patrick.net

As mentioned in this interview, what bothers me about this is how unwilling anyone in the mainstream press is to even talk about the 2020 election. When I hear the term “election denier,” I want to rip my hair out. They loosened regulations on ballots. They changed laws in various states for mail-in voting. It was not a “normal” election.

Just so you know, I was a Biden voter. I was a true blue Democrat. And still, I believed the 2020 election was rigged by unseen hands. I could not identify them; I just knew what was happening was not a “free and fair election.” It had that same eerie feeling I get from watching the lawfare against Trump. Very powerful people manipulating a system they control.

Silencing dissent is key to their entire scheme. So many people are now afraid to speak up because they don’t want to be targeted as “extremists.”

Here is the podcast, which runs around eleven minutes...

And here is the transcript:

Tucker [00:00:00] It's now apparently a criminal offense, a felony in this country, to suggest the 2020 presidential campaign was not on the level. That crime appears to form the basis of one of Donald Trump's pending indictments. He's an election denier. But actually it's worth denying the legitimacy of that election because it was not fair. Critical information was withheld from voters through censorship and yes, by the government. That is a fact. It's also a fact that Mark Zuckerberg spent $400 million to control voting in various places around the country and affect the outcome. That's not legitimate. It was also conducted in many places through electronic voting machines, and no country should ever use electronic voting machines because fundamentally they cannot be trusted. Why would you trust it? But then there's the question of outright cheating. Voter fraud. Was there voter fraud? Well, we know there was some. But was it widespread? That is a hard allegation to prove, though of course, many people believe there was widespread fraud. Well, now it turns out we know for a fact that there was. And in fact, it can be proven with a poll. Just ask people, did you personally commit voter fraud? Well, that has just been done. And the answer is a huge percentage of people asked in the poll admitted, yes, I committed voter fraud. It's remarkable. Justin Haskins is a senior fellow at The Heartland Institute. He joins us now with details. Justin, thanks so much for coming on. If you could just start by giving us the results, the shocking results of this poll, and we'll go from there.

Justin Haskins [00:01:35] Sure. So it was pretty straightforward. We asked people, a series of questions. The first of which is or one of the first questions was, did you vote in, the 2020 election? And did you vote with an absentee ballot? And if they answered yes to both of those questions, then we asked a bunch of questions related to voter fraud. We didn't tell them that they were that we were asking, did you commit voter fraud? We just asked them about various behavior. So, for example, we asked, people, did you vote in a state where you're no longer a legal resident? That's a pretty straightforward question. If you're not a permanent resident of a state, you can't vote there. 17% of people, nearly 1 in 5 said yes, they did do that. We asked people, did you fill out a ballot for someone else on their behalf? That's also illegal. You're not allowed to fill out someone else's ballot. 21% of people said yes to that question. We asked if people forged the signature of a friend or family member on their behalf, with or without their permission. We actually put that in the poll question, and 17% of people said yes to that. So all told, it's at least and I say at least 1 in 5 Mail-In ballots involved some kind of fraudulent activity. But we didn't just stop there. We also asked everyone whether they voted via mail in ballot or not. So in-person voting as well. Do you know anyone who personally in your personal life, a friend, a family member, acquaintance? Someone from work? Has anyone ever admitted to you that they did one of these kinds of forms of voter fraud? And 10% and 11%. We asked two different questions on that said yes. People admitted to me that they committed voter fraud. And so when you take 1 in 5, if we just take the 1 in 5 Mail-In ballots could be related to fraud, and you apply that to the numbers of the 2020 election, which included more mail in voting than at any point in the history of the United States of America. What you end up with is potentially 13 million fraudulent mail in ballots. And, to put that in perspective, Donald Trump lost the election in the popular vote by about 7 million ballots. So this is a massive, massive story. If it if this poll is reflective of reality, it is proof that the 2020 election results can't be trusted. ...

20% of 2020 Election Mail-In Ballots Were Fraudulent, Investigation Finds

The shocking discovery was unearthed in a probe by The Heartland Insitute.

