« First        Comments 8 - 28 of 28        Search these comments

9   HeadSet   2023 Oct 28, 8:45pm  

Patrick says

The worm finally turned, and now, all of that power you held in the palms of your hands can be used against you.

Nope. They can still cancel anyone they disagree with, they just learned that Jews are a powerful group that is off limits.
10   Patrick   2023 Nov 22, 6:03pm  

https://thelibertydaily.com/restaurant-that-ejected-sarah-huckabee-sanders-her-family/


“Commie Cluck”: Restaurant That Ejected Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Her Family Closes
11   Tenpoundbass   2023 Nov 23, 11:20am  

90% of all Restaurants are destined to close before they ever become a local tradition or eatery institution. That is why it is foolish to alienate any customer.
Those that do become a local success and the owners go on to retire. Their kids or who ever bought it, will see it closed within a year historically.
12   Patrick   2023 Dec 28, 5:35pm  

https://slaynews.com/news/democrats-legal-attacks-trump-backfire-open-biden-post-presidency-prosecution/


The Democrats’ legal attacks against President Donald Trump could backfire as partisan political prosecutors continue efforts to break down the protections of presidential immunity. ...

In their zeal to “get Trump,” however, the 45th president’s detractors overlook the fact that if Trump is denied the immunity from prosecution he has claimed, so too would President Joe Biden be opened up to potential prosecution on several different fronts once he has left office.
14   HeadSet   2024 Mar 28, 1:27pm  

Patrick says

In their zeal to “get Trump,” however, the 45th president’s detractors overlook the fact that if Trump is denied the immunity from prosecution he has claimed, so too would President Joe Biden be opened up to potential prosecution on several different fronts once he has left office.

Biden will be dead by then and no Uniparty will ever face any prosecution. Biden could also pardon himself proactively of all possible charges during his last days in office.
15   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Mar 28, 3:50pm  

Patrick says

In their zeal to “get Trump,” however, the 45th president’s detractors overlook the fact that if Trump is denied the immunity from prosecution he has claimed, so too would President Joe Biden be opened up to potential prosecution on several different fronts once he has left office


And Obama and Bush and Clinton and (technically) Carter.

Of those, they'll go after Clinton more likely.
16   HeadSet   2024 Mar 28, 6:31pm  

UkraineIsTotallyFucked says

Patrick says


In their zeal to “get Trump,” however, the 45th president’s detractors overlook the fact that if Trump is denied the immunity from prosecution he has claimed, so too would President Joe Biden be opened up to potential prosecution on several different fronts once he has left office


And Obama and Bush and Clinton and (technically) Carter.

Of those, they'll go after Clinton more likely.

Did they go after Clinton because of the president of nabbing Trump for classified info mishandling? If Trump does not get immunity, they can still excuse Clinton with the "no prosecutor would charge" and excuse Biden with "no jury would convict." They already demonstrated these exact excuses.
17   Patrick   2024 Apr 23, 3:49pm  

https://twitter.com/jakeshieldsajj/status/1782551838149259338



I do think the recent surge in anti-semitism is a direct result of decades of teaching that anti-white racism is good.
18   HeadSet   2024 Apr 23, 4:41pm  

Patrick says

I do think the recent surge in anti-semitism is a direct result of decades of teaching that anti-white racism is good.

I agree. The Jewish profs pushing that racism are now seeing that policy aimed at them.
19   richwicks   2024 Apr 23, 5:02pm  

Patrick says

I do think the recent surge in anti-semitism is a direct result of decades of teaching that anti-white racism is good.


If you're going to be convicted of a crime regardless of whether you are guilty or not, you may as well be guilty.

Israel has, for decades, accused anybody that spoke out against what they were doing as being "anti-Semites". The reason I speak out against what Israel is doing is that it's bad for Israel and for Jewish people in general and the United States. The United States had moral leadership in the world when I was a kid, it doesn't now.
20   Patrick   2024 Apr 30, 12:47pm  

https://slaynews.com/news/trump-hints-at-looming-biden-prosecutions-if-supreme-court-rules-against-presidential-immunity/


Trump Hints at Looming Biden Prosecutions if Supreme Court Rules against Presidential Immunity

On Truth Social, Trump reposted a quote from his former adviser Stephen Miller. ...

