0
0

Right Said Fed


 invite response                
2005 Jul 20, 12:52pm   16,991 views  122 comments

by HARM   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

The Housing Bubble's now official. The jig is up, cat's out of the bag, fat lady has sung. "Mr. Bubbles" himself called it in this morning's testimony before Congress: tinyurl.com/a7g7k. Of course, one could argue that AG & Co. are largely responsible for starting this mess, but that's a topic we've already covered in previous threads.

So, is there anyone left (non troll-wise) who can rationally deny that the Bubble exists? Perhaps the only topics left to debate are the questions about magnitude, impact and strategies for dealing with it. How far will prices fall? Which regions/communities will be hit hardest? What will be the macroeconomic implications of the fallout (see previous Inflation/Deflation thread)?

How should one position oneself financially to benefit from the impending crash (proactive/aggressive investment strategies)? How does one best position oneself to protect existing wealth/assets from RE market-related destruction (defensive/hedging strategies -- see Hedging thread)?

HARM

#housing

« First        Comments 72 - 111 of 122       Last »     Search these comments

72   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 2:22am  

Ha Ha, hellboy, the Chinese have been talking about that for quite a while already. So it is not a complete surprise.

Bond price is down (yield up), but nothing dramatic. Perhaps the market does not think that the re-peg will cause too much bond sell-off?

73   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 2:27am  

Prat, do you have Forex exposure other than the 10% international index fund?

74   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 2:43am  

Cattle, the government backing of Fannie Mae is a perception because

1) It is federally chartered
2) It is too big to fail (!)

I think early payment (pre-payment) has more to do with interest rate movements (http://tinyurl.com/atqo3). I am not expert in this either.

If the credit risk of Fannie Mae is not questioned, foreclosures should not matter much to the spread. Homeowners are supposed (!) to have equity to protected themselves in case of a downturn, right? ;)

75   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 2:49am  

Prat, I do stocks myself. So my brokers really love me even more. ;)

BTW, the Fidelity Target funds will rebalance your portfolio based on your expected retirement date. A pretty good idea indeed.

76   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 3:12am  

Fake P, the Chinese has demostrated that they will only revalue in "measured pace".

I think your money is probably better served elsewhere.

(Not investment advice.)

77   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 3:58am  

g lammert, great site!

78   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 4:13am  

The terrorist trolls are striking London again. I heard that no one was killed. Thank God.

79   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 5:49am  

Still seems a bit premature to short financials and housing all-out.

Shorting needs to be driven technically. It is not the time yet.

Any thoughts as to where?

Anyone has figured out what basket of currencies to which RMB will be pegged?

80   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 6:20am  

Veritas, I am looking at CHF, NOK, AUD, and NZD. How would you get Forex exposure? Would you trade them or would you hold them?

If CHF and JPY are already too high then leveraged carry trades may be difficult to implement.

81   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 6:22am  

"Too high" relative to other currencies.

82   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 6:25am  

Forget what I just said, what I meant is that it may be difficult to borrow CHF/JPY (low interest) to buy higher-interest currencies if CHF and JPY are going to appreciate because of this revaluing move. On the other hand, borrowing USD (higher interest) to buy CHF/JPY will incur a lot of carrying costs (interest).

83   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 6:37am  

Peter, I must cede to your wisdom

Do not cede to the void. I have no wisdom. Just words.

BTW, I am interested in those currencies because Norway, Australia and NZ are rich in commodities. And the Swissland has fondue. :)

84   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 7:25am  

I do not know. My tiny brain is overloading.

One question: can China use the peg as an excuse to buy up currencies of its export competitors, thus driving up their prices and removing their competitiveness?

85   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 7:51am  

Zeta, I am not going to comment. The moment I make a prediction, the reverse will happen. (Not long after Bond bears waved their white flag, bond prices started to fall. This is the way of the Collective Unconscious to punish the talkative.) :)

86   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 8:17am  

Veritas, I agree with with except

This is NOT consistent with the governing policies of the PRC. They tend to handle dissent poorly. Remember Li Peng is the guy who “green lighted” the Tianamen massacre.

My impression is that the Chinese government is pro-wealth so long as it power is not challenged. I seriously doubt that they see the middle class wealth as dissent. I think they will actually see improving economics as a reinforcer of their power because happy and complacent people are much easier to control, so long as growth remains sustainable.

87   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 9:00am  

Veritas, you have a point. I do expect instability over the intermediate term.

88   SQT15   2005 Jul 21, 9:07am  

Veritas
I just met a woman today who is raising a female child adopted from China. She told me that all the unmarried men in China are starting to form gangs because they don't have anything else to do. Off topic but interesting.

