patrick.net

Also, don't get me wrong, RE investment is excellent when the P/E ratio (or cap rate) is reasonable. But if invest in RE, I will see it as a stream of future cashflow, nothing more.

HARM: You said “Outside of flimsy, overpriced stucco shitboxes, I wasn’t aware that we still made anything here.”

You should gain a better familiarity with the U. S. economy before knocking it.

Zephyr,

I was using sarcasm and exaggerating for the sake of emphasis, not trying to knock everything that's American made. Yes, we still make things of good quality (as Fake mentioned) and I'm glad to own some.

You should also learn something about the building industry if you want to provide competent comment. The homes being build today for the masses are of a quality level that surpasses what was generally built in prior decades.

As far as building quality goes, I'm no expert and my limited personal experience is mainly with CA housing. but if you mean homes today are generally of better quality than recent decades (1970s, 1980s), then I agree with you. However, compared to older Craftsmen (1900's - 1940's) there's no comparison. IMO they were better built back then.

PeterP: Margin calls are a huge risk because you can be forced to sell when it might be best to be buying. I never use direct margin. I do occasionally borrow against my real estate to buy stocks. No margin calls that way. I did this in 2003 when I jumped back in as big as I could.

I would like to see more and more "outsourcing" in the building industry. Pre-fab modules can be constructed in lower-cost states or even Mexico and then trucked to the home site 90% finished.

Margin calls are a huge risk because you can be forced to sell when it might be best to be buying.

Of course.

I only use margin for hedging occasionally. One good thing about stocks is that you can hold good stocks through a downturn, using the long equity to short cyclical stocks as a hedge. I have yet to do this in large scale though. Any comment?

I always image pre-fab homes being trucked from Mexico to the Sun Belt states. Can't we do this with NAFTA?

HARM: It is a difficult comparison to the Pre-war product. The materials were definitely more substantial then, but the defect rates were higher than today. Today’s materials use significant technological and engineering advancements to build a better product. The construction of the 1970s and 1980s was the low point in quality for both materials and craftsmanship. The 1960s were not so great either but mixed. Most homes today are built in a very controlled process that relies more on the process and engineering than the individual craftsmanship. The pre-war homes had the best craftsmanship -- when it was good. However, there is a survivor’s bias in the remaining homes from those pre-war decades.

PeterP: I prefer to sell and shift to bonds (or cash)when I expect a downturn. The Dow was around 9600 when I sold in 1998. I sat in cash from 1998 to 2000, and missed the big final up-tick, and the collapse. In early 2000 I put that money in bonds when the yield curve when flat. I stayed there until about Halloween of 2002.

I prefer to sell and shift to bonds (or cash)when I expect a downturn.

That works too. :)

Fake P, why am I evil? Are you suggesting that it is heartless to provide job opportunities to workers in Mexico (or China/India)?

Are we more entitled to opportunities simply because we have had them?

No, I do not want to see poor families get hurt. But in the tide of globalization, it is hard to avoid.

Peter P: You are so evil. What is going to happen to our construction workers when we outsource even the construction of our houses?

Fake P: I thought you were a champion of Free Enterprise, warts and all? ;-). Are you being ironic here?

Y'know, come to think of it most of the construction in Cali is done by illegal immigrants getting paid under the table. No doubt their families (here and back home) will be negatively impacted in the short run, but I imagine they'll just migrate to the next industry or location where low-skill labor is needed.

Fake P will use any opportunity to discredit me. :(

TROLL WARNING STILL IN EFFECT... NO FEEDING!

Fake P, I do not remember seeing blood in people stabbed/slashed by light sabers. Shouldn't the high heat sear and seal the wound immediately.

"San Francisco. The high price of land and tough restrictions on what may be built on that land are major factors. PMI sees a 40% chance of falling property values over the next two years."

"Sacramento, Cal.
Affordability is a key issue in the hottest market in northern California, where prices have climbed 27% in the past year and an annualized 19% over the past five. A state-budget crisis puts jobs at risk in the Golden State's capital. Odds of a price decline: 40%."

When PMI says 40%, it probably means 80%. They do not want to set off a panic that causes more defaults.

If we cant feed trolls, then all that is for me and Fake P for fun is bubblehead bashing.

We can talk about pre-fab designs. ;)

Fake P,

Thanks for trying, but it looks like this Troll is indestructible.

"Thanks for trying, but it looks like this Troll is indestructible."

Is it that difficult to ignore some comments? I can certainly ignore my inner voice which says, "eat more food".

Fake P, do you actually have a problem with me? :)

I have access to MLS (loaded on my computer from a friend) and have not seen prices dropping nor inventory really much different from a year ago. I feel paralized with what I should do and frustrated with trying to predict the market.

LeCas,

Since you've been lurking for a while, then you probably already know what I'm going to say, but here goes anyway:

--If you're buying long-term (not "investment" property/flipping)
--If you're NOT currently overstretching to make your mortgage payments
--If you did NOT get a NAAVLP(tm) which is in danger of adjusting upward by a large % in the near future
--If you can accept (psychologically/financially) the likelihood of losing some of your current "paper equity" assuming you have to relocate (again) in the next few years

...then enjoy your house and don't worry about it.

