0
0

The Galindo Mystery


 invite response                
2007 Mar 8, 9:14am   21,572 views  221 comments

by HARM   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

Most of the posts here tend to pretty much revolve around posting housing/economic news stats, debunking REIC propaganda, ranting about the NAR/Fed, sharing stories, parodying ignorant FBs, etc. This time, I have a genuine mystery for you to help solve.

A recent San Francisco Chronicle article, "ECONOMIC DEEP FREEZE
January cold spell inflicts hardship on the state's citrus workers"
contained the following excerpt:

Ruben Galindo, 44, Castanon's neighbor and a LoBue worker for 15 years, said, "Whatever little savings that we have, we are just not spending any. We are saving our pennies and nickels just to get us through the year.''

Galindo, with a wife and three kids, also has a mortgage and thinks he can handle two months of unemployment, but no more than that. He bought his house in Lindsay in 1995 and has thought about moving to El Paso, Texas, where housing costs are lower.

"But when prices of homes here go down, I won't be able to sell,'' Galindo said. "And they're already starting to come down.''

Ok, now here are the facts:

  • Galindo bought his house in 1995, so that's 12 years of (presumably continuous) mortgage payments, at a much, much lower cost-basis than today
  • Galindo was a LoBue worker for (again, presumably continuous) 15 years
  • Yet...

  • Galindo has very little savings, in fact no more than two month's worth
  • Galindo cannot afford to sell if/when house prices here come down
  • I really need your help here, because I just can't seem to reconcile the first two statements with the last two. From 1995 to 2007, house prices throughout virtually every part of California have at least tripled. So, even assuming Mr. Galindo took out an interest-only loan back in 1995 (not likely, as they were very rare back then), he must have at least 66.67% equity in his home by now, right? And if he has been more-or-less continuously employed since 1992 (with a very, very low housing cost basis), then how could he have almost zero savings? Even with the wife + 3 kids and assuming his job is of the low-skill/low-pay fruit-picking variety, and that his wife never works, this all seems somewhat hard to understand.

    Has Mr. Galindo cash-out refinanced his house each year since 1995 and used the money to take his family on annual round-the-world luxury cruises? Has his family dined exclusively on Chateaubriand, Maine lobster, pâté de foie gras, Italian black truffles, Kobe beef and Dom Perignon for the last 12 years? Is he single-handedly putting "Kitty", "Amber" and "Bambi" at the local gentleman's club through college?

    Unfortunately, this mystery is beyond my limited amateur-sleuth abilities to solve. Please help me out here.
    Thanks,
    HARM

    #housing

    « First        Comments 129 - 168 of 221       Last »     Search these comments

    129   Brand165   2007 Mar 9, 12:49pm  

    ROFLMAO!!! The current banner ad is:

    Mortgages at Countrywide
    Fast Home Refi, Good Credit or Not.
    Countrywide 4 out of 5 approved!

    What poetic irony! The keywords in this thread have summoned the very sleazy demon we've been bashing for days! And here it is, touting its incredibly low lending standards for all to see...

    130   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 9, 1:16pm  

    Astrid,

    I took a cruise to Alaska on the inside passage... in fact, I asked my wife to marry me on that cruise. Maybe that biases me in favor of it, but I highly recommend it. Did I mention bacon at every meal plus all you can eat lobster night? ZING!

    131   DaBoss   2007 Mar 9, 4:08pm  

    Miami-based Related, the nation's largest condo developer, has trotted out a rebranded "affordable housing division," to build condos for buyers priced out of the market.

    The firm has presold 497 of 500 loft condos in a planned downtown Miami high-rise. They're priced from $159,000, about half the median price of existing condos. That's a fraction of the price of many new condos, which often now go unsold.

    Related expects to make a return of around 15%. That's about half what its luxury units typically fetch, but the company's not complaining.

    "You make less money, but the demand for this type of housing is so great that the volume you can do justifies the concession on the returns," said Oscar Rodriguez, senior vice president of Related's affordable housing division.

    http://biz.yahoo.com/ibd/070301/realestate.html?.v=1&.pf=real-estate

    132   losstotheworld   2007 Mar 9, 4:47pm  

    Unfortunately she died of breast cancer. She was a hoot.

    Sad. We need more funding in breast cancer research

    dear peter,
    check this website out
    www.komensacramento.org.

    They are doing a fund raising for breast cancer.

    133   Bruce   2007 Mar 9, 8:24pm  

    OT, but perhaps interesting to credit market watchers...

    On Friday China's Finance Minister Jin Renqing announced the formation of an agency similar to Singapore's Temasek Holdings to invest his country's currency reserves. Last year Renqing indicated his ministry would seek to diversify its holdings which have to date been concentrated in ultra-conservative assets.