“If they say there’s no immunity for official acts, the moment Joe Biden leaves office, every single red city and red state DA in the country can charge him for financial crimes related to illegal student loan bailouts, can charge him for war crimes related to deaths of service members overseas, can charge him for human trafficking, human smuggling, and by the way, more election interference than you can count.”
22   Ceffer   2024 May 3, 10:10pm  

Patrick says





It's tragic when you can't even hold on to DEI printing press diploma.
23   HeadSet   2024 May 4, 7:29am  

Patrick says





I doubt this is real. I would more believe that the UCLA staff would just want a talk session with this guy, declare their empathy with his struggle as a minority, then try to buy his affection with additional scholarships or other perks.
24   Tenpoundbass   2024 May 5, 3:50pm  

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/ny-dem-who-voted-law-meant-ensare-president/

NY Dem who voted to lift statue of limitations on rape allegations, for the sole purpose to get Trump.
Now says the law is unconstitutional, that it is being used against him.

This story belongs in so many threads here, but the Karma collection agency best fits.
25   Patrick   2024 May 6, 10:49am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/the-little-mayor-monday-may-5-2024


The New York Post ran a delightfully karmic story yesterday headlined, “NYC pol says law allowing rape suit against him was unconstitutional — despite voting for the legislation.” But the story was so much better than the headline promised.

You may recall some of last year’s anti-Trump lawfare, where bizarre cat lady E. Jean Carroll suddenly claimed twenty-five years later that Trump had sexually assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman changing room. Despite holes in her story Elon Musk could launch a Dragon Heavy rocket through, the Manhattan jury awarded her $5 million, although it also found that Trump had not raped the colorful Carroll, but had sexually assaulted her instead.

At least in part, Carroll’s antique case was resurrected by a brand-new, automatically-expiring New York law, as fancy a piece of progressive lawfare as ever high-stepped down Broadway. The “Adult Survivors Act” revived ancient sexual assault claims, making them viable — but only during a two-year period — although the statutes of limitation had long since passed.

Carroll filed her lawsuit against Trump right after the new law became effective.

The genius behind the Adult Survivors Act was state senator Kevin Parker, who at the time of passage bragged about his terrific new law, saying “I voted in favor of the Act to ensure all New Yorkers can seek justice and be heard.”

All New Yorkers. All.

Just like E. Jean Carroll, rape survivor Olga Jean-Baptiste also filed a claim — against Senator Parker — right before the Act expired late last year. According to her lawsuit, Olga was working with Parker on Haitian relief efforts twenty years ago in 2004, when Parker grabbed her by the wrists and forcibly raped her at her own home. Governor Kathy Hochul has called Olga’s allegations “deeply disturbing.”

But in a deliciously ironic motion to dismiss the case filed last week, Senator Parker now claims his Adult Survivors Act was unconstitutional. But Senator Parker, remember: no one is above the law.

It’s not just Parker, either. Lorna Beach-Mathura also filed an Adult Survivors claim right under the wire, against New York Mayor Eric Adams, who happens to be running for re-election this year. Also ironically, in Adams’ most recent motion, his lawyers complained the case is taking too long: “any longer a wait will start interfering with New Yorkers’ ability to fairly make a decision in the upcoming mayoral primary.”

Election interference!

Two months ago in mid-March, Lorna filed a ‘bombshell complaint’ accusing Adams of demanding oral sex as consideration for helping her with her budding career while the two worked in the Transit Police Department — all the way back in 1993! According to the lawsuit, when she refused his ungenerous offer, Adams — then leader of the Transit Bureau Association — allegedly whipped out and forced her to touch the little mayor, which promptly and prematurely delivered a seminal address right on her while she was struggling to secede from the salacious encounter.

What’s gooey for the goose, is gooey for the little mayor, too.

Democrats seem have a recurring ‘little mayor’ problem. See, e.g., Mario Cuomo and Jeffrey Toobin. Maybe lawfare like the Adult Survivors Act wasn’t the best idea their sticky little heads ever came up with. I’m just saying. Don’t cancel me.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste