11
0

Greeted like Liberators: Ukraine Invasion Thread


 invite response                
2022 Feb 23, 8:30pm   433,006 views  4,188 comments

by AmericanKulak   ➕follow (8)   💰tip   ignore  

« First        Comments 3,938 - 3,977 of 4,188       Last »     Search these comments

3938   Ceffer   2024 May 27, 10:06am  

What about Babylonian Debt Slavery don't they understand? So, here we see the redevelopment schemes for Globalist profits in addition to the criminal enterprise monies. Destroy, so that you can profit on the rebuilding over the bones and blood.



3939   Ceffer   2024 May 27, 11:12am  

LOL! War of the drone flag drops.

https://t.me/epochtimes/104216
3941   Patrick   2024 May 30, 9:26am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/t-minus-thursday-may-30-2024-c-and


In Putin’s own words:

Concerning the strikes, frankly, I am not sure what the NATO Secretary General is talking about. When he was the Prime Minister of Norway, we communicated often, and I am positive he was not suffering from dementia back then. If he is talking about potentially attacking Russia’s territory with long-range precision weapons, even though he is a civilian like me, he should be aware that long-range precision weapons cannot be used by Ukraine without space-based reconnaissance assistance from NATO.
Final target selection and ‘launch mission’ can only be programmed by highly skilled NATO specialists who rely on NATO’s space-based technical reconnaissance data. For some attack systems, such as British Storm Shadow, these launch missions occur without help from any Ukrainian military. So who does it? Those who manufacture and supply these attack systems to Ukraine do it.
This can and does happen without the participation of the Ukrainian military.
Other missile systems, such as U.S.-supplied ATACMS, likewise rely on space reconnaissance data. Targets are identified and automatically communicated to the launch crews who may not even realise what targets they are programming the missiles to hit. In other words, the launch mission is assembled by NATO officers, not the Ukrainian military.


If you ask me, Putin’s next warning about the dire consequences was, if anything, highly restrained. Using diplomatic words, he soberly warned that Russia would retaliate against any nation that attacks it, regardless of picky technicalities like which base the missile launched from. In Putin’s careful words:

These officials from NATO countries, especially the smaller European countries, should be fully aware of what is at stake. Before talking about ‘striking deep into Russian territory,’ they should remember that their countries are small and densely populated. It is a serious matter, and we are watching it very carefully.

This unending escalation can lead to serious consequences. If Europe were to face those serious consequences, what would the United States do, considering our strategic arms parity? It is hard to tell.

Do they WANT a global conflict?

Our corporate media loves wailing about how Putin is threatening nuclear war again, but have you noticed they never directly quote him? Honestly, I am no Putin fan, but I still find Putin’s arguments clear, thoughtful, and compelling. I defy anyone to explain how any of it was disinformation.
3945   The_Deplorable   2024 May 31, 6:05pm  

Patrick says



Because they are using the Winston Churchill "strategery."

At Galipoli Winston Churchill fought until he run out of British troops, then he run out of Australian troops and finally he run out of New Zealand troops.

In Ukraine the Winston Churchill "strategery" is fighting to the last Ukranian. Over 600,000 and counting...

And don't forget the charge of the light brigade at the Battle of Balaclava in the Crimean War where according to Alfred, Lord Tennyson Theirs not to reason why Theirs but to do and die...

Don't question why, Patrick, just do and die!
3946   RayAmerica   2024 May 31, 7:15pm  

Do you remember all the hype in the press regarding Biden's announcement that he was sending Abrams tanks to Ukraine? The claim was that they will make a decisive difference on the battlefield. They have, but not for the Ukraines!

The Ukrainian soldiers are complaining that the Abrams are insufficiently armored and are easily and quickly destroyed by Russian drones. The Ukraines describe the 30 year old tanks as death traps that also have a lot of electrical problems, often making them inoperable (i.e., sitting ducks) on the battlefield. The Russians are mocking the Abrams as 'junk' that are built like a 'tin can.'

I also recall the claim that Russia was using Soviet era armaments. That too has been proven to be false. When you really think about it, just about everything in connection to the Ukraine conflict is one gigantic lie.
3949   Patrick   2024 Jun 3, 8:15pm  

https://patrick.net/post/1340336/2021-07-29-thread-for-vax-deaths-maimings-and?start=7499#comment-2069405


Is nobody going to ask Fauci about the biolabs in Ukraine?

The Russian Military claim one of the main reasons they moved into Ukraine was because of US bioweapon development.

We are in a proxy war with Russia, and on the verge of WW3, over these labs, and NOBODY brought it up?