    Our print and broadcast media brushed off Renqing's 2006 comments as a move to preempt protectionist sentiment here but, while they may have been useful in that regard, yesterday's statement makes clear China's intention to take on the role of global investor.

    China is a major purchaser of US Treasury bonds and other government securities both here and abroad, and its investments have tended to hold intrerest rates down in recent years. The country's reserves comprise some $1 trillion, and are rising at an estimated $20 billion each month.

    It will be interesting to see China participate in the ownership of foreign holdings in addition to its long-held policy of extending credit to its export markets.

    134   thenuttyneutron   2007 Mar 9, 8:28pm  

    While regulation is bad in Theory, I know of other theories that work on paper, but not in practice. Communism is the best thing since sliced bread if you ever read the pamplet:) Govermnet regulation should be minimized, but they should also protect the money supply from the poison we now see. Protecting the value of our money should be the first priority for the Federal Reserve. They should be regulating the money supply.

    I am a strong proponent for making a 20% downpayment mandatory for all home loans. For the longest time you were required to have 50% of your money in the pot if you traded on margin in the equities. 20% down is not unreasonable to require if people want to play with other people's money in the home markets. Leverage is a bitch only if you have something to lose, I expect many $0 down people will simply walk away from their mistake and never pay $1 back to the bank that is forced to eat it.

    I am wondering if/when the derivatives markets that are intangled in the stock market will be the next smoldering hole in our economy. Buffet is a smart man and he is very afraid of the derivatives.

    135   Different Sean   2007 Mar 9, 8:45pm  

    Space Ace Says:
    Miami-based Related, the nation’s largest condo developer, has trotted out a rebranded “affordable housing division,” to build condos for buyers priced out of the market.

    Very interesting. How do they do that, given they have to purchase land or a building at inflated prices first? Building affordable housing isn't as easy as just building and selling for less -- unless you achieve it with smaller floorplates...

    136   Different Sean   2007 Mar 9, 9:41pm  

    astrid Says:
    PS - Anyone here (other than GOOG employees, you know who you are) played around with Google’s new custom search? I would love to build a patrick.net housing bubble metasearch…if you guys are willing to help…

    can't patrick just embed some HTML code from GOOG somewhere on the home page?

    138   Brand165   2007 Mar 10, 1:16am  

    PAR, it is tough to be an unloved troll. Without any attention they shrivel up into tiny little yapping dogs. And as we all know, most dogs less than 24" make a lot of noise, but generally don't have a point.

    I think he's actually trying to get back on board with the theme of the blog, though. We do complain a lot about over-leveraged boomers in McMansions. :)

    139   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 10, 1:31am  

    Is it complaining about? Or laughing at? I think we may be switching from one to the other.

    140   Peter P   2007 Mar 10, 1:32am  

    PAR, it is tough to be an unloved troll.

    Is there a loved troll?

    I do miss MarinaPrime, aka The Troll. :)

    141   Brand165   2007 Mar 10, 1:45am  

    Sometimes trolls are witty. Perhaps those trolls are not loved, but they are not entirely hated either. Their entertaining posts offer a small redeeming quality.

    142   Brand165   2007 Mar 10, 2:33am  

    From Yahoo! Finance article "Debating Standards for Mortgage Lenders" by Ruth Simon on March 1, 2007 (http://tinyurl.com/2y8yhr):

    Some 2.51% of mortgages were delinquent in the fourth quarter, the highest level since early 2002, according to Equifax Inc. and Moody's Economy.com Inc.

    This little factoid escaped me earlier. 2.51% of mortgages were delinquent in 4Q06? How is that even possible? I would expect a much higher foreclosure rate across the nation given that number. Does the delinquent payment number not really correlate well with actual defaults and foreclosures?

    143   frank649   2007 Mar 10, 3:22am  

    Did anyone catch last week’s announcement by Freddie Mac that they would no longer buy loans where there is a “high likelihood” that borrowers cannot meet their monthly payments and which are “highly vulnerable to foreclosure.” Is'nt that tantamount to an admission that Freddie Mac formerly bought loans knowing full well that they would likely end in default?!

    http://www.freddiemac.com/news/archives/corporate/2007/20070227_subprimelending.html

    "McLean, VA – Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) today announced that it will cease buying subprime mortgages that have a high likelihood of excessive payment shock and possible foreclosure. First, Freddie Mac will only buy subprime adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) – and mortgage-related securities backed by these subprime loans – that qualify borrowers at the fully-indexed and fully-amortizing rate."

