patrick.net

100% @Patrick

Criminal as hell. There should be no immunities from lawsuits and we would see 90+% of them go away.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/combination-routine-vaccination-associated

Combination Routine Childhood Vaccination Associated with Development of Asthma and Eczema

Hazard Ratios Too High to be Ignored

https://nitter.poast.org/vancemurphy/status/1866172005763998074#m

https://www.truthandtriage.com/p/babies-covid-vaccines-that-dont-work

Why Are We Giving Babies COVID-19 Vaccines That Don't Work?

A CDC-funded study found COVID-19 vaccines do not reduce the risk of infection in children under 5, and may actually increase the risk for some.

Despite persistent recommendations from U.S. health agencies to vaccinate children as young as six months against COVID-19, a new study led by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that the shots do not reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children under 5 years old and may actually increase the risk of infection in some children.

The study, published in a leading medical journal, analyzed data from three cohort studies conducted between September 2022 and April 2023 and found no difference in infection rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated children.

While health agencies claim that COVID-19 vaccines reduce the risk of severe disease in young children—who aren’t at risk for severe illness in the first place—the findings of this study show the shots do no such thing, which was a cornerstone of public health messaging during the pandemic.

Why inject babies with dangerous and ineffective mRNA? For the MONEY. What a silly question!

Diptheria is stupid. It's rare even in 3rd world countries, found only in the most poxed asspits of the 4th World. Knocked out quick with the oldest, most generic antibiotics.

Huh, even ultrasound may not be safe:

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotten-dangers-of-ultrasound

• The medical field has had a long history of exposing mothers to “treatments” that harm their infants. After decades of work to stop the routine x-raying of fetuses, the “safe and effective” practice of prenatal ultrasound (US) was adopted in its place.

• While US is thought to be safe, there are decades of research showing it can harm tissues. Initially, this was well recognized, but as the ultrasound industry took off, it became a forgotten side of medicine, and research in this area became almost impossible to conduct.

• There is a large body of evidence showing fetuses are particularly vulnerable to US. Most concerningly, dozens of trials were conducted in China immediately prior to mothers planning to have abortions, which showed giving an US beforehand clearly damaged fetal tissues.

Something has caused the exponential rise in Autism since the 70's. Coincidentally, since that time, ultrasounds gradually became a common medical practice that CAN'T be talked about negatively because of all the "benefits" that it provides.

This 2006 study suggests waiting until after the key weeks of brain development to conduct ultrasound.

Prenatal exposure to ultrasound waves impacts neuronal migration in mice

The present study examined the effect of ultrasound waves (USW) on neuronal position within the embryonic cerebral cortex in mice. We used a single BrdU injection to label neurons generated at embryonic day 16 and destined for the superficial cortical layers. Our analysis of over 335 animals reveals that, when exposed to USW for a total of 30 min or longer during the period of their migration, a small but statistically significant number of neurons fail to acquire their proper position and remain scattered within inappropriate cortical layers and/or in the subjacent white matter. The magnitude of dispersion of labeled neurons was variable but systematically increased with duration of exposure to USW. These results call for a further investigation in larger and slower-developing brains of non-human primates and continued scrutiny of unnecessarily long prenatal ultrasound exposure.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0605294103

(Personally, we waited until after 16 weeks to run a quick, <1 min sizing scan. The doctor wasn’t sure what to make of the PNAS study, but was accommodating.)

There's plenty of studies that have found evidence of how ultrasounds affect and effect fetus development. The problem is that some of the "scientists" involved in these studies had their findings influenced by the people that control the medical industry.

https://vratesh.substack.com/p/the-repackaging-of-post-vaccination

While measles death rate in US had declined by 98% and survival rate was estimated at 99.98% in UK, before the introduction of the measles vaccine, proponents of the measles vaccine often argue that the measles vaccine was effective in bringing down the incidence of measles, quoting CDC’s data. ...

In this writeup, we drill down further on measles, and specifically talk about the below 4 conditions, which, when looked at in totality, raise severe doubts about any efficacy whatsoever of the measles vaccine. These include

Atypical Measles: This terminology was attributed to recipients who had previously received the measles vaccine, both killed virus vaccine and live virus vaccine. It led to the eventual discontinuation of the killed measles virus vaccine.

Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever (RMSF): This is another disease clinically similar to measles. It had declined significantly before the introduction of the measles vaccine. However, after the introduction of the measles vaccine, its incidence increased significantly, raising questions of whether vaccinated individuals with measles were being misdiagnosed as RMSF.

Kawasaki Disease (KD): Kawasaki disease was a new disease that was discovered after the trial and introduction of the measles vaccine in Japan, and its incidence increased significantly after the measles vaccine was made mandatory in Japan. Its incidence is not tracked in North America, but studies have indicated an increasing incidence as well as the possibility of measles being misdiagnosed as KD.

Hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD): HFMD is another disease that’s clinically similar to measles. While its incidence had not been actively tracked historically, recent data indicates an increased incidence, particularly in children under the age of 5, raising questions of the impact of vaccines or immunization schedule.

