5
0

Lol, Biden has still not officially withdrawn


 invite response                
2024 Jul 29, 8:23pm   264 views  10 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (59)   💰tip   ignore  

https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/the-double-coup


The signature did not match other Biden signatures, which are usually done via auto-pen. No legacy media that I saw, asked a graphologist to review the signature.

Some commentators noted that the letter had no White House seal. That is correct but not important evidence, since campaign matters must, per FEC law, be separate from governing.

But there was also no Form 460 related to this document, to my knowledge, and no disclosure statement on the letter, both of which are required by FEC law for any communication by the candidate to the public. As a result, to my knowledge, this is just a letter. This is not an official campaign document. It has no legal weight in terms of the purported cessation of President Biden’s campaign, and is in fact, per campaign law, possibly an illegal communication. ...

Legally, as I understand FEC law, VP Harris can’t simply pick up where President Biden left off and simply “inherit” his campaign, let alone his donors’ money. To my knowledge, you can’t just at will, without at least complex filings and legal appeals, switch out the candidate and just change the name of the campaign. Read the FEC law for yourselves. There is no entry for simply switching out a candidate for the same campaign.

https://www.fec.gov/introduction-campaign-finance/

... The other thing that freaks me out is the difference between the skin tone of President Biden’s face and his hands. The skin tone of President Biden’s hands is dramatically different than the skin tone of his face. President Biden’s face is fair — indeed much more orange than before he allegedly had COVID. But his hands are purplish brown.

I have no way to assess this, except that purple or mottled skin tone is a hallmark of elders who are very close to death; perhaps makeup covered the President’s face and not his hands. Whatever this image is, of whatever it is comprised — and we live in a time, technologically, of many options that manipulate “reality” — this video is not what the public always needs at a time such as this. The public requires a live demonstration in front of live humans who can ask live questions, to confirm that the President is alive, safe, free and well.

Comments 1 - 10 of 10        Search these comments

1   FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden   2024 Jul 29, 9:35pm  

naomi wolf has been losing her shit lately too much. don’t know if act or real, but way over the top.
2   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Jul 29, 10:12pm  

Since when do Democrats follow the law unless forced to.l?
3   Patrick   2024 Aug 11, 11:54am  

https://bioclandestine.substack.com/p/drunk-nancy-spills-the-beans


Nancy pretty much just admitted that Joe was overthrown unwillingly.

But to me, it seems like she is setting the stage for Biden to rescind that letter, and get back in the race.

She says she never accepted it as “anything but a letter”, and said it “didn’t sound like Biden”.

Maybe I am reading too much into drunk Nancy’s ramblings… or maybe, Trump knows something we do not, and Biden actually is trying to get back in the race.

Biden just said he is about to go back on the campaign trail to support Kamala. Is this true, or is he just auditioning to regain the favor of the DNC elite, and win back his delegates before the convention? All it takes is a phone call, and the delegates will pledge to whomever they are told.

The DNC internal war might not be over. Trump might be onto something about Biden wanting back in the race.


Nancy really does sound drunk in that video. Can't figure out how to copy "blob" format videos. Anyone who knows, please say, thanks.
4   WookieMan   2024 Aug 11, 12:03pm  

Patrick says

Nancy really does sound drunk in that video.

She is. Most politicians are drunk or on coke. Hell most adults are. I've yet to ever meet a person (adult) that abstains from alcohol or ANY other drug including pharmaceuticals. I do my drinking and that's it. Legal weed in IL, I'm out. Hard drugs, I'm out. Prescription drugs, I'm out. Messed around in the college years, but I'm over that at this point.

Everyone is on something mind altering. Illegal or legal. I honestly would rather die before needing a weekly pill container. Count me out of that shit.
5   HeadSet   2024 Aug 11, 3:41pm  

@Patrick



I had to shrink it because you have a 10-meg upload limit.
6   Patrick   2024 Aug 11, 3:57pm  

@HeadSet

How did you grab it?
7   Ceffer   2024 Aug 11, 5:42pm  

Some think the Walz disaster will be reversed and he will be out, although he is a Satanically perfect sociopathic shill KommieKunt according to the desires of the Deep State.

Nancy Actress' statements (as one fake actor avatar to another) is to go back to Biden Actor (who will become miraculously less senile on a dime) instead of the KamalaToe disaster of wasted MSM/Mockingbird lies and promotions.

They are twisting, which is fun to watch, but desperation creates dangerous demons.
8   Patrick   2024 Aug 19, 4:25pm  

https://words.mattiasdesmet.org/p/the-democratic-party-coup-against


The democratic party coup against Biden.

I read in The New York Times that Biden was removed from the presidential race through a genuine "coup" or overthrow. It's just an isolated article amidst the vast sea of media content that upholds the illusion of the day, but it's still being picked up here and there in the mainstream media.

The content of the original article goes like this: Biden fell victim to an actual conspiracy by Obama, Pelosi, Schumer, and Jeffries. On alternative media, this conclusion was reached much earlier: the way Biden was removed from the race bears all the characteristics of a coup. This conclusion was drawn from a series of factors, including the fact that neither Biden himself nor people from his entourage publicly communicated about the withdrawal from the race, except through a letter signed by Biden "as if with a gun to his head."

