patrick.net

https://metatron.substack.com/p/history-repeats-the-blueprint-of

HISTORY REPEATS: The Blueprint of Medical Tyranny from Spanish Flu to COVID-19

How Government-Sponsored "Epidemics" Continue to Serve Pharmaceutical Profits Over Public Health ...

The author provides compelling first-hand testimony about the 1918 Spanish Influenza epidemic, which she survived. According to McBean, the devastating pandemic that killed 20 million people worldwide was actually caused by the widespread administration of multiple vaccines to soldiers and civilians after World War I. She recounts how her unvaccinated family remained healthy while vaccinated individuals succumbed to the disease in massive numbers.

McBean meticulously documents the rise in typhoid cases following mandatory military vaccination, contrasting this with the previous success of sanitation measures in reducing disease. She presents military hospital records showing how various vaccines led to increased illness and death among soldiers, particularly noting the emergence of a more severe "paratyphoid" in those who received the typhoid vaccine.

The book reveals several court cases demonstrating how medical authorities manufactured epidemics for profit. In Kansas City (1921) and Pittsburgh (1924), doctors were found to have deliberately created false epidemics to sell vaccines, resulting in massive profits and public expense. These cases were exposed through the efforts of citizen health groups who took legal action against the perpetrators. ...

The parallels between the documented historical events McBean presents and recent COVID-19 policies are indeed striking and systematic, not controversial at all when examined objectively:

Government protection of pharmaceutical companies from liability;

Falsification and manipulation of death certificates and statistics;

Use of media to create fear and suppress opposing views;

Financial incentives to medical establishments for compliance;

Rushed vaccines without proper safety testing;

Suppression of early treatment options;

Demonization of those questioning the official narrative.

https://nitter.poast.org/vancemurphy/status/1853594897455935508#m

https://covidsteria.substack.com/p/pharmasteria-best-big-pharma-memes-big-poison-panics

https://www.amazon.com/Turtles-All-Way-Down-Vaccine/dp/9655981045

If you are reading this, you are probably aware of the fierce debate surrounding vaccination and looking for information that will allow you to make the best decisions for yourself and your loved ones. Whether you are a parent or a parent to be, sorting through the many arguments on vaccines can be daunting. Still, you need an answer, a definitive one, to the crucial question: Who has it right in the great vaccine debate – the critics, who claim that vaccines often cause serious harm, or the medical establishment, which tells us that vaccines are safe and effective and the science is settled?

Rest assured, you have come to the right place. Turtles All the Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth will resolve the vaccine question for you, once and for all. By the time you finish reading, not only will you see the answer clearly for yourself, you will also have the scientific references and specific quotes at your disposal that prove it – more than 1,200 of them – all from mainstream scientific papers and textbooks, the official publications of relevant government agencies, or manufacturers’ documents.

The book consolidates a great deal of information (accompanied by detailed analysis) that is scattered in hundreds of medical articles, books, and websites. All discussion is presented in clear and easy-to-understand language, so no medical education is required. It presents several original concepts in addition to laying a robust scientific foundation for the more established ones.

Some of the fundamental vaccine safety issues covered in the book are:
How is safety demonstrated before a new vaccine is licensed? What technique do vaccine manufacturers use in clinical trials to make vaccines appear safer than they actually are?
What “last ditch” technique is employed when the above one cannot be, and what are its grave (and damning) ethical implications?
What is the scientific foundation of the safety of vaccination, and what practical tools does this body of science provide physicians to anticipate, diagnose, and treat vaccine injury?
What fundamental flaws are built into vaccine adverse events reporting systems, and how are these systems used (or misused) by health authorities to support their safety claims?
What kinds of post-marketing vaccine studies are conducted, and how can they be manipulated by researchers to produce “favorable” outcomes?
Why would researchers want to skew vaccine research, and how could skewed results be promulgated by the scientific community?
Why would medical journals publish faulty vaccine science? What is the role of the famed “peer review” in this process?
What are “the studies that will never be done” by the medical establishment and how long it has resisted doing them? (Hint: more than 100 years!)
What key CDC-recommended childhood vaccination guidelines were arbitrarily set, without an adequate scientific basis?

In addition, three cornerstones of vaccination lore are covered in depth:
What is herd immunity, and how does it apply (or not) to the vaccines on the childhood schedule?
What role did vaccines actually play in the historical decline of infectious disease?
Was the paralysis associated with polio actually caused by the poliovirus? Is there a better explanation for the great paralysis epidemics of the 20th century? What are the “19 polio mysteries”?

