patrick.net

I can't get over the crack smoking on used vehicles. 3-7 year old models with well over 60k miles up to 120k miles, aren't 50% of the current models. Often the lower trims are only a few thousand more with no miles and the full warranty length. It's batshit crazy.

WTF would I pay $25k at 7% for a 2019 with 70k miles when I can get the highest trims on a 24/25 for well under $40k at 4%?

Well, dealers can enjoy the lot rot.

AmericanKulak says

I can't get over the crack smoking on used vehicles. 3-7 year old models with well over 60k miles up to 120k miles, aren't 50% of the current models. Often the lower trims are only a few thousand more with no miles and the full warranty length. It's batshit crazy.

WTF would I pay $25k at 7% for a 2019 with 70k miles when I can get the highest trims on a 24/25 for well under $40k at 4%?

Well, dealers can enjoy the lot rot.

Agreed. We got a brand new Tiguan for 35k and so far so good, it's been a great car for the first years. Used car prices are way too high atm

AmericanKulak says

Yeah, these Jeeps are fake Macho.

Weird, my 91 wrangler engine was 190HP. Jeeps break. Over and over and over. I sold that jeep 23 years ago but still have an awesome set of tools.

I barely / slowly rolled up over a curb in front of my parents house. At a nice angle where the right front tire went up first. The "sport" bar that attached to the wind shield broke. Or rather, the torque screws holding them together did.

I went down to Chrysler, Jeep, Eagle to get replacements and they didn't have any, wouldn't order any, refused to sell me any and gave me no advice other than: fuck off (basically)

Fortunately the little biotech I worked at had a machine shop and my buddy made me some that were better and never broke again. Just everything else on the jeep broke.

Jimny is a real off-road capable truck, just small. For one or two people who don't need to haul much gear around it's perfect.

Part of the reason why some used car models see unusually high prices is due to a few very popular and well-known reliable engines were recently replaced by new unreliable engines. For example, the Toyota 5.7 liter naturally aspirited engines being replaced by the 3.4 liter turbo engine, 3.5 liter naturally aspirated engine being replaced by 2.4 liter turbo engine, Honda 2.4 liter naturally aspirited engine being replaced by 1.5 liter turbo engine, etc.. Usually manufacturers have to go through a couple generations of turbo engines before reliability stabilizes; "first" generation turbo engines from every manufacturer seem to be unreliable (coming from an owner of Saab's a couple decades ago), I think because if the immediate previous generation engine from the same manufacturer is not turbo, the engineers who had experience with designing turbo engines and drawing up maintenance schedules for turbo engines have retired, and the new guys have to learn life under high temperature and high pressure all over again. Saab took 2 generations of unreliable turbo engines over 2 decades to arrive at reliable engines by the 2000's; BMW took 2 generations of unreliable turbo engines (N54, N55) over a decade to arrive at B58 (very reliable). It may take Toyota and Honda nearly as long (Honda is already half a decade into it and seems to be dropping the 1.5 liter turbo in the near future, replacing it with serial hybrids like in the latest Civic Hybrid; Toyota is 2+ years into turbo engines right now so plagued with problems). I'm not familiar with the market under 240hp (the upper limit of naturally aspirited 4 cylinder engines), for the current market of vehicles delivering over 240hp, I'd stick with Honda/Acura 3.5 liter or BMW B58 (3 liter turbo engines with piston stroke longer than cylinder bore diameter so you can have low-end torque for daily driving, in production since 2016/17). For domestic American, ironically the 3.6 liter PentStar naturally aspirited from Chrysler/Stellantis is more reliable than the latest crop of domestic and Japanese turbo engines in trucks, simply because Stellantis is not going over to turbo's as quickly as the others.