Is it a problem that a number of influential Democratic figures forced Biden behind the scenes to withdraw? Yes, because Biden was indeed democratically nominated as the presidential candidate by millions of Democratic Party members. Kamala Harris was not democratically nominated at all.

The choice of Harris is, to put it mildly, remarkable. She initially had little to no grassroots support within the Democratic voter base; her knowledge of crucial aspects of the state system and key societal issues (such as the pressing phenomenon of inflation) seems almost nonexistent; and nature certainly did not endow her with rhetorical prowess.

Either the Democrats had an incredible poverty of available candidates, or they believe so blindly in the propaganda machine that is being mobilized that they dare to go to the elections with just anyone. A combination of these two factors seems most plausible to me.

Certain aspects of how the propaganda machine is used to influence elections have already been extensively documented. The development of Google and many other popular internet applications was originally funded by the U.S. State Department due to their potentially extraordinary usefulness as propaganda tools. And that turned out to be a good bet.

Propaganda is not primarily the art of lying; it is the art of psychological manipulation. It is primarily the art of directing attention. Propaganda ensures that you notice certain aspects of reality and not others. And what is more suited to that than a search engine? Google is nowadays the Great Other that answers all your questions.

And that answer is far from "objective" or "neutral." Google more frequently directs you to "desired" narratives than to undesirable ones. And sometimes the disbalance is quite outspoken. To give just one example: In the days following the attack on Trump, it was signaled frequently that the search term "assassination attempt" in America yielded little to no results referring to the assassination attempt on Trump. Instead, one would get content referring to all sorts of assassination attempts.

This suggests that those who believe the whole attack on Trump was a "deep state"-orchestrated publicity campaign for Trump are wrong. The attack on Trump was indeed extremely good publicity for Trump, but the establishment did everything to minimize that publicity.

While the manipulation of search strategies about the assassination attempt on Trump are still somehow speculative, the same is not true when talking about the 2020 elections. I've mentioned it before: this interview with Mike Benz introduces you to the most expert way in this matter. This much is clear: propaganda works stunningly well. It seems that the enormous propaganda machinery might even be able to achieve the impossible: making a candidate without grassroots support, without rhetorical talent, and without significant intellectual abilities the president of the USA.

The Democratic Party in America is rapidly discarding any democratic character and is transforming more and more into a fully developed totalitarian structure. Under Biden's rule, it became more or less normal to prosecute and imprison political opponents and dissident journalists (according to some sources, this involved hundreds of dissidents); he actively and explicitly helped create social support for the assassination attempt on Trump; he incited violence against the people of the MAGA movement in a barely concealed way; and in true totalitarian style, he kept the numerous (and perhaps justified) legal allegations against him and his family members out of the media.

The coup against Biden confronts Biden himself with a core characteristic of totalitarian systems. As Hannah Arendt already said: a totalitarian system always ultimately becomes a monster that devours its own children. Biden now knows this: he became a victim of the beast he himself abundantly fed.

That rising beast is, of course, not merely an American affair. It is a global phenomenon. The social dynamics set in motion by the riots in Great Britain illustrate this abundantly, for example. What is happening in Great Britain is socially so important that I will dedicate a separate article to it, but I will already touch on it here.

The totalitarian censorship there entered the next stage. People who articulated a dissident opinion on social media are now being imprisoned almost arbitrarily. In some cases, the posts indeed incite violence to some extent; but in other cases, it's hard to detect anything in the post that could be legally sanctionable. And ultimately, this is exactly what the legislator announces: the post doesn't have to be illegal to be forced to censor it.

In this way, the totalitarian system achieves something typical: it cancels every law (see, for example, Solzhenitsyn’s "there is no law") and replaces it with a system of ad hoc rules that whirls around and ultimately descends into radical absurdity. In that sense, totalitarian systems are variants and outgrowths of the bureaucratization of society:

"In a fully developed bureaucracy there is nobody left with whom one can argue, to whom one can present grievances, on whom the pressures of power can be exerted. Bureaucracy is the form of government in which everybody is deprived of political freedom, of the power to act; for the rule by Nobody is not no-rule, and where all are equally powerless, we have a tyranny without a tyrant." (Hannah Arendt, On Violence).

Ultimately, in such a bureaucratic-totalitarian system, every psychological anchor that the law normally provides is lost. In place of the law is a completely irrational and inconsistent rule system. In this way, our rationalist culture culminates in exactly the opposite of what it sought to achieve.

The absurd, suffocating networks of rules first turn against those who do not want to go along with the system. But those who do engage with the system also fall prey to it, narrowly escaping, if at all, the machine they themselves built.

In a totalitarian system, no one is safe; everything and everyone can fall under the rules that are rewritten daily on the walls of Animal Farm by the pigs in charge. This gives us a glimpse of what the coming years will mainly bring: unimaginable chaos and psychological dislocation. And the only anchor will be precisely what our rationalist Enlightenment society pushed to the background: loyalty to ethical principles even if it means losing whatever you possess in the world of appearances.
9   Ceffer   2024 Aug 19, 4:52pm  

Tempest in a teapot, and more of the same ole same ole. Biden Actor was signing blank documents since the outset and everything he has done has been illegitimate due to treason and election fraud, anyway. I wouldn't be surprised if they pulled the Satanic Inversion that they were doing a service removing their own fraud from running.

All this jumping on chairs and clutching of pearls is so much Johnnie Come Lately fume for what has been routine operating fraud and treason for years.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste