patrick.net

All of the facts that might rise to the “crimes-against-humanity” level seem to share one characteristic: These claims cannot be investigated by “Science” or “Journalism.”

The risk seems to be that if A, B, C or Z is/was investigated, nefarious truths might be “confirmed.”

And if that happened, many leaders of numerous agencies and organizations - who’d previously claimed something was definitely the truth - might be exposed as brazen liars.

If this happened, a Great Purge of such leaders might take place.

Conversely, if this doesn’t happen - the same leaders will keep their positions of power, wealth and influence.

Some people call this the “Status Quo.”

That is, today’s Status Quo seems to consist of a multi-faceted, coordinated effort to conceal the truth, a status that is achieved by not investigating anything that would prove our leaders are actually extremely-talented serial liars.

💉 Second, on Tuesday the UK Daily Mail reported a great story headlined, “Australian Doctor who was banned from practising after warning against Covid vaccines gets his licence back.”




Self-represented (!) Queensland Doctor William Bay took on his governing medical board’s legal team in a multi-year battle that just ended. On Monday, the province’s Supreme Court reinstated Dr. Bay’s license, canceled all current investigations, and said the allegations against the doctor were “entirely unfounded.”

Dr. Bay, whose license to practice was suspended over his public statements about the risks of the covid vaccine, was ecstatic. “I was able to get through this loss of career, loss of income, marriage breakdown, the whole nine yards of intimidation from the bullies of AHPRA,” the doctor explained, “because I have strong faith in God.”

Thank the Lord. It’s happening slowly. But it is slowly happening, all around the world. The madness of covid is slowly receding and Sanity is re-taking her throne. Stand by for the “retributive justice” phase.

Following the call for the worldwide withdrawal of the Covid “vaccines” due to safety concerns (more reports of linked deaths and serious injury and ongoing cardiac, neurological, immunological and oncogenic pathology than any drug in history)….. our own CSL has doubled down.

It is now recognised that “approved” doses of mRNA “vaccines” produced serious and sometimes fatal effects within days after injection. So, a solution was needed. This solution goes by the name “self-amplifying messenger RNA or sa-mRNA which represents the next generation of mRNA vaccines (also known as replicon RNA). ...

How wonderful…..you can now get a shot that keeps producing a toxic antigen in your body, such as Spike Protein, continuously using synthetic self-replicating genetic technology.

So, after 4 years more and more people simply cannot understand how the Covid vaccines were ever approved in the first place. The toxic Spike Protein was never properly investigated for intrinsic toxicity. These injections were never researched and developed in the normal way and they did not need to pass the usual safety testing which would have been considered prudent for any novel and experimental therapeutic, especially a gene-based therapeutic, intended for worldwide use including healthy individuals, pregnant women, children and infants. Why?

Answer: Because they were not considered to be pharmaceuticals. They were legally defined as “Countermeasures”. Drug regulators pretended to apply the usual quality, safety and efficacy standards…..but we know they did not. They did not because they did not need to do so. It was all theatre.

They are transitioning to full mRNA vaccines, all vaccines will be replaced with this ‘new and improved’ deadly mRNA-LNP disaster and there is not a damn thing you can do about it. Hang them all high, I say!

https://palexander.substack.com/p/nothing-is-over-it-is-not-over-you-aed

They are transitioning to full mRNA vaccines, all vaccines will be replaced with this ‘new and improved’ deadly mRNA-LNP disaster and there is not a damn thing you can do about it. Hang them all high, I say!

1. THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 mRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS
A growing body of evidence suggests that the widespread rollout of the novel Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products is contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths. ...

64,168
TOTAL SUPPORTERS
1900
MEDICAL DOCTORS
5703
OTHER HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS
2022
SCIENTISTS & ACADEMICS
54543
CONCERNED CITIZENS

GNL There are plenty of scientists who came forward. Many of them got fired or otherwise punished for telling the truth and threatening Pfizer profits and DoD plans.

A lot of them signed this:

https://thehopeaccord.org/

1. THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 mRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS
A growing body of evidence suggests that the widespread rollout of the novel Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products is contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths. ...