The nonprofit think tank worked with Rasmussen to compile data from voters who cast ballots in the 2020 election.

To gather the data, The Heartland Insitute and Rasmussen surveyed voters and asked them to confidentially admit whether they committed some form of fraud during the 2020 election.

The investigation found that one in five mail-in ballots were fraudulent.

As The Heartland Insitute notes, the issue was large enough to sway the election in Democrat President Joe Biden’s favor.

The findings of the probe were broken down during a report from Tucker Carlson.

Carlson spoke with The Heartland Institute’s Justin Haskins.

Here’s the scam.

Religious NGO’s (non-governmental orgs) like Catholic, Lutheran and other types of do-gooders collaborate with the Biden administration to take those migrants - the ones who arrive by plane - into the heartland - and register them.

The details are fascinating.

These NGOs set up addresses that seem like homeless shelters - but aren’t - they are migrant ballot registration collection points. Some are just offices in crappy strip malls.

We know because we drill into the actual address photos. Watch our videos on Omega4America.com.

The migrants show up, get a phone, gift cards worth several grand, get registered to vote.

In Wisconsin, for instance, there is a Form EL-131.

Form EL-131 says if you are homeless, check the box. You can register to vote with no supporting ID.

For you election deniers, and Republican types - read this slowly so you can comprehend this madness.

In a swing state, one of 7 that will determine the next leader of the free world - today - using Form EL-131, anyone with a heartbeat can register to vote with no ID, as long as they check the box that says “homeless.”

Or someone can do it for them! What can go wrong?

This is what the Republican Party allowed to happen - bending over and taking it - with literally zero push back.

As we find ourselves navigating through the twists and turns of another election cycle, it's easy to get lost in the sea of opinions and theories about what could possibly go wrong.

From voting machines to absentee ballots, from lawfare to NGOs, it’s hard to know where to place focus. But here's the truth: this is a 1,000 front war. Every cog in the machinery of our election process has a purpose, and every loophole or flaw can potentially impact the accuracy of the outcome.

So, what do we do about it? At True the Vote, we're advocating for what we like to call the "anti-slacktivism" approach. Sure, posting on social media can raise awareness, but when it comes to ensuring election integrity in 2024, that alone won't cut it.

Between now and Election Day, what can you realistically do to make a difference? Lots. There are concrete actions you can take now and for the next few months that will absolutely have a positive impact.

First, we have to start by rolling up our sleeves and getting involved in the process. Whether it's checking voter rolls using Scan.Check.Protect. or IV3, building your own local election integrity team, training to be an election worker, or developing resources for those involved in various election roles, there's no shortage of ways to contribute.

You can volunteer for tasks like absentee ballot review boards, work at polling places, or participating in logic and accuracy testing. Every role, no matter how big or small, contributes to the smooth functioning of your local elections.

Additionally, we can educate ourselves and others about the election process. Understanding how elections work and the potential vulnerabilities they face empowers us to advocate for meaningful change.

It's also essential to engage with policymakers and advocate for reforms that strengthen election integrity. Whether it's supporting legislation for more secure voting systems, or pushing for increased transparency in citizenship verification, our voices matter. By actively participating in the legislative process, we can shape the future of our elections for the better.

So, as we navigate the remaining weeks of this election cycle, let's commit to more than just talk. Let's roll up our sleeves, get involved, and make our voices heard!

Join Us for Lunch and Learns!
We're thrilled to announce an exciting new addition to our True the Vote lineup: a "Lunch and Learn" series with TTV President, Catherine Engelbrecht! 🎉

Starting this week, Catherine will be hosting live discussions every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 12:00 p.m. central time on our Onward Locals platform. These sessions will dive deep into "all things election integrity" and provide a fantastic opportunity for us to come together, learn, and engage on crucial topics that impact our nation.

Here's what you need to know:

📅 Schedule: Each Monday, Wednesday, and Friday

🕛 Time: 12:00 p.m. Central Time

📍 Where: Catherine’s Onward platform on Locals

🗣️ Host: Catherine Engelbrecht

This is a chance for you to have your voice heard, ask all your most pressing questions, and gain valuable insights. Whether you're passionate about safeguarding our elections or simply curious to learn more, these sessions are for YOU!

Remember, while participation in the "Lunch and Learn" series is exclusive to our Onward Locals platform members, signing up is easy and free! Once you're in, you'll have access to Lunch and Learns, Catherine’s Monday night podcasts, as well as plenty of other exciting content!

So mark your calendars, set your alarms, and prepare to join us for an enriching discussion each week!

See you there!

https://onward.locals.com/

The Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft interviewed Denver business owner Joe Oltmann on Sunday. Oltmann, the founder of FEC (Faith Education Commerce) United, revealed how he infiltrated Antifa and how during a conversation with Antifa members, he discovered “Eric from Dominion” was allegedly part of the chat during the week of September 27, 2020.

Oltmann told TGP that “Eric” was telling the Antifa members they needed to “keep up the pressure.” When one of the caller’s on a September group call asked, “Who’s Eric?” someone answered, “Eric, he’s the Dominion guy.”

Oltmann said that as the conversation continued, someone asked, “What are we gonna do if F cking Trump wins?” Oltmann paraphrased how Eric (the Dominion guy) responded, “Don’t worry about the election, Trump’s not gonna win. I made f cking sure of that!”

After Pennsylvania House Democrats passed a bill that would allow mail-in ballots to be processed before Election Day, the bill heads to the Republican-led state Senate. A Republican Senate leader expressed concerns to The Federalist that the bill’s provisions would endanger “honest, transparent and secure elections.”

HB 847 was passed along party lines, 102-99, on Wednesday and would permit county election officials to begin opening and counting mail-in ballots and absentee ballots seven days before Election Day. The results would be tabulated on Election Day.

But Chairman of the Senate State Government Committee Sen. Cris Dush said in a statement to The Federalist that the Senate had previously rejected a similar pre-canvassing provision in March due to concerns of “pre-canvassing endangering honest, transparent and secure elections which remain the cornerstone of our Constitutional Republic.”

“Just like House Bill 847, this measure also failed to include proven election integrity safeguards such as constitutional Voter ID requirements or proof of citizenship for voter registration,” Dush continued. “With the next major election only months away, I will not commit to advancing any so-called election modification legislation that does not contain proven election integrity safeguards.”

https://twitter.com/DonnaPrissyrn1/status/1787779390233076091

Wisconsin govt employee printed up 64,000 fraudulent ballots used in the fraudulent 2020 election.

""Does the investigation confirm that there are missing ballot images?
"Yes."
"We have NO ballot images for 380,761 ballots..."

But now, thanks to Benz, I know they were mapping all social circles online. That’s how they were able to censor Trump supporters. This was especially chilling regarding their campaign for mail-in ballots, which they’d planned long in advance. ...

@MikeBenzCyber
My response to the Washington Post.

This is a 40-minute lecture, Part 1 in what I'd like to be an ongoing series, Censorship Industry Decoded.

This first video cut through the tricks & traps in WaPo's verbage. These tricks are stock for the industry & essential to understand.

@JDunlap1974
Fulton County double-scanned ballots in 2020 recount

“Does the investigation confirm that there are missing ballot images?”

“Yes”

there are 380,761 ballot images from machine count that are not available from Election Day

It’s hardly a mystery anymore how “Joe Biden” got elected. It’s perfectly obvious despite the “big lie” narrative that the 2020 election was stoked with a veritable orgy of ballot fraud and direct election interference by agency rogues, especially the ones leaning hard on Facebook, Twitter, and Google to manipulate what the public actually saw. Don’t believe your lying eyes they told the nation. What is a mystery is why they chose “Joe Biden” to front for the cabal around Barack Obama actually running the show. Never before in US history was there a president who left such a slime trail of bribery and corruption. Just as they had spent all their energy the previous four years in undermining Mr. Trump, they had to spend the next four years propping up and defending “Joe Biden,” and then desperately trying to save their own asses from a Trump return.