My reservations regarding current Subarus are two fold: 1. flat boxer engines have intrinsic design problems: soaking the engine head in potentially acidic coolant when the engine is not running, upper half circle of the cylinder bore not being lubricated as well as the bottom half circle of the cylinder bore when the engine is running; if you have a low cost engine rebuilder in the back pocket, inevitable engine repairs between 50k-100k miles may not cost much in parts but mostly labor intensive for replacing mechanical parts in the engine. 2. the CVT being the only available automatic transmission in current Subarus. Traditional planetary-gear and fluid torque converter automatics, especially the 8-speed from ZF (8HP series) can take load much better and are much more reliable. When going off road (or driving on vertically undulating roads), the vehicle is taking heavy load: its own weight (which is why electric vehicles suck when doing that, as batteries don't have the energy density to deal with lifting the vehicle's own weight over obstacles for long; how long do you think the chain-driven CVT's can keep doing that literal heavy lifting?).

Among Jeep vehicles, the ones based on Fiat cars are jokes. However, Wrangler and Gladiator are solid vehicles in recent years, especially with the 3.6 liter PentStar engines (the 2 liter turbo only started selling recently) and the ZF 8speed planetary-gear + torque-converter automatic . . . a combination that Stellantis is stopping selling for 2025 model year! Perhaps the management is trying to kill sales so the Jeep division can be sold to Lamborghini to remake LM002!

I'd get the Maverick. Hyundai's are too problematic, and the Subaru has a CVT.

Having written that, when you test drive them, which one did you like the best?

AmericanKulak says

My near vision is going and I need at least a 10-inch screen.

That one might really cost you. You might have to move to a higher trim level to get it.

Reality says

My reservations regarding current Subarus are two fold: 1. flat boxer engines have intrinsic design problems: soaking the engine head in potentially acidic coolant when the engine is not running

My mechanic buddy ribbed me when I talked about buying a Sub, "let me know if you buy it, I'll go ahead and order a head gasket"

My Subaru WRX turbo wagon was my historically most reliable and care free of my cars. Yes, the turbo gasket had to be replaced at 60K, but all in all, over 120K, it was not that huge an expense. It was still in excellent condition when I traded it in after over 16 years of ownership. All parts except that gasket, batteries, filters and tires were original and still worked except for one stop on the car fan. The electric windows never had a problem, and it was pretty quiet when the windows were closed. It also was solid and never had an inherent squeak or chassis rattle.

That's a sample of one from an owner. However, I also like my Forester a lot. No turbo, regular gas, it's nearly ideal for what I want these days. It has a lot of little perks, dimming mirrors at night etc. It has a nonvolatile computer memory so if you disconnect the battery it keeps its settings, unlike my wife's old Volvo or her Honda.

We have a Subaru Outback Touring XT. 2 years old, zero issues. The turbo has zip. I actually like the adaptive cruise control for long road trips. The 11.6 inch infotainment screen is massive and I appreciate the Apple Car play interface. My wife likes the high beam assist function. Overall, pretty good bang for the buck.

I've got an Outback while my wife has a Forester. Mine is one of the last years you could get the flat 6. It has the CVT though.

Supposedly Subaru is just warranteeing the CVTs for 10yr/100K. If it breaks before then you get a new CVT - otherwise it's probably $8K to replace. The dealers aren't even performing the 30K maintenance that's mentioned in the service and owner's manuals.

The only decent, long-term reliable CVTs are found on Honda and Toyota vehicles - they've been working with these for 30 years as they're needed for hybrid drivetrains. Everyone else uses this other supplier who has far less money and experience with these transmissions.

I love the flat 6 - 250/250 hp/torque, has a timing chain which never needs to be changed, and runs on dino 5w30.

The Outback tends to waddle in turns, so I recommend a beefier rear swaybar to tighten things up. My wife's 2008 Forester handled perfectly - nice and well-balanced. I didn't have to mod anything.

Reality says

Honda 2.4 liter naturally aspirited engine being replaced by 1.5 liter turbo engine, etc.. Usually manufacturers have to go through a couple generations of turbo engines before reliability stabilizes

We got the 2021 CRV which has the 1.5 liter turbo engine, and get about 30.5 miles per gallon in city driving. We don't have a lot of traffic lights turning red where we go in the city based on traffic engineering here and our selection of roads.

Honda states the 1.5 liter turbo has been around since 2001.

https://hondanews.com/en-US/honda-automobiles/releases/release-40b876fa88ce36bf41449f6e441f9b95-honda-15-liter-turbo-engine

.