    144   Brand165   2007 Mar 10, 3:27am  

    Perhaps they knew full well that the loans were very risky. More likely, Freddie Mac just dispensed with the proper oversight. When so much cash is sloshing around, it's easy to get reckless within a huge organization.

    145   e   2007 Mar 10, 5:40am  

    A common meme of this board is that as housing prices keep going up, employers will seek to move to other places to get lower operating costs.

    Well, check out what facebook is doing:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/10/technology/10google.html?ei=5070&em=&en=750fa2a750111af9&ex=1173675600&pagewanted=all

    Instead of making it easier for employees to live far from work, Facebook, the social networking site, makes it easier for them to live nearby: it offers a $600 monthly housing subsidy for those who live within a mile of the company’s Palo Alto headquarters.

    Instead of trying to reduce their costs, they've recognized the importance of people living nearby. $7200 a year - pretty good perk!

    146   Different Sean   2007 Mar 10, 7:00am  

    Really? “It will be terrible” to deny you a 100% after you’ve been unemployed twice recently? Will it really be so “terrible” for your to rent for a bit, fix your f*cking credit by paying your bills, and potentially save you from foreclosure by having you save up a freaking downpayment?

    Not necessarily. If he can afford it, he can afford it. Short periods of unemployment are sometimes out of people's control. I don't see why the risk management processes of the bank, heavily loaded in their favour, should dictate whether someone can own their own home or not. Credit scores are a pretty robotic and punishing system which don't make much allowance for circumstances such as these. Of course, if he's immediately underwater on his mortgage payments and starts to fall behind, that's a different story...

    147   Different Sean   2007 Mar 10, 7:04am  

    2.51% of mortgages were delinquent in 4Q06?

    Also, they may catch up on their payments. Falling behind in even 1 payment may set the delinquency flag, possibly even due to errors such as delays in processing or submitting payments... So it could be a somewhat bloated statistic...

    148   frank649   2007 Mar 10, 7:36am  

    "Well, check out what facebook is doing..."

    I would venture a guess that that $7200 is coming out of their employee's compensation in one form or another.

    149   astrid   2007 Mar 10, 8:01am  

    They only give it to people who live within a mile of their campus. Guess who gets the call when something goes wrong at 2 in the morning?

    150   FormerAptBroker   2007 Mar 10, 8:53am  

    astrid asks:

    > Why isn’t Robert Novak in prison?

    Then SFWoman Says:

    > Must be that famous liberal media protecting him.

    The “press” (both right and left) tends to “protect it’s own”, but I don’t get why it is not a bigger deal to print a “government secret” (or confidential grand jury testimony) on the front page of a paper than it is to tell secret information to a reporter.

    > But no, the ‘liberal’ media has given us such great,
    > investigative reporting on the death of Anna Nicole
    > Smith and Brittany Spears haircuts.

    The “conservative” Examiner now has an “American Idol” section.

    > Guiliani is toast, there’s no way the Christian right
    > will back this man.

    The far left is no fan of Hillary, but most will still vote for her. I predict that Guiliani would win all 50 states in the biggest landslide in modern history if he went up against Hillary (or Obama) next month…

    151   astrid   2007 Mar 10, 10:01am  

    New Yorkers will tell you that Guiliani is a corrupt showboat. I would much rather vote for Bloomberg. (Actually I would be very happy with a president Bloomberg).

    152   FormerAptBroker   2007 Mar 10, 10:04am  

    theotherside Says:

    > Another look at what it will take to push a family
    > making a haha who bought WAY too much home
    > in 2004 into foreclosure

    > 1- Household making 1 HaHa ($160,000), with a 30% tax rate.
    > $160,000 * 0.7 (Tax) / 12 = $9,330 (net monthly take home)

    You forgot State Taxes, Social Security and other deductions take home pay (without any deductions) will be closer to $8,500.

    > Assuming a 30year Fixed @ 7% (APR) in 2007 when
    > they refinance (a bit high due to credit crunch!!!),
    > New housing costs = $6,590 * 0.7 (Tax) = $4,613 or about
    > 51% of they take home.

    In the Realtor world “Housing Cost = Mortgage Payment”. In addition to the mortgage payment the person (with the $990K mortgage) will also have a tax bill of about $1,000 a month and other housing expenses (including insurance of $500 a month).

    Without the tax deduction cash available after ALL housing cost would be about $400 per month, but after the tax deduction (on just the interest and taxes) you will have almost $2,500 a month left over to live it up…

    153   Different Sean   2007 Mar 10, 10:46am  

    Giuliani did WTC...

    154   Brand165   2007 Mar 10, 11:27am  

    Cody Red, where exactly are you living that such danger has arisen from a few subprime lenders going bust? Most hoodlums couldn't even spell subprime, let alone grasp its economic significance.