I’ve been trying to warn the world for years that Wuhan is the cover story and the reported point of outbreak, but the epicenter of US bioweapon development was going on in Ukraine. The entire country has essentially been one giant CIA/State Dept proxy since 2014. It’s an offshore playground for criminal racketeering that is outside the scope of US oversight. ...

Initially, the MSM/Big Tech claimed the US-funded biolabs in Ukraine did not exist at all, and censored anyone who talked about them (a la me). Then eventually they admitted the labs existed, but claimed they were purely for defensive purposes. Why lie unless they have something to hide?

Then you add in the whole layer of Hunter Biden’s Rosemont Seneca owning biolab company Metabiota operating in Ukraine, and doing gain of function research on bat coronaviruses in Ukraine as early as 2014 via project PREDICT with USAID.

Then you add the layer of Metabiota founder and lead virologist Nathan Wolfe, being monetarily affiliated with Ghislaine Maxwell and the Clinton Foundation…



3950   RayAmerica   2024 Jun 4, 7:42am  

More evidence of the USA Dictatorship, brought to you by those that are controlling the brain dead Joe Biden:

US Government Seizes Passport of Former US Marine and UN Inspector Scott Ritter — Blocks Him from Attending Event in Russia

Former US Marine Corps Intelligence Officer and UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter, who is critical of Biden’s foreign policy, has reportedly been barred from attending the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum in Russia.

According to Russian news outlet TASS, Ritter was prevented from boarding a flight from New York to Istanbul, a layover on his way to Russia.

No further explanation was given. The only information provided was that this action was carried out on orders from the Department of State.

“I was boarding the flight. Three [police] officers pulled me aside. They took my passport. When asked why, they said ‘orders of the State Department.’ They had no further information for me,” Ritter told RT. “They pulled my bags off the plane, then escorted me out of the airport. They kept my passport.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/us-government-seizes-passport-former-us-marine-un/
3951   Patrick   2024 Jun 4, 8:06pm  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/flying-garbage-tuesday-june-4-2024


Last week, without any public comment, without any public debate, without any Congressional involvement — but after “extensive debate” among anonymous aides — former Vice-President Joe Biden quietly authorized Ukraine to use U.S. missiles to strike at targets inside Russian territory.

No U.S. President has ever authorized missile strikes on the territory of a nuclear peer country, ever. You wouldn’t know how historic Biden’s decision was from reading corporate media though, which “informs” its readers the same way a worm “informs” a cabbage.
3953   RayAmerica   2024 Jun 5, 8:34am  

Patrick says

No U.S. President has ever authorized missile strikes on the territory of a nuclear peer country, ever. You wouldn’t know how historic Biden’s decision was from reading corporate media though, which “informs” its readers the same way a worm “informs” a cabbage.

An enormous event policy shift that virtually no one is giving any attention to. Incrementally, we continue to escalate, and Russia is not going to back down. WW III very well could be a reality in the near future.
3954   socal2   2024 Jun 5, 11:50am  

RayAmerica says

Patrick says

No U.S. President has ever authorized missile strikes on the territory of a nuclear peer country, ever. You wouldn’t know how historic Biden’s decision was from reading corporate media though, which “informs” its readers the same way a worm “informs” a cabbage.

An enormous event policy shift that virtually no one is giving any attention to. Incrementally, we continue to escalate, and Russia is not going to back down. WW III very well could be a reality in the near future.


Right - Putin is going to start nuking Western cities because he continues to flail in Ukraine?

If Putin doesn't want Western weapons striking Russian launch sites inside of Russia that are being used to attack Ukraine - Putin can always stop attacking Ukraine.

Just like Hamas - the death and destruction will stop as soon as Putin realizes he is fighting a losing battle.
3955   stereotomy   2024 Jun 5, 2:44pm  

The Spanish Civil War was a prelude to WWII. I guess the Ukrainian Civil War (W. vs. E) will be a prelude to WWIII.
3956   DemocratsAreTotallyFucked   2024 Jun 5, 10:45pm  

stereotomy says

The Spanish Civil War was a prelude to WWII. I guess the Ukrainian Civil War (W. vs. E) will be a prelude to WWIII.


Huh?

Don't you mean WW1?
3957   Ceffer   2024 Jun 5, 10:46pm  

UkraineIsTotallyFucked says

Huh?

Don't you mean WW1?

