by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 3 - 25 of 25 Search these comments
Now that the House has released corroboration in actual money transfers linking many in the Biden family, the media is insisting that this is no scandal because there is no direct proof of payments to Joe Biden.
Putting aside that this is only the fourth month of an investigation, the media’s demand of a direct payment to President Biden is laughably absurd. The payments were going to his family, but he was the object of the influence peddling.
The House has shown millions of dollars going to at least nine Bidens like dividends from a family business. As a long-time critic of influence peddling among both Republicans and Democrats, I have never seen the equal of the Bidens.
The whole purpose of influence peddling is to use family members as shields for corrupt officials. Instead of making a direct payment to a politician, which could be seen as a bribe, you can give millions to his or her spouse or children.
Moreover, these emails include references to Joe Biden getting a 10 percent cut of one Chinese deal. It also shows Biden associates warning not to use Joe Biden’s name but to employ code names like “the Big Guy.” At the same time, the president and the first lady are referenced as benefiting from offices and receiving payments from Hunter.
Indeed, Hunter complains that his father is taking half of everything that he is raking in.
None of that matters. The New York Times ran a piece headlined, “House Republican Report Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by President Biden.” That is putting aside evidence against all the family members around Joe Biden. It also ignored that other evidence clearly shows Biden lied about his family not receiving Chinese funds or that he never had any knowledge of his son’s business dealings.
Hunter changes his plea from not guilty to guilty. Why would he do this unless it was to get a commute or pardon from Joe before he leaves.
I'm pretty sure a pardon for Hunter by Kummala was part of the deal when Potato agreed to withdraw from the race.
RWSGFY says
I'm pretty sure a pardon for Hunter by Kummala was part of the deal when Potato agreed to withdraw from the race.
No need for Kamala to soil her hands. Biden has plenty of time to do his mass pardons between mid November and mid January.
But he publicly promised to not pardon Hunter.
Hunter changes his plea from not guilty to guilty. Why would he do this unless it was to get a commute or pardon from Joe before he leaves.
RWSGFY says
But he publicly promised to not pardon Hunter.
Do you really think he will care about that? Biden has continuously been caught lying and plagiarizing for decades and is the lamest of lame ducks. Biden will definitely do the pardon if Trump wins and would be stupid to trust Kamala once she assumes office and Biden is out with the trash.
Biden will definitely do the pardon if Trump wins and would be stupid to trust Kamala once she assumes office and Biden is out with the trash.
I read the comments made, and agree likely Biden will pardon Hunter after the election
On what charges?
An AG from Arkansas could charge him for something.
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,261,575 comments by 15,065 users - komputodo online now