There are other diseases that are clinically similar to measles, however their incidence data is hard to come by. Hence this writeup focuses on the above 4, to demonstrate the illusion of reduced incidence of measles post introduction of the measles vaccine.

https://lawhealthandtech.substack.com/p/are-vaccines-life-saving-miracle

Variolation with Jenner’s vaccine was extremely unsafe and carried significant risk to the recipient. The original source for Jenner’s first singular vaccination was fluid from sores on the hands of milkmaids believed to be caused by cowpox. With no control for confounders such as the very real possibility of prior exposure and immunity to smallpox, when Jenner variolated an eight-year-old boy with this cowpox fluid and after exposure to smallpox the boy failed to succumb to the disease, he proclaimed his new treatment on the basis of this one poorly controlled experiment created lifelong immunity. ...

The alleged cure Jenner claimed as his own invention was being better done by the Chinese hundreds of years before and, rather than involving pus collected from sores on cows, the Chinese method collected humoral response from sores on infected humans for use as their vaccine medium. Ironically, it appears the Chinese process may have been safer and possibly even more effective. However, and in spite of the fact that smallpox outbreaks and elevated death rates repeatedly followed vaccination campaigns, propaganda of the day that was often written by the doctors whose incomes primarily came from performing these variolations proclaimed vaccination to be the safest and most effective medical intervention for treating smallpox. Perhaps it was the fact that performing these vaccinations had become the single most lucrative branch of surgical practice at the time (Vaughan et al, 1922 at p189) that helped these doctors to overlook the infectious outbreaks, physical harm and death that variolation wrought upon communities.

In communities that received inoculation for smallpox it was found that vaccination increased rates of smallpox death and burials by as much as 27%. In fact, and as the work of Dr Elizabeth Fenn would demonstrate in her investigation chronicled in Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82, vaccination for smallpox (variola) was as likely to start an epidemic as stop one, dramatically affected the outcome of the American War of Independence, and may have caused the continental epidemic in North America.

https://patientmaktpatientcv.substack.com/p/sudden-infant-death-post-vaccination

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-combination-vaccination

Combination Vaccination of Premature Neonates Results in Apnea Events

Randomized Trial Shows Irrational Immunization of Preemies Harmful, Demonstrates Mechanism of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Premature babies are at high risk for neurological and pulmonary complications in the neonatal ICU. They are not at risk for hospital-acquired Hepatitis B, Rotavirus, Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus, or Haemophilus Influenza B. Thus the wisdom of giving 7 vaccines to a frail and vulnerable preterm newborn should be challenged in a randomized trial.

Greenberg et al performed a randomized prospective clinical trial in 223 infants born before 33 weeks of gestational age. The primary endpoint was apnea, defined as a respiration pause > 20 seconds or > 15 seconds associated with bradycardia less than 80 beats per minute. ...

(paywall)

https://over-vaccination.net/

Challenging Big Pharma's lucrative over-vaccination of people and animals

Citizens questioning the Australian Government’s vaccination policy are being ignored and even censored. Big Pharma is controlling taxpayer-funded vaccination policy now. ...

Children are the major target for the vaccine industry’s growth, as indicated by ever-increasing national vaccination schedules.[8] New vaccines continue to be added to vaccination schedules with an alarming lack of transparency of the process, see for example the controversial human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Children who are already likely to be immune after the first dose of the Measles/Mumps/Rubella (MMR) vaccine are arbitrarily revaccinated with a second dose, often misleadingly termed a ‘booster’.

See also: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/

https://x.com/vancemurphy/status/1880075677325754553#m

Patrick says

There is no liability shield at this point because they were caught lying about
"safe and effective" a million times.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-study-childhood-vaccination

Preliminary studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children have reported that the vaccinated are significantly more likely than the unvaccinated to be diagnosed with bacterial infections, allergies, and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). ...

The specific aims were to test the hypothesis that: 1) vaccination is associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other NDDs; 2) preterm birth coupled with vaccination increases the odds of NDDs compared to preterm birth without vaccination; and 3) increasing numbers of vaccinations are associated with increased risks of ASD. ...

The analysis of claims data for 47,155 nine-year-old children revealed that: 1) vaccination was associated with significantly increased odds for all measured NDDs; 2) among children born preterm and vaccinated, 39.9% were diagnosed with at least one NDD compared to 15.7% among those born preterm and unvaccinated (OR 3.58, 95% CI: 2.80, 4.57); and 3) the relative risk of ASD increased according to the number of visits that included vaccinations. Children with just one vaccination visit were 1.7 times more likely to have been diagnosed with ASD than the unvaccinated (95% CI: 1.21, 2.35) whereas those with 11 or more visits were 4.4 times more likely to have been diagnosed with ASD than those with no visit for vaccination (95% CI: 2.85, 6.84).

Conclusions: These results suggest that the current vaccination schedule may be contributing to multiple forms of NDD; that vaccination coupled with preterm birth was strongly associated with increased odds of NDDs compared to preterm birth in the absence of vaccination; and increasing numbers of visits that included vaccinations were associated with increased risks of ASD.

Patrick says

On the contrary. Infants are not at risk because at that age their immune
system is impenetrable.

Patrick says

The_Deplorable says

Patrick says

On the contrary. Infants are not at risk because at that age their immune
system is impenetrable.

While I haven't verified the numbers Patrick posted (they do seem a little skewed) and generally agree on today's overvaccination for pharma profit, an infants immune system is far from perfect.

While it comes with an innate cytokine response it does not have more measured adaptive responses yet and hence the sheer amount of cytokines after discovering a virus later (because of being untrained) definitely harbors a risk.

Also massive inflammatory responses early on can lead to auto immune disorders, too pro-inflammatory responses, or destruction of necessary healthy cells (e.g leading to type 1 diabetes) later on.

Sometimes this site drifts too far into the other direction, there is certainly a balanced approach to vaccinations which may likely be better than all and none.

@Patrick where did you get the numbers/meme from? I could not find a single study tying even one SIDS case to a vaccine. Now gulag may be censoring and the vaccine lobby exercising its influence on publications, but I would expect the risk of death no greater than 1 in a million for a vaccine like dtap, and especially if you take just Tetanus out of dtap. 1 in 76000 seems outlandish. Also the number of SIDS per 100k de declined by 2/3 from 1993 to 2018 while many new vaccines were added to the schedule. It seems like these numbers were derived by attributing every single SIDS case to a vaccine, and then applying some random distribution amongst the different vaccines, considering how many of these are administered to infants each day.

@mell It's from here:

https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/

@Patrick thanks, doesn't look like the best source to me. Reading something about homeopathy curing the flu on horses. Our pediatrician who has been staunchly against the covid toxxine for children says he has to send a couple babies with rsv to intensive care each season as they develop meningitis from it, so the thinks rsv is worth it. I think it's a case by case basis, I would opt for dtap and rsv at the minimum, hepatitis a is ok as well as it can be transmitted via food and dirt.

Has the RSV or DTAP vaccine ever been tested against placebos?

Patrick says

Has the RSV or DTAP vaccine ever been tested against placebos?

I dont know but iirc back then they did do studies against placebo. It's possible that the likelihood of dying from any of those is lower than from the vaccine, esp. for diphteria which is very rare here. But if you do get tetanus you're in trouble, and the tetanus vaccine reliably prevents infection. I don't think this is as clear cut as some may think. Whooping cough in babies is serious as well, as is rsv

The only thing that will ever make me trust any vaccine ever again is unlimited liability for all of the manufacturers. Without that, it just reeks of corruption.

https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/vaccination-and-neurodevelopmental-disorders-a-study-of-nine-year-old-children-enrolled-in-medicaid/

Results: The analysis of claims data for 47,155 nine-year-old children revealed that: 1) vaccination was associated with significantly increased odds for all measured NDDs; 2) among children born preterm and vaccinated, 39.9% were diagnosed with at least one NDD compared to 15.7% among those born preterm and unvaccinated (OR 3.58, 95% CI: 2.80, 4.57); and 3) the relative risk of ASD increased according to the number of visits that included vaccinations. Children with just one vaccination visit were 1.7 times more likely to have been diagnosed with ASD than the unvaccinated (95% CI: 1.21, 2.35) whereas those with 11 or more visits were 4.4 times more likely to have been diagnosed with ASD than those with no visit for vaccination (95% CI: 2.85, 6.84).

Conclusions: These results suggest that the current vaccination schedule may be contributing to multiple forms of NDD; that vaccination coupled with preterm birth was strongly associated with increased odds of NDDs compared to preterm birth in the absence of vaccination; and increasing numbers of visits that included vaccinations were associated with increased risks of ASD.

https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/opinion-invalidity-of-counterfactual

I express and support the opinion that all models that purport to calculate the mortality (infant mortality in particular) averted by vaccine programmes are invalid because they are based on inputs of vaccine efficacy and pathogen prevalence and virulence that are themselves invalid. ...

The longstanding industry of infant vaccination programmes is a baseless fraudulent enterprise of exploitation.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-serious

Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Serious and Irreversible Neurological, Developmental, and Immune-Related Health Risks

Four Studies Reveal the Grave Consequences of Childhood Hyper-Vaccination

https://tritorch.substack.com/p/autism-pre-conditioning-and-normalization

Autism Pre-Conditioning & Normalization: Production Begins on Film 'Rain Man' in 1986, Same Year Congress Grants Immunity Shield to Vaccine Architects

Pre-Programming on Shakespeare's World Stage: We've been played for fools while our children have been cast by .gov to pharmaceutical wolves who knew from the start exactly what they were doing.

1986: Congress Grants Immunity Protection to Vaccine Makers Against Injection Damage | Film ‘Rain Man’ Slated to Begin Production