@HARM:

All my exact thoughts are belong to you.

Chewbacca,
prat

Prat -

Right back at'cha, bro!

LeCas,

It's tough fighting the herd mentality, but Keep the Faith! Remember, NAAVLP(tm) Kool-Aid = The Dark Side

Show her the Dinkytown Buy vs. Rent calculator: tinyurl.com/dfccg

All,

We're well past the "magic 200" threshhold, so time for new thread:
"Right Said Fed"

LeCas: If the majority of a whole generation gets priced out of homeownership then the subsequent generations will also be unable to pay. So who will the sellers sell to? Who will pay the prices for the houses?

This idea that nobody will be able to afford a house is as old as housing markets. I remember being told this in the 1970s and 1980s. The problem is always temporary.

Housing prices will peak in some places very soon. Others will peak later. Usually it takes about two years for every cyclical market to reach its peak. I believe that the fundamentals are such that this cycle will spread its peaks over only one year, maybe 18 months. Then prices will decline until 2009.

Jack: We will never have 100% of the population owning their own home. Some people will just never get there. But on average the market reverts toward the mean. Prices decline and incomes rise. This has happened over and over. It will happen again.

However, some areas are not for starter home buyers, and never will be.

I would not stretch at all right now. Prices should be lower or comparable in a few years. Why stretch now?

Style, spending and anti-style

Well that was a scintillating last post if I do say so myself - sorry hit enter accidentally. This is a great thread, I'm only just trawling through it all.

When I was in Sydney earlier this year I actually got really sick of how glam and cool everyone was. It was pretty boring as everyone was the same. I used to be the worst perpetrator of style, but a dose of having a child and living in the 'burbs seems to have worked some magic. I now see a lot of this spending as mindless waste. It is interesting tracking fashion though as it moves through the slick glam to the anti-fashionista statements where brands are pretty uncool now, but even the anti-brands cost a fortune.

The thing that is worrisome and makes the forces of anti-thrift pertinent is that companies spend an absolute fortune on working out the spending triggers. There was a great show called 'The persauders' - did anyone see it? It talked about specialists that worked with companies to find the prime motivators to get people to buy their goods. A conglomerate of luxury good companies had apparently used these techniques with amazing results. So, although I think people do need to get a clue and save some money it is hard when you are surrounded by trends and enough people and legitimate companies pushing the same message that you might not realize it's not a good thing to do. It seems 'normal'.

We are very near the top of the market cycle.

Does it make sense to buy now? That depends on your circumstances including your purpose or needs, where you are, your time horizons, and your finances. There is no single right answer for everybody.

I do not believe we will have a major decline in prices, so buying now or waiting a few years will probably make very little difference.

I personally don't want to buy but my husband hates the idea of renting and we can't stay in our current house. I'm actually hoping he does get a job in LA and I can convince him to rent for a while to let us look around. Then the market will be so depressing we won't buy for a long time (this has been going on for the last two years so it's likely it will continue). I think this is called a subversive wife maneuver:)

Jack - we own. Unfortunately it's a modest 3brm in the East Bay that if it were on the other side of the bay would be worth twice as much. That's what makes house hunting somewhat depressing. I find it hard to buy something if I don't feel that I'm getting some value for my money. It's just not logical and annoys me.

I sound like Spock. I don't think logic exists in financial markets anymore.

Oh and Scotty from Star Trek died today! Sad.

Jack, no Star Trek love? Society is crumbling around me...

On a side note, I was thinking about why I was so drawn to this blog when it's not something I would normally do. For me the housing bubble subject, while a little interesting is really a front. I like the fact that people on this blog (for the most part) are polite, caring and amusing. It's good to see, as the speed we all move at nowadays seems to circumvent the niceties of life.

Jack - you are an artist? Tell us more. I'm curious what others on this list do as well.

Jack - property taxes? Are you trying to get me to go to bed...I think it's working.

L:eCAS, don't be a piggy. Oink oink.

HARM. An English major? Criminy! Nice AG translation.

Zephyr, nice tag, all wind. I don't know where you get your numbers from, but, far as I have read, we "manufacture" in the sense that we still assemble parts that are brought in from elsewhere, but we don't manufacture from the ground up like we used to.

As for houses, we differ. I marvel at how crappy modern construction is. I think construction was at it's best in the 60s and 70s. The houses don't have major defects, and they weren't popping em out like a big McMansion machine outta Dr. Seuss.

My sister bought a 700k house, huge, new, 2 years ago. 1 year later, there's about 1/2 " of settling under the baseboard trim. The A/C system is ineffective, and the place just seems thin to me. Oh well, just my take. I'll take a 1970 colonial over a 2000 colonial with the huge difference in price.

Escaped: The manufacturing info came from an article in the Wall Street Journal this week.

Most houses in most decades have been fine. However, during the boom years during the 1970s and 1980s an unusually large volume of houses were disastrously defective. Everybody was suing everyone else about it. It was a zoo.

Oh and Scotty from Star Trek died today! Sad.

Oh no! I love Scotty.