patrick.net

https://lawhealthandtech.substack.com/p/are-vaccines-life-saving-miracle

Variolation with Jenner’s vaccine was extremely unsafe and carried significant risk to the recipient. The original source for Jenner’s first singular vaccination was fluid from sores on the hands of milkmaids believed to be caused by cowpox. With no control for confounders such as the very real possibility of prior exposure and immunity to smallpox, when Jenner variolated an eight-year-old boy with this cowpox fluid and after exposure to smallpox the boy failed to succumb to the disease, he proclaimed his new treatment on the basis of this one poorly controlled experiment created lifelong immunity. ...

The alleged cure Jenner claimed as his own invention was being better done by the Chinese hundreds of years before and, rather than involving pus collected from sores on cows, the Chinese method collected humoral response from sores on infected humans for use as their vaccine medium. Ironically, it appears the Chinese process may have been safer and possibly even more effective. However, and in spite of the fact that smallpox outbreaks and elevated death rates repeatedly followed vaccination campaigns, propaganda of the day that was often written by the doctors whose incomes primarily came from performing these variolations proclaimed vaccination to be the safest and most effective medical intervention for treating smallpox. Perhaps it was the fact that performing these vaccinations had become the single most lucrative branch of surgical practice at the time (Vaughan et al, 1922 at p189) that helped these doctors to overlook the infectious outbreaks, physical harm and death that variolation wrought upon communities.

In communities that received inoculation for smallpox it was found that vaccination increased rates of smallpox death and burials by as much as 27%. In fact, and as the work of Dr Elizabeth Fenn would demonstrate in her investigation chronicled in Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82, vaccination for smallpox (variola) was as likely to start an epidemic as stop one, dramatically affected the outcome of the American War of Independence, and may have caused the continental epidemic in North America.

https://patientmaktpatientcv.substack.com/p/sudden-infant-death-post-vaccination

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-combination-vaccination

Combination Vaccination of Premature Neonates Results in Apnea Events

Randomized Trial Shows Irrational Immunization of Preemies Harmful, Demonstrates Mechanism of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Premature babies are at high risk for neurological and pulmonary complications in the neonatal ICU. They are not at risk for hospital-acquired Hepatitis B, Rotavirus, Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus, or Haemophilus Influenza B. Thus the wisdom of giving 7 vaccines to a frail and vulnerable preterm newborn should be challenged in a randomized trial.

Greenberg et al performed a randomized prospective clinical trial in 223 infants born before 33 weeks of gestational age. The primary endpoint was apnea, defined as a respiration pause > 20 seconds or > 15 seconds associated with bradycardia less than 80 beats per minute. ...

(paywall)

https://over-vaccination.net/

Challenging Big Pharma's lucrative over-vaccination of people and animals

Citizens questioning the Australian Government’s vaccination policy are being ignored and even censored. Big Pharma is controlling taxpayer-funded vaccination policy now. ...

Children are the major target for the vaccine industry’s growth, as indicated by ever-increasing national vaccination schedules.[8] New vaccines continue to be added to vaccination schedules with an alarming lack of transparency of the process, see for example the controversial human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Children who are already likely to be immune after the first dose of the Measles/Mumps/Rubella (MMR) vaccine are arbitrarily revaccinated with a second dose, often misleadingly termed a ‘booster’.

See also: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/

https://x.com/vancemurphy/status/1880075677325754553#m

Patrick says

There is no liability shield at this point because they were caught lying about
"safe and effective" a million times.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-study-childhood-vaccination

Preliminary studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children have reported that the vaccinated are significantly more likely than the unvaccinated to be diagnosed with bacterial infections, allergies, and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). ...

The specific aims were to test the hypothesis that: 1) vaccination is associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other NDDs; 2) preterm birth coupled with vaccination increases the odds of NDDs compared to preterm birth without vaccination; and 3) increasing numbers of vaccinations are associated with increased risks of ASD. ...

