Prof Mark Woolhouse criticised corporation for reporting rare deaths among healthy adults as the norm during pandemic

The BBC was allowed to “misrepresent” the risk posed by Covid to most people to boost public support for lockdown, the UK Covid Inquiry has heard.

Prof Mark Woolhouse, an eminent epidemiologist and government adviser, lambasted the corporation for having “repeatedly reported rare deaths or illnesses among healthy adults as if they were the norm”.

He said this created the “misleading impression” among BBC News viewers at the start of the pandemic that “we are all at risk” and “the virus does not discriminate”.

In reality, he said it was known at the time that the risk of dying from Covid was 10,000 times higher in the over-75s than the under-15s.

But Prof Woolhouse told the inquiry the BBC did not correct its reporting, saying: “I suspect this misinformation was allowed to stand throughout 2020 because it provided a justification for locking down the entire population.”

So when is the BBC going to be punished for intentionally distorting information in order to harm the public?

https://www.leefang.com/p/covid-and-corruption-of-science-discussion

The saga started almost immediately after he conducted one of the first comprehensive COVID-19 studies examining how the virus spread and impacted patients. The “Santa Clara Study,” released in April 2020, found that the mortality rate of the disease was close to .2%, or about 2 out of 1,000 people -- orders of magnitude below the World Health Organization's warnings at the time of 3% or 4%. The study showed that the virus had a steep age gradient and generally did not impact children. The elderly and immunocompromised were at high risk. Healthy children and adults faced relatively minimal harm. Many of the people who were infected with the virus showed no symptoms.

The study, followed by research in Los Angeles County and other studies that confirmed its findings, outraged the establishment, which was using radically higher mortality rates to demand draconian restrictions on travel, commerce, education, and all other manners of public life. Bhattacharya publicly criticized economic and school lockdowns, which he called unnecessary and likely to harm the young and the most vulnerable in society. These statements further made him a public enemy. ...

He has subsequently been vindicated on virtually every point of contention. The school lockdowns were a catastrophe that created a crisis of learning loss, particularly among low-income children in public schools. COVID-19 vaccines did not prevent transmission, as the Biden administration claimed. The mortality rate of the virus was much more in line with Bhattacharya’s early findings than with the stated claims of the WHO and the U.S. government public health agencies. The vaccine mandates for young, healthy adults were never remotely supported by scientific evidence.

https://billricejr.substack.com/p/how-many-employees-at-public-health

What is the real Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) for Covid-19? ...

The only group I can think of that might have an IFR over 0.4 percent would be nursing home residents.

Indeed, common sense tells me that any group we can identify with people who are still working or going to school is going to have a microscopic Covid IFR. (The average age of a Covid victim ranges from age 76 to 82 in most countries).

My guess would be the IFR at the CDC and NIH is also either 0.000 percent or a smidgen above this microscopic figure.

One possible reason these public health agencies won’t provide an honest answer to a simple question is that the answer might prove the novel coronavirus is/was not a “deadly” virus to those who work in almost every single identifiable American group, industry or organization.

This information, in turn, might prove these agencies have been knowingly spreading disinformation to scare the daylights out of people who should have had no reason to fear dying from Covid.

https://slaynews.com/news/disabled-patients-do-not-resuscitate-orders-boost-covid-deaths/

Disabled Patients Given ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ Orders to Boost ‘Covid’ Deaths

An inquiry has heard shocking evidence that doctors were ordered to issue “do not resuscitate” (DNR) directives for disabled patients during the pandemic to boost the number of “Covid” deaths.

The allegations first emerged late last year when several disabled people in Scotland discovered that they had secretly been issued with “do not resuscitate” orders, without their knowledge or consent.

Several of those patients have now testified saying they feel like the government believes their lives are “not worth saving.”

According to a recent report from the Daily Mail, as Covid began to spread, doctors’ receptionists even called up those with disabilities to try to persuade them to sign up for the orders.

The DNR orders inform doctors that they do not want their lives saved in an emergency.

At the time, doctors were pushing for disabled patients who had tested positive for Covid to sign a DNR order.

Patrick says

Several of those patients have now testified saying they feel like the government believes their lives are “not worth saving.”

Like, DUHHHHHHHHH! When they have finished skinning you for military service, taxes and labor throughout your lifetime, you might presume they will angle for sending you to the glue factory rather than costing your medical care or fulfilling the delusionary social contracts, except for political appearances. More money for them.

https://xnumber11x.substack.com/p/covid-novel-and-dangerous-or-scam

I am going to say this really loud.

HOW DANGEROUS WAS COVID?
PROTOCOLS used in the hospitals killed people.
THE MURDER OF PATIENTS was INCENTIVISED for patients WHO TESTED POSITIVE FOR COVID.
I don’t think people are hearing this very well, because they are very concerned about Gain of Function, but what should be at the top of their mind after hearing stories like this is that:

GAIN OF FUNCTION IS A RED HERRING!

GAIN of FUNCTION IS A DISTRACTION!
THEY MURDERED PEOPLE IN THE HOSPITAL SO THAT THEY COULD JUSTIFY THE ROLLOUT OF mRNA TECHNOLOGY!

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/01/25/covid-inquiry-bbc-misrepresented-risk-pandemic/

The BBC was allowed to “misrepresent” the risk posed by Covid to most people to boost public support for lockdown, the UK Covid Inquiry has heard.

Prof Mark Woolhouse, an eminent epidemiologist and government adviser, lambasted the corporation for having “repeatedly reported rare deaths or illnesses among healthy adults as if they were the norm”.