64,168
TOTAL SUPPORTERS
1900
MEDICAL DOCTORS
5703
OTHER HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS
2022
SCIENTISTS & ACADEMICS
54543
CONCERNED CITIZENS

Nearly alone in the world, our government's medical "experts" recommended repeated vaccine shots for healthy young people, age 5 and up, despite their facing near-zero risk from COVID, but serious risks from the vaccine, such as anaphylaxis, myocarditis, pericarditis and/or early death. Ask your doctor if the COVID vaccine is right for you!

Fauci and Francis Collins, then head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), were so devoted to the scientific method that they conspired to manufacture a "quick and devastating published takedown" of scientists who dissented from their demand that the entire country be shut down -- specifically, the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, which argued against universal shutdowns, advocating instead for focused protection for the elderly, i.e., the only people at risk of death from COVID.

Obviously -- thank you Sweden and Florida -- the dissenters were 100% correct, while Fauci, Collins and the rest of our health bureaucracy were 100% wrong. But at the time, the declaration's principal authors, from Harvard, Stanford and Oxford, were smeared by Collins as "fringe epidemiologists" and blacklisted from social media with the connivance of the federal government.

It isn’t just that these "public health" experts failed spectacularly and never apologized. They're still bragging about ruining millions of lives for no reason. Fauci was paid nearly $5 million for his memoir about his “journey in public service.” Collins delivered his letter of resignation in the form of a whimsical ditty, sung by himself, accompanied by himself on acoustic guitar. The guy is nuttier than Lizzo's personal trainer.

Our constitutionally protected watchdog media lavishly praised these bozos while ginning up nonstop COVID hysteria.

In addition to The New York Times' lachrymose "Those We've Lost" series, producing obituaries for every COVID death (average age of the dead: 120), the paper told an alarmist story about a "26-year-old physician" who died of COVID in a New York City hospital early in the pandemic. His death was somberly reported in the magazine section by Times contributor, Dr. Helen Ouyang.

In response to repeated requests from an alert reader for evidence that such a death had occurred, the editors indignantly claimed that Ouyang had spoken "with the man’s attending physician," and the death was "confirmed by fact-checkers." Executive Editor Dean Baquet snapped at the persistent skeptic: “Enough. ... [W]e have answered and we are done.”

Then it turned out that, of course, the doctor who died of COVID was made up. After The Washington Post's Erik Wemple got on the case, the Times admitted as much in an "Editor's Note." Baquet owned up to an "error."

But even the "Trust the Science!" Times expressed outrage when it discovered the CDC had been hiding data that proved booster shots did absolutely nothing for adults between the ages of 18 and 49. Nothing, that is, other than put them at risk of death and other side effects.

They bankrupted us. They ruined the lives of the bottom 70%. They spent ALL the money. They then proceeded to bankrupt the world. And, realizing the money was all gone, their gamemasters tried to kill us off, first with an engineered virus that failed, then with a vaccine that didn’t. Then they ran up $10 trillion in four years trying to keep the vegetable in power, to get to that point where the Green New Deal paid off in torrents of lovely other people’s money. Which was such a stupid idea that clearly IQ has nothing, absolutely nothing to do with wisdom.

The vaxx is dangerous and ineffective, but even if it were not, it would still be a crime against humanity to force mass injections of anything, much less the new Thalidomide.

Last month, a quiet but blockbuster study was published in the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine titled, “Pharmaceutical product recall and educated hesitancy towards new drugs and novel vaccines.” The peer-reviewed study savaged the covid shots.




While on its face broadly critical of the entire pharmaceutical safety process, the study clevery situated the covid ‘vaccines’ within the broader history of botched pharmaceutical recalls and horrifying medical scandals. The authors drew parallels to other scandalous cases like Vioxx, Thalidomide, and the miscarriage drug DES. All the drugs were highly profitable, were marketed as “safe and effective,” eventually showed hair-raising long-term side effects, and for too many, the recalls occurred painfully slowly.

But, as the study proceeded, it specifically homed in on the covid jabs and on mRNA, which the authors called “gene technology.” The covid mRNA shot was the only drug discussed in the paper that is, in the researchers’ words, “yet to be recalled.”

Not yet.

Happily, the debate over whether the mRNA shots are actually “vaccines” is alive and well, even though it looked dead and buried. The authors primly dismissed the ‘vaccine’ label as straight-out misinformation:

Use of the term "vaccine" for novel experimental agents that deploy gene codes may convey a false sense of
assurance in the absence of supportive data and thus may mislead. In pharmacological design terms, these
products are "pro-drugs". They must enter cells and undergo translation of genetic code before intended
outcomes unfold (Figure 2), and in this sense they operate as "synthetic viruses" Unintended consequences
are thus possible.

Haha, synthetic viruses. Just as we lawyers have been saying for years.

The study authors challenged the “narrative” (their word) that the covid shots offer any protection against severe disease, dismissing that claim as “a narrative challenged by more recent data” and observing that “Official data from New South Wales during the omicron wave did not concord with the message that these agents prevent serious disease or death, and even suggested the opposite.”

It next turned to mandates and excess death, arguing through hard data. Without coming right out and saying it, the article strongly implied that political jab mandates murdered people who were at zero risk of dying from covid. The study was packed with ammunition for all of us who’ve never given up on proving the vaccines were a historic disaster far beyond the Titanic or the Hindenburg.

Truthfully, the scale of the disaster is better compared to previous horrific drug mistakes, which is exactly what this paper does.

Possibly my favorite part was when they put a logical chokehold on “vaccine hesitancy,” renaming it to “educated hesitancy.” The researchers supported their improved nomenclature by citing surveys showing that reluctance to accept the jabs was highest among PhDs —people most likely to understand the failures of medical literature— and healthcare workers, especially EMTs and paramedics — the people most likely to encounter adverse drug reactions firsthand.

“Educated hesitancy towards these products,” the researchers drily noted in the forgiving passive tense, “has been ridiculed.” We all know by whom. From there, they proceeded not only to show the evidence of great harms caused by the jabs, but they directly grappled with the lack of much serious scholarship about those harms, which they tied right back to the sordid history of other recalled drugs, some of which had encountered the same phenomenon.

This high-quality, peer-reviewed study was extremely well supported, with every claim upheld by multiple footnotes. You can safely send this study to anyone without fear of criticism about its quality.

Maybe most significantly, the study lacked any of the mandatory gatekeeping language we are used to seeing, a sentence sprinkled in here or there about how historic the covid vaccines were, or how many millions were saved, or how the benefits outweigh the risks, and so forth. It was just the opposite, actually.

Reading this study was rhetorically similar to watching a group of pit bulls rip apart an unsuspecting chicken coop. Being so well-supported by well-established data, the researchers’ logic was also difficult to argue with, as was their well-reasoned conclusion. I have included the study’s entire conclusion for your interest:

Conclusion
The fullest context is one in which the pharmaceutical industry has provided many remarkable drugs for the
benefit of humanity. From this backdrop, we have selected a few of the most significant events in
pharmaceutical recall history, in which commercial interest has dominated market strategy, and we have
sought to derive key lessons from these.
A host of mechanisms are used by the pharmaceutical industry to promote and market their products.
These include changes to the definitions or boundaries of disease, introduction of bias long before data
collection begins, concealment of raw data, failure to collect safety data, or decisions not to report negative
or unfavourable results. 33,89,90
Gene codes for foreign protein production throughout the body are particularly novel. Close attention to
pharmacovigilance data is imperative. Failure to withdraw the gene-based COVID-19 vaccines from the
market, despite clear indications of harms, is not without precedent - as has been seen with Merck's Vioxx
(rofecoxib).
Excess mortality figures are high at present in many countries that have deployed the novel and
experimental gene-based COVID-19 vaccines. As open-mindedness, objectivity and curiosity are essential to
good science, we must immediately include new corporate products in our discussions about excess
mortality and its possible causes. Drug recalls have been significant and numerous over recent decades. It
may well be high time for the recall of still more.