Lol! Well, strictly speaking, it was a prelude to both.
3958   Patrick   2024 Jun 6, 11:19am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/terminate-this-thursday-june-6-2024


Most folks now agree the Russians’ pragmatic, entrepreneurial approach in Ukraine has decisively proven its battlefield superiority over our fancy, high-tech, acronymized weapons that took decades to develop: our top-tier M1 Abrams tanks, our PATRIOT air defense systems, our HIMARS and ATACMS missiles, our JDAMS flying bombs, and our networked cluster munitions. ...

Unfortunately, the Russians — those ‘incompetent,’ slipshod, gas-station-with-nukes ice jockeys — somehow overtook us in electronic jamming technology. And then kept going, without looking back. The Russians are jamming all our toys!

Our Borg-like, electronically interconnected technology is dead in the water, or in the mud, if it can’t talk to the other parts of itself. Worse, Russian jamming cuts it all off from its handlers thousands of miles away in America. In other words, it’s damned useless, which is why Ignatius predicted it wouldn’t last five minutes against China. ...

In desperation, and because Ukraine uber alles, all those ethical concerns over autonomous weapons systems instantly became as obsolete as our trillion-dollar aircraft carriers. The ban on machines that kill on automatic has been swept aside.

It’s an emergency, dummy.

Then, Ignatius described the easy fix to the problem. The simple correction is truly autonomous weapons, weapons that can’t be jammed, weapons that don’t have to talk to each other, weapons that push the pesky humans right out of the picture. In the same way the military is now quietly moving aside the humans, David also glided right over the pesky ethical issues, which earned not a single syllable in his column. ...

Two years ago, the Deep State’s influential Council for Foreign Relations openly argued to cut off debate, in its article “Stop the “Stop the Killer Robot” Debate: Why We Need Artificial Intelligence in Future Battlefields.” ...

But the CFR never grappled with the accountability problem. Who’s responsible when the robot goes rogue and wipes out a village, or a wedding, or a whole city? Who’s tried for the war crimes?

Nobody, that’s who. You can’t expect technology to be perfect, dummy. ...

The government knows full well that public outcry will only slow down the killer robot train. The military is now moving with mind-blowing, demonic, uncharacteristic speed toward building its dystopian, robot-armed future. The first fully autonomous killing machines have already been designed, built, and delivered to Ukraine. ...

What can I say? It’s 2024. Here come the terminators, and nothing can stop it. We all knew this day was coming; we just didn’t think it would come from us.

Somebody track down that scrappy Sarah Connor and tell her it’s time to report for duty.
3959   HeadSet   2024 Jun 6, 7:59pm  

Ceffer says

UkraineIsTotallyFucked says


Huh?

Don't you mean WW1?

Lol! Well, strictly speaking, it was a prelude to both.

No, WW2 is correct. You may have been thinking of Spanish-American War. The Spanish Civil War did not take place until well after WW1, and the Nazis interceded on Franco's side.
3960   stereotomy   2024 Jun 6, 8:55pm  

HeadSet says

Ceffer says


UkraineIsTotallyFucked says



Huh?

Don't you mean WW1?

Lol! Well, strictly speaking, it was a prelude to both.


No, WW2 is correct. You may have been thinking of Spanish-American War. The Spanish Civil War did not take place until well after WW1, and the Nazis interceded on Franco's side.

@Headset with the hat tip
3961   Ceffer   2024 Jun 6, 10:10pm  

Yes, the Spanish Civil war was WWII. I was thinking of the Spanish American war.
3962   RayAmerica   2024 Jun 7, 1:56pm  

Ceffer says


Yes, the Spanish Civil war was WWII. I was thinking of the Spanish American war.

There have been so many wars it's easy to get them confused with one another.

The Spanish/American war was the one that Randolph Hearst sold to the gullible American public. Of course, that was an exception to the rule as far as how the media operates.

Thankfully, our modern media would never use propaganda in order to sell us on an unnecessary war now would they? Of course they wouldn't silly.
3965   DemocratsAreTotallyFucked   2024 Jun 11, 12:47pm  

socal2 says

Ukraine, despite what you think - is now one of the most experienced and most heavily armed militaries in Europe and are going to continue killing tens of thousands of foolish Russians trying to occupy their land.









3966   socal2   2024 Jun 11, 1:07pm  

How has that Kharkiv offensive gone for Russia?

Has Russia made any meaningful territorial gains this past year despite losing tens of thousands of human beings in the process?


3967   DemocratsAreTotallyFucked   2024 Jun 11, 3:03pm  

socal2 says

How has that Kharkiv offensive gone for Russia?


Better than it has for Ukraine.
3968   Eric Holder   2024 Jun 11, 4:19pm  

UkraineIsTotallyFucked says

socal2 says


How has that Kharkiv offensive gone for Russia?


