patrick.net

richwicks says

He's probably messing with the woman that constantly abuses him. You are not likely looking at the reason she attacked the rooster, by rather why the rooster attacked her.

Nah. He's trying to dominate her. Chickens don't have very big brains.

We used to raise chickens and you could always tell the pecking order. The dominant rooster was immaculate, not a feather out of place. Number two had a couple loose feathers. On down the line until you get to the low bird who definitely had some bald spots. Roosters are mostly bluff. When I was a kid I had to clean out their pens. Always some rooster trying to attack me. A couple of punts across the coop and they give up.

Now Geese, which we also raised, are very territorial. They would attack my mother. I found the best defense against a goose attack, wings out head down neck extended, is to dribble their heads when they get close enough. We had some trouble with racoons. They got some chickens but never touched our geese.

I wouldn't eat a dog. I feel sorry for cows and pigs no matter how tasty they are, but I have no compunction against eating chickens.

That lady had a right to defend herself against that little bastard.

Patrick says

We had to give away the roosters partly because of this behavior. One attacked someone who was visiting us, or rather attacked the purse she was holding. Not sure why.

Pecking order. Stupid rooster perceived the purse as a threat,

Reptilian (birds are dinosaur descendants) brain tells the beast to escape from anything bigger that moves and try to eat anything that moves smaller than it.

Onvacation says

Pecking order. Stupid rooster perceived the purse as a threat,

I bet you're right.

We noticed that our chickens would attack a lower-status chicken that was literally higher, like on a higher branch. Maybe the purse looked like a rival rooster higher up. I think it was a red purse.

Is this just a nice way of describing castration and submission?

AI Trump sells Melania.

https://youtu.be/3Gc09cNPziQ?si=u8fTaxhkORIFQGI4

Onvacation says

That lady had a right to defend herself against that little bastard.

The video isn't a one time deathmatch fight. She's walking by and the rooster attacks her and the attack and her reaction is edited and spliced together.
Who knows how many times the rooster attacked her before she started fighting back. Notice the rooster keeps challenging her though.

Raccoons



https://twitter.com/AMAZlNGNATURE/status/1786418202731282523

https://twitter.com/TheFigen%20/status/1786854050555666451

Advanced TikTok. class final presentation at Harvard.

Run away from all doctors!

If you must see a doctor, stay away from the minorities (aside from Asians) because they were admitted with far lower test scores and grades.

Asian doctors have the highest qualifications on average, then whites.

Patrick says

Run away from all doctors!

If you must see a doctor, stay away from the minorities (aside from Asians) because they were admitted with far lower test scores and grades.

Asian doctors have the highest qualifications on average, then whites.

Yeah, Asians are the most discriminated against in medicine. Between white and an Asian doctor, go Asian, and I'm white.

This is kind of ironic, because my childhood doctor was black, and I was born in 1971. He was tremendously intelligent. He didn't get in through any DEI bullshit, he really was brilliant, his daughter became a surgeon - back then, I would have said, go to black doctor. They were intensely discriminated against.

Meritocracy is the only way to go. We knew this at least 40 years ago. He came to our backwater as a kind of charity (or he was forced to?) - I don't know. I honestly think he saw us as a bunch of backwater hicks, and he was stuck in hell for a few years to prove himself. He went back to UCLA at one point to teach and some hospital to practice medicine.

The versions of me I hope is in other's minds.

Patrick says

If you must see a doctor, stay away from the minorities (aside from Asians) because they were admitted with far lower test scores and grades.

They have faked it so long and so successfully (by institutional fiat and negligence), they will not admit their deficiencies or limitations. They live a lie and they tell lies to cover up when they mess up, and you can't challenge them because racis'.

Just like the Vatican has a 'pedo shuttle' of moving pedo priests around to different locations as a moving target cover up, since the 70's the med schools and hospitals have had the 'incompetent minority shuffle' where after a medical disaster, they would shuttle the individual to different institutions to spread the medical disasters around, lots of transfers. Of course, a lot of the disasters would just be covered up or re-characterized by pathologists to protect the institutions.

personal

richwicks says

awaiting moderation

"Nothing I've said is incorrect or inaccurate."

@richwicks

When you concentrate on the person rather than the point, you alienate everyone and help no one at all.

Patrick says

richwicks says

awaiting moderation

"Nothing I've said is incorrect or inaccurate."

richwicks

When you concentrate on the person rather than the point, you alienate everyone and help no one at all.

Look - he lies. I'm tired of people getting away with lying. Oh, if I point it out, "it's a personal attack!"

When people purposely post false information over and over and over again, to get people to go to the wrong conclusion - what are they?

I hate propagandists, I gave up on one person here that simply doesn't care if passes on bullshit, most people realize that's all does, so they just ignore him, and I do as well - only person I ignore.

People who intentionally misinform society HURT society, they're malicious.

No one is the ultimate arbiter of truth.

You say he lies, he says he doesn't. Now it's personal, and all constructive dialogue ends right there.

That's why personal attacks are forbidden on this site.

Patrick says

No one is the ultimate arbiter of truth.

Who said any one person is?

I have told you how to understand what is truthful and not. Took me a long time to figure it out, turns out like most things it's easy.

The truth is never self contradictory. Just like a story always had plot holes, so does propaganda, unless it's amazingly well constructed, and they don't bother with that anymore - the days of Edward Bernays are gone, we have morons creating our propaganda.

Stawman are common propaganda. So, if I state "I don't want to see a bunch of Palestinians murdered", that's intentionally misinterpreted as "you hate Joos". My name isn't mentioned specifically, but I know what he's talking about, and it's not just me. This is an intentional lie. He does it all the fucking time.

Patrick says

You say he lies, he says he doesn't. Now it's personal, and all constructive dialogue ends right there.

Here, I have a challenge for you, demonstrate that AmericanKulak has EVER had constructive dialogue on this site - seriously. Find a threat where he changed his mind or took in new information.

I don't think he's a sincere person, I really think he's a propagandist and that's just about the worst thing you can be.