« First « Previous Comments 817 - 856 of 1,066 Next » Last » Search these comments
Can't cheat this one. Look where the money is going. They're going to try and salvage the House and Senate seats. They're already going to lose a Senate seat in Montana. Too many House seats to track all the races. They're likely flooding them with money. They can't have Trump running government with all 3 branches being conservative. House and Senate is the only option. Harris is toast and being used as a black fundraiser for down ballot. Just a pawn. Without Congress Trump can't do anything of substance.
last time Trump did have all 3 branches. Republicunts just sat on their dicks and did nothing. whole thing is bullshit shitshow. As i get older more i agree with George Carlins rants, just both parties, he mainly blamed Republicans.
Trump did have all 3 branches. Republicunts just sat on their dicks and did nothing. whole thing is bullshit shitshow.
@TrumpWarRoom
17h
Kamala's teleprompter briefly went out at the beginning of her speech — you can tell the exact moment it happened.
She had absolutely no idea what to do or say.
Humiliating.
Kamala's teleprompter briefly went out at the beginning of her speech — you can tell the exact moment it happened.
She had absolutely no idea what to do or say.
Humiliating.
Kamala's teleprompter briefly went out at the beginning of her speech — you can tell the exact moment it happened.
She had absolutely no idea what to do or say.
Humiliating.
In a 2024-style twist that might explain much, it unsurprisingly turns out that Kamala Harris has serious daddy issues. The New York Times ran a hagiographic story Friday headlined, “Kamala Harris and the Influence of an Estranged Father Just Two Miles Away.” Perhaps even more astonishing than the fact that Kamala and her father haven’t spoken in decades was that Kamala’s father’s first name and middle initial are “Donald J.” I am not making that up.
The Times’ article is an overlong, over-the-top biography of far-left economist Donald J. Harris that tries its best to excuse Kamala’s absence from his life, bizarrely attempting to paint a picture of a strong, albeit absent, father figure who positively influenced his daughter even though the two can’t stand each other. Without evidence, the Times hilariously described their nonexistent relationship as his “spectral presence” in her life.
In other words, he ghosted her.
Dr. Harris,” the Times earnestly informed readers, “has been a mostly absent figure from his daughter’s life but not an irrelevant one.” Uh huh. The excruciatingly lengthy, excuses-packed, race-baiting, meandering article never quite got around to putting its finger on the family’s problem, even though that would seem to be the most interesting question for readers. The closest the article came was quoting a family friend who said the trouble “is that they’re so much alike.”
I think that is called damning someone with faint praise. What common element of their similar personalities precludes familial affection?
I’m not slamming Kamala Harris for having a troubled family life. Who among us can claim a halcyon Leave It To Beaver legacy? But all this blackwashing has got to stop.
https://babylonbee.com/news/howard-stern-under-fire-for-exploiting-mentally-challenged-guest-for-cheap-laughs
« First « Previous Comments 817 - 856 of 1,066 Next » Last » Search these comments
original link