Better than it has for Ukraine.


Doubtful.
3969   Eric Holder   2024 Jun 11, 4:24pm  

Speaking at a meeting of regional defence ministers in Kazakhstan, Defence Minister Andrei Belousov said Russian forces had captured a total area of 880 square kilometres (339 square miles) so far this year


Soo, here we have it, right from the horse's mouth: after almost 5 months of offensive action this year (most of which Ukies were fighting w/o weapons re-supply and with prohibition to fire across the international border by our brave Potato) the migthy Red Army has captured and equivalent of a square 18 by18 miles. Or, if you prefer it this way, they moved the 800 mile long front 0.4 miles on average.
3970   DemocratsAreTotallyFucked   2024 Jun 11, 4:52pm  

Eric Holder says


UkraineIsTotallyFucked says


socal2 says


How has that Kharkiv offensive gone for Russia?


Better than it has for Ukraine.



Doubtful.



On 10 May 2024, the Russian Armed Forces began an offensive operation in Ukraine's Kharkiv Oblast, shelling and attempting to breach the defenses of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the direction of Vovchansk and Kharkiv.[2] The Guardian reported that the offensive has led to Russia's biggest territorial gains in 18 months.[3]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_northeastern_Ukraine_offensive
3971   Patrick   2024 Jun 14, 12:41pm  

https://bioclandestine.substack.com/p/the-stage-is-set-for-trump-to-be


If Trump is able to come in and stop the war in Ukraine immediately like he claims he will, that would be a nail in the coffin for the Deep State.

It would prove that the Biden regime could have stopped this war the entire time, yet chose to push us to the brink of WW3 anyways.

The stage is set for Trump to be the global peacemaker, which would not only prove the Deep State’s criminality, but also give Trump near-unlimited political ammunition and optics to hold them accountable for their crimes against humanity.

If Trump is able to prevent WW3, he will not only win over the trust and approval of Americans, but citizens worldwide. It would be impossible to refute that Trump is for The People. It also would mean that Trump’s enemies just spent the last 8+ years trying to stop the guy who ended up preventing WW3…
3972   stereotomy   2024 Jun 14, 1:02pm  

I think one of the reasons why Putin hasn't given the west a nuclear ultimatum is that he thinks that Trump will end this neocon shitshow. If Bidet steals the next election, then kiss your loved ones goodbye, because if a country is faced with an insane, implacable, rabid enemy (the neocons and their NATO lackeys) bent on your own country's destruction, then the only option is a limited strike on all of the globohomo hideouts in the west.
3973   WookieMan   2024 Jun 14, 1:35pm  

Patrick says

If Trump is able to prevent WW3, he will not only win over the trust and approval of Americans, but citizens worldwide. It would be impossible to refute that Trump is for The People. It also would mean that Trump’s enemies just spent the last 8+ years trying to stop the guy who ended up preventing WW3…

This is WWIII already Patrick. We just won't label it for another 2-3 years. It's going to expand. Iran and Israel is problematic. There will be troops on the ground at some point. Ukraine is the only non-NATO member bordering Russia. This gets worse before it gets better.

I like Trump but this is a canoe in the river with no paddle. No nukes, but a lot of people are going to die. This doesn't end/finish until 2030. Fortunately we'll be okay here as no one has the capacity to attack us in any meaningful way. A lot of posturing.

Ukraine is toast. Russia is going to loose a ton of men. If they use a nuke they'll be glass in minutes. This also is all assuming Ukraine didn't hold back some nukes from the 90's. They did. Russia knows this, hence the WWI style trench warfare. Their population is larger. Long term Russia will look like idiots, but they will win.
3974   stereotomy   2024 Jun 14, 1:47pm  

China and NK both have the capacity to hit the US now, thanks to Clinton. Whether they will do it is the question - they have much more to lose

I'm old enough to remember the last spasm of the Cold War. The 1980's were existentially terrifying, and that was with only two major nuclear powers (I'm lumping NATO forces of UK and France together with the US here).

Now we have India, Pakistan, Israel, North Korea, and who knows how many other clandestine programs.

Anatomically modern humans (even brain size) have existed for over 300,000 years. Why is there no evidence of technological civilizations prior to our own? Maybe we blew ourselves back to the fucking stone age every 50-70,000 years.
3975   DemocratsAreTotallyFucked   2024 Jun 14, 2:25pm  

WookieMan says

This also is all assuming Ukraine didn't hold back some nukes from the 90's


Nukes they never had the control codes for anyway?

« First        Comments 3,938 - 3,977 of 4,188       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste