« First « Previous Comments 398 - 437 of 547 Next » Last » Search these comments
www.USHomeAuction.com
S. Calif auction coming up for 300 foreclosed homes
No but being a former landlord I can just help with the concept. Even the landlords with fixed costs enjoy a movement like interest rates because competitors have to react to them so the price moves accordingly. Also lines of credit are affected.
Lower dollar could actually help cushion the price free fall especially by foreign investors.
OO,
If you actually work the numbers, you can determine what is best. Most people do not do that, they merely look at monthly payments, and use abstracts they've heard like (weakening dollar, always goes up) to justify the decision.
I am not saying whether one should use a dp in this market. I am saying that if down payments become required again, we may have an initial hurt, but then house prices will come down to the point where down payments will be affordable. I see no reason to have the next gen of citizens spending 75% of their paycheck for dwellings.
If you have a 4% mortgage I would agree that buying Treasuries at 5% instead of paying off the mortgage is wise. And I agree that many businesses prudently use debt. But I disagree with the idea that one should borrow while they still can to justify consumer spending, citing tax advantages and cheapening dollars. This is the style of thinking, prodded by high commission easy loans, that created this bubble.
In my situation, I like paid for real estate. It protects me from both inflation and deflation. Heaven help the man with the "wise use of debt" on his property if deflation sets in.
Maybe I could have done better by mantaining mortages and investing, but I am not good at finding these opportunities. I have had people tell me about their great returns in a mutual fund or other investment, but when I looked at it in detail, the investment paid less than a savings account. Many people just believe their broker and do not know how to calculate an ROI.
In 1995, I bought a house for $138,000 cash. The rate at the time was 7.5% I then put the money that would have gone to paymets in the bank. In 10 years, I had my $138,000 back. Remember also that I did not have to pay loan closing costs and the builder gave a 6% discount for cash. Remember also that the PIT on that size loan barely beats the standard deduction.
I had no family money to pay that $135,000, just my 15 years of Air Force pay, and a couple of rental properties I bought on credit and paid off as quick as I could.
Rates going up can push prices down on houses. Obviously if the payment is critical rate going up means price comes down. The other thing from the supply side is that a landlord who can get a better return on investment with higher interest rates may sell the unit also pushing housing prices down with increased supply.
Anybody have the article on the 20 bil. Freddie bail-out? I saw it a minute ago now I can't find the damn thing! Anybody? TIA
I had no family money to pay that $135,000, just my 15 years of Air Force pay, and a couple of rental properties I bought on credit and paid off as quick as I could.
Maybe this is a question for FAB, but how hard is it to get into the landlord game as a side business?
I'm a typical Bay Area professional working 50-60-70 hours a week. I'd really like to get some sort of passive income stream going on. Some of my coworkers own rental properties, but they bought them a long time ago - so it's hard to compare.
What's a good strategy moving forwards?
A buddy of mine purchased a nice twice the home for the same amount in 1995. What some poor idiots do these days.
And of course another idiot paid $950K for 1000 sq ft. 200% overvalued.
2266 Plummer Ave. $950,000, 1,112 SF, 4 BR, 1994:$180,000
http://www.mercurynews.com/realestatenews/ci_5459903
I just saw the ad on TV and thought I would pass it along. I hate it when they stick reserves in there.
I’d really like to get some sort of passive income stream going on. Some of my coworkers own rental properties, but they bought them a long time ago - so it’s hard to compare.
eburbed,
As FAB has shown many times here by example, owing rental properties is in no way "passive income." The maintenance work involved, dealing with renting and tenants, that's all pretty darn active. My parents own several rental properties too (for decades), and I've been "asked" to help with the maintenance work throughout my youth. Nothing passive there.
Space Ace,
You might appreciate this commentary from marketwatch re: Web 2.0:
"No boundaries. The economy is going to suck this year. I see all sorts of commercial for lease signs."