The analysis of claims data for 47,155 nine-year-old children revealed that: 1) vaccination was associated with significantly increased odds for all measured NDDs; 2) among children born preterm and vaccinated, 39.9% were diagnosed with at least one NDD compared to 15.7% among those born preterm and unvaccinated (OR 3.58, 95% CI: 2.80, 4.57); and 3) the relative risk of ASD increased according to the number of visits that included vaccinations. Children with just one vaccination visit were 1.7 times more likely to have been diagnosed with ASD than the unvaccinated (95% CI: 1.21, 2.35) whereas those with 11 or more visits were 4.4 times more likely to have been diagnosed with ASD than those with no visit for vaccination (95% CI: 2.85, 6.84).

Conclusions: These results suggest that the current vaccination schedule may be contributing to multiple forms of NDD; that vaccination coupled with preterm birth was strongly associated with increased odds of NDDs compared to preterm birth in the absence of vaccination; and increasing numbers of visits that included vaccinations were associated with increased risks of ASD.

Patrick says

On the contrary. Infants are not at risk because at that age their immune
system is impenetrable.

Patrick says

The_Deplorable says

Patrick says

On the contrary. Infants are not at risk because at that age their immune
system is impenetrable.

While I haven't verified the numbers Patrick posted (they do seem a little skewed) and generally agree on today's overvaccination for pharma profit, an infants immune system is far from perfect.

While it comes with an innate cytokine response it does not have more measured adaptive responses yet and hence the sheer amount of cytokines after discovering a virus later (because of being untrained) definitely harbors a risk.

Also massive inflammatory responses early on can lead to auto immune disorders, too pro-inflammatory responses, or destruction of necessary healthy cells (e.g leading to type 1 diabetes) later on.

Sometimes this site drifts too far into the other direction, there is certainly a balanced approach to vaccinations which may likely be better than all and none.

@Patrick where did you get the numbers/meme from? I could not find a single study tying even one SIDS case to a vaccine. Now gulag may be censoring and the vaccine lobby exercising its influence on publications, but I would expect the risk of death no greater than 1 in a million for a vaccine like dtap, and especially if you take just Tetanus out of dtap. 1 in 76000 seems outlandish. Also the number of SIDS per 100k de declined by 2/3 from 1993 to 2018 while many new vaccines were added to the schedule. It seems like these numbers were derived by attributing every single SIDS case to a vaccine, and then applying some random distribution amongst the different vaccines, considering how many of these are administered to infants each day.

@mell It's from here:

https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/

@Patrick thanks, doesn't look like the best source to me. Reading something about homeopathy curing the flu on horses. Our pediatrician who has been staunchly against the covid toxxine for children says he has to send a couple babies with rsv to intensive care each season as they develop meningitis from it, so the thinks rsv is worth it. I think it's a case by case basis, I would opt for dtap and rsv at the minimum, hepatitis a is ok as well as it can be transmitted via food and dirt.

Has the RSV or DTAP vaccine ever been tested against placebos?

Patrick says

Has the RSV or DTAP vaccine ever been tested against placebos?

I dont know but iirc back then they did do studies against placebo. It's possible that the likelihood of dying from any of those is lower than from the vaccine, esp. for diphteria which is very rare here. But if you do get tetanus you're in trouble, and the tetanus vaccine reliably prevents infection. I don't think this is as clear cut as some may think. Whooping cough in babies is serious as well, as is rsv

The only thing that will ever make me trust any vaccine ever again is unlimited liability for all of the manufacturers. Without that, it just reeks of corruption.

https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/vaccination-and-neurodevelopmental-disorders-a-study-of-nine-year-old-children-enrolled-in-medicaid/

Results: The analysis of claims data for 47,155 nine-year-old children revealed that: 1) vaccination was associated with significantly increased odds for all measured NDDs; 2) among children born preterm and vaccinated, 39.9% were diagnosed with at least one NDD compared to 15.7% among those born preterm and unvaccinated (OR 3.58, 95% CI: 2.80, 4.57); and 3) the relative risk of ASD increased according to the number of visits that included vaccinations. Children with just one vaccination visit were 1.7 times more likely to have been diagnosed with ASD than the unvaccinated (95% CI: 1.21, 2.35) whereas those with 11 or more visits were 4.4 times more likely to have been diagnosed with ASD than those with no visit for vaccination (95% CI: 2.85, 6.84).