The book is intended for parents overwhelmed by conflicting messaging on this important topic, but it is also an excellent reference for medical researchers and professionals who seek a better understanding of vaccine safety science. Whether you are new to the vaccine debate or a “veteran” seeking a deeper grasp of the science, this book is a must-read. It also serves as an excellent primer on vaccination to share with friends and relatives who may benefit from a deep dive into the subject.

Patrick says

Man that's fucked up, we all know Covid is BS. Checked CDC site it's correct.

Patrick says

It's worse than evil - infants can't articulate their distress or who "touched you in the wrong place." They are killing all infants that weren't aborted in the first 12 months. This is truly a depopulation program.

It's all about a criminal Congress granting Pfizer and other vaccine makers complete immunity no matter how many people they kill.

Repeal the "Vaccine Injury Act" of 1986. All vaccines and other medical products must come with unlimited liability for manufacturers at all times.

100% @Patrick

Criminal as hell. There should be no immunities from lawsuits and we would see 90+% of them go away.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/combination-routine-vaccination-associated

Combination Routine Childhood Vaccination Associated with Development of Asthma and Eczema

Hazard Ratios Too High to be Ignored

https://nitter.poast.org/vancemurphy/status/1866172005763998074#m

https://www.truthandtriage.com/p/babies-covid-vaccines-that-dont-work

Why Are We Giving Babies COVID-19 Vaccines That Don't Work?

A CDC-funded study found COVID-19 vaccines do not reduce the risk of infection in children under 5, and may actually increase the risk for some.

Despite persistent recommendations from U.S. health agencies to vaccinate children as young as six months against COVID-19, a new study led by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that the shots do not reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children under 5 years old and may actually increase the risk of infection in some children.

The study, published in a leading medical journal, analyzed data from three cohort studies conducted between September 2022 and April 2023 and found no difference in infection rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated children.

While health agencies claim that COVID-19 vaccines reduce the risk of severe disease in young children—who aren’t at risk for severe illness in the first place—the findings of this study show the shots do no such thing, which was a cornerstone of public health messaging during the pandemic.

Why inject babies with dangerous and ineffective mRNA? For the MONEY. What a silly question!

Diptheria is stupid. It's rare even in 3rd world countries, found only in the most poxed asspits of the 4th World. Knocked out quick with the oldest, most generic antibiotics.

Huh, even ultrasound may not be safe:

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotten-dangers-of-ultrasound

• The medical field has had a long history of exposing mothers to “treatments” that harm their infants. After decades of work to stop the routine x-raying of fetuses, the “safe and effective” practice of prenatal ultrasound (US) was adopted in its place.

• While US is thought to be safe, there are decades of research showing it can harm tissues. Initially, this was well recognized, but as the ultrasound industry took off, it became a forgotten side of medicine, and research in this area became almost impossible to conduct.

• There is a large body of evidence showing fetuses are particularly vulnerable to US. Most concerningly, dozens of trials were conducted in China immediately prior to mothers planning to have abortions, which showed giving an US beforehand clearly damaged fetal tissues.

Something has caused the exponential rise in Autism since the 70's. Coincidentally, since that time, ultrasounds gradually became a common medical practice that CAN'T be talked about negatively because of all the "benefits" that it provides.

This 2006 study suggests waiting until after the key weeks of brain development to conduct ultrasound.

Prenatal exposure to ultrasound waves impacts neuronal migration in mice

The present study examined the effect of ultrasound waves (USW) on neuronal position within the embryonic cerebral cortex in mice. We used a single BrdU injection to label neurons generated at embryonic day 16 and destined for the superficial cortical layers. Our analysis of over 335 animals reveals that, when exposed to USW for a total of 30 min or longer during the period of their migration, a small but statistically significant number of neurons fail to acquire their proper position and remain scattered within inappropriate cortical layers and/or in the subjacent white matter. The magnitude of dispersion of labeled neurons was variable but systematically increased with duration of exposure to USW. These results call for a further investigation in larger and slower-developing brains of non-human primates and continued scrutiny of unnecessarily long prenatal ultrasound exposure.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0605294103

(Personally, we waited until after 16 weeks to run a quick, <1 min sizing scan. The doctor wasn’t sure what to make of the PNAS study, but was accommodating.)

There's plenty of studies that have found evidence of how ultrasounds affect and effect fetus development. The problem is that some of the "scientists" involved in these studies had their findings influenced by the people that control the medical industry.