by seesaw ➕follow (0) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 69 - 89 of 89 Search these comments
Folks have wondered why the jury would deadlock after four days on the more serious crime of manslaughter, but then quickly find “not guilty” on the lesser charge of criminally negligent homicide.
We find a clue in a different article about Jordan Williams, a black subway passenger who claimed to have stabbed to death another passenger in self-defense, and who was not charged by the same team prosecuting Daniel Penny. In the Williams case, the DA’s office explained that “Under New York law, a person is justified in using deadly physical force when they reasonably believe it is necessary to use such force to defend themselves or others from imminent use of deadly or unlawful physical force.”
In short, Danny Penny’s jury was on solid legal ground to find him not guilty. Even had Penny meant to kill the Subway Terrorist, the jury only had to find that Penny’s headlock was “justified” in order to defend others from unlawful physical force that Danny reasonably expected would occur.
So black people aren't even charged for much worse crimes
In the eyes of toxic libtards, blacks have no agency, similar to retarded people.
He's going to be sued civilly for sure. I hope he beats that too.
The lawsuit would likely get them less than attorney fees. Basically pointless.
WookieMan says
The lawsuit would likely get them less than attorney fees. Basically pointless.
No fees. Lawyers will line up to do this pro bono for just the publicity alone or, at most, some BLM type non-profit will pay it.
What would the family get though?
« First « Previous Comments 69 - 89 of 89 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,260,339 comments by 15,050 users - Ceffer, Patrick online now