In other words, it appears we have entered a glorious new phase, where open criticism of the vaccines has now become permissible. The final step is next, the step from here into the major journals, signaling the complete surrender of those journals’ big pharma masters, which will only happen when continuing denialism is no longer viable.

Once that happens, it will be time for accountability. We are this close, and a skeptical Administration is just about to arrive.

@RepThomasMassie

@CDCgov is quietly deleting misleading information from their website

The following statement was removed from their website between July 16th and July 22nd:

“The mRNA and the spike protein do not last long in the body.”

Current link: https://cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html

ht: @RayArmat

Pfizer SV40 DNA has now been found in the blood of Australians. This is a slap with a wet fish for the TGA…. right after their emails demonstrate they know this DNA is a nuclear targeting sequence. They are up the spout as they have assured the public this can not happen and they just rolled out the green and gold for Moderna to build a few vaccine manufacturing plants down under. ...

62 other highly decorated physicians and scientists have signed this letter asking for immediate action.

This DNA was discovered in a Peer Reviewed paper from Ryan et al which was not looking for it. Communication with the lead author of the paper informed us that they even used DNA depletion steps in their protocol so its a bit surprising any DNA sequences were found at all. This leaves us with the only rational conclusion, which is that the DNA loads in Australians blood after vaccination is in fact much higher than can be measured in the Ryan et al study. SV40 Promoter sequences were detected in this study. The Journal has been notified of the discovery. They may not act as the Ryan et al study was never designed to monitor the DNA and therefor this doesn’t constitute an error in need of correction but an incidental finding. Sandeep Chakraborty has written a preprint about this discovery and I have confirmed his findings.

Over the years, I’ve come to accept that the marketing and propaganda apparatus (the public relations industry) has no scrupules and will regularly engage in fairly appalling campaigns to promote a product or a sponsor’s message.

Nonetheless, what I saw them do during COVID-19 was on a completely different level from anything I’d seen in the past. For instance, it was so shameless (e.g., consider the gift cards, lotteries, KFC, donuts [which CNN repeatedly promoted] alcohol, illicit drugs and brothel sessions were given away as incentives to get the vaccine). ...

In theory, if a vaccine “works” you should be protected from individuals who are infected, including those who never vaccinated. Unfortunately, this is not good for vaccine sales as that doesn’t win over people who don’t want to vaccinate, particularly since a non-vaccinated cohort can serve as a control group that shows the dangers of the vaccine (e.g., the industry has done everything it can to stonewall trials of unvaccinated children, but when conducted, those trials consistently show vaccinated children have 3-10 times as many chronic illnesses).

To solve this, three sales pitches were developed:

1) Eliminating an infectious disease is only possible if a sufficient amount of the population is vaccinated (thereby creating herd immunity). This essentially has never worked ...

2) Stating that even if you are vaccinated, it is not safe to be around someone who is unvaccinated (which is absurd as that effectively constitutes an admission the vaccine doesn’t work). ...

Likewise, Biden’s illegal workplace mandates were justified under the rationale that OSHA had a statutory obligation to protect workers from dangers in the workspace. Therefore, it was necessary to force workers to vaccinate so their vaccinated coworkers could have a safe workspace (which is quite remarkable given that OSHA was created to prevent workers from being poisoned and killed by their employers but instead mandated the greatest workplace hazard in history).




... During Bush’s presidency, the rhetoric of “you’re either with us or you’re with the terrorists” was trialed as a way to shut down any dissent on his controversial policies. During Obama’s presidency, it kicked into full gear, particularly after Occupy Wall Street (e.g., BLM was created by the media 5 months after OWS started).

Many of us believe this was done because OWS represented a genuine threat to the America’s business interests, which Obama was keen to defend (e.g., in private meetings with banking CEOs, in contrast to what he told the public, he pledged to protect them from public outrage against them causing a devastating financial crisis—which he then did). As such, Obama used a tried and true tactic from throughout America’s history, pit the lower class against each other so they ignore their exploitation by the upper class.