He said this created the “misleading impression” among BBC News viewers at the start of the pandemic that “we are all at risk” and “the virus does not discriminate”.

In reality, he said it was known at the time that the risk of dying from Covid was 10,000 times higher in the over-75s than the under-15s.

But Prof Woolhouse told the inquiry the BBC did not correct its reporting, saying: “I suspect this misinformation was allowed to stand throughout 2020 because it provided a justification for locking down the entire population.”

https://dee746.substack.com/p/was-there-a-pandemic-or-not

https://dailycaller.com/2022/03/18/cdc-data-kids-pediatric-covid-coronavirus-deaths/

CDC Says It Accidentally Inflated Children’s COVID Death Numbers In ‘Coding Logic Error’

https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/148687.html

You could be run over by a car, and you go into the ER, you say I'm short of breath because your blood is filling your lungs, and if they test you for covid, you died of covid, not of a car accident. You could have known, severe cardiovascular disease, which is what I partake in, and you come in with an absolute 100% heart attack, but they test you for covid, what did you die of? Covid.

What just happened about two weeks ago? CDC is now telling all the laboratories to stop using the PCRs that we've been using this whole time because they cannot decipher between the flu and covid. So we have to stop using them. That information alone should stop this whole ridiculousness, OK?

Number two, the masks. What is the dirtiest spot on your body? It is your mouth. If— I'm pretty sure no one here would sit there and smell their anus and their private parts all day because that seems disgusting. But your mouth is dirtier than your private parts. Why would you sniff the bacteria that comes out of your mouth all day long? And force that on our children? That is wrong. That is, psychologically affects them, and you're going to implore more infections on them. There are literally studies that I can prove to you that are on the CDC website that are randomized controlled studies that show that nor hand washing nor wearing surgical masks, especially anything less than that, actually prevents you from getting infected, whether if you're infected or you're trying to prevent an infection. I can sit here alone on that topic for least 3 hours and talk to you about how that is so ridiculous.

Let's get to the most important part because because I'm very limited on time and I could sit here for hours and talk to you about this.

The unvaccinated theory is nothing but BS. OK? Does anyone here know, especially the medical professionals here, that the CDC, about a month and a half ago, changed the requirement for hospitals and clinics to count a covid case. If you are now vaccinated, you don't have to register that person as a covid case if they have covid. Even if they're in the hospital and dying of covid, if they were vaccinated you don't have to count that as a covid case.

Why are people saying, oh, the unvaccinated are filling the hospitals? Because the CDC has literally changed that. So if you get covid and you're vaccinated you don't count into the pool of people that are vaccinated. Does anybody here know that? I doubt it. ...

And then the vaccines. Just a whole 'nother nutshow case in itself. In six months [time alarm sounds] more people have died from this vaccine than in 20 years of every single vaccine given in America. Let that sink in. In 6 months. 12,000.

And the VAERS reporting system?[2] Harvard, who everyone should trust here, did a major study. And they found out that only 1% of all the adverse effects and deaths are actually reported. So imagine that. If 12,000 we know now have died, that's only 1 percent. One percent.

What just came out last week that probably no one here knows because it's been censored? There was just now a lawsuit that went up against the CDC and the FDA because they found out that these pharmaceutical companies created their own adverse effects agencies where their reporting is happening there, and they found out that, it seems now, that in 3 days over 45,000 people have died because of vaccine.

https://billricejr.substack.com/p/im-getting-cranky-in-my-old-age

The statement that “more than one million Americans lost their lives from this disease” is a preposterous claim, disinformation at its most egregious.

As a few non-indoctrinated Americans know, 94 percent of the people who allegedly died from “Covid” had multiple co-morbid conditions. What we had was not “a pandemic of the unvaccinated,” but a pandemic of Bogus PCR tests and a never-ending smorgasbord of Pure Government-created Propaganda.

Also, the majority of alleged Covid victims were over the age of 80 when they died. One’s not supposed to point this out, but the quality of life of many alleged Covid victims had long since disappeared.

https://slaynews.com/news/top-professor-testifies-covid-pandemic-hoax/

A globally esteemed professor has given an explosive testimony during a federal government hearing in Germany to warn that the Covid pandemic was a hoax.

Prof. Stefan Homburg testified before top officials that the COVID-19 pandemic did not begin in 2020 as the world has been led to believe.

While addressing the Corona Symposium in the Bundestag, Homburg explained that the coronavirus did emerge in 2019.

However, he said that it simply took the place of regular influenza and the virus was no more severe.

The world-renowned German professor cited data showing no increase in mortality rates during 2020, the first pandemic year.

Yet, data shows that deaths only started increasing in 2021, after the Covid mRNA shots were rolled out for public use.

Homburg told the federal government hearing that mortality rates started skyrocketing from 2021 onward because the injections are killing people, not the virus.

During his bombshell testimony, Homburg asserted that the pandemic was a hoax that sought to scare people into accepting the dangerous mRNA shots.

He told the hearing that reports of soaring Covid deaths were “not true,” noting that there were no more “sick people and deaths than usual.”

“There were no more severe respiratory illnesses than usual in 2020 and 2021,” the professor testified.

“Corona came, influenza disappeared.

“Age-standardised mortality was not higher in 2020 than usual.

“Mortality only increased since 2021 [just after the “vaccine” roll-out started],” Homburg noted.

“The idea of a ‘pandemic’ arose exclusively from new types of mass testing… [which] led the public to believe that there were more sick people and deaths than usual, which was not true.

“One must also ask whether the measures [masks, lockdowns, vax mandates, etc] were really intended to prevent infection, which they clearly did not, or rather served the purpose of breaking down vaccine hesitancy.”