The economy will be OK, healthy profits this year so far. For lease signs have been around now for 6 years and not moving. City should rezone and add more homes off Central in SC to MT. so damn space wasted and plenty of builders ready to jump in.
You can expect rates to go up .... FED is still targeting the RE bubble.
skibum - I was as they say in the middle of the $4 Trillion Dollar B2B market. My company was valued at nearly $6 Billion dollars. There was
only 250 people there. Honestly we though our stock was manybe worth $20 bucks at best on a good day. Even us finance guys were wondering what Wall Street was smoking.
Space Ace,
the FED is not targeting the housing bubble, the FED is busy savings its own ass. The FED has long departed from its initial mission statement - fighting inflation.
I bet you anything that the only possible action for FED right now is the stay put, while keeping the hawkish comment on inflation alive. People around the world are already finding out that FED won't do anything about inflation, all it can offer is lip service. Either late 2007 or early 2008, FED will start cutting rate.
I am looking forward to the day when FED starts cutting rate, that will be a lifetime opportunity for us to profit.
"20 bil. Freddie bail-out?"
Dinor - they are extending 30 years to 50 years and giving 5% discount on montly payments. This is after it goes up 35% So instead of
paying 3x price after 30 years you get 4-5x price after 50 years.
What did the Economist call this The new Serfdom ... picture of peasent caring a home on his back...Financial Slavery... give me break...
@Mark,
Ha. She's deleted every post, including the non-combative ones (incl. mine). Oh well, it's her blog to do with as she pleases.
Y'know, I just noticed that EVERY thread on her blog has "0 comments". Hmmm... is she really that unpopular or just intolerant of dissenting opinions?
As FAB has shown many times here by example, owing rental properties is in no way “passive income.†The maintenance work involved, dealing with renting and tenants, that’s all pretty darn active.
I think my colleagues own places in Arizona - so i don't think they're actually going there to manage the properties.
Do property management companies take a big bite via fees?
People around the world are already finding out that FED won’t do anything about inflation, all it can offer is lip service. Either late 2007 or early 2008, FED will start cutting rate.
If the fed can only give lip service and not raise rates, then why would they cut rates?
http://www.mercurynews.com/realestatenews/ci_5459903?nclick_check=1
Man, there's a lot of sales from "Somename Trust" to "Average Joe".
OO,
I also believe FED want to bail themselves out badly but the real question is if there is room for them to cut rates further.
Wouldn't that make the dollar plunge even further and hurt the fiat currency system?
Also, if you don't mind me asking, how will you profit from that? Gold?
Man, there’s a lot of sales from “Somename Trust†to “Average Joeâ€.
It is not uncommon for people of moderate means to place properties under revocable living trusts. I think it is more of an estate planning thing.
I am not an expert.
Not estate planning advice.
eburbed,
Were you talking passive income in the tax sense, in that you have other passive income you need a corresponding write off for?
I only deal with single family homes, and screen my tenants well. So far I have been lucky (compared to others) in the "toilets and tenants" aspect. However, I only have one rental at this time. I sold the other 4 during the housing bubble, since the prices went to absurd highs and anyone with good credit wanted to jump on the buy bandwagon and not rent. I put all that cash into Treasuries and 6% Credit Union accounts, waiting for the right time to buy again.
If you are going to buy rentals in CA, you may have to wait awhile for the prices to fall low enough for you to buy such that rent will cover enough of the mortgage. It will happen. I've been around long enough to see crashes in Texas, Denver, Boston, DC, ABQ, Phoenix, Omaha, Florida, and Virginia. But maybe the SF Bay area is different......
It is not uncommon for people of moderate means to place properties under revocable living trusts. I think it is more of an estate planning thing.
Hm, the words "revocable living trust" was never in my vocabulary. Are these just big tax shelters or something?
Do property management companies take a big bite via fees?
Not too much, normally 5-10% monthly rent per unit. Obviously the more units, the less they charge. I always chose to manage my own just because on a month to month basis they basically mail your mortgage payment in. I use eviction services for evictions which is all a manger would do anyway.
If the fed can only give lip service and not raise rates, then why would they cut rates?
Because the Fed --and Congress-- just loves asset bubbles and (stealth) inflation. Anything to help keep the economy lookin' good and assist in deflating those Twin Towers of Terror: The National Debt & future Medicare/SS obligations. Of course, cutting rates will also help bail out FBs and lenders, or at the very least, slow the bleeding.
Are these just big tax shelters or something?
Not necessary. But AFAIK properties under these trusts are non-probate.
I am not a lawyer.
Were you talking passive income in the tax sense, in that you have other passive income you need a corresponding write off for?
No, I'm just looking for passive income for... passive income. Being a worker bee at a Fortune 500 company isn't really going to get me and my future family where I want to be.
And my luck w/stock options has been the complete opposite of SP's Sun/Yahoo/Google friend.
You avoid probate fees, that's about it since pretty much the inheritance tax is no longer being charged on most estates.
I think the process of probate itself is scarier than its fees.
Estate Question:
If a wife murders her husband and then commits suicide, who survives who? :)
viably + vehemently = viamently
So he coined a new word, what's not to like? ;-)
a_k1947
Nice word play on the handle. I assume the 1947 is your birth year (since you are 60), but the a_k hits a note.
Is this a play with your real initials on the Soviet Kalishnikov 1947, aka AK-47?
Nice Harm. Criticize a typo from this morning. I'm the only one I know.
How would you even know what he was talking about. I had to scroll up to see what you guys were talking about. Give me a break.
I did a page search just like you. Sheesh, why do I have to be the bad guy?
« First « Previous Comments 398 - 437 of 547 Next » Last » Search these comments
Sadistic, Greedy Buyers Toying with Sellers Like Cats with Prey*
Copyright © 2007 UnReality Times®. All Rights Reserved.
by David Lereah, Leslie Appleton-Young and John Karevoll
As the alleged real estate bear market enters its second year of hitting bottom, some buyers out there are clearly enjoying this one-time market aberration --perhaps a little too much. Is deriving sadistic glee from other peoples' suffering a nice thing to do? The Germans have a word for this: schadenfreude (and we all know what cruelty the Germans are capable of!).
According to Donald Parisi, president of the Realtor Association of the Fox Valley (IL), buyer cruelty is reaching grotesque proportions:
This view is further clarified by Jim Fox, manager of Realty One in Canton, Ohio:
Even more to the point than Mr. Parisi, Florida Realtorâ„¢ Becky Troutt gets right to the heart of the matter:
Now, that's telling 'em like it is, Becky!
While the unbridled greed and glee exhibited by these sadistic buyers (and the American Dreamâ„¢-hating press) are stomach-turning awful, they are not the primary causes of this upside-down market. The real culprit for this most unnatural and unhealthy market condition, is well understood in the industry:
Clearly what's needed here is massive government intervention to protect homeowners and rekindle the normal 20%/year appreciation. This might take the form of a distressed homeowner mortgage buy-down, or federal underwriting for all the kindhearted subprime lenders who generously enabled low-income Americans participate in the American Dreamâ„¢ (often mischaracterized by Gloom'n'Doomers as a "bailout").
To proactively tackle this looming crisis, the NAR and CAR have teamed up with the MBAA (Mortgage Bankers Association of America) to sponsor the Save the American Dreamâ„¢ Act of 2007. Says NAR Chief Economist, David Lereah, "We are urging people to sign our online petition, and write, call, email and beg their Senators and Congresspersons to support this badly needed piece of mercy legislation. Home ownership is as American as apple pie --only you (and Uncle Sam) have the power to save it! Please do your patriotic duty and support the SADA. God bless."
[*Note: while the offset quotes and links are real, this 'article' is a parody]
#housing