Arkansas Looks to Hold Pharma Execs Criminally Liable for Vaccine Injuries

Arkansas lawmakers are weighing legislation that could pierce the pharmaceutical industry’s federal liability shield for vaccine injuries by holding corporate executives criminally liable for “vaccine harms” if they concealed evidence of risks associated with a vaccine that subsequently seriously injured or killed the recipient.

Under Senate Bill 6, introduced by Republican State Sen. Bryan King, an executive officer of a pharmaceutical company that “knowingly hides, conceals, omits, or otherwise withholds evidence, documentation, or information that the vaccine has dangerous effects,” would be found guilty of a felony and face a prison sentence of one year to life.

The bill is pending before the Arkansas Senate. King also introduced Senate Bill 5, to hold Pharma executives criminally liable for “prescription drug harm.”

Previous versions of both bills unanimously passed last year in the Arkansas Senate but died in the Arkansas House.

Ray Flores, senior outside counsel for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), welcomed the proposed legislation. He told The Defender:

“Regarding vaccines and other health-related issues, the public is increasingly frustrated with the impervious protection current law and corporate structure afford. The time is ripe to single out those ultimate decision-makers who benefit the most.

“This is an attempt, done properly through legislation, to address that powerlessness currently radiating throughout society.”

California-based healthcare attorney Rick Jaffe called the proposed legislation “an excellent jumping-off point for the serious discussion the country needs to have about vaccines.”

At Safeway today: voice announcements that flu vaccines were free, available at the in store pharmacy, and would come with a ten percent discount on grocery purchases.

US intelligence officials “silenced” researchers who found evidence that the Covid-19 pandemic was the result of a Chinese lab leak, the New York Post reported on Thursday, citing sources.

According to the outlet, their analysis included “dozens” of data points to back up a lab leak version, but none of them made it to a 2021 report ordered by President Joe Biden, which stated that the virus was “probably not genetically engineered.”

The researchers involved were John Hardham, Robert Cutlip, and Jean-Paul Chretien, who at the time worked at the National Center for Medical Intelligence, part of the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency, tasked with studying biological weapons threats and infectious diseases. They conducted a scientific study of Covid-19 and concluded that the virus was most likely made in a lab.

According to their findings, the virus contained a biological characteristic that allowed for easier transmission to humans, similar to a feature described in a Chinese study several years back. They also found that a Chinese military researcher applied for a patent for a Covid-19 vaccine mere weeks after the virus was first sequenced in 2020, which meant he must have had the sequence much earlier. Moreover, the researchers found that scientists at China’s research laboratory for coronaviruses in Wuhan, the city in which Covid-19 was first detected, previously worked with US researchers on viruses which won’t have traces of being scientifically-manipulated.

The damning findings, however, were overlooked in the report on Covid-19 origins prepared by the director of national intelligence, Avril Haines, which was presented to Biden in August 2021. The researchers were also reportedly forbidden from sharing their findings, including with Congress and the FBI.

António Guterres
antonioguterres
On this International Day of Epidemic Preparedness, I call on countries to heed the lessons of past health emergencies to help prepare for the next.

Let’s commit to working together for a safer and healthier world for everyone, everywhere.

The public health agencies, FDA, NIAID, CDC, NIH, and so on have become outright mafias, with labyrinths of money-laundering channels, government grant-grifting, and pharma phuckery, not least around the still-mysterious, homicidal Covid-19 prank, with the deadly mRNA vaccine program piggybacked onto it. Their nemesis, RFK, Jr., is coming on-board to oversee exactly what happened in these corrupt fiefdoms. If you have read his books about Dr. Anthony Fauci, you know that he is adequately prepared to discover what took US public health off-the-rails. Don’t forget, also, that the entire medical profession lies in a slough of dishonor for going along with the fake-and-deadly Covid-19 treatment protocols (intubation, remdesivir, midazolam, and morphine) that killed so many people needlessly. Plus, the doctors’ dishonest demonization of ivermectin and other viable treatments, plus the disgraceful, mendacious behavior of the medical journals in the whole filthy scam.