Conclusions: These results suggest that the current vaccination schedule may be contributing to multiple forms of NDD; that vaccination coupled with preterm birth was strongly associated with increased odds of NDDs compared to preterm birth in the absence of vaccination; and increasing numbers of visits that included vaccinations were associated with increased risks of ASD.

https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/opinion-invalidity-of-counterfactual

I express and support the opinion that all models that purport to calculate the mortality (infant mortality in particular) averted by vaccine programmes are invalid because they are based on inputs of vaccine efficacy and pathogen prevalence and virulence that are themselves invalid. ...

The longstanding industry of infant vaccination programmes is a baseless fraudulent enterprise of exploitation.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-serious

Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Serious and Irreversible Neurological, Developmental, and Immune-Related Health Risks

Four Studies Reveal the Grave Consequences of Childhood Hyper-Vaccination

https://tritorch.substack.com/p/autism-pre-conditioning-and-normalization

Autism Pre-Conditioning & Normalization: Production Begins on Film 'Rain Man' in 1986, Same Year Congress Grants Immunity Shield to Vaccine Architects

Pre-Programming on Shakespeare's World Stage: We've been played for fools while our children have been cast by .gov to pharmaceutical wolves who knew from the start exactly what they were doing.

1986: Congress Grants Immunity Protection to Vaccine Makers Against Injection Damage | Film ‘Rain Man’ Slated to Begin Production

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/senator-hassan-proclaims-measles

Measles has largely gone away as a childhood illness in large part due to improved living conditions, cleanliness, sanitation, nutrition, and yes mass vaccination. However, death due to measles was very rare and went away decades ago in the United States and was linked to vitamin A deficiency as highlighted in a Cochrane Review where studies used vitamin A as a therapeutic resulting in a 79% reduction in death among children under age 2 years. ...

Please enjoy this analysis of measles vaccination on the Shannon Joy Show. We are now up to 10% of children and their parents declining all vaccines including measles. I anticipate we will see the return of this illness and more natural immunity. I doubt there will be fatal cases with good nutrition and supportive medical care in severe cases.

I had measles, as did everyone I knew as a kid. No one died, or even got all that sick.

https://nitter.poast.org/vancemurphy/status/1887536983183864222#m

SIDS was only a thing beginning in the late 80's (coinciding with the laws that absolved vaccine manufacturers from any liability). I'm old enough to clearly remember the prosecutions of parents for murder when it was actually SIDS. Too many parents went to jail for the fictitious "shaken baby syndrome," when it actually was due to the massive increase in vaccines.

Where are these wrongly accused parents now? This is 1,000,000 times worse than the "Dingo ate my baby!" malicious prosecution in Aussieland back in the day.

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dismantling-the-common-lies-used

Dismantling The Common Lies Used To Push Vaccines

How the System Continually Manipulates Us and How We Can Now Overcome It.

Over the last year and a half, I’ve been doing all that I can to push RFK Jr.’s candidacy along. This was essentially because:

•From both mutual friends who know him personally and my own interactions with him, I know that RFK Jr. is sincerely dedicated to advancing the issues I believe are important and hence unlikely to sell-out to the pharmaceutical industry (whereas the majority of politicians who campaign on populist issues inevitably do so once they are in a position where they can threaten the system).

•A variety of extremely unusual political factors (I described in detail here) coalesced to make what RFK Jr. and the Make America Healthy Again movement were doing suddenly possible—while in contrast, for decades, anything like what we’re witnessing now had simply been impossible (and due to the rapid proliferation global censorship from COVID-19, rapidly becoming increasingly impossible).

•A very small window existed to make the critical changes in medicine we needed, and I felt it was quite likely that this window would close, and if that happened, it would be a long time before a similar opportunity presented itself. Since the abuses of the medical industry keep on increasing, that meant if this window was missed, a lot of people would be severely harmed before the next opportunity to fix things emerged (assuming it even did).

Fortunately, a few miracles happened over the last week, and it appears that RFK Jr. is on his way to becoming the Secretary of Health and Human Services (H.H.S.). From watching that process unfold, I realized there were a few critical points that need be understood as we move forward into the next stage of healing America’s health.

Note: the Secretary of H.H.S. is typically considered to be one of the most important cabinet positions, as in addition to overseeing roughly a quarter of the Federal budget, roughly half of our health related laws have provisions that leave their implementation to the Secretary of H.H.S. This is a major reason why the healthcare lobby (e.g., pharmaceutical companies, hospitals and insurance companies) is considered to be the most powerful lobby in Washington and why so much was invested into stopping RFK’s nomination. ...

I find it both immensely valuable to understand the PR industry’s tactics and simultaneously immensely frustrating that those tactics (at least until recently) always worked.

Some of these tactics include:

•Paying focus groups to identify which sculpted messages can emotionally draw the listener to the desired position (which is why you frequently hear “odd” phrases be continually repeated).

•Monopolizing every mass media platform (including medical journals) so that the targeted messages (and no competing narrative) will be heard by everyone, and then blasting it out across those channels at the optimal time.

•Providing fake “news programs” to media stations (especially underfunded local news stations) which are made to look like legitimate news programs but are actually part of a PR campaign.

•Using a variety of “credible” third parties (discussed further here) to promote your client’s message (e.g., paid-off “experts” or “non-profits” with misleading names that imply they are opposed to the industry that’s actually funding them). ...

In turn, to overcome a bad frame, one or more of the following can be done:

•Overpower the existing frame with a stronger frame (which is often what people do when they fight for dominance in a social situation).

•Find a way to shatter or dispel an existing frame (which is often an art requiring significant verbal talent).

•Recognize that the premises behind the frame are false.

Framing Vaccination
Within the vaccination debate, over the years, a variety of frames have been developed by the industry (and PR firms) that are constantly overlaid onto any discussion of vaccine safety. As you might expect these frames:

•Reinforce the reality that all vaccines are 100% safe and effective and that all ways vaccines are given are “necessary.”

•Reinforce the reality that vaccines were the greatest thing in human history.

•Reframe any questions of vaccine safety or efficacy as an existential danger to mankind.

Note: the phrase “safe and effective” is a very clever marketing frame, as the terms are deliberately not defined but imply “100% safe and effective,” thereby both giving vaccinators the wiggle room to not be caught in a lie (as they [e.g., Fauci here] can say “I never said it was 100% effective”) but simultaneously effectively able to constantly assert that lie [e.g., which Fauci did throughout COVID-19] and gain all the political capital that comes with it (since arguing against the widespread belief vaccines are completely safe and effective is a huge uphill battle). As such, vaccine zealots will never define what “safe and effective” means (as that would destroy their grift), and as I showed here, this slogan so effectively frames the vaccination debate that it’s been re-used since the dawn of vaccination despite honest experts in each generation complaining about its dishonesty.

Ibid:

You could say the same about general nutrition.

Current roster of Kaiser vaxicide recommendations to me. They are so heavy into the Rockefeller/Pharma allopathic AI profit engines, I wonder if they are going to be class actioned into bankruptcy some day.

https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/diagnostic-codes-for-death-due-to

For the Past 45 Years, the Medical Diagnostic System Has Been Rigged to Cover-Up Infant Deaths Caused by Vaccines

The consequences of rigging the diagnostic code system and eliminating vaccination as a cause of death have been financially and psychology devastating to victims and their families.

There are over 130 diagnostic codes to choose from in order to diagnose the cause of death in newborns and infants. These diagnostic codes are government approved and published in the International Classification of Diseases and are known as ICD codes. However, the diagnostic codes for “vaccine” and “prophylactic inoculation” was removed from the US medical diagnostic system in the 1970’s.

Diagnostic codes (ICD) attributing deaths and diseases due to vaccinations were eliminated by the US government and healthcare authorities back in 1979 and replaced with codes such as, cause unknown or accidental suffocation.