Modelo still reigns after dethroning Bud Light
Modelo Especial remains the best-selling beer in the U.S. and its sales are up 12% so far in 2024, compared to a year ago, according to Bump Williams Consulting. The Shelton, Connecticut firm services the alcoholic beverage industry and uses NIQ data tracking retail sales at supermarkets, convenience and select liquor stores.

You know you want the Lobo edition of the Maverick.
The Lobo sport truck comes with the turbo four-cylinder and standard all-wheel drive, but drops the eight-speed in favor of a seven-speed automatic with paddle shifters. Ford has given the Lobo a lowered suspension, upgraded brakes, cool 19-inch rally-inspired wheels, and a special Lobo driving mode that encourages the rear end to drift when exiting a corner.

I don't know, Subaru's scream gay to me. Male or female. Just get a real car.

Was out in Montana in the winter with a buddy and I felt completely unsafe in his car. I don't know the model of Subaru. He thought it was fine. I was drinking and sent him onto a road that should have been easy to handle. One of the few times I feared for my life. No cell signal and a shitty car. He even admitted he was scared.

It's no mans land in that spot so we keep going back there now. Not in the winter though. My other buddy has a 4x4 truck so we usually ride around in that in the winter. So many yuppie migrants are going to MT and don't understand winter and rugged terrain. A Subaru ain't gonna cut it out there.

Honda states the 1.5 liter turbo has been around since 2001.

https://hondanews.com/en-US/honda-automobiles/releases/release-40b876fa88ce36bf41449f6e441f9b95-honda-15-liter-turbo-engine

What's stated in the link is that 1.5L turbo is part of the Honda L engine series; the series started in 2001, not the turbo variety of engines. I had to look up on this (as I have never shopped in this category of engines myself), according to Wikipedia, what was introduced in 2001 at the debut of L series engines were naturally aspirited engines displacing 1.0L to 1.2L using dual-spark (two spark plugs per cylinder) no VTEC. Turbo engines in the L-series are only available on the VTEC variety, and TurboVTEC 1.5L was introduced in 2016.

Most of the eCVT systems used in Toyota hybrids and Honda hybrids are actually not belt-driven but Planetary Gear systems with two input gears (therefore achieving continuous input/output gear ratio instead of a few fixed gear ratio; the mechanics is rather complicated, and there are a few good youtube videos explaining how this works). The problem with most non-hybrid CVT transmissions is the fact that they are metal chain/belt driven systems. Similar to motorcycles, engine timing and even high spin-speed clothes washers, gear-driven power transmission are far more reliable and longer lasting than chain/belt driven alternatives because chains/belts eventually get stretched especially in high load applications (e.g. high torque initial starts, raising the vehicle's own weight over obstacles due to going up hill or over broken terrain especially when vehicle speed is slow so no help from inertia to overcome obstacles, and etc.)

I think this topic is being overthought. Buy a car you like. Maintain it and you'll be fine. The mechanics of it don't matter. A repair is trivial really. If you don't have the money, buy a used car and learn to wrench on it. Or have a good mechanic that you know and trust. There are cheap ones out there.

Murphy's Law dictates that car breakdowns usually take place when one can least afford it. So the solution is avoiding money trouble risks and buying reliable cars. I had a tenant who had a turbo V8 BMW (M550i ??), making far more power than my B58 BMW daily driver. He was having a great time modding his car to get more power out of it (reaching over 800hp), then suddenly due to a heated dispute with his girlfriend and the girl reporting him to the police, he lost his job and the car also started having drivability problems. Eventually it sat in the backyard of the rental property for over a year before the bank sent tow truck to repo it. Beautiful car and I'm sure a lot of fun driving it, but what a waste.

WookieMan says

I don't know, Subaru's scream gay to me. Male or female. Just get a real car.

Lesbian to you, sir. We who drive Subaru are honorary lesbians, but without the purple and green hair requirement.

Makes sense. Lesbian cars will blow a gasket on an unpredictable schedule.

Every time I drive my Subaru, my beard pulls in instead of growing out and my breasts get sensitive. However, I get an insatiable urge for clam dip.

zzyzzx says

The generation to which the blue one belongs predate the head gasket problems.