« First « Previous Comments 8 - 31 of 31 Search these comments
BayArea sayswhat would be the argument for that and how would pay for it?
Argument was already given and DNA testing is cheap these days and only going to get cheaper...esp if there's a volume contract
Basic question: If a guy doesn't feel sure, can't he buy a saliva kit and have the paternity test done without his wife even knowing, before signing a birth certificate?
How will the wife not know that a dna sample was taken from the baby for a match?
This gut was lucky. In many states, if you are currently married to the woman who gives birth, you are legally responsible whether the kid is biologically yours or not. A paternity test would not matter.So you have to force a paternity test before birth? Wow! Yet another of men's perils of marriage.
BayArea says
How will the wife not know that a dna sample was taken from the baby for a match?
If all you have to do is rub a Qtip in the babies cheek, you can easily do it without the mother knowing.
You can avoid marriage and still have a child if you feel the desire to.
People will discover shit like how almost everyone in some small town is descended from one guy who sired 80 babies with half the women in town at one point.
Many kids are harmed by growing up with a father who is not entirely certain he is the father. Would be better for everyone (except skanky women) to simply know for a fact immediately at birth who is and who is not the biological father of every child.
There should be mandatory paternity testing at birth. To oppose it is to promote deception and uncertainty.