89   SQT15   2005 Jul 21, 9:08am  

I shouldn't say ALL the unmarried men. But you get the point.

90   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 9:10am  

SactoQt, that would be very bad.

91   SQT15   2005 Jul 21, 9:13am  

Peter
I really don't know much about it. But can you imagine so many young men with no one to marry? I do wonder what the long term consequences will be.

92   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 9:18am  

I do wonder what the long term consequences will be.

No doubt some will turn to various forms of fundamentalism.

93   SQT15   2005 Jul 21, 9:20am  

You're probably right, but in this case I would have to hope you're wrong.

94   SQT15   2005 Jul 21, 9:22am  

Since we are talking about the Chinese economy, how do you think this kind of instability will affect the world economy in the future?

95   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 9:26am  

You’re probably right, but in this case I would have to hope you’re wrong.

I certainly hope that I am wrong too.

Perhaps they can marry someone from neighoring west asian countries?

96   SQT15   2005 Jul 21, 9:29am  

Perhaps they can marry someone from neighoring west asian countries?

Let's hope they are considered "acceptable marrying material."

97   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 9:30am  

Since we are talking about the Chinese economy, how do you think this kind of instability will affect the world economy in the future?

Instability is never a good think for the world economy. A country with more than 1 billion people is going to make a lot of impact.

One thing though, policy decisions are extremely efficient in China. I do have faith that they can solve the problem without resorting to war.

98   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 10:04am  

Veritas, have you consider the possibility that the "re-peg to basket" is a scheme to further depress the value of RMB?

Although the initial revaluation result in a gain of about 2%, they now have the flexibility to "choose" appreciation and depreciation against various currencies so long as the peg to the sum remains relatively constant. This re-peg to a basket of currencies is a very clever strategic move.

99   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 11:20am  

Veritas, now you are being dramatic.

100   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 11:27am  

Strategic nuclear weapons will never be used against another nuclear nation. It will forever remain a threat and only a threat.

101   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 11:40am  

I agree, but it does bring parties to the table, like Pakistan and India.

Absolutely. We only need to worry about nukes from terrorists.

Anyway, I think China's posession of nukes did played a major part in their emergence as a economic power.

102   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 11:42am  

Maybe they are sensing Europe and Asia would become more important export destination than US in future.

Or they now have a way to depress its value against the dollar without relying on US assets. The Chinese rarely makes a wrong long term strategic move.

103   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 11:46am  

Oil is the black gold. I do expect oil conflicts among economic powers. Let's hope that nuclear fusion can give some hope.

104   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 12:06pm  

With this in mind I expect bay area prices to fall at least 10% in the August to December time frame.

This is a more daring prediction than mine! :)

105   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 12:13pm  

I hereby reaffirm my October prediction.

By the end of the October, I expect certain credit/financial market events will give convincing evidence that a real estate crash is imminent.

106   praetorian   2005 Jul 21, 12:58pm  

Peter,

Looks like you might have called it. Given how wrong I've been the last few years, I think I prefer to prophesy after the event...

What do you think about my previous posting on the allocation of capital between various index funds? Like I said, I want boring, diversified and inexpensive rather than exciting, high potential and pricey. I'm a bit ashamed to admit that VFINX is my kind of thing. Plunk it in and forget about it for 20 years. I guess where this strategy really loses is in its lack of leverage. But it makes up for it with its lack of antacid buying.

Swing... Set. Through.

Cheers,
prat

107   praetorian   2005 Jul 21, 1:13pm  

_smile_

From ben's:

http://tinyurl.com/drt2l

Cheers,
prat

108   HARM   2005 Jul 21, 1:48pm  

Jack Says:
Re: China currency….Looks like its time for another new thread HARM!

It looks like you guys already have a good start on the topic right here, but what the heck... Here you go:

"The China Syndrome"

109   gabby   2005 Jul 21, 2:23pm  

Switch to the next blog (latest one) so I don't have to bounce to this one - please?

110   Peter P   2005 Jul 21, 2:48pm  

Prat, I think index investing is cool. It should work out fine.

I am just a bit wary of mutual funds. But I am wary of a lot of things including 401K and IRA. So please ignore me.

:)

111   HARM   2005 Jul 21, 2:52pm  

I am wary of a lot of things including 401K and IRA

Peter, if you don't put any money into retirement accounts, what do you use as a write-off? My IRA/403b is about all I've got tax-deduction wise (no mortgage, no kids). Plus, with IRAs (and most 401/403s) you get to invest it pretty much any way you want to.

« First        Comments 72 - 111 of 122       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste