« First « Previous Comments 59 - 98 of 166 Next » Last » Search these comments
I don’t know anyone who has used one of these crazy loans personally.
Most of my friends are using IO or Option ARM.
"Your defense before about tone, stinks…"
See, this is why I stated in the first place that we're on such different pages, we're reading completely different books. You don't get most of what i say, and big deal. That's fine. But please in the future ignore me, and I will ignore you. I think tone is extremely important in commucating in writing. I do it for a living, so I think I can state this with some certainty.
"here are some smileys :):):) . BTW there were no smileys in the above statement. "
There were no smileys because they knew I was joking. I requested that you use some emoticons if you were joking because I've only ever interpreted your tone as earnest and serious and occasionally frustrated or annoyed.
"You getting angry at me before only proves that you didn’t want to miss a golden opportunity to attack Allah."
I never got angry at you. Please show me where I communicated anger. I was and am vaguely annoyed, but that's another emotion entirely.
Jamie,
When we had the argument about Women having a hard time getting back into the workforce, you disagreed......and you threw it back in my face as some kind of an attack on Women...I don't know why! Perhaps just because I said it and any attempt for me to clarify it failed because you were on the defensive. I know many Women who went through this...and I told you this before...... When I saw that article, I read it and noticed it was written by a Woman describing the exact thing that I was trying to get across. I figure that if I sent you this link, I would MIGHT get across to you, but I didn't because it seemed that you probably didn't even read it.....That is why I said "whatever"..... see for yourself........
Allah, I don’t know what I’m supposed to be getting angry about here. It’s not like some big secret that mothers suffer discrimination in the workplace–it’s such common knowledge that Desperate Housewives has a whole storyline about the issue.
The article was about Mothers having a problem getting back into the workforce....The article has comments from REAL Mothers who describe exactly what happened when THEY went to interviews.....this is REAL LIFE, not phoney made up comedy script like desperate housewives...that is why I said I really didn’t know you watched garbage like that.
I’d like to drop this subject completely, because clearly I accomplished nothing the first time we debated this issue. Your thinking I’d get pissed off about the article shows that we’re on such different pages, we’re not even reading the same book.
You disagreed with me before and you got PISSED OFF....since the article explains the same EXACT thing I was trying to get across to you, I figured maybe you'd get mad since you did the last time when it came from my keyboard. I figured maybe if you heard it from the keys of another Woman, I would have made my point.
Theory: the more *off topic* we get, the more the actual topic becomes interesting!
Item! We go off on this tangent, Toll misses and the MSM really starts doom-and-glooming it!
Item! We go off on this tangent , and the MSM puts out affordability sob-stories!
Item! I got a haircut today. Very military-ish. I'm practicing for the coming aristo-landlord wars.
Item! Jamie, whatever her other wonderful qualities may be, is apparently
_makes two handeded quote motion_
mentally
_makes two handeded quote motion_
_makes two handeded quote motion_
retarded
_makes two handeded quote motion_
when it comes to taste in music.
That's the p-p-p-p-Power of Love!
Can you feel it?
prat
I have seen some very lascivious comments on this blog about women, and I’ve never been bothered by them, because they were always said in a joking way. Big deal. It’s no secret what men like. It’s all about the tone, and your tone is consistently so morosely serious that there’s no way I could interpret what you say as a joke.
I joke around just like anybody else...what is this your tone is consistently so morosely serious I don't know where you get the tone thing from...just because I don't always use emoticons? :) :) :) Allah is not allowed to joke around? :) :) :)
Regarding my comments on Prince’s ass, really, what did I say that’s sexist? Is it sexist to acknowledge that he has an ass and wore pants that exposed it completely? I stated a fact, in a joking way. I’ve rarely say anything to SQT or prat that isn’t a joke, so I always assume they know I’m kidding them. If you were truly offended by it, then I apologize for stating that Prince has a little ass.
I don't get offended by anything like this at all.....In fact I don't get offended by most of the stuff people say.....but I know that if I started mentioning something gender related it's like pulling a pin out of a grenade. :) :) :) (to smooth the morose tone) :) :) :) being labeled as a sexist when everyone who really knows me can tell you that I am not, that is what offends me. Sorry if my writing skills don't show you my emotions, I don't claim to be a professional writer.
I never got angry at you. Please show me where I communicated anger. I was and am vaguely annoyed, but that’s another emotion entirely.
Sarcasm is a form of anger...
OF COURSE, what was I thinking, I’m a woman! I should never have had any major ambitions in life, because my husband will always earn more than me and will always be less adept than me at raising kids and scrubbing toilets. Instead of getting a college degree, I should have just gone to home economics classes so I could perfect my domestic technique and therefore attract the highest-earning male who is looking for a subservient wife to dust his house, mend his shirts, fry his pork chops, and give him lady-like little blow jobs.
WHAT WAS I THINKING? I should not have the need for intellectual stimulation, challenges beyond making the floor shine, or the desire for human interaction beyond serving my Husband.
"SQT: It goes to show that housing has a bigger impact on the whole economy than most people want to admit."
Right. Some people believe the housing market is the only thing that has kept the consumer going during the past few years.
hey Allah
WOT way off tangent !
chill out grab some sushi enjoy!
I am just making my last attempt to prove my point....probably will fail again though.
"That’s the p-p-p-p-Power of Love!
Can you feel it?"
((shudder)) I need to go take a shower now.
"you, but I didn’t because it seemed that you probably didn’t even read it…..That is why I said “whateverâ€â€¦.. see for yourself……..:
I did read it.
"The article was about Mothers having a problem getting back into the workforce….The article has comments from REAL Mothers who describe exactly what happened when THEY went to interviews"
I know plenty of examples of women in my real life who have not suffered discrimination re-entering the work force. So I'm was speaking from personal experience. I've also dealt with businesses while going through pregnancy and having kids, and the fact that I'm a mom has not caused them to discriminate against me in any way that I can see.
And yet I don't deny that it's true women suffer such discrimination. I just believe that insisting things are ONE way and only one way--that there aren't a zillion individual examples that prove any point imaginable--is ridiculous.
"Sarcasm is a form of anger…"
I don't consider it a form of anger. I will admit it's an unfair argumentative tactic, and for being sarcastic when you find it offensive, I apologize.
shud·der
intransitive verb (past and past participle shud·dered, present participle shud·der·ing, 3rd person present singular shud·ders)
Definitions:
1. shiver violently: to shake or tremble uncontrollably from a reaction such as cold, fear, or disgust
2. vibrate: to vibrate rapidly and heavily
Which one? 1. Cold, fear, disgust or 2:vibrate
:) :) :) This has been a joke and nothing but a joke :) :) :)
stop being so hard on Huey.
Yeah...Huey was very cool for his time!
"I am just making my last attempt to prove my point….probably will fail again though. "
This is why we don't get along. Because I've asked repeatedly that we just agree to disagree, and you keep trying to prove your point. I disagree with you. Period.
He basically said that if it was taken away the housing market would go bust and that would be so catastrophic for the economy we could have a full scale depression.
Yeah because he loves his huge deductions and if he can admit that there is a bubble and that it will do severe damage to the housing market as a result of losing that deduction, he will.......... When Donald talks people listen!
:) :) :) (some smileys, especially for Jamie) :) :) :)
"(some smileys, especially for Jamie)"
Please, don't bother now, not for me. Just pretend I don't exist! Please! I'm getting tired of you even mentioning my name.
Please, don’t bother now, not for me. Just pretend I don’t exist! Please! I’m getting tired of you even mentioning my name.
:) :) :) Don't be sad :) :) :)
SQT..... I am SINCERELY trying to be nice... I really am. I don't want to be known as morosely serious. I am using the smileys to show that I am not. Without the smileys, I am morose to ____, with them I am being insulting.....I can't win! I'm sorry :( but I want to break the morose habbit and make my tone a little more pronounced....I'll cut down on them ok :)
PolishKnight Says:
HARM’s point about Carly Fiorina, Oprah Winfrey and Stewart, for example, is interesting because these women as far as I know are unmarried. Overall, successful women tend to not marry or have few children which is made up through immigration or “red stater†women having more children.
Actually Carly is married, her husband is Frank Fiorina. I don't understand why marriage excludes a career (notice, I didn't mention successful). I didn't see many folks here question men who can have both a successful career and lead a happy family life?
Not Peter P, btw, just posing as him...
This is why we don’t get along. Because I’ve asked repeatedly that we just agree to disagree, and you keep trying to prove your point. I disagree with you. Period.
Just one last thing :) I never expected you to agree with everything or anything I said, just that you understand what I was trying to tell you instead of taking it like I'm making a sexist statement or sounding like a Women hater. That is all....
When searching for “bubble blog,†patrick.net is now listed ahead of Ben’s blog, does this reflect the audience is watching us more because of these verbal tangents?
Ben does not have threads with more than 2000 comments.
We don’t make widgets any more.
_politely applauds_
Isn't it unfortunate that we reward so heartily the people who produce so little?
_shrug_
Cheers,
prat
"Jamie, you’ve been added to my roster of People Who Contribute Here That I Really Like. It’s a growing list, but I thought I’d let you know specifically just because it’s hard to do battle in the trenches of misunderstanding."
Aw, thank you, flak. I'm touched. No, really, I am! I needed some kind, non-back-handed words right about now. It's nice to know that one whole person understood me. Yay. I'm not a complete failure at communicating. You rock. We should, like, develop a secret handshake now or something. :-P
Someone will probably accuse you of being me now, posing as "flak." That happens nearly every time anyone says anything nice here. :-)
"narrow version of hypothesis: there are more engineers here (and like occupations, those who rationalize the non-social world - economists, by contrast, try to rationalize the social world) than one would expect to meet at a random gathering of overeducated, decently paid folk."
Interesting theory, and you're probably right. I've often wondered how the demographics of this blog differ from that of the everyday world. I'm not sure how many engineers we have here. Roll call? Me--not an engineer.
Oh great, Jack has retired to the shed with his wireless connection and may never come out again.
You're being awfully...something-or-other Jack. Not your usual self. Whassup with that?
Now you're sounding slightly more like yourself...but still something's missing.
« First « Previous Comments 59 - 98 of 166 Next » Last » Search these comments
Many of us have been here awhile, and while we think housing is an important topic (we wouldn't all gather her otherwise) we do digress quite a bit.
One topic that has come up time and time again is the issue of dual income families, and the rise in housing costs that have occured because so many familes now have two incomes instead of one.
We've discussed the role of the woman in the workplace and at home, so perhaps it's time to digress a little more.
-- Have dual incomes been a big factor in housing prices?
-- Do those of us who live on one income end up renters as a result?
--Are we better or worse off now that the majority of households have two incomes?
--Have the cost of other goods and services risen due to the extra income, or can that be blamed on inflation?
In other words, are we as a society in the same place economically as we would be if we stayed in a predominantly one income society?
#housing