    Although I admit, I am highly amused at the thought of speculator hotspots in Florida turning into some sort of gangland of snowbirds riding Harleys and firing shotgun blasts into empty retirement McMansions...

    Gimme mah false teef, ya young uns! Chik-chik-BOOM!

    Is this the same train of thought where we later conclude we should go to Buffalo, NY because the bone-aching cold makes it safer?

    155   Doug H   2007 Mar 10, 11:54am  

    Anybody want to mix it up on a realtor's blog? She's writing about how much higher net worth you'll achieve being a homeowner rather than a renter. I know some have all the data and facts....anyway, here's the link:

    http://activerain.com/blogsview/55466/Homes-Not-just-a

    157   astrid   2007 Mar 10, 12:06pm  

    "Giuliani did WTC…"

    Huh? Did you mean he built it? Financed it? Torched it? *Did* a la Debbie Does Dallas???

    158   Allah   2007 Mar 10, 12:13pm  


    Anybody want to mix it up on a realtor’s blog? She’s writing about how much higher net worth you’ll achieve being a homeowner rather than a renter. I know some have all the data and facts….anyway, here’s the link:

    http://activerain.com/blogsview/55466/Homes-Not-just-a

    Every single post on that blog was bullish towards real estate; I just had to add some negativity :evil: I wonder if she'll remove it like I've seen other realtors do.

    159   astrid   2007 Mar 10, 12:23pm  

    We should mellow out and be less hostile...through the magic of diminished expectations.

    Say we expected to live our lives as impoverished Russian serfs...that way every morning we wake up to something better than moldy potatoes and back breaking work of manure picking would be a good day.

    160   Brand165   2007 Mar 10, 12:28pm  

    Diminishing my expectations is un-American. :)

    I have often wondered how few possessions I could really get away with. I figure it's about two packframes worth, excluding furniture.

    161   Allah   2007 Mar 10, 1:05pm  

    The FB recruiter kit

    The mortgage business is not only booming, but it's one of the few industries [such as realtors] that doesn't require a college degree to make lots of money. In fact, as a mortgage originator , the only limit to income potential is your [willingness to put innocent sheeple into dangerous loans with your] own effort and ability. But how can you break into this lucrative business? The Mortgage Originator Success Kit is a one-of-a-kind resource dedicated to helping you make the leap into an exciting career in the mortgage business. This comprehensive resource gets you started with expert advice on [how to trick buyers into signing up for toxic loans which make you more money than traditional loans in] virtually every aspect of the business.

    [emphasis] by Allah

    162   ozajh   2007 Mar 10, 1:11pm  

    10. Eat ramen with caviar.

    I think I'll have some of Astrid's Black Forest cake instead.

    163   ozajh   2007 Mar 10, 1:20pm  

    Great comment about debt, Zephyr.

    164   astrid   2007 Mar 10, 1:21pm  

    To my shame, I am a terrible cake baker. I haven't advanced beyond out-of-box cakes. My last attempt was so horrible that I was actually ashamed to throw it away, until the fungi forced my hand. (Hopefully it gets better once I get a mixer and some cake flour).

    165   astrid   2007 Mar 10, 1:26pm  

    I would highly recommend adding about 2 oz of Microplane grated parmesan cheese to a bread recipe. Bake on a pizza stone for a really amazing bottom crust and very tender crumb.

    166   ozajh   2007 Mar 10, 1:27pm  

    PAR,

    If foreclosures continue to rise at 14% per month, how long before every house in CA is in foreclosure? My mental arithmetic has it at about 4 years. :D

    167   ozajh   2007 Mar 10, 1:39pm  

    Astrid,

    A (very tasty :)) fruit cake is incredibly easy to bake, either as a full cake or as individual serves, because it is not so sensitive to the degree of rise.

    (The term for the individual serves in UK/Oz is Rock Cakes; I don't know how that translates into US-ese.)

    Apart from breakfast stuff, it's the first thing my mum had me cook by myself when I was about 8.

    168   ozajh   2007 Mar 10, 1:56pm  

    An evil thought which probably applies more to a state like Texas than California.

    Would it ever, from a purely financial perspective, be worth a state's while to subsidise a refi so the tax base stays up?

    I'm thinking something along the lines of offering an OJF (Only Just FB) a I/O refi at 5% or so to get them out of the Reset From Hell (tm). The logic would be that the OJF would refi again when things got 'back to normal', and in the meantime the government would be collecting more in interest AND property taxes than the cost of the loan.

    « First        Comments 129 - 168 of 221       Last »     Search these comments

    Please register to comment:

    api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions