patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,260,075 comments by 15,047 users - AmericanKulak online now
invite response« First « Previous Comments 149 - 188 of 221 Next » Last » Search these comments
They only give it to people who live within a mile of their campus. Guess who gets the call when something goes wrong at 2 in the morning?
astrid asks:
> Why isn’t Robert Novak in prison?
Then SFWoman Says:
> Must be that famous liberal media protecting him.
The “press†(both right and left) tends to “protect it’s ownâ€, but I don’t get why it is not a bigger deal to print a “government secret†(or confidential grand jury testimony) on the front page of a paper than it is to tell secret information to a reporter.
> But no, the ‘liberal’ media has given us such great,
> investigative reporting on the death of Anna Nicole
> Smith and Brittany Spears haircuts.
The “conservative†Examiner now has an “American Idol†section.
> Guiliani is toast, there’s no way the Christian right
> will back this man.
The far left is no fan of Hillary, but most will still vote for her. I predict that Guiliani would win all 50 states in the biggest landslide in modern history if he went up against Hillary (or Obama) next month…
New Yorkers will tell you that Guiliani is a corrupt showboat. I would much rather vote for Bloomberg. (Actually I would be very happy with a president Bloomberg).
theotherside Says:
> Another look at what it will take to push a family
> making a haha who bought WAY too much home
> in 2004 into foreclosure
> 1- Household making 1 HaHa ($160,000), with a 30% tax rate.
> $160,000 * 0.7 (Tax) / 12 = $9,330 (net monthly take home)
You forgot State Taxes, Social Security and other deductions take home pay (without any deductions) will be closer to $8,500.
> Assuming a 30year Fixed @ 7% (APR) in 2007 when
> they refinance (a bit high due to credit crunch!!!),
> New housing costs = $6,590 * 0.7 (Tax) = $4,613 or about
> 51% of they take home.
In the Realtor world “Housing Cost = Mortgage Paymentâ€. In addition to the mortgage payment the person (with the $990K mortgage) will also have a tax bill of about $1,000 a month and other housing expenses (including insurance of $500 a month).
Without the tax deduction cash available after ALL housing cost would be about $400 per month, but after the tax deduction (on just the interest and taxes) you will have almost $2,500 a month left over to live it up…
Cody Red, where exactly are you living that such danger has arisen from a few subprime lenders going bust? Most hoodlums couldn't even spell subprime, let alone grasp its economic significance.
Although I admit, I am highly amused at the thought of speculator hotspots in Florida turning into some sort of gangland of snowbirds riding Harleys and firing shotgun blasts into empty retirement McMansions...
Gimme mah false teef, ya young uns! Chik-chik-BOOM!
Is this the same train of thought where we later conclude we should go to Buffalo, NY because the bone-aching cold makes it safer?
Anybody want to mix it up on a realtor's blog? She's writing about how much higher net worth you'll achieve being a homeowner rather than a renter. I know some have all the data and facts....anyway, here's the link:
"Giuliani did WTC…"
Huh? Did you mean he built it? Financed it? Torched it? *Did* a la Debbie Does Dallas???
Anybody want to mix it up on a realtor’s blog? She’s writing about how much higher net worth you’ll achieve being a homeowner rather than a renter. I know some have all the data and facts….anyway, here’s the link:
http://activerain.com/blogsview/55466/Homes-Not-just-a
Every single post on that blog was bullish towards real estate; I just had to add some negativity :evil: I wonder if she'll remove it like I've seen other realtors do.
We should mellow out and be less hostile...through the magic of diminished expectations.
Say we expected to live our lives as impoverished Russian serfs...that way every morning we wake up to something better than moldy potatoes and back breaking work of manure picking would be a good day.
Diminishing my expectations is un-American. :)
I have often wondered how few possessions I could really get away with. I figure it's about two packframes worth, excluding furniture.
The FB recruiter kit
The mortgage business is not only booming, but it's one of the few industries [such as realtors] that doesn't require a college degree to make lots of money. In fact, as a mortgage originator , the only limit to income potential is your [willingness to put innocent sheeple into dangerous loans with your] own effort and ability. But how can you break into this lucrative business? The Mortgage Originator Success Kit is a one-of-a-kind resource dedicated to helping you make the leap into an exciting career in the mortgage business. This comprehensive resource gets you started with expert advice on [how to trick buyers into signing up for toxic loans which make you more money than traditional loans in] virtually every aspect of the business.
[emphasis] by Allah
10. Eat ramen with caviar.
I think I'll have some of Astrid's Black Forest cake instead.
To my shame, I am a terrible cake baker. I haven't advanced beyond out-of-box cakes. My last attempt was so horrible that I was actually ashamed to throw it away, until the fungi forced my hand. (Hopefully it gets better once I get a mixer and some cake flour).
I would highly recommend adding about 2 oz of Microplane grated parmesan cheese to a bread recipe. Bake on a pizza stone for a really amazing bottom crust and very tender crumb.
PAR,
If foreclosures continue to rise at 14% per month, how long before every house in CA is in foreclosure? My mental arithmetic has it at about 4 years. :D
Astrid,
A (very tasty :)) fruit cake is incredibly easy to bake, either as a full cake or as individual serves, because it is not so sensitive to the degree of rise.
(The term for the individual serves in UK/Oz is Rock Cakes; I don't know how that translates into US-ese.)
Apart from breakfast stuff, it's the first thing my mum had me cook by myself when I was about 8.
An evil thought which probably applies more to a state like Texas than California.
Would it ever, from a purely financial perspective, be worth a state's while to subsidise a refi so the tax base stays up?
I'm thinking something along the lines of offering an OJF (Only Just FB) a I/O refi at 5% or so to get them out of the Reset From Hell (tm). The logic would be that the OJF would refi again when things got 'back to normal', and in the meantime the government would be collecting more in interest AND property taxes than the cost of the loan.
ajh,
I checked out a rock cake recipe and it sounds very similar to scones. I have heard of it a few times before, so I assume they are also Rock Cakes in US-ese. :)
Curse the world of carb filled world of interesting recipes! I'll never start on my Atkins diet.
"Me, I am hoping for reasonably intelligent candidate with fiscal responsibility and no appetite for militaristic adventurism."
Me too. A Bloomberg-Gore unity ticket would a welcome wake up call from our current national nightmare.
Astrid,
Bit more fruit and shortening than scones.
It just occurred to me that these days most people would probably bake the individual serves as muffins.
astrid, I did Atkins in college. Lost 25 lbs. And then once I started eating normal food again, it all came back, plus another 5-10. Plus I was constantly fatigued, probably due to low blood sugar. Unless you relish the thought of eating nothing but bacon, eggs and steak for the rest of your life, try exercise. People underestimate simple walking; I listen to podcasts and music on my evening stolls.
(astrid drinking her 7th mug of tea for the day and munching on prosciutto. Checking in between research olive oil and the death of Captain America.)
Brand,
Any (free) podcast recommendation? Right now my que is limited to Le Show (Harry Shearer).
sfbubblebuyer
2007 Mar 10, 2:42pm
I posted in that real estate lady's blog. Here is the post, in case she deletes it :
As somebody in the business, can you REALLY suggest buying in after one of the largest run ups in history? If you've already bought in the recent (2-3 years) history, hang on for all you're worth. In the long run it DOES work out. But for new buyers, it makes no sense. My wife and I have been looking at new homes, and it would cost us 20% down plus twice what we pay in rent. Historically, housing prices rise at the rate of inflation (yes, even on the coasts) and so even if you buy into the idea that housing WON'T go down where you live, it still has to cost less to rent than to buy to make sense putting 20% down given that you can do better than current inflation rates with short term CDs. My wife and I are 30 and 32, worth a collective 400K in assets, and wouldn't buy a house if you held a gun to our heads in the current market. Median and average house prices are 6-9 times media and average incomes in the bay area (california). Historically in 'expensive' markets, it's 3.5-4 times median and average incomes. Ergo, it's a bubble. People bought into the hype when interest rates dropped, and ARMS and relaxed lending standards let people who had no business committing to a debt 6-10 times their salary buy in with the idea that when they couldn't repay, they could still sell for a profit. Well... that time is over. It's not going to work anymore. My wife and I will continue to horde our cash until the inevitable crash occurs, and THEN will buy when prices are closer to a more maintainable level. We make almost twice the median income in some of the best 'upper middle class' areas, and yet even with a 20+% down payment can't buy a house without committing 50% of our income to mortages, yet IN THE VERY SAME AREA we can RENT an a Single Family House for 25% of our income? It makes exactly zero sense to buy now. Those 'net worths' you are quoting exist SOLELY from inflated housing prices, and when they refuse to rise, or even sink over the next 5-10 years, you'll find that prudent renters will shellac buyers in today's market. Claiming otherwise shows a lack of economic sense. Spending 2 weeks learning to be a Realtor(R) not only in no way makes you qualified to give investment advice about buying a home, it in fact makes you LESS qualified, as you now have a stake in making people think "Now is a great time to buy or sell." If you suggested your potential customers do research on buying vs. renting, and laid out the costs and break even points, your article would hold merit. As it stands if you can't be sure you're going to be in a house for over 10 years, you're likely going to LOSE money if you're in a bubble market. Only people who are 1) VERY secure in their job, 2) VERY happy with the neighborhood, and 3) VERY happy with the house in particular should be buying right now. Over 50% of people move in less than 5 years, and now that the market has doubled in 5 years, when historically it ought to be up 3-5% a year (about 15-20% in five years) and sales have flattened across the nation, you're looking at 5-10 years of stagnation. It happened to Japan (including, if not EVEN WORSE in Tokyo), so it can happen to any market.
I'm not a genius, but it doesn't take a genius to examine the underlying information and realize that we're at the top of a precipice, and people buying now out of fear of being 'left out of the market' are going to be hurt. Please, make sure your clients are VERY secure in their intentions before buying a house in this market, if only for their sakes. It's going to be a very ugly few years as the subrpime and alt-A mortgage lenders dry up, and anybody who bought too much house or paid way to much for very little house are going to have a very rough time.
If you are very financially secure, and love the house and neighborhood, however, you can get the house you want now. Just make sure you have a good reason, and good foundation, before doing so and in 30 years you'll be as happy as those of us who waited 5 years to buy. If you're frantic because you feel you're going to get 'priced out forever', take a deep breath and ask youself, "Just who the heck is going to BUY these overpriced starter homes if _I_ can't?" If you're priced out of the market and you have 20% down, rest easy knowing the the current market insanity will collapse back to normal within 5-10 years at most, and buy then. If you DON'T have 20% down, DO NOT let people talk you into betting your entire life on real estate perpetually appreciating. Rent cheap, save for that 20% down, and buy when you know you can afford it, and that mortgage will let you sleep easy at night, not cause insomnia.
Malcolm
2007 Mar 10, 3:00pm
Brand Says:
March 10th, 2007 at 7:27 pm
Cody Red, where exactly are you living that such danger has arisen from a few subprime lenders going bust? Most hoodlums couldn’t even spell subprime
Murders and violent crimes (mainly robberies) are rising. They are up 10% last year. The crime stats are mirroring housing performance. We had someone kill their realtor here in San Diego. It doesn't matter that these people can't spell subprime. They didn't read their loan docs in the first place, no one said they were bright. People are getting desperate, and some are picking up guns. I sent Patrick a link, and have been concerned about this for the last year or so. This is not unexpected, and it could get a lot worse.
B.A.C.A.H.
2007 Mar 10, 3:01pm
Allah, thank you for sharing the link to the website about the realtor.
If we can help to influence even one potential "buyer" or "investor" to consider that buying now can be risky, well, we can make a difference one person at a time.
I've already done that by referring a relative to this Patrick website last year. He was pressured by his inlaws to be an "investor" in San Joaquin County in what sounded like a Ponzi scheme to me.
Thanks to the tuition-free education he received from Patrick's links, he got the gumption to stay out of his in-law's schemes. Maybe the messages we post on that realtor's blog will encourage people to be healthily skeptical.
About Countrywide, from a comment posted at Calculated Risk:
"New Countrywide rate sheet out, I still see 100% financing, it just jumped up a lot in one week. 100% 1 loan increased 650bp-1100bp depending on score, 80/20 increased 1350bp on the 80.
"The other loans increased 250-300bp-ish.
"I wonder where the news got the 'no 100% financing' story"
Cal | 03.10.07 - 6:20am | #
Malcolm,
I agree that crime rate will definitely go up during a recession/depression.
BUT I'm far less convinced that currently nice parts of the SW and FL will turn into unlivable gangland during said recession/depression.
AND I'm completely unconvinced that the frigid winters of Upper State New York would protect me from violent gangs of brown people. ESPECIALLY if the recession does cause currently nice parts of the SW and FL to turn into unlivable gangland.
In 2005, Buffalo has a higher crime rate than any large-ish SW or FL city. Detroit and Baltimore, two cities not particularly inundated by Spanish speaking immigrants, have the highest crime rates in the country.
Perhaps I would feel differently if I watched the local 11 o clock news every night...
We should mellow out and be less hostile…through the magic of diminished expectations.
Well yes, actually. The secret to happiness is decreased expectations. You must not be Buddhist, or you would already know that.
I think America is going to have to learn to live with a lot of decreased expectations in the next few decades, as we have to learn to share the world's resources with the 1.1B Indians and the 1.3B Chinese. There is going to be a lot of populist, Michael Savage-type backlash, like from our most recent troll, but we will muddle through somehow.
Oh, welcome back Zephyr. Haven't seen you in a while (though I have been pretty busy myself, so I may have missed you).
Jimbo,
The Buddhist *high church* believes in no desire and embracing all experiences as karma. The Buddhist *low church* asks Buddha for special favorites and use their faith as a crutch through life. I don't think I've ever met a lay Chinese Buddhist who actually grasps the concept of nirvana.
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_5411822
"The harsh side of the housing boom"
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/11/business/11mortgage.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Who will be left to buy nasty little $800,000 houses in dangerous SF neighborhoods with the subprime lenders scaling back?
I'll throw in my political two cents: I feel that Hillary Clinton is a pro-choice neocon. She was right alongside the neocons calling for this war when it was politically expedient to do so, and now she wants it both ways. She won't admit her war vote was a mistake, but she also wants the pro-choice progressive women's vote.
She is a war-hawk in sheep's clothing.
spike66 Says:
> Guiliani win in all 50 states…never happen.
> No New Yorker would vote for that jerk.
I’m no fan of Guiliani, but I still think that he would beat Hillary or Obama. We may be ready for a woman or black president here in San Francisco, but most of America will not pull the lever to vote for a “lady†or a “colored guyâ€. I forget the exact number but on the national news last week they were talking about a big survey where most women would rather work for a male boss. I had an interesting conversation about racism with a business school classmate who grew up in Mississippi. He said that there is less racism in big cities since most people in big cities know at least a few smart hard working blacks. Since smart hard working blacks get out of rural America as soon as they can most Americans have never met a smart college educated black guy.
> Of course, if you want a prez who is utterly reckless
> with spending, prefers cronyism to competence, and
> is of course utterly hypocritical
Sounds like our current prez…
> Me, I am hoping for reasonably intelligent candidate with
> fiscal responsibility and no appetite for militaristic adventurism.
Can you name anyone currently running for president that sounds like that?
I don’t think I’ve ever met a lay Chinese Buddhist who actually grasps the concept of nirvana.
Does nirvana involve a Lexus? :)
I am all for a life of minimal possessions, so long as I can have books.
« First « Previous Comments 149 - 188 of 221 Next » Last » Search these comments
Most of the posts here tend to pretty much revolve around posting housing/economic news stats, debunking REIC propaganda, ranting about the NAR/Fed, sharing stories, parodying ignorant FBs, etc. This time, I have a genuine mystery for you to help solve.
A recent San Francisco Chronicle article, "ECONOMIC DEEP FREEZE
January cold spell inflicts hardship on the state's citrus workers" contained the following excerpt:
Ok, now here are the facts:
Yet...
I really need your help here, because I just can't seem to reconcile the first two statements with the last two. From 1995 to 2007, house prices throughout virtually every part of California have at least tripled. So, even assuming Mr. Galindo took out an interest-only loan back in 1995 (not likely, as they were very rare back then), he must have at least 66.67% equity in his home by now, right? And if he has been more-or-less continuously employed since 1992 (with a very, very low housing cost basis), then how could he have almost zero savings? Even with the wife + 3 kids and assuming his job is of the low-skill/low-pay fruit-picking variety, and that his wife never works, this all seems somewhat hard to understand.
Has Mr. Galindo cash-out refinanced his house each year since 1995 and used the money to take his family on annual round-the-world luxury cruises? Has his family dined exclusively on Chateaubriand, Maine lobster, pâté de foie gras, Italian black truffles, Kobe beef and Dom Perignon for the last 12 years? Is he single-handedly putting "Kitty", "Amber" and "Bambi" at the local gentleman's club through college?
Unfortunately, this mystery is beyond my limited amateur-sleuth abilities to solve. Please help me out here.
Thanks,
HARM
#housing